Federated Farmers Welcomes Freshwater Regulations Review
"We're pleased to see all options are on the table and that consultation will be open until 27 July," Federated Farmers freshwater spokesperson Colin Hurst says.
"The previous Government's freshwater rules were completely unworkable for farmers. In some cases, even if you converted a whole catchment to native forest, you still wouldn't have achieved the bottom lines.
"The current Government simply had to push pause on these rules - and now we're seeing steps towards more sensible national direction to local authorities."
Hurst says it's particularly welcome that the Government wants a more balanced approach to Te Mana o Te Wai.
"That concept, as pursued by the previous Government, has been unworkable and highly problematic.
"It was unclear how councils should interpret and apply what was a vague concept of protecting the mana and mauri of water under Labour's rules, and what that might mean for our farms and rural communities."
Under Te Mana o te Wai, the health and wellbeing of water is put ahead of all other considerations, including human health, and social, cultural and economic wellbeing.
"That seems wildly imbalanced. The Government's announcements today recognise such a strict hierarchy is flawed."
The consultation document says: "Multiple objectives require councils to provide for multiple outcomes and can better reflect the interests of all water users."
"Federated Farmers absolutely agrees with this. In fact, we believe it's worth considering whether Te Mano o te Wai is a concept that should be scrapped altogether, which is one of the options now on the table," Hurst says.
Another big question is whether it's worth making these freshwater changes right now under the current Resource Management Act (RMA), or if this should wait until the Government has reformed the RMA, with the freshwater changes to follow.
"Federated Farmers will be reading through the detail of today's announcement and going back to the Government with our position, on behalf of our members, in the next few weeks."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
2 hours ago
- NZ Herald
British Prime Minister expected to set out proposals in what insiders envisage as public ‘moment'
Emmanuel Macron, the French President, last week became the first leader of a G7 nation to announce that he would take the step , with the formal change coming at the United Nations General Assembly in September. It came after weeks of private discussions with the United Kingdom and other allies about how and when to announce the recognition of Palestine. British officials have long favoured attaching conditions to the move to deliver tangible changes in the stance taken by Hamas, the terror group that rules Gaza and was responsible for the October 7, 2023 attacks on Israel. Macron argued that the announcement alone could trigger progress towards peace. Today Donald Trump, the United States President, appeared to clear the way for Starmer to change the UK's stance on recognition, saying the Prime Minister was free to take a new position. But No 10 will still be carefully calibrating Washington's reaction to any new declaration after Marco Rubio, the US Secretary of State, last week accused Macron of serving 'Hamas propaganda'. Today a US State Department spokesman described a United Nations conference to discuss recognition of Palestine – being attended by David Lammy, the Foreign Secretary – as 'unproductive and ill-timed'. The spokesman said: 'This is a publicity stunt that comes in the middle of delicate diplomatic efforts to end the conflict'. Around 150 of the countries that are members of the UN, some three-quarters of the total, have already recognised Palestine as a state – but not the UK, the US or the biggest European economies. Britain's long-standing position has been that the step will be taken but only when it can help the peace process in the Middle East. The images of malnutrition in Gaza, including of starving children, that have made the front pages as Israel limits access to aid have fuelled renewed debate within the UK about recognition. Behind the scenes, Cabinet ministers including Angela Rayner, the Deputy Prime Minister, and Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, are pushing Sir Keir to take the step. Last week, 135 Labour MPs signed a letter calling for the recognition of Palestinian statehood, while Labour mayors and the party's Scottish leadership are also piling on the pressure. Starmer has recalled his Cabinet from the northern summer parliamentary recess for a discussion about Gaza at 2am Wednesday NZT which is expected to include the approach on statehood and increased delivery of aid. Speaking to reporters during his meeting with Trump in Scotland today, the Prime Minister made clear his shock at the photographs of starvation coming from Gaza. He said: 'Certainly, speaking for the British public and myself, those images of starving children in particular are revolting and there's a sense of revulsion in the British public at what they're seeing. And they know and we know that humanitarian aid needs to get in at speed, at volume.' Trump also publicly pressed Israel to do more to get food to the Palestinians, saying there was 'real starvation' in Gaza and that the US would be setting up places with 'no boundaries' that people could reach by walking. Starmer has been hardening his rhetoric on recognising Palestine in recent days, when he also has been talking to both Macron and Friedrich Merz, the German Chancellor, about Gaza. On Friday NZT, he said it was the 'inalienable right' of Palestinians to have their own state. The following day he said he was 'unequivocal' that recognition was necessary for 'lasting peace'. But placing caveats on the declaration when he unveils his plan later this week, rather than announcing the move immediately, would risk a backlash from some in Labour. Labour MPs have expressed concerns to the Telegraph that delays could benefit the new hard-left party being set up by Jeremy Corbyn, the former Labour leader, which is championing Palestine. One Labour MP said: 'There are millions of voters deeply worried about Gaza. I think the Government are in deep trouble on the issue. 'They need to move fast but it may be too late to win voters back … This is why so many Labour MPs are so worried about their own seats.' Sir Keir is taking part in discussions, led by Jordan, about whether aid can be dropped into Gaza to help ease malnutrition. At the weekend, Israel announced that it would suspend fighting in three areas of Gaza for 10 hours a day and open secure routes for aid delivery. Starmer's official spokesman said the plan coming later this week would build 'on the collaboration to date that paves the way to a long-term solution on security in the region'. He added: 'The Prime Minister will be presenting that plan to other key allies, including the US and Arab states, over the coming days, and indeed convening Cabinet this week. You can expect to see more coming out of that.'
