MPs slam ‘disgraceful' rollback of Northern Ireland veterans legislation
MPs critical of the move suggested it would open a 'witch-hunt' against veterans who served to protect citizens across communities in Northern Ireland.
The debate followed a public petition against repealing the legislation which attracted more than 170,000 signatures.
Conservative MP John Lamont, who opened the parliamentary session, said the rollback could lead to 'two-tier' payouts for figures such as former Republican politician Gerry Adams.
Mr Lamont said: '[The change] could result in a six-figure payout for Mr Adams, simply because his interim custody order was not considered by the secretary of state, but rather a junior minister.
'That is simply outrageous.
'We have seen a lot of examples of two-tier justice since the Labour government came to power, but this may simply be the worst of all.
'Is the Government really contemplating creating a system to drag northern Irish veterans through the courts, whilst potentially paying millions to terrorists?
'We should also be clear about the differences between the actions of soldiers and terrorists. When terrorists get up in the morning, they go out with murderous intent to use violence to attack our democracy. Soldiers do not.
'The Legacy Act is by no means perfect, but it is better than the disgraceful spectacle of veterans being dragged through the courts.
'Doing so is not sustainable – legally or morally.'
Others echoed Mr Lamont's comments, highlighting the implications the rollback could have on the armed forces in future conflicts.
Conservative MP Sir David Davis argued the change would mean that British soldiers would be abandoned by the country they served.
He said: 'Getting this right is not just a matter of historical justice.
'The legal witch-hunt won't end in Northern Ireland.
'It'll cast a shadow over every future conflict that our armed forces engage in, and undermine their abilities to defend us.'
He added: 'Those who freely talk about human rights would do well to remember that our rights, our law, our democracy and our nation were protected by the very veterans that are at risk today.
'So let us all make one promise, that no British soldier will ever again be abandoned by the nation they have so bravely protected.'
Other MPs voiced their support in favour of the Government's proposals, arguing that the current act is not fit for purpose.
Labour MP Louise Jones suggested that the lack of support for the legislation among victims, politicians across parties in Northern Ireland, and veterans themselves meant it ought to be repealed.
She said: 'This Legacy Act has been found to be unlawful. It gives immunity to terrorists, and it denies justice to the families of the 200 service personnel that were murdered by terrorists during the Troubles.
'It is not supported in its current form by victims, it's not supported by a Northern Irish party, and many veterans are troubled by it. It must go and be replaced, and I call on the minister to outline how we can protect veterans from malicious lawfare of any conflict.'
'We have a huge duty here in Westminster to work with those communities not against them, and I hope everyone here will reflect on that important undertaking.'
Northern Ireland Secretary Hilary Benn pointed to statistics from the Centre for Military Justice that show that only one British soldier has been convicted since the Good Friday Agreement in 1998.
He suggested that this was the case over the 27 years, despite immunity for British military personnel not being enshrined in law for the majority of this time.
Mr Benn also argued that the changes would allow incomplete investigations into the deaths of soldiers to reopen.
He said: 'Legacy is hard. This is the unfinished business of the Good Friday agreement.
'And that is why we need to listen to the many families who lost loved ones, including the families of British service personnel, who served so bravely.
'There are more than 200 families of UK military personnel who are still searching for answers 30, 40, 50 years ago about the murder of their loved ones.
'The Police Service of Northern Ireland recently confirmed they had 202 live investigations into Troubles-related killings of members of our armed forces, and a further 23 into the killings of veterans.
'Each and every one of those investigations was forced to close by the Legacy Act, and we will bring forward legislation to deal with that.
'The other challenge is the lack of confidence in the act on the part of communities in Northern Ireland, which we are going to seek to reform.
