Singaporean Travellers Are Prioritising Rest, Relaxation and Peace of Mind – Even While Cost-Of-Living Is Top of Mind
Rest, relaxation and peace of mind are the priority for Singaporeans, with 74% planning holidays focused on resorts and wellness, followed by enjoying cultural experiences (50%) and to have an adventure (43%). This is in line with regional findings with 65% of APAC respondents travelling to rest and relax, 50% to enjoy cultural experiences, and 40% for adventure. Destination wise, most Singaporeans are planning to travel within Asia (52%) and Oceania (19%), followed by UK and Europe (9%), North America or Canada (4%), and South America or Middle-East and North Africa (2%).
How much Singaporeans will spend on travel
Most Singaporean travellers are planning to spend between $1.2k to above $3k per trip in the coming year. The research suggests that the affordability, adventure on offer and geographical proximity is helping make Asia the go-to destination for many. 30% more travellers with lower travel budget ($1.1k and below) are likely to pick Asia as a travel destination than those with a higher budget (over $3k).
Almost twice as many travellers in the 50+ age group than in the 18-29 age group will spend more than $3k on their holidays indicating this generation are prioritising their discretionary spend towards travel. On average, compared to other markets in APAC, Singaporeans budget lesser for travelling, behind Australia, New Zealand, Mainland China and Hong Kong SAR. India budgets the least for travel, followed by Japan.
Being prepared is top-of-mind
Alongside rest and relaxation, Singaporeans are prioritising being prepared for unforeseen events. Almost all Singaporean and APAC respondents say they will purchase travel insurance (87% vs 86%), citing top concerns such as personal safety (59% vs 48%), falling sick (56% vs 40%), being scammed, robbed or pickpocketed (55% vs 40%), flight cancellations and delays (55% vs 42%), and extreme weather events (46% vs 40%).
For Singaporeans, the main reasons for buying travel insurance are to cover such unforeseen events (73%), for security or peace of mind (68%) and to cover the cost of the trip (24%). For APAC travellers, the number one reason to purchase travel insurance is for peace-of-mind (65%), followed by readiness for the unexpected (59%).
When it comes to purchasing, Singaporean travellers will purchase insurance directly from an insurance provider (55%), followed by a travel website (17%), or through a travel provider like airline, hotel or tour operator (9%).
The research also found that there are direct correlations between travel budgets, and likelihood of purchasing insurance, with those spending more than $3k on their travel almost 24% more likely to purchase travel insurance than those budgeting $1,100 and less.
Everyone's a travel influencer
According to the Allianz Partners Travel Index, word of mouth and social media are incredibly influential for Singaporeans when selecting their holiday destinations. More than half of all Singaporeans (67%), whether planning to travel or not, stated that they are inspired by recommendations from family and friends when it comes to travel locations. Similarly, majority of APAC travellers rely on recommendations from family and friends, but there is more reliance on social media among Chinese and Hong Kongers.
Those who intend to travel also cite social media as a key source of inspiration when selecting their destination, with YouTube (69%) being the main source, followed by Instagram (56%) and Facebook (53%).
While cost-of-living is front of mind for many Singaporeans, travel intentions remain high for many, especially for rest and relaxation. With the peak mid-year holidays approaching, we expect that travel demand will remain high across age groups and will continue throughout the rest of the year. The research also tells us that concerns over personal safety is leading to a more conscientious approach from travellers and they are willing to spend a little extra for peace of mind. The travel industry is unpredictable and evolving, with potential tensions ranging from bad weather events and flight delays to incidents such as lost luggage or falling ill on holiday, making it more important than ever to be prepared for unforeseen events. We would like to see all travellers, regardless of their travel budget, make travel insurance an essential purchase because we know that when the unexpected happens overseas, it can be costly. Having this extra layer of protection will provide a peace of mind, making travel a stress and worry-free experience. Vinay Surana, Managing Director of Asia Pacific, Middle East and Africa at Allianz Partners
About Allianz Partners
In the United States, Allianz Partners USA (AGA Service Company) offers Allianz Travel-branded travel protection plans and serves millions of customers each year. In addition to travel protection, the company offers event ticket protection, registration protection for endurance events and unique travel assistance services such as international medical assistance and concierge services. AGA Service Company is doing business as Allianz Global Assistance Insurance Agency in California (License # 0B01400) and Massachusetts. Allianz Partners USA is part of the Allianz Partners group. Allianz Partners is a world leader in B2B2C insurance and assistance, offering global solutions that span international health and life, travel insurance, mobility and assistance. Customer driven, our innovative experts are redefining insurance services by delivering future-ready, high-tech, high-touch products and solutions that go beyond traditional insurance. Present in over 75 countries, our 19,400 employees speak 70 languages, handle over 58 million cases each year, and are motivated to go the extra mile to offer peace of mind to our customers around the world.
