Nation urged to increase spending on AI storage
AI is stored in data centres - massive facilities that process data from cloud servers, with complex operations being needed by millions of customers.
Industry figures say the nation's AI storage facilities are lacking. Australia currently has 314 data centres, with tech giant Amazon pledging to build more after meeting with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese in June.
However, KPMG's national technology lead Simon Dubois said Australia is in a position to do much more, and not capitalising on it could see a productivity slump.
"If we're going to keep pace and get productivity like the government and everyone wants, we need to invest in the infrastructure that's going to power that," Mr Dubois said during a panel talk in Canberra.
"If we don't invest and give (businesses and entrepreneurs) the ecosystem behind them to do it, they will find a way. Most likely that way will be a going to (another) place."
Chief technology officer at computer hardware manufacturer Firmus, Daniel Kearney, said having data stored onshore is important as most Australians would not want their health or financial data stored overseas.
"It's a billion dollars for a 100 megawatt data centre," Dr Kearney told the panel.
"So when you see people throwing around numbers like 300 megawatts, 500 megawatts, that's a significant amount of investment."
Dr Kearney said storing foreign data could also benefit the economy.
He spoke about the European Union whose economy is "stagnating", and will not be able to capture the economic benefits that AI can bring because of regulation.
While the US has been more open to AI innovation, he said Australian lawmakers should take inspiration from both when drafting AI legislation.
Australia does not currently have strict AI laws, and chair of corporate regulator ASIC Joe Longo recently cautioned against over-regulation.
He urged governments not to address a perceived problem by simply throwing more rules at it.
But winning over the public's perception of AI is a challenge of itself, as a KPMG report found that only 36 per cent of Australians trust AI.
Mr Dubois said there is a fine balance between storing AI ethically and powering our economy through data centres.
AI is expected to become a major focus at the government's economic roundtable in August, however, unions are calling for appropriate safeguards for employees.
Businesses and technology providers will look to foreign countries if Australia does not build digital infrastructure to house artificial intelligence, experts say.
AI is stored in data centres - massive facilities that process data from cloud servers, with complex operations being needed by millions of customers.
Industry figures say the nation's AI storage facilities are lacking. Australia currently has 314 data centres, with tech giant Amazon pledging to build more after meeting with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese in June.
However, KPMG's national technology lead Simon Dubois said Australia is in a position to do much more, and not capitalising on it could see a productivity slump.
"If we're going to keep pace and get productivity like the government and everyone wants, we need to invest in the infrastructure that's going to power that," Mr Dubois said during a panel talk in Canberra.
"If we don't invest and give (businesses and entrepreneurs) the ecosystem behind them to do it, they will find a way. Most likely that way will be a going to (another) place."
Chief technology officer at computer hardware manufacturer Firmus, Daniel Kearney, said having data stored onshore is important as most Australians would not want their health or financial data stored overseas.
"It's a billion dollars for a 100 megawatt data centre," Dr Kearney told the panel.
"So when you see people throwing around numbers like 300 megawatts, 500 megawatts, that's a significant amount of investment."
Dr Kearney said storing foreign data could also benefit the economy.
He spoke about the European Union whose economy is "stagnating", and will not be able to capture the economic benefits that AI can bring because of regulation.
While the US has been more open to AI innovation, he said Australian lawmakers should take inspiration from both when drafting AI legislation.
Australia does not currently have strict AI laws, and chair of corporate regulator ASIC Joe Longo recently cautioned against over-regulation.
He urged governments not to address a perceived problem by simply throwing more rules at it.
But winning over the public's perception of AI is a challenge of itself, as a KPMG report found that only 36 per cent of Australians trust AI.
Mr Dubois said there is a fine balance between storing AI ethically and powering our economy through data centres.
AI is expected to become a major focus at the government's economic roundtable in August, however, unions are calling for appropriate safeguards for employees.
Businesses and technology providers will look to foreign countries if Australia does not build digital infrastructure to house artificial intelligence, experts say.
AI is stored in data centres - massive facilities that process data from cloud servers, with complex operations being needed by millions of customers.
Industry figures say the nation's AI storage facilities are lacking. Australia currently has 314 data centres, with tech giant Amazon pledging to build more after meeting with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese in June.
However, KPMG's national technology lead Simon Dubois said Australia is in a position to do much more, and not capitalising on it could see a productivity slump.
"If we're going to keep pace and get productivity like the government and everyone wants, we need to invest in the infrastructure that's going to power that," Mr Dubois said during a panel talk in Canberra.
"If we don't invest and give (businesses and entrepreneurs) the ecosystem behind them to do it, they will find a way. Most likely that way will be a going to (another) place."