1News
4 hours ago
- 1News
Bay of Islands hapū achieves Ngāpuhi-first Treaty milestone
A Bay of Islands trust representing four Ngāpuhi hapū groupings has achieved a major milestone in its Treaty of Waitangi negotiations. The Trust received its Crown Deed of Mandate recognition on July 16 - the first for a group of Ngāpuhi hapū. Te Whakaaetanga Trust chairperson Herb Rihari (Ngāti Torehina ki Matakā) said the milestone was of 'historical significance'. 'Te Whakaaetanga is looking forward to discussing and negotiating the full spectrum of their redress options,' Rihari said. Ngāpuhi — New Zealand's largest iwi with almost 185,000 people — has not yet achieved Treaty of Waitangi settlement. ADVERTISEMENT The hapū grouping's area of claim encompasses most of Pēwhairangi/the Bay of Islands. It includes the eastern Bay of Islands' Ipipiri Islands where wealthy American writer Zane Grey set up his gamefishing base at Urupukapuka Island's Otehei Bay in 1926 and described New Zealand as the 'Angler's El Dorado'. It also includes Motukōkako (Piercy Island) which features the internationally-famous Hole in the Rock boat trip tourist destination, and Cape Brett. Rihari said Te Whakaaetanga Trust's Crown Deed of Mandate had been recognised after 18 years' mahi. Te Whakaaetanga Trust's achievement comes 14 years after the Government's controversial 2011 Tūhorunuku Deed of Mandate, which was towards a single settlement for all of Ngāpuhi. That Deed was rescinded in 2019, after major rejection from within the iwi's 100-plus hapū. The July Deed of Mandate meant the Crown formally recognised the trust's mandate to negotiate a Treaty of Waitangi settlement on behalf of its affiliated hapū. ADVERTISEMENT The morning's headlines in 90 seconds, including the atmospheric river arrives, Epstein's girlfriend pushes for appeal, and Jennifer Lopez's wardrobe malfunction. (Source: Breakfast) Rihari said it also opened the door to "negotiate redress that acknowledges the mamae (hurt) of the past and creates meaningful opportunities for our hapū and mokopuna". 'It provides a foundation for enduring redress, cultural and economic revitalisation and the restoration of hapū mana across our rohe,' Rihari said. Te Whakaaetanga Trust represents coastal hapū Ngāti Kuta, Ngāti Manu me ngā hapū rīriki - Te Uri o Raewera and Te Uri Karaka, Ngāti Torehina ki Matakā and Patukeha. The trust is made up of two people from each of the hapū it represents. Rihari said the hapū grouping's area of claim approximately encompassed an area bounded in the north by the Bay of Islands' Purerua Peninsula. Its boundary ran from the peninsula's tip, south-east across the waters of the Bay of Islands to Cape Brett and Rāwhiti. ADVERTISEMENT Te Whakaaetanga Trust chairperson Herb Rihari (Source: Local Democracy Reporting) Rihari said the boundary then travelled south-west to Karetu. From there, the claim's western boundary headed roughly north to Tāpeka Point and included Opua and Russell settlements. It continued northwards across Bay of Islands waters including Moturoa Island on the way to Te Puna Inlet. From there it continued to the northern side of Purerua Peninsula, the claim encompassing all of the landform to the east, including the maunga (mountain) Matakā at the peninsula's tip. Treaty Negotiations Minister Paul Goldsmith told Local Democracy Reporting Northland the Crown Deed of Mandate for Te Whakaaetanga was a positive achievement. "We're pleased to be making progress,' Goldsmith said. Northland Māori leader and Te Kotahitanga co-chair Pita Tipene said it was a major milestone for Ngāpuhi hapū working towards Treaty of Waitangi redress. ADVERTISEMENT It offered a model for Ngāpuhi tribes, such as those around Waimate, Taiamai, Kaikohe and Whangaroa who were collectivising towards the same goal. Tipene said it was important the Government approached any Ngāpuhi Treaty of Waitangi hapū redress on a hapū-based commercial and cultural basis. However, Minister Goldsmith poured cold water on that. 'The Government has indicated its preference for a single financial redress for Ngāpuhi, with a small group of cultural-based settlements sitting underneath,' Goldsmith said. 'Te Whakaaetanga is now mandated as one of the groups with which we will be discussing a cultural settlement,' Goldsmith said. Rihari said the next stage would be preparation for formal negotiations with the Crown and the trust was committed to ongoing kōrero with all who 'held an interest in our shared future'. Rihari said many hands, hearts and minds — past and present — had contributed to the kaupapa of achieving the deed of mandate milestone over many years. ADVERTISEMENT 'Ehara tēnei i te mahi māmā, engari he mahi nui mō ngā uri whakatupu. Mā tātou katoa tēnei e kawe, mā te rangimārie, mā te kotahitanga, mā te aroha hoki. 'This is not easy work, but it is important work for the generations to come. Together, through unity, peace and aroha, we carry it forward.' Local Democracy Reporting is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
