China probes Wuhan ex-mayor who presided over Covid response
Zhou Xianwang
served as the top Communist Party official in the Chinese metropolis from 2018 until early 2021, playing a major role in the handling of the first known outbreak of Covid-19.
Beijing's two key anti-corruption watchdogs said Zhou was suspected of "serious violations of disciplines and laws" -- a common euphemism for graft.
He "is currently undergoing
disciplinary review
and supervision investigation", according to a statement by the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection and the National Supervisory Commission.
The statement did not provide details about Zhou's alleged misconduct or the period of time during which it took place.
Zhou has served in a range of high-level roles, including from 2021 to 2023 as vice chairman of a provincial committee under
China
's top political advisory body.
Chinese President Xi Jinping has engaged in an expansive
anti-corruption campaign
since coming to power over a decade ago, ostensibly aimed at stamping out graft at all levels of the ruling Communist Party.
Supporters say the drive promotes clean governance, while critics say it serves as a tool for Xi to oust political opponents.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
37 minutes ago
- India Today
Court orders Maharashtra regulatory body to resume hybrid hearing in 4 weeks
The Bombay High Court on Thursday directed the Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (MahaRERA) to reinstate the hybrid model of hearings, i.e. allowing parties to opt for either physical or virtual appearances within four weeks. The court held that "procedural fairness includes the right of parties to choose their mode of hearing, especially when both physical and virtual modalities are feasible."advertisementThe direction came after a petition was filed by a city resident seeking timely execution of a 2020 order in his favour and requesting the court to streamline the execution proceedings before MahaRERA. The petitioner highlighted systemic delays, the absence of a mechanism for urgent hearings, lack of physical hearing options post-pandemic, and one-way communication from the bench of Justices Revati Mohite Dere and Neela Gokhale observed that while virtual hearings were introduced due to COVID-19, MahaRERA's continued insistence on a virtual-only model, despite having the infrastructure for physical hearings, was unwarranted and detrimental to access to justice.'Access to justice is a constitutional guarantee and cannot be reduced to a mere formality,' the court said, emphasising that procedural fairness includes the right of parties to choose their mode of judges noted that tribunals, created to provide speedy and decentralised justice, must be accessible in both form and bench noted that even the Apex court has said that "access to virtual hearings alone is insufficient. Denial of physical hearing, even when facilities exist, amounts to an unreasonable fetter on litigants' rights."Accordingly, the court directed MahaRERA to restore hybrid hearings, maintain a register of urgent mentions, timestamp its orders, assign fixed hearing dates and publicly display functional contact details and court made it clear that these directions are aimed at realigning MahaRERA's functioning with the principles of inclusivity, transparency, and timely adjudication. A compliance report has been sought by September 4.- EndsMust Watch
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
A slow revival: on the state of India-China ties
India's decision to restart issuing tourist visas for Chinese nationals is a strong signal that diplomacy over restoring ties rent apart by the LAC military standoff and Galwan clash of 2020 is moving smoothly. Since Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping met in Kazan last October, there have been a number of high-level meetings; the Working Mechanism for Consultation and Coordination on India-China Border Affairs (WMCC) has been convened three times. The visa decision comes a month after China reopened the Kailash Manasarovar Yatra pilgrimage. The two sides have also agreed in principle to revive direct flights, and it is hoped visas for journalists will follow. A joint statement last month said that they would hold 'certain functional dialogues' to discuss economic issues and trade, presumably to address India's restrictions on Chinese investment, and China's export restrictions on fertilizer and critical minerals. The export restrictions are causing considerable disruption in Indian technology sector companies, and even Japanese and South Korean automotive companies based in India have raised concerns over supply chain issues. The measures are expected to continue to roll out as preparations begin for the expected visit of Mr. Modi for the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Summit in August. The WMCC held on Wednesday in Delhi discussed preparations for the next meeting of Special Representatives on the China-India boundary question, to discuss dispute resolution; China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs says that it is speaking to India about New Delhi's concerns over the mega-dam project on the Brahmaputra (Yarlung Tsangpo) in Tibet. However, both sides have been muted about the reason for the rupture in ties in the first place. There has been little discussion over what prompted the Chinese PLA to transgress the LAC in 2020, which led to the Galwan clash, and what guarantees Beijing has given that this would not be repeated. While in December 2024, the government told Parliament that normalcy in ties could only follow the restoration of 'peace and tranquillity in the border areas', it appears it is now prepared to continue to normalise other parts of the relationship without achieving troop de-escalation, dismantling of infrastructure in disputed areas and buffer zones that would lead to restoring patrolling to pre-2020 levels. Ties have also been impacted over Operation Sindoor, with revelations that the PLA was in lock-step with Pakistan's army. The government must realise that restoring mechanisms of bilateral ties are not by themselves sufficient for rebuilding trust. Sweeping key issues under the carpet, without some transparency on the path ahead, could put the whole process of reviving relations at risk.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Supreme Court stays use of Bombay HC's 7/11 blast verdict as precedent, but won't halt release of acquitted accused
New Delhi: The Supreme Court Thursday stayed the Bombay High Court verdict in the Mumbai train blasts case of July 11, 2006 to the limited extent that it will not be treated as a precedent in other cases. A division bench of justices MM Sundresh and N Kotiswar Singh, however, refused to stay the release of the 11 accused who were acquitted by the high court. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Finance Others Operations Management healthcare PGDM Technology MBA Data Analytics Healthcare CXO Digital Marketing Degree Design Thinking Public Policy others Data Science Management Product Management Project Management MCA Leadership Cybersecurity Artificial Intelligence Data Science Skills you'll gain: Duration: 9 Months IIM Calcutta SEPO - IIMC CFO India Starts on undefined Get Details Skills you'll gain: Duration: 7 Months S P Jain Institute of Management and Research CERT-SPJIMR Fintech & Blockchain India Starts on undefined Get Details The bench ordered, "all respondents (accused) released and thus no question to bring them back to prison. However, on the question of law we will say that impugned judgment is not treated as precedent in any other cases. Therefore, to that extent let there be stay on the impugned judgment". Appearing on behalf of Maharashtra government , solicitor general Tushar Mehta argued that the high court ruling could adversely affect other trials under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act ( MCOCA ). Hence, Mehta sought an urgent stay on the verdict though he did not press for a stay on the release of the acquitted persons. Mehta said as far as stay is concerned, he is "not on liberty" of the accused. Live Events Referring to the high court ruling, Mehta added "there are some findings which will affect all our MCOCA trials. The judgment can be stayed and release be not hampered". The court agreed and granted limited stay on the judgment as urged by Mehta. The bench issued notice to the respondents, directing them to file their responses to the appeal filed by Maharashtra government challenging the high court verdict. In its appeal, the Maharashtra government has challenged the Bombay High Court's decision to acquit all the 12 accused in the 7/11 train blasts case of 2006, nearly a decade after a special court awarded death penalty to five accused and life sentences to the remaining. The case relates to the serial bomb blasts that occurred on July 11, 2006, in which seven bombs exploded in suburban trains on Mumbai's Western Railway line, killing 187 people and injuring more than 800 people. A special court had in 2015 sentenced five of the accused to death and seven to life imprisonment. One of the convicts died in 2021 due to Covid-19 while lodged in Nagpur jail. The Bombay High Court on Monday acquitted all the accused observing that "the prosecution utterly failed in establishing the case beyond reasonable doubts". Lambasting the prosecution, the high court ruled that the prosecution's case gave the public a "misleading sense of resolution" while "the true threat remains at large".
