Judge keen to ensure trial of Jeffrey Donaldson and his wife not delayed again
The couple both face charges relating to alleged historical sex offences.
The trial had previously been due to start in March, but was delayed because of Eleanor Donaldson's ill health.
A new trial date has been set for November 3.
The case was mentioned briefly at Belfast Crown Court on Friday morning for an update on an assessment over whether Eleanor Donaldson is currently fit to stand trial.
Ian Turkington KC, who represents Eleanor Donaldson, said his client was examined by a consultant psychiatrist on July 18.
'We have been told we can expect a report, hopefully this Monday,' he said.
'That being so, I've indicated that if there is an intention to serve any report, it'll be done within seven days of our receipt of the report, assuming it is Monday.'
The prosecution also intend to instruct a doctor to examine Eleanor Donaldson.
Judge Paul Ramsey put to Mr Turkington that this depends what is in the report, and expressed that he is keen to ensure the trial date is not interfered with.
It was agreed the case would be mentioned on September 11 at Newry Crown Court for an update.
The judge said it would not be necessary for defendants to attend on that date.
Jeffrey Donaldson, 62, who did not attend the hearing in Belfast on Friday, has pleaded not guilty to 18 alleged offences.
The charges include one count of rape as well as allegations of indecent assault and gross indecency.
These alleged incidents span a time period between 1985 and 2008, and there are two alleged victims.
Eleanor Donaldson, 59, of Dublinhill Road, Dromore, who also did not attend court, is facing charges of aiding and abetting, which she denies.
Jeffrey Donaldson, the long-standing MP for Lagan Valley was arrested and charged at the end of March last year.
He resigned as DUP leader and was suspended from the party after the allegations emerged.
Weeks before his arrest, he had led the DUP back into Stormont after a two-year boycott of the powersharing institutions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
12 minutes ago
- The Independent
Manchester United fans announce opening day protest and say ‘Jim Can't Fix This'
A Manchester United supporters' group has announced a fresh protest against the Glazer family and, for the first time, Sir Jim Ratcliffe ahead of their Premier League opener against Arsenal. The 1958 have organised numerous demonstrations in recent years calling for a change in ownership and will march to Old Trafford on August 17, with new banners being produced reading 'Jim Can't Fix This'. Ratcliffe owns a 28.94 per cent stake in United and has overseen wide, often unpopular, changes since taking over day-to-day operational control from the Glazers in February 2024. A spokesman for The 1958 said: 'It's a new season but the same old ownership issues. Twenty years of the Glazers and their debt mountain is 20 years too long. Enough is enough. 'We won't allow some natural optimism and a couple of shiny new signings to deflect from the bigger off-field picture. 'Jim Ratcliffe chose to get into bed with the Glazers and in our opinion is helping keep them in charge. 'So on 17th August, we protest not just against the Glazers, but now also against Jim Ratcliffe – a man once seen by many, including ourselves, as a possible saviour, a beacon of hope but now revealed as complicit in the ongoing erosion of everything that makes our club what it is. 'This is no longer just about ownership; this is about survival – the survival of our identity, our community, and our values.' The 1958 spokesman said the protest is for 'every fan who has been silenced, evicted, priced out and disregarded', adding 'this is about the future of football'. The group representative added: 'Jim Ratcliffe, you have chosen your side and it is not ours. You now stand shoulder to shoulder with the Glazers. The mask has slipped. You are no saviour. You're like a (red) devil in disguise.' Ratcliffe suggested in March that he would walk away from United if he ever suffered abuse on the level of that directed at the Glazer family. 'It can be unpleasant,' Ratcliffe said in the Times. 'And I've probably failed on the having fun front. 'I can put up with it for a while. I don't mind being unpopular because I get that nobody likes seeing Manchester United down where they are, and nobody likes the decisions we're having to make. 'Eventually, if it reached the extent that the Glazer family have been abused, then I'd have to say, 'look, that's enough guys, let somebody else do this'.' United finished 15th in the Premier League last season – their lowest top-flight finish since 1974 – and missed out on European qualification after losing the Europa League final to Tottenham.