'We owe it to all these families.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
23 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Young, angry and in debt: why Gen Z could turn to Corbyn
The opportunities are out there – to almost be a left-wing version of the populist right Reform. Standing for subterfuge and scapegoating, Reform seeks to protect the elite few. Corbyn can offer hope of a better future for the many. Last month More In Common polled 1,408 people on whether they'd vote for a Corbyn-led party. Regardless of gender, it found 10% would, with the Farage-led Reform on 27% and Labour on 20%. Much more interestingly and importantly, 32% of 18-24-year-olds – the highest for this age group for any party – said they would also do so. Reform was on just 7% for this age group. Among 25-34-year-olds, Reform moved ahead with 21% support compared to Corbyn's 14%. Support amongst older age groups continued to decline at roughly the same rate as it grew for Reform, suggesting a battle of the generations. In other words, the Gen Z generation – those born between 1997-2012 – are far more attracted to Corbyn and his politics than to Farage and his. And support across all ages in Scotland, at 18%, was the highest amongst any of the nations and regions in Britain. Without any policies yet declared, what will Gen Z be looking for and what will Corbyn and his comrades need to offer to keep them away from the clutches of a charlatan like Farage? The far left that hopes to have a home in the Corbyn party suggests a plethora of platitudes, whether it be welfare not warfare, ending austerity, taxing the rich, freedom for Palestine, climate action, and anti-racism. And since Corbyn lost the Labour leadership in 2020, he has led his Peace and Justice Project, focusing upon environmentalism, international peace cooperation, social inequality and corporate power. Read more by Gregor Gall None of these issues should be lightly dismissed but there needs to be something much more concrete to get Gen Z to turn up en masse at the polling booth to vote for the Corbyn party. It's called the security of self-interest. Unless Gen Zers have rich parents, they're the first generation that will be poorer than their parents were when they had them. So top of the priority list of policies must be housing, debt, and employment. Unless helped by the "bank of mum and dad", Gen Z-ers cannot afford, let alone get, a mortgage to put a foot on the property ladder. Forced to rent, they have no security of residence as rents rapidly rise. As demand outstrips supply, what they get for their money is pretty grotty. Thus, policies of house price control, council house building and more first-time buyer financial support as well as rent controls for flats and landlords licensed only where minimum quality standards are met. Next many have gone to college or university and graduated with debt. And that's with having worked through the time they did their degrees. Though student loan debt repayment only kicks in when earning above a certain level, the irony is that many do not get to that point for some years. Thus, reintroduction of student grants, abolishing fees, cancellation of student debt, price controls on basic food stuffs, free public transport, and a new national state bank offering low interest loans. Upon entering the jobs market these days, many will end up in jobs that are no better paid and with no more security or prospects than the ones they did during their degrees. Artificial intelligence will reduce, not increase, job opportunities at this end of the labour market. Thus a doubling of the minimum wage to £25 per hour, ending temporary employment contracts, and job security for the first five years of a job. To bastardise Oscar Wilde's saying, you can only look at stars when you're not lying in the gutter. So, only then with that firm basis securely established can the policy platform then add on those more altruistic aspects like "world peace". But before we run away thinking it's just about the policies on offer, we need to remember that the issues of the personalities and processes are important too. With chants of "Oh, Jeremy" still heard today, a party built too much around a single leader comes with dangers. Yes, it needs a clearly identifiable and credible leadership but putting too many of its eggs into one basket can be a ticking timebomb. We know this from the experience of the likes of Tommy Sheridan and George Galloway. Corbyn could easily suffer a stroke under the strain of it all. Zarah Sultana has stepped up to the plate by leaving Labour (Image: PA) Now Zarah Sultana MP has stepped up to the plate by leaving Labour. She is a still young – but not quite Gen Z - 31 year-old woman with Pakistani heritage. It could be a case of replicating the current practice of the Green parties either side of the Border of having two co-leaders. And, just as many young people flocked into Labour when Corbyn became leader in 2015, many also became disillusioned by their inability to change the party to sing in tune with him. This should not be a problem in the new political party but that does not mean that members will be happy to become just the shock troops that knock on doors and hand out leaflets come election times. All is to play for. There will be competition with the Greens because there might be some policy overlap, especially if the radical candidates win the leadership here and down south shortly. Time is of the essence, as a party not yet established and with no name has a hard hill to climb to fend off Farage. The youth and vigour of the 32% of the young Gen Zers need to be tapped into now to bring on board their peers and others. Professor Gregor Gall is a Research Associate at the University of Glasgow
BBC News
26 minutes ago
- BBC News
Legacy Act: Hilary Benn accuses Conservatives of making false promises to veterans
