Investors fear bankruptcy waiver permitted former Pickleball Rocks CEO to escape prosecution
Ponder, a retiree from Oklahoma who referees pickleball games, met Grubbs in 2017 at an international tournament in Spain. A few years later, after Grubbs pitched him an investment opportunity, Ponder gave him $65,000 over the course of several transactions beginning in 2022.
More: 5 things to know about Rodney Grubbs and the fraud accusations involving Pickleball Rocks
Grubbs, a resident of Brookville in southeastern Indiana, used a similar approach to solicit other short-term loans: invest $25,000 for 18 months in exchange for 12% monthly interest. In the case of a default, the deal called for Grubbs to repay investors their principle plus 18% interest.
The money, he told potential investors, would help expand All About Pickleball LLC, his equipment and apparel business better known as Pickleball Rocks. Drawn in by Grubbs' personable demeanor, his presence on the national pickleball scene and his outward professions of faith, hundreds of people from across the U.S. took the offer.
But when the first of Ponder's loans came due, Grubbs didn't pay him back. Ponder soon discovered he wasn't alone. In late 2023, a group of unpaid investors decided to file a lawsuit to force Grubbs into bankruptcy and stop him from soliciting more investors for money. Ponder joined the case.
They've now waited more than 18 months to see if they will get any of their money back — and if Grubbs will be criminally charged for operating what they allege was a nationwide Ponzi Scheme. So far, neither has happened, leaving jilted investors frustrated and feeling hopeless.
More: Indiana Secretary of State orders pickleball apparel CEO to halt alleged investment scheme
Grubbs did not respond to IndyStar inquiries sent via Facebook Messenger. A phone number listed for him no longer works. In court documents, he has denied operating a Ponzi Scheme and defrauding investors — though he has conceded to poor bookkeeping practices.
So far, Grubbs hasn't explained what happened to the $47 million he acknowledged owing investors. He also hasn't been charged with any crimes.
"It's just not right," says Ponder. "It's not right that he gets to walk free."
Investors were temporarily buoyed after federal agents, with assistance from local police in Brookville, raided Grubbs' home in December. The FBI removed a phone, laptop and other personal and business documents.
The FBI also opened a portal for victims to submit their information if they wished to be interviewed by federal agents. Some investors hoped the raid would lead to criminal charges, but nearly seven months later a spokesperson for the FBI declined to discuss the status of the case.
"It's moved incredibly slow," Ponder said. "You know he's old. He could very very easily die before anything is adjudicated."
Ponder said he can deal with not getting his money back. Financially, he is OK, but some unpaid investors are struggling to adjust to losing their financial safety net. Others invested all they had with Grubbs — likely to never see any of their money again. Those are the victims Ponder worries about the most.
Many of those investors are retired professionals who played pickleball for fun or to stay active. Some made multiple investments with Grubbs believing they could make money off the increasingly popular sport. Many permitted him to roll over their loans several times, convinced an even bigger guaranteed payment was on the horizon.
But as time moves on, Ponder said some investors are giving up and trying to come to terms with their financial losses.
"They're like, 'Oh well, yeah, he got us. Gosh, that really sucks,' and then they're going on with their lives," said Ponder, who added he's not sure what his next move will be or whether he'll keep pushing for justice.
There was another glimmer of good news for victims in June, when the U.S. Department of Justice issued a press release about the bankruptcy case. It said Grubbs agreed to forever waive his ability to discharge $47 million in unsecured debt through the bankruptcy case. The waiver does not equate to an admission of guilt, but means Grubbs still is legally on the hook for the debt.
The statement said the action came after an investigation by the agency's U.S. Trustee Program obtained personal and business records and examined Grubbs under oath. Transcripts of those examinations, which were not conducted in open court, have not been made public.
The Justice Department declined to confirm or deny an ongoing investigation.
In the meantime, Grubbs assets have been sold off as part of the bankruptcy case to raise money to repay creditors. Roughly $1.2 million was raised from the sale of real estate and pickleball assets, according to court documents.
Grubbs' agreement with the trustee left open a door for creditors to pursue payment through other legal means even after the bankruptcy case is closed.
That's not good enough to investors who feel victimized by Grubbs.
Teri Siewert of Florida pressured Grubbs to repay her before the bankruptcy case and led the charge to stop him from seeking new investors. Siewert also is part of the original group of investors who successfully forced Grubbs into bankruptcy.
