
Flag Day feels different this year, but it doesn't have to
Saturday is Flag Day. In previous years, June 14 came and went for most people without a second thought. But this year, Flag Day is making a lot of waves — not only because of the Washington, D.C., military parade for the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary or because it coincides with President Donald Trump's birthday, but also because of the nationwide protests planned. 'No Kings' protests are scheduled across the country as a response to Trump's military parade.
Recently, it seems like there have been a lot of protests, not just those held last weekend in Los Angeles, but also outside Tesla dealerships, the May Day rallies, the Hands Off protest in April and others. While I appreciate and respect the First Amendment right to protest and exercise free speech, something that doesn't sit right with me is watching protesters fly the flag upside down.
The upside American flag was used in the past to signal a ship in distress, but both the left and the right also have employed it as a way to show dissent.
I understand that people want to protest Trump's policies, and many may feel these are dire circumstances deserving of the strongest response. But do we all still remember the outrage when Trump supporters flew the flag upside down after his conviction on 34 felonies last summer?
Upside down flag
Before recent events, I had never seen the American flag fly upside down. But it has happened before. After President Harry Truman fired General Douglas MacArthur in the middle of the Korean War, Americans turned their flags upside down in protest. According to the American Legion, the flag should only be flown upside when there is extreme danger to life or property.
In Spence v. Washington, a 1974 Supreme Court decision, the court found that desecrating the flag, including flying it upside down as a symbol of protest, is protected speech under the First Amendment. Nevertheless, it's sad to see Old Glory upside down — especially at the recent May Day protest in Miami. The protests were in response to the administration's actions against immigrants and federal workers in the first 100 days of Trump in office.
What is most troubling here is what the recent embrace of using the flag as a protest symbol reveals about where we are as a nation.
When both sides wave an upside down American flag, it signals that a lot of us believe democracy is in peril. They may be right, but have we lost sight of what the flag is meant to represent?
Stars and stripes
The flag has long been a symbol of what unites us as a nation — 13 stripes for the original colonies and 50 stars for each state. Despite our differences, the flag has served as reminder that we are united in one nation, even when we disagree.
On this Flag Day, whether that means parades or protests, take a moment and think about what the American flag has stood for in history. During the War of 1812, Francis Scott Key wrote the Star Spangled Banner, as the British attacked Fort McHenry, about the flag continuing to wave over 'the land of the free and the home of the brave.'
Old Glory has weathered wars, terror attacks, the Great Depression and elections. It has covered the coffins of service members who died while defending our rights, including the right to protest. It has been a beacon of hope for many and stood tall in our nation's darkest hours.
On Saturday, let us remember what it stands for.
Mary Anna Mancuso is a member of the Miami Herald Editorial Board. Her email: mmancuso@miamiherald.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Iran admits U.S. strikes caused 'significant damage' to nuclear sites
June 27 (UPI) -- Iran officially acknowledged its nuclear sites had sustained "serious and significant damage" from U.S. air and missile strikes last weekend. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said that while the extent of the damage was still being assessed by the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, it was undeniable that the losses were substantial and that the country's nuclear facilities "have been seriously damaged." The admission by Araghchi in an interview with Iranian state television on Thursday came amid conflicting reports on the efficacy of the unprecedented military action launched by the United States against three nuclear sites on June 21. Earlier Thursday, Iranian leader Ayatollah Ali Khanamei claimed the opposite of his foreign minister, saying damage to the sites had been minimal and instead hailing the "damage inflicted" by Tehran's "victorious" retaliatory strike on the United States' Al-Udeid Air Base in Qatar on Monday. The administration of U.S. President Donald Trump has said the strikes using 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs and long-range Tomahawk cruise missiles "completely and fully obliterated" Iran's nuclear program -- although public briefings have focused on the "primary site," a key underground uranium enrichment plant at Fordow, with few details forthcoming on the facilities at Natanz and Esfahan. U.S. officials have pushed back on a leaked preliminary report by the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency that assessed the strikes had only set back Iran's nuclear development by a few months at most, with the White House calling its findings "flat-out wrong." Araghchi said inspectors from the United Nations' nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, might never be allowed back into Iran. Iranian lawmakers passed a bill Wednesday, effectively banning any future cooperation with the IAEA, which Tehran has accused of carrying out reconnaissance on behalf of Israel and the United States. The legislation has been waived through by the Guardian Council and will go forward to President Masoud Pezeshkian's desk for him to sign into law, or veto. "Without a doubt, we are obliged to enforce this law. Iran's relationship with the agency will take a different shape," Araghchi warned. The independent London-based Iran International said Tehran was considering quitting the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. However, Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei on Thursday, reasserted Iran's right to pursue peaceful nuclear development afforded to it by the treaty, according to state-run Press TV. Citing Article IV of the 1968 agreement, he said Iran was determined to keep its nuclear program going "under any circumstances." The statement came a day after Trump, announcing fresh Iran-U.S. talks, said he wasn't interested in existing or new agreements because the only thing the U.S. would be asking for was "no nuclear." Araghchi took to social media to claim Iran had conducted itself honorably and abided by international diplomatic norms, contrasting its record against that of European countries and the United States in particular, accusing Washington of treachery for attacking when Iran-U.S. talks were still in play. "Our diplomatic legitimacy was undeniable. In every conversation I had with foreign ministers, they either approved Iran's rightful position or were forced into silence. We stood firm, and even adversaries acknowledged our position," he said in a post on X. "We have had a very difficult experience with the Americans. In the middle of negotiations, they betrayed the negotiation itself. This experience will certainly influence our future decisions." Araghchi confirmed no resumption of talks was planned despite Trump saying Wednesday that the two countries would meet "next week." White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters at her regular briefing Thursday that nothing was "scheduled as of now," but that communication channels between the United States and Iran remained active.


The Verge
38 minutes ago
- The Verge
Trump's T1 phone drops its ‘Made in the USA' promise.
Trump's T1 phone drops its 'Made in the USA' promise. This week on The Vergecast , we revisited how the flagship Trump Mobile phone suddenly swapped out its 'Made in the USA' claim for 'Designed with American values in mind.' We already had our guesses about who might really make the T1, but with new specs and screen size, we might have to do another round of investigation.
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Is Chinese history repeating itself in the US?
Scholars and commentators in both the US and China are drawing comparisons between the early months of President Donald Trump's second term and communist dictator Mao Zedong's Cultural Revolution. But some believe the way of Mao is unlikely to take root in America. CNN's Kristie Lu Stout explores the similarities and differences between the two leaders.