logo
Goodbye to Berlin: New Novels Recall a City's ‘Poor but Sexy' Heyday

Goodbye to Berlin: New Novels Recall a City's ‘Poor but Sexy' Heyday

New York Times23-06-2025
Berlin, they say, is dead. Kaput. Over. Not what it used to be.
Then again, part of Berlin's modern identity as Europe's licentious, experimental, ultraliberal techno capital is that it has always been finished. A jaded, black-clad noise musician declared as much to me on my first visit to the German capital in my early 20s, two decades ago. Then, as now, Berlin existed in a perpetual state of disdain for its present in favor of a vanished, superior past — the precise years of which varied widely depending on whom you asked (and tended to coincide with the person's youth).
Still, the consensus seems to be that Berlin is, if not quite over, no longer the anything-goes metropolis that, from the collapse of the wall to the 2010s, enchanted so many people seeking a freer, cheaper, less conventional way of living.
I lived in Berlin for several years starting in 2018, and continue to spend my summers there. I still find it inspiring, more so than my native Dublin (a capital that's always felt like a village), but there's no avoiding the facts: The city is fast becoming as expensive as London or Paris, and a new nexus of capital and property speculation is erasing what's left of a bohemian utopia in its 'poor but sexy' heyday.
Dark historical clouds once again swoop in. I regularly see footage of Berlin's Polizei suppressing pro-Palestinian protests with disturbing brutality, while a state-sanctioned cancellation campaign against critics of Israel's actions in Gaza has chilled the cultural sector. The sinister far-right party Alternative für Deutschland is on the rise. The other kind of party — the one represented by storied techno temples such as Berghain and Tresor — is now the stomping ground of tech and finance elites.
I've just read a batch of novels set in Berlin, all published this year. While fiction is an imperfect receptacle for history, it tends to capture the moods, textures and sensibilities of a period far better than official records can. Novel writing being a slow-motion affair, only one of these four books is set in our evil decade. The others take place in the decade prior — when an image of the city solidified just as the reality underpinning it began to dissolve.
Reading about Berlin at its most recent peak underscores the subtle manner in which a city can both vanish and endure — can be credibly declared dead even while retaining great promise and vitality to those who still flock there in search of a better life. The books speak less about the city itself than the desires, pretensions and last gasps of a 21st-century vanguard: the hedonistic cosmopolites and dropout creatives who once dominated the cultural discourse but now look very much like an endangered species within the current world order. While common themes emerge — gentrification, immigration, economic and political shifts — these four very different novels form something of a Cubist portrait of a place, and a people, receding into the mists of history and nostalgia.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Russia ramps up use of banned chemical weapons in Ukraine, including WWI-era poison gas, 3 European intel services say
Russia ramps up use of banned chemical weapons in Ukraine, including WWI-era poison gas, 3 European intel services say

CBS News

time41 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Russia ramps up use of banned chemical weapons in Ukraine, including WWI-era poison gas, 3 European intel services say

What we know about the death of Russia's chemical weapons head The Hague — Two Dutch intelligence agencies said on Friday that Russia is increasing its use of prohibited chemical weapons in Ukraine, including the World War I-era poison gas chloropicrin. The Netherlands' military intelligence and the security service, together with the German intelligence service, found that the use of prohibited chemical weapons by the Russian military had become "standardized and commonplace" in Ukraine. According to the findings, the Russian military uses chloropicrin and riot control agent CS against sheltering Ukrainian soldiers, who are then forced out into the open and shot. Dutch Defense Minister Ruben Brekelmans called for more sanctions against Moscow and continued military support for Kyiv. Brekelmans, who stayed on in a caretaker role after the Dutch government collapsed last month, said he doesn't want to see the use of chemical weapons become normalized. He said on social media, "Drones are dropping the chemical chloropicrin on trenches, driving away and then killing Ukrainian soldiers." Brekelmans said with the use of large-scale chemical weapons, Russia was again showing "its evil face." Lowering the threshold for use "is not only dangerous for Ukraine, but also for the rest of Europe and the world," he said in a statement. Russia has signed up to the Chemical Weapons Convention, which bans the use of chloropicrin and CS as weapons. The convention's watchdog, the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, or OPCW, has found several incidents in Ukraine involving CS, but the group hasn't conducted a full investigation, which must be requested by the member states. The executive committee for the OPCW is holding a regular meeting next week, where it's expected to discuss the conflict in Ukraine. Russian authorities didn't immediately comment on the findings, but they have denied using chemical weapons in the past, instead alleging that Ukraine has used the banned substances. According to Ukraine, Russia has carried out 9,000 chemical weapons attacks in the country since the start of the full-scale invasion in 2022. In December, the head of the Russian military's biological and chemical weapons unit, Lt. General Igor Kirillov, was killed along with his deputy during a blast in Moscow. At the time, an informed source in the Security Service of Ukraine told CBS News, "Kirillov was a war criminal and an absolutely legitimate target, since he gave orders to use prohibited chemical weapons against the Ukrainian military." In 2024, the U.S. State Department said that it had recorded the use of chloropicrin against Ukrainian troops.