Now, she is focusing on finding alternative options to hold him accountable, such as asking Case Western Reserve Law School in Cleveland to provide pro bono legal help to elderly people allegedly defrauded by Grubbs. Siewert said she started exploring options after learning from her attorney, Matt Foster, that the U.S. Attorney is not likely not charge Grubbs with any federal crime.
Foster could not be reached for comment. Meanwhile, Wayne Greeson, an attorney who also loaned Grubbs money and is representing several other claimants, said he has not received an update on the federal investigation and is unsure about its status.
Siewert fears the waiver was a back door that permitted Grubbs to escape criminal prosecution.
"How is that even remotely in the public's interest? The victims are left with no faith in the justice system," she said via text message to IndyStar. "Seems all that matters is money. Since there's no money to be had — justice is denied the victim. No restitution is possible since no criminal charges were adjudicated. Travesty."
While hundreds of creditors wait for repayment, the bankruptcy trustee assigned to oversee case has reached a settlement agreement with Grubbs' sons and their wives.
The family members had sought to recoup more than $1.2 million they claimed Grubbs owed them and joined the bankruptcy cases as creditors. Zack and Amy Grubbs filed a claim totaling $964,706. Josh and Abby Grubbs filed a claim nearly $250,000.
Trustee Joanne Friedmeyer objected to the claims. According to a filing submitted by Friedmeyer, Grubbs paid his sons and daughter-in-laws a salary and reimbursements in exchange for their work marketing and selling Pickleball Rocks products.
"Based on records obtained from FCN Bank via subpoena," she wrote, "it appears that the transfers were made in the ordinary course of business ... and in exchange for reasonably equivalent value in the form of the labor of claimants."
Grubbs sons and their wives signed the agreement without admitting or denying any responsibility for liability, but with the understanding they would file no other claims against the estate.
James O'Connor, the Fort Wayne attorney who represents the sons and their wives, declined to comment on why they entered into the agreement with the trustee. He called the matter a sensitive issue wrapped in a sad family dynamic.
"It's just no one else's business," O'Connor said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
28 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Feds raid California home of ‘TikTok Cult' pastor in sex trafficking, fraud investigation
LOS ANGELES - A home linked to a pastor featured in the Netflix docuseries 'Dancing for the Devil: The 7M TikTok Cult' was raided Friday by federal agents in relation to an investigation into sex trafficking, money laundering and other accusations, according to authorities. Property records show the home in the 7700 block of McGroarty Street in Tujunga is linked to multiple owners, including Robert Shinn, pastor of the Shekinah Church and the subject of a 2024 docuseries. He operates a talent agency that purportedly helps social media stars and TikTok dancers find jobs in Los Angeles. Those featured in the docuseries call Shinn an abusive cult leader. They say he kept them away from their families by telling them that in order to be saved, they had to 'die' to their loved ones who did not follow his teachings. He reportedly told them that if they were 'godly' enough, they would also save their families from damnation. On Friday, agents with the U.S. Postal Service, Internal Revenue Service and U.S. Department of Labor served a warrant at the home around 6 a.m., according to the El Monte Police Department, which provided assistance along with the FBI. The search was related to allegations of sex trafficking, money laundering, tax evasion and COVID-19 pandemic-era-related fraud. SWAT officers were at the scene to assist, according to the El Monte Police Department. Postal Inspector Patricia Mendoza said in a prepared statement that officials will provide more details as the investigation progresses. 'U.S. Postal Inspection Service is working closely with our local, state, and federal law enforcement partners on this ongoing investigation. This remains an active case, and we are continuing to gather and review information,' Mendoza said. Law enforcement sources familiar with the investigation say the federal warrant is connected with the alleged cult featured in the Netflix docuseries, but details from the investigation remain under seal in federal court. News footage from KTLA showed several handcuffed people outside the residence, but sources familiar with the investigation say there have not yet been any arrests. On Friday afternoon, the Tujunga home bustled with onlookers, curious neighbors and news vehicles. The gated entrance to the home was visibly twisted and warped, having been rammed by federal agents early that morning, according to neighbors. 'I was getting ready for work when I heard the flash-bangs go off,' said one neighbor, Jake Hartmann. 'Then a loud speaker ... 'You need to come out, hands up.' All the neighbors came out to find FBI, Sheriff's Department and police taking up the whole area.' An open gate is apparently unusual for the home. Several neighbors said that in the few years that the alleged cult lived on the property, it was constantly blocked off. The owner reportedly built higher walls and grew trees to further block views of the home. 'When they moved in, it was weird,' said neighbor Marge Wagner. 'They were very secretive, then they sent out a flyer of what they wanted to do. They said they wanted to do all these things for our community. Like letting scout troops meet at the house, doing prayer meetings at night, letting people swim in the pool. It was so bizarre.' The property is large, wrapping around a street corner and lined with a thick wall of trees. Wagner recalls the owner taking back initial offers for a community space and giving mixed messages on the purpose of the property, a move that confused several in the community. 'The owner instead said in local meetings that they would hold a men's prayer night there every Tuesday,' Wagner said. 