
River Island may have to close… but I'll cherish the memories of my 1990s fashion disasters
Oatmeal – the height of sophistication! Not boring school shirt-white, not bland-old beige – but oatmeal. Slightly ribbed, with minute white flecks like a speckled egg. If I only had that body-suit, I'd look exactly like Nicole Appleton from All Saints, I just knew it.
I could wear it, I fancied, to attract boys like Justin Peterson in the year above me; whose name I used to write in my diary – over and over – with my special glittery pen with the pom-pom on the top. One look at my River Island denim dress with the irridescent shell pop buttons and he'd be mine. How could he resist?
And if he wasn't sure, I had a secret weapon: shimmer pink lipstick with dark brown lipliner and a silver puffa jacket. Phwoar. (Spoiler: he wasn't mine, and I never forgave my friend Gemma for wearing an even better denim dress with a maroon body-suit beneath it, from Tammy Girl.)
Now, perhaps you can understand my heartbreak, because rumour has it that River Island – bastion of bucket hats, purveyor of crop tops, combat trousers and woven belts, stalwart of satin slip dresses and velvet chokers with a small silver cross dangling from the middle – could collapse within weeks, following £33m losses.
According to the Telegraph, the beloved retailer will go unless landlords and creditors approve a radical rescue plan – due to be put before the High Court next week – which would see 33 stores close, rents slashed on a further 71 shops and debts written off.
If the rescue plan works, then an emergency loan from River Island 's founders might just save it. If not, it'll close by August. And not only would the closures be devastating for those who work there – River Island employs 5,300 people in its various stores, plus a further 950 at its head office in Hanger Lane – but it would decimate one of the last faded giants of 1990s nostalgia.
Be still my beating heart that pumps in time to 'Pure Shores' – they cannot do this to us, they cannot. If River Island goes, it will join the ghosts of Topshop, Miss Selfridge, Morgan de toi and Jane Norman. And where will we get our crushed velvet dresses and cami tops, then?
I put an urgent call-out to the friends who dressed as badly in the nineties as I did, to see what they'd miss most about the retail chain if it went under.
'For me, River Island was all about the store in Ilford Exchange. It was the first shop where I felt like a grown-up,' Roz admitted. 'Prior to that, it was all about going into C&A – in the Clockhouse section – and Tammy Girl. But shopping in River Island in Ilford felt like I'd graduated to a higher level.
'The plastic bags were coveted because they were so iconic – multi-coloured, floral – if you had something in a River Island bag, you were the height of chic. It's where I bought my favourite item of clothing that decade – a pair of oatmeal linen trousers, which I obviously wore with a body. Plus, they had really, really good accessories.'
'This isn't directly related but I remember fondly the store at Oxford Circus,' Emma told me. 'It was pretty much opposite Aroma [a popular coffee shop chain in the 1990s] where we'd meet in the downstairs area and smoke ciggies and drink coffee and then shop at River Island and feel very grown up and like we had found life.'
While Louise said: 'You were literally s**t hot if you had a bag from River Island. I used to go shopping there for chunky belts, vest tops, crushed velvet and cargo trousers, like All Saints, which we'd wear with Timberland boots, obviously. I think glitter make up was just starting. And, if we were going 'out out', it'd be assymetric skirts and tops with chunky necklaces.'
One of my colleages at The Independent (who's asked to remain nameless), meanwhile, shared his fond experiences of working in River Island menswear. 'On my first day, the pregnant manager, who interviewed me and offered me the role, was marched out by police in handcuffs for stealing jeans,' he reminisced.
'I got paid £4.35 an hour and used to hide in the stockroom and drink vodka and orange with the 30-year-old managers who I genuinely thought were the coolest people alive. Skinny jeans and really pointy brogues, Scouting For Girls on loop all day... there was loads of shagging going on, too, in the stockroom.'
But when I ask my teenage daughter if she ever shops in River Island when she goes to Westfield with her mates, she actually stops and stares at me with what looks a lot like... horror. 'No, Mummy. As if I go to River Island. That's for old people – like you. Or Nanny.'
