China's ‘involution' trap is hurting nation's competitiveness, state media warns
A self-defeating cycle of excessive competition – known as neijuan , or involution – has remained prevalent, distorting market dynamics and hindering sustainable growth, the Economic Daily warned in a commentary on Wednesday, as the issue has been a focal point in the past year.
Explaining the term as 'the harder you work, the less you gain', the state-owned newspaper focusing on economic reports urged government officials and business owners to focus on long-term economic health rather than short-term gains.
Do you have questions about the biggest topics and trends from around the world? Get the answers with SCMP Knowledge, our new platform of curated content with explainers, FAQs, analyses and infographics brought to you by our award-winning team.
Such a phenomenon 'traps all kinds of entities in a vicious cycle of low-price, low-quality, and ineffective repeated competition, ultimately damaging the overall competitiveness of related industries in China', it said.
Among local governments, that type of self-defeating competition includes misguided efforts to attract businesses through unsustainable policies – such as offering excessive incentives like tax breaks and subsidies – resulting in rising debt and long-term risks, the newspaper noted.
For businesses, 'involution' manifests in excessive price wars, a lack of differentiation, and a focus on short-term profits at the expense of long-term innovation, which leads to resource waste, stagnation and lowered overall competitiveness.
The commentary used solar energy as an example, with the output value of China's photovoltaic manufacturing industry slumping by more than 40 per cent in the first 10 months of 2024 from the same period of 2023.
In March, Premier Li Qiang vowed to launch a 'comprehensive crackdown on neijuan ' during his work report to the National People's Congress – the first time the premier has mentioned the once-obscure concept in his agenda-setting annual address.
In what has been seen as a response to Beijing's push to stop vicious competition, e-commerce platforms jointly announced on Tuesday that they would abandon a 'refund-only' policy that has been criticised for straining merchant profit margins.
Major platforms such as Taobao and Pinduoduo will no longer proactively intervene in after-sales requests made by consumers for refunds without returning the goods that they have already received. Such issues will be left to sellers and buyers to negotiate instead, in a move to balance merchant-rights protection with an improved consumer experience, they said.
Taobao is operated by Alibaba Group, which owns the South China Morning Post.
JD.com, the parcel-logistics services giant that expanded to food delivery earlier this year, and on-demand delivery firm Meituan have been accusing each other this week of the monopolistic behaviour of blocking part-time delivery riders from accepting orders on both platforms.
More from South China Morning Post:
For the latest news from the South China Morning Post download our mobile app. Copyright 2025.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
9 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
Asia shares, yen weather Japan uncertainty as earnings loom
SYDNEY: Asian shares and the yen held their ground on Monday as Japanese elections proved bad for the government but no worse than already priced in, while Wall Street futures braced for earnings from the first of the tech giants. Investors were also hoping for some progress in trade talks ahead of President Donald Trump's Aug 1 tariff deadline, with US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick still confident a deal could be reached with the European Union. There were reports Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping were closer to arranging a meeting, though likely not until October at the earliest. In Japan, the ruling coalition lost control of the upper house in an election on Sunday, further weakening Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba's grip on power as a tariff deadline looms. Ishiba expressed his intention to stay in the position, which along with a market holiday, limited the reaction and the yen was 0.4 per cent firmer at 148.29 to the dollar. "Ishiba will try to govern with support from some within the opposition, but this likely means a looser fiscal policy and is not good news for bond yields," said Rodrigo Catril, a senior FX strategist at NAB. "History also suggests that domestic political uncertainty tends to keep the BOJ on the side-lines, so the prospect of rate hikes is now set to be delayed for a little bit longer." The Bank of Japan still has a bias to raise rates further but markets are pricing little chance of a move until the end of October. While the Nikkei was shut, futures traded up at 39,875 and just above the cash close of 39,819. MSCI's broadest index of Asia-Pacific shares outside Japan was flat, while South Korean stocks added 0.4 per cent. MEGA CAPS KICK OFF S&P 500 futures and Nasdaq futures both edged up 0.1 per cent, and are already at record highs in anticipation of more solid earnings reports. A host of companies reporting this week include Alphabet and Tesla, along with IBM. Investors also expect