'For him to say that it was a church and only have one event a week for men … I thought, this isn't right. Nothing seemed right.' Anthony Jackson, who lived next door for years, interacted with the residents of the property many times. Jackson described the neighborhood as quiet, with mostly older residents, and says he never saw any red flags. '[Shinn's] wife is very nice. I've never seen anything out of the ordinary, heard anything out of the ordinary,' Jackson said. 'So when I saw the charges on the news, I couldn't even believe it. I mean, I still don't believe it.' Others, like Wagner, said they found the standoffish behavior of residents at the property suspicious. 'My daughter said, 'Mom, have you heard about that ... documentary? Mom, you've gotta come over and watch this,' ' Wagner said. 'I didn't feel surprised. They ostracized themselves from people around.' A man who refused to be named exited the property as a Times reporter approached. 'This is all just a misunderstanding,' he said, shaking his head at the damaged gate. 'A misunderstanding that resulted in destroyed property.' In response to a request for an interview, the man replied, 'I don't wanna get caught up in all of this. I just live here. They'll see soon that it was all just a misunderstanding.' It was not immediately clear if Shinn had any legal representation. The docuseries follows former Shekinah Church members who worked with the 7M Films talent agency, which was founded by Shinn in 2021. The series reveals that the dancers who were represented by the talent agency started as social media collaborators who frequently posted dance videos together on TikTok, but that group found themselves attending Bible study with Shinn. Those dancers invited friends to join what eventually became the core group of the alleged cult. Shinn reportedly called himself 'the Man of God' and said his teachings would grant his followers salvation. Times staff writers Brittny Mejia and Kimberly Aguirre contributed to this report. Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
Fox News
2 hours ago
- Fox News
Johnson says Ghislaine Maxwell deserves life sentence over Epstein crimes, rejects potential pardon
House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., said Sunday that Jeffrey Epstein's former girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell deserves a life sentence, rejecting the idea of a potential pardon for the convicted sex trafficker. In an appearance on NBC's "Meet the Press," Johnson was asked if he supported a pardon for Maxwell, but the speaker emphasized that the decision ultimately belongs to President Donald Trump. "I think 20 years was a pittance," Johnson said of Maxwell's time behind bars. "I think she should have a life sentence, at least. I mean, think of all these unspeakable crimes." "I mean it's hard to put into words how evil this was and that she orchestrated it and was a big part of it, at least under the criminal sanction, I think is an unforgivable thing," Johnson added, acknowledging that federal prosecutors identified more than 1,000 victims, many of whom were underage. "So again, not my decision, but I have great pause about that as any reasonable person would." While leaving the White House on Friday en route for Scotland, Trump was asked if he considered a pardon or clemency for Maxwell. The president left the door open, responding: "I'm allowed to do it, but it's something I have not thought about." Johnson said he supports the position of the president, the FBI and the Justice Department that "all credible evidence and information" be released, but emphasized the need for safeguards to protect victims' identities. As for Maxwell, she was questioned by Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche at federal prison in Tallahassee, Florida, for two consecutive days last week. Her lawyer told reporters she answered questions on about 100 potential Epstein associates as she angles for clemency. "That's a decision of the president," Johnson said of a potential Maxwell pardon. "He said he had not adequately considered that. I won't get in front of him. That's not my lane. My lane is to help direct and control the House of Representatives and to use every tool within our arsenal to get to the truth. I'm going to say this as clearly and plainly and repeatedly as I can over and over. We are for maximum disclosure. We want all transparency. I trust the American people. I and the House Republicans believe that they should have all this information to be able to determine what they will. But we have to protect the innocent. And that's the only safeguard here that we've got to be diligent about, and I'm insistent upon doing so." Johnson criticized a petition for the release of all the Epstein files brought by Reps. Thomas Massie, and Ro Khanna, D-Penn., as "reckless" and poorly drafted, arguing that it ignored federal rules protecting grand jury materials and "would require the DOJ and FBI to release information that they know is false, that is based on lies and rumors and was not even credible enough to be entered into the court proceedings." The speaker said the petition also lacked safeguards for minor victims who were subjected to "unspeakable crimes, abject evil" and who risk being "unmasked." Johnson said Massie and Khanna "cite that they don't want child abuse, sex abuse information uncovered, but they cite the wrong provision of the federal code, and so it makes it unworkable." The speaker argued Republicans on the House Rules Committee are committed to a better drafted approach that will protect the innocent. Asked about a potential pardon for Maxwell, Massie told NBC's Kristen Welker earlier in the program that it "would be up to the president, but if she has information that could help us, I think that she should testify." "Let's get that out there, and whatever they need to do to compel that testimony, as long as it's truthful, I would be in favor of," Massie said. Khanna said he did not believe Maxwell's sentence should be commuted and that he was concerned that Blanche was meeting with her. He said he agreed with Massie that Maxwell should testify but noted she has been indicted twice for perjury. "This is why we need the files. This is why we need independent evidence," Khanna said.