Chief technology officer at computer hardware manufacturer Firmus, Daniel Kearney, said having data stored onshore is important as most Australians would not want their health or financial data stored overseas.
"It's a billion dollars for a 100 megawatt data centre," Dr Kearney told the panel.
"So when you see people throwing around numbers like 300 megawatts, 500 megawatts, that's a significant amount of investment."
Dr Kearney said storing foreign data could also benefit the economy.
He spoke about the European Union whose economy is "stagnating", and will not be able to capture the economic benefits that AI can bring because of regulation.
While the US has been more open to AI innovation, he said Australian lawmakers should take inspiration from both when drafting AI legislation.
Australia does not currently have strict AI laws, and chair of corporate regulator ASIC Joe Longo recently cautioned against over-regulation.
He urged governments not to address a perceived problem by simply throwing more rules at it.
But winning over the public's perception of AI is a challenge of itself, as a KPMG report found that only 36 per cent of Australians trust AI.
Mr Dubois said there is a fine balance between storing AI ethically and powering our economy through data centres.
AI is expected to become a major focus at the government's economic roundtable in August, however, unions are calling for appropriate safeguards for employees.
Businesses and technology providers will look to foreign countries if Australia does not build digital infrastructure to house artificial intelligence, experts say.
AI is stored in data centres - massive facilities that process data from cloud servers, with complex operations being needed by millions of customers.
Industry figures say the nation's AI storage facilities are lacking. Australia currently has 314 data centres, with tech giant Amazon pledging to build more after meeting with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese in June.
However, KPMG's national technology lead Simon Dubois said Australia is in a position to do much more, and not capitalising on it could see a productivity slump.
"If we're going to keep pace and get productivity like the government and everyone wants, we need to invest in the infrastructure that's going to power that," Mr Dubois said during a panel talk in Canberra.
"If we don't invest and give (businesses and entrepreneurs) the ecosystem behind them to do it, they will find a way. Most likely that way will be a going to (another) place."
Chief technology officer at computer hardware manufacturer Firmus, Daniel Kearney, said having data stored onshore is important as most Australians would not want their health or financial data stored overseas.
"It's a billion dollars for a 100 megawatt data centre," Dr Kearney told the panel.
"So when you see people throwing around numbers like 300 megawatts, 500 megawatts, that's a significant amount of investment."
Dr Kearney said storing foreign data could also benefit the economy.
He spoke about the European Union whose economy is "stagnating", and will not be able to capture the economic benefits that AI can bring because of regulation.
While the US has been more open to AI innovation, he said Australian lawmakers should take inspiration from both when drafting AI legislation.
Australia does not currently have strict AI laws, and chair of corporate regulator ASIC Joe Longo recently cautioned against over-regulation.
He urged governments not to address a perceived problem by simply throwing more rules at it.
But winning over the public's perception of AI is a challenge of itself, as a KPMG report found that only 36 per cent of Australians trust AI.
Mr Dubois said there is a fine balance between storing AI ethically and powering our economy through data centres.
AI is expected to become a major focus at the government's economic roundtable in August, however, unions are calling for appropriate safeguards for employees.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
9 News
25 minutes ago
- 9 News
Japanese company wins $10 billion deal to build new Australian warships
Your web browser is no longer supported. To improve your experience update it here A Japanese multinational will build $10 billion worth of new warships for the Royal Australian Navy, the federal government announced today. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries edged out German company TKM to secure the deal, a decision made months ahead of schedule. The Japanese company's advanced Mogami frigates will replace the navy's ageing Anzac-class vessels over the coming years. The Australian government has selected the upgraded Mogami-class frigate to replace the Royal Australian Navy's Anzac class vessels. (Department of Defence) The latest Mogami-class frigate can operate at a range of up to 10,000 nautical miles, and is armed with surface-to-air missiles, anti-ship missiles and underwater warfare systems. The government ordered the first three of the new warships to be built overseas in order to secure a speedier delivery. They are scheduled to hit Australian waters by 2029 before becoming operational one year later. Most of the other frigates will be built in Perth. Defence Minister Richard Marles says the new warships are part of the government's plan to more than double the size of the navy's surface combat fleet. "The upgraded Mogami-class frigate will help secure our maritime trade routes and our northern approaches as part of a larger and more lethal naval surface combatant fleet," he said. Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy said they offer the navy increased firepower. "It will take our general purpose frigates from being able to fire 32 air defence missiles to 128 missiles, giving our sailors the cutting‑edge weapons and combat systems they need to prevail in an increasingly complex environment." defence Australian Defence Force navy maritime military CONTACT US
West Australian
25 minutes ago