upbeat news for defence groups RTX , Lockheed Martin and General Dynamics. Ramped up government spending across the globe has seen the S&P 500 aerospace and defence sector rise 30 per cent this year. In bond markets, US Treasury futures held steady having dipped late last week after Federal Reserve Governor Christopher Waller repeated his call for a rate cut this month. Most of his colleagues, including Chair Jerome Powell, have argued a pause is warranted to judge the true inflationary impact of tariffs and markets imply almost no chance of a move in July. A September cut is put at 61 per cent, rising to 80 per cent for October. Powell's reticence on rates has drawn the ire of Trump who threatened to fire the Fed chief, before backing down. The spectre of a potential political appointee who would seek to ease policy sharply has investors on edge. The European Central Bank meets this week and is expected to hold its rates steady at 2.0 per cent following a string of cuts. "The press conference will likely keep highlighting uncertainty and need to wait for tariff negotiations to conclude before deciding the next step," said analysts at TD Securities in a note. "Similarly, its 'meeting-by-meeting' language would be retained in the release." The euro was unchanged at US$1.1630 in early trading, having dipped 0.5 per cent last week and away from its recent near-four-year top of US$1.1830. The dollar index was a fraction lower at 98.40. In commodity markets, gold was little changed at US$3,348 an ounce with all the recent action in platinum which last week hit its highest since August 2014. Oil prices were caught between the prospect of increased supply from OPEC+ and the risk European Union sanctions against Russia for its war in Ukraine could curb its exports. Brent edged up 0.1 per cent to US$69.36 a barrel, while US crude added 0.1 per cent to US$67.39 per barrel.
Malaysian Reserve
32 minutes ago
- Malaysian Reserve
Global magnet crisis subsides as China eases up on supply curbs
CHINA boosted shipments of rare earth magnets in June — including to the US — after a global supply squeeze that threatened factory closures and inflamed trade tensions. Total cargoes of the magnets rose to 3,188 tons last month, according to Chinese data on Sunday, more than double volumes of 1,238 tons in May in the midst of China's curbs. Flows to the US alone rose to 353 tons, up from just 46 tons. Total shipments were still substantially lower than before Beijing launched export controls in early April. China put restrictions on seven of 17 rare earth elements, which also extended to the powerful magnets used in high-tech manufacturing from electric vehicles to smartphones and fighter jets. That threatened deep disruptions to US industry and encouraged US President Donald Trump to agree a trade truce. After trade negotiators struck an agreement in June in Geneva to ease tensions, Trump said China had agreed to fully supply rare earths and magnets. On July 1, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said flows of magnets from China had picked up but were still not going fast enough. –BLOOMBERG
New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Easing foreign equity caps may boost FDI but raises sovereignty risks, say economists
KUALA LUMPUR: Easing foreign equity limits in strategic sectors may unlock fresh foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows into Malaysia but also pose structural and sovereignty-related risks, economists said. Malaysia has gradually liberalised its foreign equity rules including allowing up to 100 per cent ownership in the manufacturing sector since 2009. The country, however, still imposes significant limits in sectors like telecoms, finance, insurance, agriculture, property and healthcare. Investment, Trade and Industry Ministry last week reportedly said it was in talks with regulators and key industries about relaxing foreign ownership limits as part of efforts to reduce the 25 per cent US tariff on Malaysian goods. UCSI University Malaysia associate professor in finance and research fellow at Centre for Market Education Dr Liew Chee Yoong said the economic and structural impacts would likely be multifaceted. Liew said relaxing equity limits in Malaysia could potentially boost FDI inflows by 15-25 per cent in selected sectors, offering much-needed capital for infrastructure upgrades and technological progress. "This could facilitate valuable knowledge transfer, particularly in areas like 5G deployment, financial technology and cloud infrastructure," he told Business Times. Greater competition from foreign players could spur innovation and may lead to more competitive pricing for consumers, he added. "Strengthening linkages with global corporations might also bolster Malaysia's position within international supply chains," he said. Liew said the push for Malaysia to ease the caps is driven by a combination of interrelated factors. "Primarily, the US seeks enhanced market access for its corporations, particularly large financial institutions, telecommunications providers and technology firms, enabling them to gain controlling stakes and greater operational influence within Malaysia's developing economy. "This push also aims to secure competitive parity for US companies against regional rivals, such