The Independent
12 minutes ago
- The Independent
The ‘worrying trend' that puts you at risk of identity fraud
Fraud prevention service Cifas has identified a "worrying trend" of individuals selling their own identities, often for promised financial opportunities. This practice leaves people vulnerable to criminals taking out loans or credit in their name, leading to significant personal debt. Cifas's latest Fraudscape report revealed over 118,000 suspected identity fraud cases between January and June 2025, with AI significantly exacerbating the threat through synthetic identities and fabricated profiles. The report also highlighted a rise in employee fraud, including individuals concealing background information and engaging in "polygamous working" or using fraudulent references. Cifas CEO Mike Haley described fraud as a "national emergency" supercharged by AI, urging urgent, coordinated cross-sector collaboration to combat the evolving threat.
Daily Mail
12 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Thug who tried to claim he had sexsomnia when he raped woman in vicious campaign of abuse is jailed for 11 years
A dangerous thug with a tattoo of an axe on his face who left two women terrified with a campaign of violence has been jailed for 11 years for rape after his lawyers tried to argue he was suffering from 'sexsomnia'. Dean Final, 32, installed cameras in every room of the house he shared with his first victim, told her what to wear and to 'keep her head down' when she went out without him. He also suffocated her and slammed her head on the floor and against a kitchen cupboard. After being arrested he quickly moved in with a woman in another county who was also subjected to a similar campaign before being raped twice by Final - who was on bail for the first offences at the time. Leicester Crown Court heard when interviewed by the police, the second victim said Final's eyes were closed while he raped her and Final's defence team submitted a report to claim non-insane automatism - a condition which means a person cannot be held responsible for their actions because they had no control or conscious knowledge of what they were doing. But prosecutors applied to the court to exclude any suggestion of sexsomnia - a rare, sleep disorder which causes a person to engage in sexual acts while asleep - pointing out that Final had no history of sleep issues before or after the rape. Prosecutors also highlighted the fact that before one of the attacks, he had gone into a different room and picked up a sex toy before returning to rape the victim. Following legal argument, sexsomnia was excluded from the defence's case and Final pleaded guilty to two counts of rape and controlling or coercive behaviour against the woman. He also admitted six charges against his first victim including controlling and coercive behaviour between September 2020 and December 2023; strangulation; three counts of actual bodily harm and causing unnecessary suffering his victim's dog. Jailing him on Tuesday, recorder Jacob Hallam KC told Final he was a 'dangerous' offender, and had decided it was appropriate to impose an extended licence period of three years upon his release, meaning he could be immediately recalled to custody if he committed further offences. He said: 'I have concluded that the risk you pose to women with whom you enter relationships is sufficiently profound as to need monitoring and assessment before you can be released from custody, and to mean that you need an extended period of supervision upon that release to protect members of the public from the significant risk of serious harm caused by the commission of further specified offences.' In addition, the recorder imposed a Sexual Harm Prevention Order (SHPO) until 2043, with conditions preventing Final from being alone with a female unless they are a biological relative, a work colleague, or if he has told them about his conviction. He added: 'Here, the sexual harm is contact offending with females in the context of a relationship. I am satisfied that a SHPO is necessary to protect members of the public that might fall into such a category from sexual harm from you.' Recorder Hallam went on to say Final must indefinitely comply with the notification requirements of being released as a sexual offender, including registering his address with the police within three days of being freed. And he was handed indefinite restraining orders preventing any contact with his victims. James Varley, defending, had argued that Final was 'not by and large someone who offends sexually', and said that in this case the rape took place 'in the dying throes of Mr Final trying to continue a relationship that was well and truly dead.' He told the court the terms of the SHPO risked making Final a 'pariah', adding: 'If the moment he is to be alone with a female he is to disclose his convictions, he is going to know it is going to be impossible for him to form any sort of relationship with any person. 