Otago Daily Times
5 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Electoral Amendment Bill passes first hurdle
Legislation banning prisoner and same-day voting has passed its first reading. The House heard spirited speeches for and against the controversial electoral law changes today. The Electoral Amendment Bill claims it "makes a range of systems improvements to support the timeliness, efficiency, integrity, and resilience of the electoral system". It makes a suite of changes including ending same-day voter enrolment, banning prisoner voting, changes to "treating" (such as offering free food) on Election Day and expanding anonymous political donation limits. Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith said the system was strong but needed "constant maintenance". "Confidence in the Electoral Commission has fallen in recent years, and we know the system has come under significant strain. "This bill overhauls a number of our dated and unsustainable electoral laws. The package of amendments will strengthen the system, helping to deliver timelier election results, manage the costs, clarify rules, and provide more efficient services to voters." Same-day voting did make it easier for some people to vote, but it also removed the incentive for people to get enrolled before the election, he said. "We had the Electoral Commission, on one hand, with one message saying, 'Get enrolled; get enrolled', and they were funded with many millions of dollars to encourage people to enrol, which the law says you should do; but, on the other hand, they were also saying, 'By the way, don't bother, because you can just rock up on election day and vote'. "More people heard the second message than heard the first message. As a result, more and more people were turning up and enrolling when they voted. That's led to more and more special votes and pressure on the count." Goldsmith said he had received advice that the final count, which took three weeks in the 2023 general election, could take even longer in future elections. Labour's justice spokesperson Duncan Webb said it was a dark day for democracy, arguing the changes would make it harder for people to vote. "Politicians should be making it easier for people to vote, not harder. That's how we make sure that everybody's voice is heard, that everyone gets a say, and that this democracy - this Parliament - is truly representative. Webb pointed to Attorney-General Judith Collins' report that found the proposals were inconsistent with people's rights as further reason the legislation should be scrapped. "The Attorney-General, frankly, slated this bill. I have never seen an Attorney-General's report which is so bluntly vicious and damning, saying things like 'freezing registration earlier in the voting period has the potential to harm confidence and trust'." ACT Party justice spokesperson Todd Stephenson said shifting the enrolment deadline from the day of the election to 13 days before was a "modest change". "Voting in a democracy such as ours does come with some responsibilities, and it's one of those responsibilities to actually be on the electoral roll - that's a legal requirement. "If you can't be bothered doing that within a short period before an election, you've really got to question whether you have a commitment to being a participant in our democracy." Green Party co-leader Marama Davidson said it was already clear the bill would not achieve what its proponents were promising. "This bill proposes the exact opposite of a modern and robust, effective democracy, because it intentionally seeks to deny entire groups of people and communities from having easier access to be able to enrol and to be able to vote, while at the same time it is shifting the threshold for donations to be declared." Te Pāti Māori co-leader Debbie Ngarewa-Packer said the changes were cynical. "It's not a coincidence that the very communities who would be silenced are the same communities that wouldn't vote for this government, and probably the same communities that made up the netballers on the weekend. "They say they're fixing democracy, but let's remember: this is the same government that has abolished Māori wards, introduced the Treaty Principles Bill, dismantled co-governance, Te Aka Whai Ora. And we know, again, why they do not want to see 16-year-olds voting." The legislation is now off to select committee, having passed with support from coalition partners National, ACT and New Zealand First.