Sigh. Kids today have no taste. Let's just hope the rescue plan works. They can take River Island – but they'll never take the memory of our 1990s fashion disasters.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scotsman
a minute ago
- Scotsman
Swinney: New work for bus maker Alexander Dennis being explored
The First Minister said details remain commercially sensitive Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... The Scottish Government is actively exploring a package which could deliver new work to the troubled Alexander Dennis bus maker, John Swinney has said. The First Minister said he could not provide further details due to 'commercial sensitivity'. He has asked the company to consider an extension to its consultation period while the package is developed. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad General view of the Alexander Dennis site at Camelon, near Falkirk | PA Last month, Alexander Dennis announced it was proposing to consolidate its UK operations at a single site in Scarborough, North Yorkshire. The decision puts 400 jobs at risk at its facility in Falkirk in another blow to the Forth Valley, which has already seen more than 400 jobs go at the Grangemouth refinery this year. Mr Swinney said: 'Scottish ministers place the utmost importance on the presence of Alexander Dennis in Scotland and the retention of its highly skilled manufacturing workers. 'The Scottish Government has committed to exploring any and all viable options throughout the consultation period to allow the firm to retain its skilled employees and manufacturing and production facilities. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'While I cannot provide details due to commercial sensitivity at this time, I hope this update provides the workforce and local community with further assurance that the Scottish Government remains wholly committed to supporting the future of bus manufacturing in Scotland. 'We will undertake this work in tandem with every other short, medium and long-term opportunity we continue to explore in close collaboration with the company, Unite, GMB, Scottish Enterprise, Transport Scotland and the UK Government.' Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes will meet with the unions GMB and Unite today to update them on the proposal. Labour previously accused Holyrood ministers of overlooking Scottish industry in favour of ordering buses from China. Mr Swinney argued state aid regulations – in the form of the UK-wide Subsidy Control Act – prevent the Government from directly procuring from a single supplier like Alexander Dennis. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Speaking to The Scotsman last month, Scottish Secretary Ian Murray said: "They [the Scottish Government] have to look themselves in the mirror. But they should be leaving no stone unturned about how we can keep this bus company open."


Times
2 minutes ago
- Times
The wealth raid gamble that isn't paying off
A Treasury plan to bolster the public purse through higher taxes seems to have backfired. New figures show that the amount of capital gains tax (CGT) paid has plummeted from £14.6 billion in 2022-23 to £12.1 billion the year after. This is despite rule changes that were designed to raise more tax. The number of taxpayers caught in the CGT net did however edge up from 376,000 to 378,000, according to HM Revenue & Customs data. Lizzie Murray from the London tax firm Saffery said: 'The figures present a slight paradox: while increasing numbers have been forced to pay tax, the actual amount paid to the government has dropped significantly compared with previous years. 'So although the rule changes brought more people into the scope of CGT, taxpayers appear to be actively managing their affairs to reduce their tax bills under the new regime.' CGT is a tax paid on the sale of most assets, including second homes. You used to be able to make up to £12,300 of profit tax-free each year, but the allowance was cut to £6,000 in April 2023 and halved again to £3,000 in April 2024 — a reduction by the former Conservative government that is not yet reflected in the latest CGT figures. The new Labour government put CGT rates up in October — basic-rate taxpayers now pay a flat rate of 18 per cent on all profits above the allowance, up from 10 per cent on all assets except property, while higher-rate taxpayers pay 24 per cent, up from 20 per cent on assets except property. These changes will also not be reflected in the latest data. Capital gains are added to your income, so you will be classed as a higher-rate taxpayer for CGT if your taxable gains (your profit minus the CGT allowance) plus your taxable income (your income minus the £12,570 personal allowance) come to more than £37,700 a year. • How much one year of Labour has cost you Shaun Moore from the financial advice firm Quilter said the policy changes had prompted 'behavioural shifts' that had dented the Treasury's tax take. CGT is a fairly easy tax to avoid or postpone. This is because it is often within your control to decide when to sell the asset that will trigger a tax bill. 'If the tax will be higher than they would prefer to pay, many can easily avoid it by just not selling the asset in the first place,' said Joseph Adunse from the accountancy firm Moore Kingston Smith. 