What to know about buying electric vehicles after the federal tax incentives end
Buyers have until Sept. 30 to qualify for the federal tax credits on EVs before they are terminated. But experts say there are still strong financial reasons to consider buying the vehicles even without those incentives.
Before the bill passed, new electric vehicles came with a $7,500 federal tax credit, and used EVs included up to $4,000. Those incentives were originally designed to help make the vehicles more affordable. According to the latest data from Kelley Blue Book, the average purchase price of a new EV is roughly $9,000 higher in the United States than the average new gas-powered car. Used EVs on average cost $2,000 more than comparable gas cars.
Those credits, paired with other incentives in many states, helped bridge that price gap. Without them, Senior Policy Director Ingrid Malmgren of the nonprofit advocacy group Plug In America said they will become unaffordable to many lower- and middle-income Americans.
'That's really disappointing because ... they're just a really great way to reduce transportation energy cost burden," Malmgren said.
The up-front cost of an electric vehicle might be higher, but for those who can afford to consider the lifetime fuel and maintenance savings, Malmgren said the EV is still a good financial and environmental move in every state.
EVs are typically still cheaper to own long-term
That is because electric vehicles might not be cheaper to buy, but they are cheaper to drive. Malmgren said that even without the federal tax credits, an electric vehicle owner would still come out ahead.
'Quickly you'll end up paying less than a gas car because it costs much less to fuel, and it needs almost nothing for maintenance,' Malmgren said.
Malmgren said the point at which an EV driver's savings on fuel and maintenance outweigh the higher initial price varies. It depends on the kind of car and how often they are driven, as well as the cost of gasoline and electricity in an area. She said EV owners pay less in upkeep because the cars typically have fewer moving parts to maintain and require less frequent servicing. There are multiplecalculators online that pinpoint that moment based on some of those criteria.
A 2020 study in the academic journal Joule found that the average EV in the U.S. charged with a typical mix of public and private chargers saves the driver $7,700 in fuel costs over a 15-year life span, compared to filling a car with gas. Savings vary by state. The study found that someone charging a car at home during off-peak hours, deemed as a best-case scenario, could save more than $14,000 over 15 years in Washington, where electricity is relatively affordable. The study said that an EV driver in any state exhibiting typical driving and charging behavior would save money on fuel costs. The study did not account for the car's purchase price, its maintenance cost or associated tax credits.
EVs are still cleaner, even when they charge on coal power
Manufacturing an electric vehicle typically creates more pollution than making a traditional gas-powered one. But experts say that driving an EV over the long-term is still less polluting than a gas car.
Once they both drive about 15,000 miles (24,000 km) — slightly more than the average American drives in a year — the total pollution that has gone into making and driving each type of car has evened out, said Peter Slowik, U.S. Passenger Vehicles Lead for the International Council on Clean Transportation. Every mile after that widens the gap between the cleaner electric car and the more pollutive gas car. By the end of the car's life, emissions caused by the average EV are roughly half the average gas car, according to the U.S. Department of Energy.
So unless you buy a new car each year, the EV is the cleaner choice, he said.
'They are a no-brainer,' Slowik said. 'Electric vehicles are already inherently so much more efficient.'
A 2023 analysis by Yale Climate Connections found that electric vehicles are responsible for less carbon dioxide pollution even in areas where the electricity used to charge them comes from coal. An EV in West Virginia, which is one of the most coal-reliant states, still pollutes 31% less than an equivalent gas-powered car, according to the analysis.
Slowik said that is because electric cars are better at translating energy into forward motion. For example, the most popular EVs in the US, the Tesla Model Y and the Tesla Model 3, can drive more than 100 miles (161 km) on energy equivalent to what is provided by a gallon of gasoline.
'If you compare that to a 25-mpg gasoline vehicle, that's already four to five times more efficient,' Slowik said.
___
The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.