Forbes
2 hours ago
- Forbes
‘Missing' Epstein Video—Digital Forensics Experts Reveal What Really Happened
The Epstein 'missing video" explained by digital forensics experts. When reports emerged of 'missing minutes' in Jeffrey Epstein's jail surveillance video, the story seemed to suggest something sinister. After all, how could crucial surveillance footage be incomplete during such a significant event? But this case offers a perfect example of why understanding digital forensics is essential in modern litigation, and why the most dramatic explanations aren't always the correct ones. Two former FBI Senior Forensic Examiners, Stacy Eldridge and Becky Passmore, decided to conduct their own analysis when they felt media reports lacked sufficient technical detail. Their findings suggest not a cover-up, but rather the complex reality of how digital video works in the modern surveillance age. However, their analysis also reveals an important limitation: without access to the original raw surveillance files, even expert forensic examiners cannot be completely certain about what occurred. Understanding Work Product vs. Raw Evidence When digital forensic examiners need to share surveillance footage, they rarely share the original files straight from the camera system. Instead, they create what's called a 'work product.' This happens because raw footage often requires specialized and sometimes proprietary software and equipment for viewing. Think of it like the difference between a photographer's original camera files and the edited photos they share publicly. The FBI's released video falls into this category. As Eldridge and Passmore discovered through their analysis, 'This is not a 'raw' file. It's not evidence. It's work product. Something someone would make for easier viewing and sharing.' Understanding this distinction is vital because work products undergo processing that can create timing discrepancies without affecting the underlying evidence. It's the difference between the original surveillance recording and a presentation version designed for public release. However, this also means that definitive conclusions about tampering require access to the original files that the experts did not have. How Modern Digital Forensics Works Digital forensics operates much like traditional detective work, but instead of fingerprints and DNA, experts examine metadata, file structures and digital signatures. Metadata serves as a digital fingerprint that reveals a file's complete history: when it was created, what software processed it, how many times it was saved, and even details about the computer that handled it. Eldridge and Passmore employed the same rigorous techniques used in criminal investigations. Their analysis revealed several important technical details. The video was processed using Adobe Premiere Pro, as evidenced by a project file named 'mcc_4.prproj' and metadata showing it was created from two separate source files. They even found a partial username, 'Mjcole~1,' providing insight into who processed the footage. This level of detail matters because it allows forensic experts to reconstruct how the final video was created and identify what changes may have occurred during processing. However, the experts were careful to note the limitations of their analysis without the original source material. Decoding Three Types of Time Discrepancies The experts identified three distinct issues that created timing discrepancies. Understanding each category helps explain why timing problems don't automatically indicate evidence tampering, while also showing why definitive conclusions require more complete information. The first category involves the acknowledged system reboot. Surveillance systems, like all computers, require periodic maintenance. The jail's system underwent routine maintenance around midnight, creating a 62-second gap in recording. The experts pinpointed this precisely: 'Nightly reboot start timestamp 8/09/2019 11:58:58 last number appeared' and 'nightly reboot end timestamp 8/10/2019 12:00:00 AM first number reappeared.' This gap represents actual missing time, but it's the kind of planned maintenance that occurs in surveillance systems nationwide. The key question isn't whether this gap exists, but whether it occurred naturally or was deliberately timed to coincide with significant events. Without access to system logs and maintenance records, this question cannot be definitively answered. The second category involves edited content from the beginning of the file. The experts found evidence that approximately 3 minutes of content appears to have been removed from the very start of the video file. However, they emphasized an important caveat: 'The 3 minutes not accounted for from the file 2025-05-22 was likely cut from the beginning of the file. This is an assumption based on time calculations based on the metadata we were able to retrieve. This is not definitive as we do not have the original videos that were used to create This finding illustrates both the power and limitations of forensic analysis. The location of missing content matters enormously. Content removed from the beginning of a file often suggests routine editing to focus on relevant timeframes, similar to how a documentary editor might trim unnecessary footage from the start of a scene. Content removed from the middle of a timeline, particularly during critical moments, would