- West Australian
Australian consumers unlikely to see US beef on supermarket shelves as giants support local farmers
Australia's major supermarkets and fast food chains have no plans to stock beef from Canada or Mexico and slaughtered in the US, despite the Albanese Government lifting a long-standing import ban last month. The Federal Government last month controversially ended a 22-year-old ban on beef from Canadian and Mexican cattle slaughtered in the United States, declaring the move followed a decade-long scientific review and posed no risk to food safety. But leading retailers — including Woolworths, Coles, Aldi and McDonald's — have confirmed they will continue sourcing 100 per cent of their beef from Australian producers, with no intention of selling imported meat. A Woolworths spokesperson said the supermarket sourced about seven per cent of the nation's total beef production and remained committed to its local-first approach. 'We apply an Australian-first approach, and 100 per cent of our fresh red meat is sourced directly from Australian farmers, with whom we have long-standing relationships,' he said. 'We have no plans to change that approach.' A Coles spokeswoman echoed Woolworths commitment to provide local beef, and said there would be no changes to its meat supply or products made available to customers. 'At Coles, we continue to partner with top beef producers across Australia to bring our customers the high-quality, 100 per cent Australian-sourced Coles brand fresh beef that they enjoy today,' she said. An Aldi spokeswoman also confirmed the chain has no plans to change its position in sourcing meat from Australian farmers. American fast-food giant McDonald's has also thrown its support behind local beef producers — choosing to shun US beef for its burgers. Federal Agriculture Minister Julie Collins announced the removal of the ban in July on the basis of a 'rigorous' and decade-long review based on science, and declared any food coming into Australia was 'safe'. The Nationals leader David Littleproud called for an independent review of the Federal Government's decision to lift the beef ban, and said he was concerned biosecurity standards were being 'sacrificed' for a meeting with US President Donald Trump. But the call for an independent inquiry into the import decision was knocked back in the Senate last week. Myalup beef producer and WAFarmers livestock president Geoff Pearson also questioned lifting of the beef ban and said he would like to see the detail behind the Federal Government's move. 'The biggest concern is that they preach the fact that the science has been done and there's no biosecurity risk to industry,' he said. Mr Pearson said he was not concerned with the importation of US beef affecting the price of local beef, with Australia exporting more beef into the US than there is US product coming into Australia. 'The effect for the bottom line of Australian producers is fairly limited,' he said. The ban lift came just before Australia was hit with a 10 per cent tariff on exports to the US — the lowest tier under a tariff schedule introduced during Donald Trump's presidency.
Perth Now
25 minutes ago
- Perth Now
Door open on changes to major tax
Assistant Treasurer Daniel Mulino has left the door open to potential changes to the GST, saying the upcoming economic reform roundtable should consider a broad range of tax options to boost productivity. Speaking ahead of the forum, which will focus on ways to lift Australia's long-term economic performance, Dr Mulino said ruling any ideas in or out ahead of time would 'undermine' the purpose of the discussion. 'In the long run, productivity growth is what underpins our standard of living, and any productivity discussion has to include tax,' he told Sky News. GST, or Goods and Services tax, is a levy of 10 per cent on most items sold in Australia. Assistant Treasurer Daniel Mulino has left the door open to potential changes to the GST ahead of the economic reform roundtable. NewsWire / Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia His comments follow a new report suggesting the most effective way to fund reductions in corporate tax would be through expanding the GST, increasing council land rates, and raising taxes on offshore oil and gas projects. Dr Mulino said it was important to look at the full tax system, including how different taxes affect the economy, fairness, and how easy they are to administer. 'And what the Treasurer has said from the outset is that he doesn't want to get into the rule in rule out game, because that would undermine the whole purpose of this process. 'And so he's open to a range of ideas being brought to the round table. 'So what we saw in the analysis that you're referring to is that it's possible to rank taxes by how distortionary they are, and that's an important piece of the analysis. 'But I'd also say that when we're looking at tax reform, that's only one of the criteria. 'It's also important to consider, when you look at a range of taxes, the equity of different taxes and also the administrative simplicity of different taxes and their physical implications. 'That's what makes tax reform complex, but you can't just look at that one characteristic of taxes in isolation.' Opposition industrial relations spokesman Tim Wilson labelled the roundtable a 'tax hike summit'. NewsWire / Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia Opposition industrial relations spokesman Tim Wilson labelled the roundtable a 'tax hike summit' saying Australians 'didn't vote' for GST reforms. 'So far, all we've had is proposals for tax hikes. It's a tax hike summit from Treasurer Jim Chalmers. You know, initially it was a productivity one,' Mr Wilson said on Sky News. 'I've heard lots of proposals to raise taxes. I haven't heard many proposals about how they plan to cut taxes and drive productivity growth and improvements in the economy.' The discussions are set to be held over three days from August 19.