The Northern Ireland secretary has accused the Conservatives of making "false promises" to veterans with the controversial Legacy Act, as he defended Labour's plans to replace Benn was speaking during a three-hour debate in Parliament, which saw MPs clash over legacy in the presence of some military act, which was brought in by the Conservatives, introduced a ban on inquests and civil actions related to incidents during the also sought to offer a conditional amnesty for people suspected of Troubles-related crimes in exchange for co-operating with a new information recovery body - that was later ruled unlawful. Labour is in the process of repealing the act, but has faced a backlash from some who say it could reopen prosecutions against military in Westminster on Monday evening, Benn said that 202 live inquiries into Troubles-related killings of members of the armed forces were brought to a stop in May 2024 and a further 23 involving veterans - as a result of the controversial legacy was responding to a petition signed by more than 170,000 people calling for Labour to safeguard "protections for veterans around prosecutions for Troubles-related incidents".Benn said hundreds of military families were still seeking answers, and that the government was "listening carefully" to veterans as well as victims and their relatives."I and the defence secretary are engaging with our veterans community and with all interested parties over future legislation, and we will ensure that there are far better protections in place," he Conservative MP and Shadow Armed Forces Minister Mark Francois described the government's plans as "two-tier justice at its worst".He said many veterans now effectively had a "sword of Damocles hanging over them again". Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) leader Gavin Robinson accused the government of seeking to "rewrite the history of the past", and said his party had opposed the Legacy Act for "very different reasons" than Sinn Féin."We're asking for the government to protect those who protected us," he Unionist Party (UUP) MP Robin Swann hit out at what he called "point-scoring" between Conservative and Labour MPs during the debate, adding that any party in power had a duty to "get this right to make sure those people who served aren't dragged through the courts".Traditional Unionist Voice (TUV) leader Jim Allister said the secretary of state needed to take veterans' concerns seriously."This government is said to be tackling legacy issues and if this government is going to tackle it, then it needs to stem it by tackling inquests and that route which is now producing potential prosecutions of some of the bravest of our citizens," he of the debate, hundreds of military veterans protested in Westminster against Labour's plans to change the say they fear it could reopen the possibility of more prosecutions against Army veterans. 'Labour fell for this' Almost 170,000 people signed a petition backed by Francois, demanding Labour not make any changes to the law that would allow Northern Ireland veterans to be prosecuted – a level which means the subject has to be debated by those at the protest were Geoff Butler and Glen Espie, who each served tours in Northern Butler said his message to the government was to "get rid" of its plans and listen to veterans."It's totally ridiculous the way this has come to a head... Labour fell for this, half the MPs in the Commons weren't born during the Troubles, what do they know about it?"Mr Espie said he attended the protest to support colleagues who he felt were at risk of being "put in court as elderly veterans"."It's not right. Successive British governments have let down the veterans community." What is the Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Act? The act was passed by the Conservative government in September 2023 despite opposition from Labour, all Northern Ireland parties, several victims' groups and the Irish created a new legacy body known ICRIR to take over all Troubles-era cases from 1 May 2024, including those on the desk of the Police Service of Northern act shut down all historical act's most controversial element, the offer of conditional immunity to suspects, was disapplied following legal action by bereaved court ruled this part of the act was incompatible with human rights' legislation and the Windsor July, the Labour government wrote to the Belfast courts abandoning an appeal against the striking out of the amnesty clause in the December, the secretary of state formally started the process to repeal the act, but as well as prompting a backlash from veterans who do not want to see the law repealed, he was criticised by some political parties and victims' groups for not moving quickly enough.
The Herald Scotland
33 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Why have we let the RMT wreck our ferry services?
Generous pay can be justified where high-level skill and responsibility is called for or work is onerous, dangerous, or living conditions unpleasant. Is the level of skill and responsibility of a CalMac steward or cook, for example, greater than, say, a care worker, nurse, teacher, bus driver, or many others? I suggest not. CalMac's fortnight on, fortnight off plus up to 10 weeks' paid holiday works out at a 21-week working year, which may be enhanced by overtime as sickness cover kicks in. The state-funded pension is infinitely more generous than any other in the public service. Why so? The single en-suite staterooms for each crew member, coupled with gym, messroom and steward-served meals, on a ship that ties up at night, is a level of luxury unheard of elsewhere. On a Royal Navy frigate, ratings share six or nine to a room with tiered bunks. Only lieutenant commanders and above have a tiny cabin to themselves. Only the commanding officer has an en suite. Yet those vital ships can be at sea for months on end. But that's not the worst of it. Successive Scottish governments have so long appeased the RMT, that, to vast public expense, the larger CalMac ships carry twice the crew actually required, terminals are grossly over-manned and the RMT dictates that no alternative be allowed to operate within the state-funded network. Why? They love nationalised industries, because they know they can run rings round generalist civil servants and ministers in a way they cannot with hard-nosed commercial managers. They know that if communities ran their own ferry services, the whole rotten system of privilege and excess would collapse to be replaced with something vastly more efficient to the great benefit of our island communities. Roy Pedersen, Inverness. Read more