raise much more serious questions about tampering. Yet the experts' honest acknowledgment of uncertainty demonstrates scientific integrity. They found patterns suggesting routine editing, but cannot eliminate other possibilities without the original files. The third category involves dropped frames, a concept that requires careful explanation because it's often misunderstood. When video systems encounter processing limitations, whether due to hardware constraints or file compression needs, they employ a technique called frame dropping. Instead of losing entire sections of video, the system removes individual frames scattered throughout the recording. Think of this like removing every 100th word from a novel. You lose some detail, but the story remains coherent and readable. The experts found approximately 12,000 individual frames were dropped during processing out of more than 1.2 million total frames, creating a loss rate of 0.97%. 'Dropped frames account for the missing 6 minutes and 34 seconds we thought we discovered. Loss rate is less than 1%,' the experts concluded. This distinction between dropped frames and missing video segments is necessary for understanding evidence integrity. Dropped frames represent a technical limitation that doesn't compromise the evidentiary value of surveillance footage, while truly missing video content could suggest deliberate tampering. However, distinguishing between routine frame dropping and intentional deletion requires access to the original processing logs and source files. Epstein Video: Why Technical Context Prevents Misinterpretation The Epstein video case demonstrates why technical literacy matters in interpreting digital evidence. Without understanding how video processing works, timing discrepancies can appear suspicious when they're actually routine technical artifacts. Consider how the initial reports interpreted the evidence. WIRED reported '2 minutes and 53 seconds' of missing footage.. However, without the proper forensic context, this was presented as potentially significant missing content rather than normal processing artifacts. As Eldridge and Passmore noted, they were motivated to conduct their analysis after being 'not satisfied with the reporting on the metadata involved in this case.' Their expertise allowed them to distinguish between technical processing effects and actual evidence problems, though they acknowledged the inherent limitations of analyzing processed files rather than original evidence. The confusion stemmed primarily from two factors: the FBI labeling processed video as 'raw footage,' creating expectations that this was unaltered surveillance content, and normal frame dropping during video compression creating timing discrepancies that seemed suspicious without technical context. The Critical Limitation: Why Raw Footage Matters While the expert analysis provides valuable insights, it also highlights a fundamental principle of digital forensics: the most definitive conclusions require access to original, unprocessed evidence. As Eldridge and Passmore honestly acknowledged, their analysis was limited by working with processed files rather than the original surveillance data. This limitation doesn't invalidate their findings, but it does place them in proper scientific context. The experts found no evidence of tampering and identified plausible technical explanations for all timing discrepancies. However, for these conclusions to move from 'highly probable' to 'certain,' forensic examiners would need the FBI to provide the original raw surveillance files for examination. This distinction matters because it demonstrates both the power and the limits of forensic analysis. Expert examination can rule out many conspiracy theories and provide strong evidence for technical explanations, but absolute certainty in digital forensics often requires access to complete evidence chains that may not always be available. Balancing Skepticism with Technical Reality The Epstein video analysis ultimately reveals that the most complex conspiracy theories can often have the simplest explanations. In this instance, timing discrepancies that seemed suspicious were most likely routine technical artifacts created during normal video processing. This doesn't diminish the importance of thorough investigation or the value of healthy skepticism about official accounts. Rather, it demonstrates why proper technical analysis is essential for distinguishing between genuine evidence problems and normal digital processing effects. It also shows why honest scientific analysis includes acknowledging limitations and uncertainties. The case serves as a reminder that in today's world, technical literacy is becoming as important as traditional investigative skills. Understanding how digital systems work helps us ask better questions, interpret evidence more accurately and avoid drawing dramatic conclusions from routine technical processes. It also helps us understand when additional evidence is needed for complete analysis. As Eldridge and Passmore noted, they conducted their analysis because 'We're both former FBI Senior Forensic Examiners and we're here to share the facts.' Their work exemplifies how proper forensic analysis can cut through speculation and provide evidence-based conclusions, while also demonstrating the scientific integrity to acknowledge when complete certainty requires additional evidence.
