TSET sues Oklahoma leaders over new law it says threatens its independence
OKLAHOMA CITY – A constitutionally created board overseeing nearly $2 billion in public dollars on Tuesday asked the Oklahoma Supreme Court to overturn a recent state law saying it threatens its independence.
House Bill 2783, which Gov. Kevin Stitt let become law without his signature, allows the appointing authorities of the Tobacco Settlement Endowment Trust board to remove members at will. It also limits members of the board to seven years.
Members currently serve staggered, seven-year terms and are tasked with overseeing the public endowment fund.
'The purpose of having staggered terms is to provide continuity by new appointees joining other board members who have institutional knowledge,' the suit said.
The seven members are appointed by the governor, treasurer, state superintendent, attorney general, state auditor and leaders of the Oklahoma House and Senate.
Each of those officials is named as a defendant in the suit.
The suit asks the high court to put the law, which takes effect Aug. 28, on hold and find it unconstitutional and invalid.
'As I have stated publicly for several months, the Legislature stands ready to work with TSET and our members were genuinely excited about commitments made by them at the start of session to collaborate on projects,' said House Speaker Kyle Hilbert, R-Bristow. 'Unfortunately, they've since decided to change course and now, instead of ever talking to us about their concerns with pending legislation, are going straight to the courts.'
TSET is not a private sector entity, Hilbert said.
'This endowment consists entirely of public funds and as such, the elected members of the Legislature will exercise our authority in overseeing the expenditure of public funds,' Hilbert said.
Lawmakers over the years have unsuccessfully attempted to force TSET to fund various projects, including Medicaid expansion.
Some Democratic lawmakers have said they believe the new law is retaliation and an attempt to strip the board of its independence after TSET declined to immediately provide $50 million for a University of Oklahoma children's pediatric hospital in Oklahoma City. Lawmakers put $200 million into the project.
Oklahoma voters created TSET, an endowment trust, in 2000 through a constitutional amendment after 46 states sued tobacco companies. The companies paid the states damages for illnesses caused by smoking.
TSET's Board of Investors invests the funds. The earnings, which have grown to about $2 billion, are used to support efforts to improve health.
'The intent of voters was to keep politics out of the administration of the TSET trust, which has grown to about $1.9 billion,' said Bob Burke, an attorney representing TSET.
He said TSET uses the fund's interest to pay for about $80 million annually in grants and programs including the Oklahoma Tobacco Helpline, cancer research, and other community efforts to improve health.
The suit alleges that only a vote of the people can alter the terms board members serve.
'Allowing an Appointing Authority to replace his or her appointment to the board at will violates the plain and unambiguous meaning of the constitutional provision and the voters in approving the amendment,' the suit said.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
14 minutes ago
- Business Insider
UnitedHealth Stock (UNH) Faces Divided Analyst Opinions After Q2 Results
UnitedHealth Group (UNH) stock is down 5% on Tuesday after missing analyst estimates for Q2. However, the company reinstated full-year guidance and offered a clearer view of its outlook for 2025 and 2026. Following the release, several analysts offered mixed reactions to the earnings report, but they see potential for recovery in 2026. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Mizuho and Bernstein Analysts Remain Bullish Analyst Ann Hynes from Mizuho praised the company's transparency on 2025 and 2026 expectations. She noted that cost pressures are expected to continue, especially in Medicaid and Medicare Advantage, where expenses are rising faster than expected. The five-star analyst forecasts mid-single-digit growth in 2026 and possibly low double-digit growth in 2027. Overall, she maintained a Buy rating and $350 price target on UnitedHealth stock. Similarly, analyst Lance Wilkes from Bernstein said the company is working to rebuild investor confidence and reduce uncertainty. He believes UnitedHealth's strong market position will support a return to solid earnings growth, especially as trends in Medicare Advantage pricing and usage improve. For 2025, he sees EPS guidance between $20 and $21, and for 2026, possibly 15% growth, which could bring the company back to its long-term goal of 13% to 16% annual growth. Wilkes kept a Buy rating and $377 price target on the stock. BofA Analyst Lowers Price Target for UNH Stock Analyst Kevin Fischbeck from BofA Securities lowered the price target to $300 from $350 but kept a Hold rating. He noted that the company is focusing on better execution, but believes progress may be slower than expected. Fischbeck said that UnitedHealth was transparent about its segment margins and challenges, which helps investors understand the business better. However, he remains cautious as the company did not fully confirm its long-term growth target. Is UNH a Good Buy Right Now? average UnitedHealth stock price target implies a 30.46% upside potential.