'He is going to become ostracised and re-ostracised and re-ostracised. 'The reality is any incentive to work towards rehabilitation is going to be gone and any counselling working towards the light at the end of the tunnel will be completely and utterly unworkable.' Mr Varley said any future new partners could already be informed by the police of Final's convictions under the Domestic Violence Disclosure Scheme, and claimed the restrictions of the SHPO would be a 'significant imposition on him'. Charlotte Caulton-Scott from the Crown Prosecution Service said afterwards: 'Dean Final has been exposed for what he really is – a violent, manipulative and controlling individual. He is where he belongs now, where he cannot do any more harm to women. 'There was absolutely no merit in claiming he had not been in control because of sexsomnia. Prosecutors recognised immediately that this was just an attempt to shirk responsibility for his violent conduct. 'We will continue to challenge the myth of sexsomnia because in the vast majority of cases, it is simply not justified.' The court heard Final met his first victim, from Lancashire, in October 2020 and was initially 'kind and caring' but within a month became controlling and violent 'which was to be the hallmark of the relationship thereafter'. Paul Raudnitz KC, prosecuting, said Final prevented her from seeing friends and family, abused her verbally, made her delete social media apps and told her what clothes to wear. He also physically abused her dog which she had owned since it was a puppy and transferred money from her bank account into his own without her knowing. On one occasion he dragged her off the sofa by her hair, knelt on her legs and covered her nose and mouth so that she could not breathe. Mr Raudnitz said: 'The defendant installed CCTV in every room of the house except the bathroom and if he could not see her called her repeatedly to see where she was'. The court was told he punched her on the arms, ribs and hips - where he believed other people would not see the bruises - and used a screwdriver, drill, shoe and DVD box as weapons. Mr Raudnitz said: 'In short, whatever he could get his hands on'. When she went out on her own, he told her to 'keep her head down'. In June 2022, she tried to leave the relationship but he 'followed her and dragged her back home'. The court heard in June 2023, following an argument, he grabbed her by her ponytail, threw her to the floor, punched her to the hip and ribs, grabbed her by the throat and slammed her head on a concrete floor. The victim, who has a number of health issues, was not permitted to seek medical attention. She eventually managed to flee to a women's refuge in October 2023 and Final was arrested and bailed. The court heard he met his second victim online in September 2023. He told her he 'needed to get away and didn't have anywhere to go' and asked if he could stay with her while he 'got himself sorted' and later turned up at her house in Leicestershire with a 'van full of stuff'. Mr Raudnitz said this relationship 'was also characterised as had his previous relationship by ...controlling and coercive' behaviour. He said he took his victim's keys and stopped her from going to work because he was 'obsessed with the notion she was cheating on him at work'. Mr Raudnitz said he would 'make up reasons for her to remain at home and physically stop her from leaving for work'. If she did manage to go to work he would repeatedly message her and ask her to share her location. The court heard he suffocated her on February 13 telling her: 'If I can't have you nobody can'. He raped her twice the following day. The court heard Final has 10 previous convictions including one for harassment after he called another former partner 110 times in one day. Sexsomnia, in which people take part in sexual activity while asleep, is extremely rare though has been as a controversial defence in rape trials. Last year, the CPS paid out £35,000 to a woman after it dropped her rape case because of claims she could have had an episode of 'sexsomnia'. Jade Blue McCrossen-Nethercott, 32, contacted police in 2017 after waking up and feeling she had been raped while she slept. But the charges were dropped just days before the trial three years later because lawyers for the accused claimed she had 'sexsomnia'. In 2021 Ms McCrossen-Nethercott lodged an appeal through the CPS victims' right to review system. It apologised and admitted it was wrong to close her case - saying it should have been taken to trial.