Caleigh Wells, The Associated Press
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Wall Street's $13B Signal: The Real Estate Freeze Might Finally Be Melting
Brookfield Asset Management (NYSE:BAM) is back in selling modeand in a big way. After years of sluggish activity, the firm has already moved $13 billion worth of properties across the U.S., Spain, and Australia in 2025, compared to just $2 billion during the same period last year. These aren't one-off disposals either: deals include everything from a retirement housing business in Australia to student housing in Spain, and a $2.2 billion sale of Fundamental Income Properties to Starwood. CEO Lowell Baron, who took over last month, said the market is edging back toward more normalized deal flow after a painful drought triggered by higher rates and mismatched expectations between buyers and sellers. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Sign with BAM. Why does this matter? Because for years, real estate managers have been stuck in limbounable to sell assets, return capital, or raise new funds. That's started to shift. Brookfield raised $5.9 billion in the first quarter alone for its flagship real estate fund, which now totals $16 billion. According to Baron, one major reason investors were holding back was because they hadn't seen any distributions. Now that the firm is finally returning capital, it could grease the wheels and restart the fundraising cyclejust when most managers need it most. U.S. commercial real estate investment also rose 14% in Q1 year-over-year, hinting that the worst may be behind us. But this isn't a rising tide lifting all boats. Demand is rebounding for data centers, housing, and logistics assets, while older office buildings still face elevated vacancy and distressed loan restructurings. Brookfield itself defaulted on office loans in Los Angeles and restructured debt on London's CityPoint tower. And yetit's also doubling down on select opportunities. After making contrarian bets on European offices post-pandemic, the firm is now eyeing supply shortages in high-end urban markets. We still see that bifurcation, Baron noted, adding that the buying window remains open as the backlog of distress slowly plays out. For now, capital is coming backbut only for the strongest stories. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Intel to separate networking unit as new CEO Tan overhauls business
(Reuters) -Intel is planning to separate its networking and communications unit into a stand-alone company and has begun the process of identifying investors, the chipmaker said on Friday, as new CEO Lip-Bu Tan looks to streamline its operations. Tan's plan to rejuvenate the once-iconic chipmaker focuses on shedding non-core assets and reducing expenses by scaling back major investments and cutting workforce numbers. Reuters reported in May that Intel was considering divesting its network and edge businesses, previously called NEX in its financial reports. "Like Altera, we will remain an anchor investor enabling us to benefit from future upside as we position the business for future growth," the company said in an emailed statement. In April, Intel agreed to sell a majority stake in its Altera programmable chip business to buyout firm Silver Lake at a valuation of about $8.75 billion, or nearly half of what it had paid for the business in 2015. Tan has been given the challenge of revitalizing the chipmaker after years of missteps and high-capital manufacturing strategies led to growing losses, all while the company grapples with establishing a foothold in the burgeoning AI market. Intel's shares were down 9% on Friday after the chipmaker warned of exiting chip manufacturing if it failed to secure a major customer. It also reported a surprise second-quarter adjusted loss and forecast a bigger-than-expected loss in the third quarter. In the latest first quarter, Intel made NEX a part of its data center and PC group and does not report its results as a separate segment. The unit, which makes chips for telecom equipment, generated revenue of $5.8 billion in 2024, securities filings show. That constituted about 11% of the company's total sales. Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Melden Sie sich an, um Ihr Portfolio aufzurufen. Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why QuantumScape Stock Is Sinking Today
Key Points QuantumScape is sinking after Goldman Sachs published bearish coverage on the stock. Goldman raised its one-year price target on QuantumScape from $2 per share to $3 per share, but it maintained a sell rating on the stock. QuantumScape's solid-state batteries could be revolutionary, but the stock is a high-risk play. 10 stocks we like better than QuantumScape › QuantumScape (NYSE: QS) stock is being hit with big sell-offs Friday in response to bearish analyst coverage. The company's share price was down 6.3% as of 3 p.m. ET. despite the S&P 500 being up 0.4% and the Nasdaq Composite being up 0.3% at the same point in the day. The stock had been down as much as 11.9% earlier in trading. Shortly before the market closed yesterday, Goldman Sachs published new coverage on QuantumScape and reiterated a sell rating on the stock. Despite some recent pullbacks, the company's share price is still up 127% this year. QuantumScape stock sinks following bearish coverage With its coverage yesterday, Goldman Sachs raised its one-year price target on QuantumScape from $2 per share to $3 per share but kept a sell rating on the stock. Mark Delaney, the firm's lead analyst on the solid-state battery specialist, said he saw some encouraging signs with QuantumScape's new Cobra manufacturing process and the expansion of its deal with Volkswagen's PowerCo subsidiary, but he remained heavily bearish on the stock due to a belief that big risk factors facing the business aren't reflected in its current valuation. As of this writing, the investment firm's price target implies potential downside of roughly 74.5% for the stock. What's next for QuantumScape? QuantumScape's solid-state battery technologies have the potential to make big waves in the electric vehicle (EV) industry by offering superior charge capacity, faster charging, and safety improvements. On the other hand, it still remains to be seen whether they will actually wind up being brought to market and used by Volkswagen's PowerCo and other potential customers. With its recent quarterly report, the company announced that it had secured a new deal with PowerCo worth $131 million and that it now had enough cash to fund its operations through 2029. QuantumScape stock could deliver huge returns if its solid-state batteries see market adoption, but the stock is a speculative play and could see big sell-offs if the company hits roadblocks on the path to commercialization. Do the experts think QuantumScape is a buy right now? The Motley Fool's expert analyst team, drawing on years of investing experience and deep analysis of thousands of stocks, leverages our proprietary Moneyball AI investing database to uncover top opportunities. They've just revealed their to buy now — did QuantumScape make the list? When our Stock Advisor analyst team has a stock recommendation, it can pay to listen. After all, Stock Advisor's total average return is up 1,040% vs. just 182% for the S&P — that is beating the market by 858.13%!* Imagine if you were a Stock Advisor member when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $636,774!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,064,942!* The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025 Keith Noonan has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Goldman Sachs Group. The Motley Fool recommends Volkswagen Ag. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why QuantumScape Stock Is Sinking Today was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data