Kremlin calls minister's death ‘tragic' but gives no clues on apparent suicide
It comes amid media speculation that he was potentially facing corruption charges.
Advertisement
Mr Starovoit, who served in his post for a little over a year, was found dead from a gunshot wound – news that broke hours after a decree was issued on Monday by Russian President Vladimir Putin that dismissed the 53-year-old cabinet member.
Russian President Vladimir Putin, left, meets with Russian transport minister Roman Starovoit at the Kremlin (Gavriil Grigorov/AP)
Mr Starovoit's body was found in the Odintsovo district just west of the capital that is home to many members of Russia's elite, according to the Investigative Committee, the country's top criminal investigation agency.
It said that a criminal probe was launched into his death and investigators saw suicide as the most likely cause.
The agency said Mr Starovoit's body was found in his car, but Russian media that carried images from the scene later reported that he was found dead in a small park next to a parking lot where he left his Tesla and a pistol presented to him as an official gift was at his side.
Advertisement
The reports said Mr Starovoit's personal assistant was asked to identify his body and she was seen weeping afterwards.
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov refused to comment on the circumstances of Mr Starovoit's death, saying that investigators will have to determine the details.
'Such information is always tragic and sad,' Mr Peskov said, noting that Mr Putin was immediately informed about it.
'Naturally, we were shocked by it.'
Advertisement
Russian media reported that Mr Starovoit's dismissal and his death could have been linked to an investigation into the embezzlement of state funds allocated for building fortifications in the Kursk region, where he was governor for five years before becoming transportation minister.
Mr Starovoit's successor as governor, Alexei Smirnov, stepped down in December and was arrested on embezzlement charges in April.
Some Russian media have claimed that Mr Smirnov had told investigators about Mr Starovoit's alleged involvement in the corruption scheme and his arrest appeared inevitable.
Russian transport minister Roman Starovoit attends a meeting in Mineralnye Vody, Russia (Dmitry Astakhov/AP)
Some commentators even alleged that Mr Starovoit's associates in higher echelons could have ordered his killing to avoid exposure.
Advertisement
The alleged embezzlement has been cited as one reason behind the Russian military's failure to stem a surprise August 2024 incursion in the region by Ukrainian troops that quickly overwhelmed lightly armed Russian border guards and inexperienced army conscripts.
The incursion humiliated the Kremlin — the first time the country's territory was occupied by an invader since the Second World War.
The Russian military announced in April that its troops had fully reclaimed the border territory nearly nine months after losing chunks of the region.
Ukraine had disputed that assertion.
Advertisement
On July 1, former deputy defence minister Timur Ivanov was convicted on charges of embezzlement and money laundering and sentenced to 13 years in prison in a high-profile case that exposed rampant military corruption widely blamed for Moscow's military setbacks in Ukraine.
Mr Ivanov was the most visible figure in a far-ranging probe into alleged military graft that also targeted several other top officials who were close to former defence minister Sergei Shoigu.
Mr Shoigu, a veteran official who had personal ties to Mr Putin, survived the purge of his inner circle and was given a high-profile post of secretary of Russia's Security Council.
Mr Ivanov, 49, was named deputy defence minister in 2016 and oversaw military construction projects, as well as property management, housing and medical support for the troops.
He was known for his lavish lifestyle that outraged many in Moscow just as the fighting in Ukraine exposed glaring deficiencies in Russian military organisation and supplies that resulted in battlefield setbacks.
Mr Putin named Andrei Nikitin, who served as deputy transport minister, to replace Mr Starovoit.
Legislators in the lower house of Russian parliament quickly endorsed his appointment on Tuesday.
Mr Starovoit, who was divorced, is survived by two teenage daughters.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Trump slams Putin's ‘bulls***' amid Russia's ongoing Ukraine war
Donald Trump has called out Vladimir Putin 's 'bulls***' whilst discussing the ongoing Russian war and Ukrainian peace talks. Speaking to reporters following a meeting with his Cabinet on Tuesday (8 July), the US president said: 'I'm not happy with Putin. I can tell you that much right now," noting that Russian and Ukrainian soldiers were dying in their thousands. 'We get a lot of bulls*** thrown at us by Putin. ... He's very nice all the time, but it turns out to be meaningless,' he added. The US president also said he was considering 'very strongly' whether to give his backing to a bill in the Senate that would impose harsh sanctions on Moscow over the war.