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
‘Anybody but Mamdani': 5 Groups Emerge to Raise Millions in Attack Funds
In the blood sport of New York City real estate, where comity can be hard to come by, the developers of some of the city's most prized parcels appeared to be in agreement about one thing when they met in private this week. Zohran Mamdani, the Democratic candidate for mayor, had to be taken down. 'Our goal is anybody but Mamdani,' Marty Burger, the chief executive of Infinite Global Real Estate Partners, wrote in one of two emails sent ahead of the meeting that were obtained by The New York Times. To help, Mr. Burger proposed that his peers start by putting in $25,000 each to a new super PAC, New Yorkers for a Better Future, or to seed other groups. He cited potential ad campaigns attacking Mr. Mamdani; spending plans to boost specific rivals; and other efforts to register and turn out thousands of voters who typically sit out Election Day. A month after Mr. Mamdani's primary victory stunned New York's business elite, its leaders have begun cranking open a powerful gusher of outside spending to try to stop the man whose socialist policies they fear could sour the city's business climate. But with fewer than 100 days to go, they are still very much searching for a unified plan that could work. On Monday, the men whose companies run the Seagram Building and Hudson Yards joined the call for one anti-Mamdani super PAC, while leaders of a different super PAC invited donors to a $1,000-per-person fund-raiser scheduled for Thursday. 'Fighting Mamdani is expensive,' the organizer, Betsy McCaughey, a former lieutenant governor, wrote on the invitation. 'But allowing him to win will cost you more.' Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
2 hours ago
Sen. Cory Booker in angry outburst says 'complicit' Democrats need a 'wake-up call'
WASHINGTON -- In a rare public outburst on the Senate floor Tuesday, New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker took his Democratic colleagues to task, declaring his party 'needs a wake-up call!' Angrily screaming at two of his shocked Democratic colleagues, his words all but reverberating off the chamber walls, Booker blocked the passage of several bipartisan bills that would fund police programs, arguing that President Donald Trump's administration has been withholding law enforcement money from Democratic-leaning states. 'This is the problem with Democrats in America right now,' Booker bellowed. 'Is we're willing to be complicit with Donald Trump!' The surprise Senate spat over bills that have broad bipartisan support — mental health resources and other help for police officers — strikes at the heart of the beleaguered Democratic party's dilemma in the second Trump era as they try to find a way back to power, and also their frustration as Republicans have pushed through legislation and nominations that they vehemently disagree with. Do they cooperate where they can, or do they fight everything, and shut down governance in the process? 'A lot of us in this caucus want to f—— fight,' Booker said with an expletive as he left the Senate floor after the exchange. Nevada Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto, one of the two Democrats on the floor who tried to pass the law enforcement bills that raised Booker's ire, said she had a different view. 'We can do both,' she said afterward. 'Support our communities, keep them safe, and take on Donald Trump and his bad policies.' Booker's tirade began Tuesday afternoon when Cortez Masto tried to pass seven bipartisan bills by unanimous consent. But Booker objected to five of the seven bills, which would have directed resources to law enforcement agencies, arguing that the Trump administration is 'weaponizing' public safety grants by canceling them in many Democratic-leaning states like New Jersey. 'Why would we do something today that's playing into the president's politics and is going to hurt the officers in states like mine?' Booker asked. Things escalated from there, with Cortez Masto and Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., saying that Booker should have objected when the bill was passed unanimously out of committee. 'This is not the way to go about it,' Cortez Masto said. Klobuchar said to Booker: 'You can't just do one thing on Police Week and not show up and not object and let these bills go through and then say another a few weeks later on the floor." 'I like to show up at the markups and I like to make my case," Klobuchar said. Booker responded with a booming tirade. 'The Democratic party needs a wake up call!' he yelled, walking away from his desk and out into the aisle. 'I see law firms bending the knee to this president, not caring about the larger principles,' he said, along with 'universities that should be bastions of free speech.' He added: 'You want to come at me that way, you will have to take it on with me because there's too much on the line.' The arguments points to the tensions below the surface of the Democratic caucus as they head into important moments — both this week, as Republicans push to quickly confirm dozens of Trump administration nominees before the August recess, and this fall when Congress will have to pass bipartisan spending bills to avoid a government shutdown. Democrats suffered a swift backlash from their base in the spring when Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., helped advance a Republican spending bill that kept the government open instead of forcing a shutdown. Schumer argued that shutting the government down would have been worse, and that they were both 'terrible' options. It is unclear whether Schumer and Democrats will want to force a shutdown in the fall if Republicans don't include some of their priorities in spending legislation. Booker did not have specific advice for his colleagues beyond the need to fight harder. But other senators say they will have to find a balance. Democratic Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut says he hears both things at home — 'why can't you all get along' and 'thank you for fighting.'