as Singaporean or Chinese firms, which may operate under different frameworks or have established significant regional headquarters." He added that these kinds of requests are frequently used as bargaining tools in broader trade talks, such as under the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework, to gain certain advantages. From a geopolitical standpoint, strengthening economic ties through investment is a strategic move to offset China's growing influence in the region, he said. Balancing growth and sovereignty Liew said one of the main advantages from the possible relaxation is the substantial inflow of foreign capital, which plays a crucial role in enhancing national infrastructure and supporting the growth of high-value industries. He added that gaining access to advanced technologies and international best practices could boost productivity and competitiveness, create jobs in higher-value sectors, and deepen economic ties with key partners such as the US. "However, these advantages are counterbalanced by substantial risks. Foremost is the erosion of control over strategic national assets and key industries, raising sovereignty concerns. "Domestic firms, particularly small and medium enterprises and Bumiputera-owned companies, face the risk of marginalisation or acquisition," he added. Liew said the disruption to long-standing socio-economic policies designed to ensure equitable wealth distribution could have significant political and social repercussions. "Furthermore, substantial profit outflows from foreign-controlled entities could negatively impact Malaysia's foreign exchange reserves and current account stability over time," he added. Putra Business School associate professor Dr Ahmed Razman Abdul Latiff said Malaysia imposes equity restrictions to promote greater local participation in industries and to ensure that wealth distribution benefits local investors and, ultimately, the broader population. "Lifting up such restrictions is still doable as long as the initial objectives are maintained or strengthened. "Maybe no longer through equity participation but perhaps with higher technology transfer such as technical know-how and co-sharing of intellectual properties rights," he added. Razman said this approach helps accelerate innovation within local industries and enables the development of competitive homegrown products, which in turn supports the long-term sustainability of local businesses. Bank Muamalat Malaysia Bhd chief economist Dr Mohd Afzanizam Abdul Rashid said opening up Malaysia's economic sectors to foreign investors must be done thoughtfully to safeguard local interests. "At the same time, we would also want our local companies to be able to compete effectively and be able to penetrate the overseas market," he said. Current landscape of foreign equity in Malaysia Afzanizam said as of June 2025, foreign ownership in Malaysian equities stood at 19 per cent, down from the historical peak of 25.1 per cent recorded in June 2013. This comes despite the market's appealing valuation, with the FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI trading at a price-to-earnings ratio of around 14 times, compared to the historical average of 17 times. "Among the criticisms is the liquidity of the stocks as the large companies, especially the government linked companies are being held by domestic institutions such as the government linked investment companies. "This has led to the amount of available stocks to invest is not economically viable for the foreign institution to invest from the liquidity stand point," Afzanizam told Business Times. Meanwhile, Liew said many service industries in Malaysia still face strict foreign ownership limits. For example, the telecommunications sector generally allows up to 49 per cent foreign ownership, while commercial banks are subject to a lower cap of 30 per cent. Investment and Islamic banking are typically limited to 49 per cent as well. "The insurance sector allows up to 70 per cent foreign ownership. Further limitations apply to agriculture and property, such as thresholds between 30 per cent and 50 per cent for agricultural land. "Crucially, the long-standing Bumiputera policy, mandating a 30 per cent equity share for Bumiputera interests, continues to influence ownership structures across various sectors," he shared. Key industries likely under review Afzanizam said Tengku Zafrul may have been referring to key sectors such as telecommunications and banking, given their significant role in Malaysia's economy. Sharing a similar view, Liew noted that the telecommunications sector is currently subject to a 49 per cent foreign ownership cap, which impacts major companies like Maxis Bhd and Axiata Group Bhd. He added that banking restrictions are even more pronounced, with commercial banking limited to 30 per cent foreign ownership and investment banking to 49 per cent. "Other sectors likely under discussion include professional services such as legal, accounting, and engineering firms, which often face limits between 30 per cent and 49 per cent; private healthcare, capped at 30 per cent; and potentially defence-related industries or critical transport infrastructure like ports and airports, deemed vital for national security and sovereignty," Liew said.