NBC News
2 hours ago
- NBC News
Trump unloads on Putin after promising more military aid to Ukraine
President Donald Trump expressed mounting frustration with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Tuesday, promising during a lively cabinet meeting to boost U.S. military aid to Ukraine. 'We get a lot of bull--- thrown at us by Putin, if you want to know the truth,' Trump told reporters, who attended a nearly two-hour stretch of the meeting. 'He's very nice all the time, but it turns out to be meaningless.' The comments echoed his remarks from Monday, when he described himself as 'not happy' and 'disappointed' with Putin's actions. The last known conversation between the two leaders was on July 3. When asked about a reported pause for some weapons shipments to Ukraine, Trump seemed to dismiss the idea, saying he wanted to equip 'brave' Ukrainians with defensive arms. Putin 'is not treating human beings right,' he said. 'He's killing too many people, so we're sending some defensive weapons to Ukraine, and I've approved that.' At last month's NATO summit at The Hague, Trump suggested the U.S. was exploring options to send Patriot air defense missiles to Ukraine. 'They do want to have the anti-missile missiles,' Trump said of Kyiv at the time. 'As they call them, the Patriots, and we're going to see if we can make some available.' However, a subsequent shipment that included dozens of Patriot interceptors capable of defending against incoming Russian missiles was paused over concerns about low U.S. stockpiles, according to two defense officials, two congressional officials and two sources with knowledge of the decision. When pressed on who ordered the pause, Trump responded sharply: 'I don't know, why don't you tell me?' Trump also said on Tuesday that he was closely eyeing a sanctions bill targeting Russia, saying that he might support it. U.S. officials had been attempting to broker a peace deal to end the war in Ukraine, but negotiations have stalled in recent weeks. Trump had promised to resolve the conflict on the first day of his second term, though he has since claimed he was joking or exaggerating. The cabinet meeting, Trump's sixth since taking office, covered a broad range of topics, including the recent Texas floods, tariff negotiations, U.S. strikes on Iran, Hunter Biden's laptop and the disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein. He also launched into an extended screed about wind farms and a lengthy discussion about the artwork in the room. Trump also discussed a recent meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, whom he defended against his ongoing criminal trial. The two plan to meet again to focus on the Gaza conflict. 'He's coming over later and we're going to be talking about, I would say, almost exclusively, Gaza,' Trump said. 'It's a tragedy. And he wants to get it solved, and I want to get it solved, and I think the other side wants to get it solved.' The meeting highlighted the absence of Elon Musk, once a key adviser who drove an initiative to streamline government efficiency. Musk, who spent a quarter-billion dollars to help elect Trump in 2024, according to campaign finance reports, has since parted ways with the administration and threatened to launch a third political party, a move that could challenge Republican prospects. Trump appeared unfazed, responding, 'I think it'll help us.' 'It'll probably— third parties have always been good for me, I don't know about Republicans, but for me,' the president added.
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Starmer and Macron can save Ukraine. Will they?
When it comes to European security, Britain and France share a special responsibility. Once they had the world's most powerful navy and army respectively; now they possess nuclear weapons. If Donald Trump's America is unreliable, then London and Paris are the continent's final guarantors. To which you might answer: heaven help us. The fact that this obligation now rests on Emmanuel Macron and Sir Keir Starmer might be definitive proof of history's grim sense of humour. But no matter how unpopular they might be, their leadership of Europe's two biggest military powers gives them a unique duty to ensure that Ukraine survives Russia's onslaught and Vladimir Putin never launches any more wars of conquest. How should they fulfil that task? The first point is that, so far, events in 2025 could have been worse. Mr Trump and Putin might have agreed between themselves to end the conflict on Russia-friendly terms and then sought to impose this settlement on Ukraine, just as Britain and France jointly enforced the Munich surrender on Czechoslovakia in 1938. If Putin had shown even the slightest flexibility on any of his demands, this might have happened. Instead, thanks to his own obduracy, he may have missed his chance to ally with Trump and force Ukraine to surrender, with the rest of Europe watching helplessly. Putin also failed to say a clear 'yes' to the US-proposed ceasefire that Ukraine accepted as long ago as March 11. Back then, it seemed likely that there would be a truce or even that the war would end on Putin's terms in 2025. Sir Keir and Mr Macron prepared for that possibility by creating a ' Coalition of the Willing ' to deploy troops to guarantee the security and independence of whatever would have remained of Ukraine after a ceasefire or peace agreement. Now their plan is almost certainly redundant. There will probably be no truce or pause or settlement. Putin is determined to continue fighting no matter what. The fact that Russia has probably suffered a million casualties – 250,000 dead and 750,000 wounded – leaves him unmoved. A war which began in 2014 with his seizure of Crimea and invasion of eastern Ukraine may continue for many more years. For Europe, that leaves one question: how does Ukraine succeed? Given that Putin will not yield and Volodymyr Zelensky will never agree to abolish his own country, is there a credible way for Ukraine to survive an indefinite conflict? Britain and France must work alongside Mr Zelensky to devise a new theory of victory for Ukraine. One possibility would be to build upon what Ukraine has already achieved. Despite having almost no navy, Ukraine has used killer drones and missiles to achieve the 'functional defeat' of Russia's Black Sea fleet, sinking or disabling over 20 of its vessels and submarines, including the flagship Moskva. Today, this once proud unit of Russia's navy can no longer operate from Sevastopol, the Crimean city built by Catherine the Great as its home port in the 18th century. True enough, the Black Sea Fleet has not suffered strategic defeat: it still exists in depleted form. But it cannot do its job, which is to blockade Ukraine. Instead, Ukraine's seaborne exports are running at pre-war levels. Andriy Zagorodnyuk, from the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a US think tank, argues that victory for Ukraine would mean inflicting the same 'functional defeat' on Russia's occupying forces on the ground. Drones, artillery and ubiquitous sensors have already combined to turn the 600-mile frontline into the deadliest expanse of land in the world. Russian troops cannot mass for the attack without being detected and then decimated by drones and shells. Tanks and armoured personnel carriers cannot venture within five or six miles of the frontline. Hence Ukraine has been able to drive back every Russian offensive this year, inflicting huge casualties. Mr Zagorodnyuk writes that Ukraine should use its technological edge to freeze and immobilise Putin's forces, reducing them to a state of 'operational irrelevance in which Russia may still fight but cannot win'. Sir Keir and Mr Macron should put their 'Coalition of the Willing' behind a plan of this kind. They should assume no help from America and press on with ensuring that Ukraine defeats Putin by simply paralysing his invasion.