UN report targeting Israel sparks backlash, author accused of overstepping her mandate
UN report targeting Israel sparks backlash, author accused of overstepping her mandate

Fox News

time2 hours ago

  • Fox News

UN report targeting Israel sparks backlash, author accused of overstepping her mandate

A United Nations report targeting Israel and companies that operate within the country entitled "Economy of Occupation to Economy of Genocide" is sparking backlash and concern. The report was authored and presented by U.N. Special Rapporteur on the Occupied Palestinian Territories Francesca Albanese, a controversial figure who has been condemned by multiple nations for making allegedly antisemitic remarks. In her latest report, she calls for sanctions against "entities and individuals involved in activities that may endanger the Palestinians." NGO Monitor Legal Advisor Anne Herzberg said that while it's not surprising that Albanese would issue a scathing report on Israel, as she has done so many times in the past, this latest report was unique. "I think that the difference now is that this report explicitly endorses adopting BDS — boycott, divestment, and sanctions against Israel — in a very overt way," Herzberg told Fox News Digital. She added that even though Albanese is an independent investigator, the report could be interpreted as the U.N. supporting the BDS movement against Israel. In response to a Fox News Digital request for comment, the Office of the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights said "special procedures experts," like Albanese "work on a voluntary basis," do not receive a salary and are not U.N. staff. "While the U.N. Human Rights office acts as the secretariat for special procedures, the experts serve in their individual capacity and are independent from any government or organization, including OHCHR and the U.N.," OHCHR's media team told Fox News Digital. "Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the U.N. or OHCHR." Herzog told Fox News Digital that not only did Albanese overstep the boundaries of her role, but so did the U.N. Human Rights Council (HRC), as it does not have the authority to issue sanctions, something the report recommends. "The U.N. Human Rights Council, which is where she presented her report, and that's under whose auspices she is working, does not have the power under the U.N. charter to issue sanctions," Herzog said. "And so not only has she overstepped her mandate as a rapporteur, the U.N. Human Rights Council by endorsing this, not endorsing the report, but by allowing this report to be published." Herzog said she saw "threatening and harassing" letters that Albanese sent to companies and NGOs "basically threatening them with being included on her boycott list and claiming that they were complicit in international crimes like genocide, apartheid, blocking self-determination or Palestinians." The United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights is a voluntary code that companies can sign on to as a pledge to be mindful of how their operations run and their customers are treated. Herzog argued that Albanese "weaponizes this voluntary positive, pluralistic framework" and that she does so improperly, making it a "binding punitive framework." "Not only is she distorting international law, she's distorting this UNGP framework, and I suspect that if this type of activity of hers gains purchase or other people start following in her footsteps, she's going to be responsible for basically destroying the whole area of business and human rights." Albanese presented her report to the UNHRC on Thursday, just two days after the U.S. called for her removal over her "years-long pattern of antisemitism and anti-Israel bias." In the report, Albanese claims that corporations have aided Israel in "its ongoing genocidal campaign in Gaza." She repeated this claim at UNHRC on Thursday, charging Israel with being "responsible for one of the cruelest genocides in modern history." She also accused Israel of using the war in Gaza as a testing ground for new weapons "to exterminate a people without restraint." Israeli Ambassador to the U.N. in Geneva Daniel Meron, who was not present at the UNHRC meeting, told Fox News Digital that through her report Albanese is "willingly spearheading the global efforts to promote terrorism propaganda." "This report, just like all others by this rapporteur, is riddled with inflammatory rhetoric and is legally baseless," Meron told Fox News Digital. "Her obsession with demonizing Israel is clear in the narrative she pushes." Albanese did not respond to Fox News Digital's questions or request for comment in time for publication.

Hamas ‘considering laying down arms'
Hamas ‘considering laying down arms'

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Hamas ‘considering laying down arms'

Hamas is considering laying down its weapons as part of a ceasefire deal with Israel, sources have said. The terror group is yet to respond formally to a proposal from the White House, aimed at freeing the hostages potentially within days. However, Saudi outlet Asharq News reported, citing Hamas sources, that the organisation was showing 'flexibility' on the issue of possession, manufacture and smuggling of weapons under a post-war settlement. Repeated attempts to reach a new deal have failed since February because Hamas refuses to release hostages without an Israeli guarantee to end the war, effectively leaving the terror group at large in the Strip. At the same time, Israel has stopped short of committing not to resume fighting after the hostages are recovered. Using the political momentum from his bombing of Iran and subsequent brokering of a peace deal between the Islamic Republic and Israel, Donald Trump is now effectively offering Hamas that guarantee himself, according to reports. Sources say the president has committed to begin detailed discussions on ending the war on day one of a 60-day ceasefire, on which approximately eight hostages would walk free. Arab nations have put forward a proposal for an interim technocrat government for Gaza, with the involvement of the Palestinian Authority. Similar discussions were due to begin some days into the January ceasefire deal with Hamas, but never materialised owing to Benjamin Netanyahu's domestic political constraints. Israel then restarted its military campaign in mid-March. According to Asharq, Hamas may commit to putting an end to weapons smuggling into the Gaza Strip and manufacturing its own weapons. It may even commit to handing over its existing weapons. There have also been suggestions that a symbolic number of senior Hamas figures would agree to go into exile. However, Hamas has issued no formal response yet – although Mr Trump says he expects one within 24 hours – and the optimistic reports could amount to nothing. The group has a history of appearing to entertain proposals only to introduce hurdles later in the process. Israel has repeatedly said that Hamas can have no part in running a post-war Gaza government. The question will be to what extent Mr Netanyahu's government is prepared to consider a staged process of reform. Under what is known of the proposed agreement, Hamas would release 10 living hostages, approximately half of the total number it holds, and a number of bodies over the 60-day period. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store