letters Don't blow a fortune on EVs The Government is poised to announce a £700 million fund to encourage people to buy more electric cars, which will include cash for infrastructure such as pavement gullies for cables to enable roadside charging and grants to make them cheaper to buy. I fully agree that the climate is changing, whether it is due to mankind's pollution or natural causes, and whether we believe and accept the most dire predictions of flooding, drought, mass migration and death the impact will be, as Ed Miliband warns, a massive impact on the British way of life. But how will blowing £700m on a few thousand more electric cars on UK roads avoid, or mitigate, the "climate disaster" when the UK only contributes to 1% of global warming? We should be focusing on resilience. Surely the money would be better spent on planning and constructing proper defences for the predicted weather impacts? As well as avoiding the impacts of other countries' carbon profligacy it would be better way of achieving the economic growth we keep getting told is required to fix the other – in my view greater – day to day threats to our way of life such as poor education, obesity, lack of cheap housing, policing social media, immigration and defence. This is what other countries are doing. For example Indonesia is moving its capital from Djakarta to Nusantara because of the threat of flooding, a huge project which will boost its construction industry by 8.5% every year until 2028. Or is this more about shoring up Ed Miliband's increasingly loopy environmental policy defences and providing an "off ramp" for car manufacturers who face a £15k fine for every internal combustion car sold above their quota limit? Allan Sutherland, Stonehaven. • George Herraghty (Letters, July 12) is upset because his local wind turbines are not turning (Herald 12/7/25) He should be comforted when they are whizzing round and the excess electricity generated is used in the various pump-storage facilities, which can be switched on at short notice as required – for example when "the wind industry is on holiday". David Hay, Minard. Social security: mind the language The piece by Citizens Advice Scotland's Jonathan Boyd ('Why it's vital to get social security right', The Herald, July 12) resonated deeply with me on several levels. As part of my 30 years of service with the now Department of Work and Pensions, I spent several years in the 1980s striving enthusiastically to introduce plain English into the department's communications at all levels so that the maximum number of people could read, understand and respond to them. Those efforts, while initially successful, have now palpably dissipated, not only within DWP but within the public sector at large. Meanwhile, the average reading age in the UK, at 9-11 years, has remained stubbornly and shamefully unimproved since the 1980s. Coincidentally, during the 1980s and 1990s, I worked as a voluntary adviser with the Citizens Advice Bureaux in Blackpool and later in Perth, where I witnessed at first hand how a lack of basic literacy skills and comprehension contributed so directly and fundamentally to the day-to-day difficulties of so many clients. Sadly, in this respect also, the comprehensibility of so many official communications seems not to have improved in the last three decades. At a purely personal level, I am gratified that the CAB's Help to Claim service also recognises the importance of the disadvantages people with hearing difficulties face; a hidden, but nonetheless very real, disability which many like myself are loath to acknowledge. Jonathan Boyd is right; social security should be simple and accessible to all. It should not need bodies such as CAB – worthy as they are – to help navigate clients through a needlessly incomprehensible and hostile nightmare. Iain Stuart, Glasgow. Library assistants and economics With regard to the decision taken by North Ayrshire Council to employ four library assistants to do the work of five librarians ("Second council cuts school librarian posts", The Herald, July 12), perhaps it would make sense to put library assistants in charge of every aspect of the council's work. We would need fewer binmen, fewer teachers and if we elected library assistants we would need fewer politicians. Now that would be a saving. Graeme Arnott, Stewarton. Tariff trouble for US citizens It is widely reported that the US Customs take has surpassed $100 billion for the first time and only nine months into a fiscal year. In the main due to Donald Trump's tariffs, this could reach $300bn by the end of the fiscal year when President Trump applies yet more tariffs on August 1. Whilst this may boost treasury receipts, do the American electorate realise that it is they who are paying? The last major increase in tariffs exacerbated the negative effect of the Great Depression of the 1930s. Let us hope that the MAGA brigade wake up before it is too late. Peter Wright, West Kilbride. Should Keir Starmer get tough with Benjamin Netanyahu? (Image: PA) Who could vote for Starmer now? On the 10 o'clock BBC News on Sunday (July 13) there was yet another report on the suffering in Gaza imposed on the Palestinians by the Israeli government. I don't need to describe the horrendous scenes. Your readers will be only too well aware of the horrors the Gazans and their children are going through. Israel's former prime minister Ehud Olmert is reported online as having said: 'The 'humanitarian city' Israel's defence minister has proposed building on the ruins of Rafah would be a concentration camp, and forcing Palestinians inside would be ethnic cleansing ... Israel was already committing war crimes in Gaza and the West Bank and construction of the camp would mark an escalation.' What is unacceptable from the UK's perspective is Keir Starmer's failure to make a statement along the following lines: 'Enough is enough! I have told the inconceivably malign Benjamin Netanyahu that I no longer support his criminal actions in Gaza. And what is more I will do everything I can to stop him building his concentration camp in Gaza for the few Gazans that are left alive.' How can any voter in the UK so much as contemplate ever voting for Keir Starmer again until he does so? John Milne, Uddingston.