'It's something very much in their control, which is different to things like income tax where if the rate increases, you still have the same salary so you just pay more tax.' Adunse said he had many clients looking to mitigate their CGT bill. The idea that policy changes affect taxpayer behaviour is illustrated by the Laffer Curve, an economic theory which suggests that there is an optimal tax rate to maximise Treasury coffers. The general idea is that very high and very low tax rates will lead to reduced receipts. Too low and the tax system will not bring in enough money, but too high and taxpayers will find ways to avoid paying or leave the country altogether. Shifting taxpayer behaviour is more of a risk with CGT than other forms of taxes, according to Chris Etherington from the tax firm RSM UK. He said: 'A large proportion of CGT revenues derive from a small number of taxpayers, so you only have to change a few people's behaviour to lower receipts. In fact, about 2,000 people account for 37 per cent of the capital gains that are subject to tax.' Other factors could have played a part in the drop in CGT receipts. Julian Jessop, formerly of the Institute of Economic Affairs, a free market think tank, said that many had sold assets sooner than they otherwise might have done because they were worried that a Labour government would ramp up wealth taxes. 'There is plenty of anecdotal evidence that Labour's tax policies are pushing the limits of the Laffer Curve,' he said. 'This is also consistent with economic theory and past experience — most countries that adopted wealth taxes have since abandoned them.' The Office for Budget Responsibility now expects CGT receipts to reach £25.5 billion by 2029-30, although this is £5.5 billion less than it had originally forecast in October. A big increase is expected in 2025-26, when those who sold assets in the lead up to October's budget will need to pay their tax bill. Etherington said: 'The government will be hoping to receive this anticipated windfall. The question then is whether this can be sustained, or whether domestic and geopolitical affairs will put the brakes on CGT receipts in the future.' You do not have to pay CGT on the sale of your main home, your car, investments held in an Isa or a pension, Premium Bond gains or lottery winnings, but you should expect a tax bill on the profit you make from selling most other assets. You will also pay CGT when you give something away, trade it for another asset or get compensation based on an item's value, such as if something is stolen or destroyed in an accident. But there are simple ways to set up your finances to lower these bills. Use all your Isa and pension allowances because any gains made from investments held within these 'wrappers' are free from CGT. • Why the super-rich are leaving Britain If you are married or in a civil partnership, look at your tax allowances and tax rates as a combined entity. Adunse said: 'If one of the couple isn't earning income, they would have a lower tax rate, so making investments with a potential CGT liability in their name can mean that you pay a lower rate.' Another option is to offset your gains against your losses. This is called crystallisation and you can do it with losses made up to four years ago. Gifts to charity are also free from CGT, so if you usually give a hefty sum of cash, consider giving the charity the asset that you would have paid CGT on instead. 'Many people may not realise that they are now likely to pay CGT and it's essential to know about the reduced allowances,' said Claire Trott from the financial advice firm St James's Place. 'What may have once been a straightforward sale, could now result in a tax bill.' The Treasury said: 'These figures cover the previous government. The annual exemption ensures people are not taxed on low levels of capital gain, and the current levels remain at an appropriate level to fulfil this while helping to fund essential public services.'


BBC News
2 minutes ago
- BBC News
Plans for Staines four-star hotel by River Thames fall through
Plans for a riverside four-star hotel in Surrey have fallen through after the council decided that the project was "no longer practical".Spelthorne Borough Council had been working with Arora Group to agree plans to regenerate the land under Bridge Street car park in Staines, which would include developing the the council has now said it has agreed to terminate the lease for the site, subject to approval at a full council meeting in Sexton, leader of the council, cited the upcoming reorganisation of local government as a driving factor in the decision. She said: "While this was a difficult decision, it reflects our responsibility to adapt to new priorities and the reorganisation of local government means we must reassess what is right for Staines."We remain committed to creating a vibrant future for the town and will work closely with the community as we plan the next steps for this important site."Under the original plans signed in February, Arora had agreed to lease the site to develop the site of the car park and neighbouring Hanover development would have included creating a four-star hotel by the side of the River declined to comment on the decision.A council spokesperson added that it would be continuing to look at future options for the site, which will continue to operate as a public car park in the government reorganisation plans will see councils in Surrey disbanded and reformed into a number of unitary authorities as part of national government devolution plans.