For Allianz Partners USA products offered and sold in the U.S.: Terms, conditions, and exclusions apply to all plans. Plans are available only to U.S. residents. Not all plans are available in all jurisdictions. Availability of coverage, including the epidemic-related benefits and covered reasons described here, varies by product and by state. Products may not include all benefits or covered reasons described here. All benefits are subject to maximum limits of liability, which may in some cases be subject to sublimits and daily maximums. Benefits and limits vary by plan. For a complete description of the coverage and benefit limits offered under your specific plan, carefully review your plan's Letter of Confirmation/Declarations and Certificate of Insurance/Policy. Insurance coverage is underwritten by BCS Insurance Company (OH, Administrative Office: Oakbrook Terrace, IL), rated "A" (Excellent) by A.M. Best Co., under BCS Form No. 52.201 series or 52.401 series, or Jefferson Insurance Company (NY, Administrative Office: Richmond, VA), rated "A+" (Superior) by A.M. Best Co., under Jefferson Form No. 101‐C series or 101‐P series, depending on state of residence. A+ (Superior) and A (Excellent) are the 2nd and 3rd highest, respectively, of A.M. Best's 13 Financial Strength Ratings. Except as otherwise specified, AGA Service Company d/b/a Allianz Global Assistance is the licensed producer and administrator of Allianz Travel-branded travel protection plans in the U.S. and an affiliate of Jefferson Insurance Company. Allianz Global Assistance is a mark of AGA Service Company or its affiliates. The insured shall not receive any special benefit or advantage due to the affiliation between Allianz Global Assistance and Jefferson Insurance Company. Plans include insurance and assistance services. Noninsurance benefits/products are provided and serviced by Allianz Global Assistance.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
15 minutes ago
- CBS News
Mize, Torkelson lift Tigers to 1-0 shutout win over Guardians
Casey Mize threw seven innings of four-hit ball, Spencer Torkelson homered and the Detroit Tigers dealt the Cleveland Guardians their ninth straight loss, 1-0 on Saturday night. It is the fifth time during the Guardians' skid that they have not scored a run. It was the 11th time this season they have been shut out, tied with Pittsburgh for most in the majors. It is the third time Mize (9-2) has gone seven innings in 15 starts this season. The right-hander walked two and struck out four as he won for the third time in his last four starts. He threw 102 pitches, only the fourth time in five big league seasons he has reached the century mark. Tommy Kahnle worked the ninth for his ninth save. Detroit was held to two hits by four Cleveland pitchers. Torkelson's 20th homer of the season to lead off the second inning was enough, though. Torkelson drove a fastball from starter Logan Allen (5-7) just over the wall in right-center. It is the first time since 1993 that two Detroit players have hit at least 20 homers before the All-Star break. Riley Greene leads Detroit with 21. Allen allowed one run on two hits in six innings. The left-hander retired the last seven hitters he faced. It was Detroit's 10th shutout, tied for the second-most. Key moment Detroit All-Star second baseman Gleyber Torres left the game in the middle of the first inning after he took an elbow to the head while sliding into second base. Key stat Cleveland has a .165 batting average since its skid started on June 26. It is 4 for 44 with runners in scoring position, including 0 for 5 on Saturday. Up next Detroit left-hander Tarik Skubal (10-2, 2.15 ERA) looks to win his sixth straight start. Cleveland goes with right-hander Gavin Williams (5-4, 3.86), who is 0-1 in his last five starts.
Finextra
17 minutes ago
- Finextra
Context Engineering for Financial Services: By Steve Wilcockson
The hottest discussion in AI right now, at least the one not about Agentic AI, is about how "context engineering" is more important than prompt engineering, how you give AI the data and information it needs to make decisions, and it cannot (and must not) be a solely technical function. "'Context' is actually how your company operates; the ideal versions of your reports, documents & processes that the AI can use as a model; the tone & voice of your organization. It is a cross-functional problem.' So says renowned Tech Influencer and Associate Professor at Wharton School, Ethan Molick. He in turn cites fellow Tech Influencer Andrej Karpathy on X, who in turn cites Tobi Lutke, CEO of Shopify: "It describes the core skill better: the art of providing all the context for the task to be plausibly solvable by the LLM. " The three together - Molick, Karpathy and Lutke - make for a powerful triumvirate of Tech-influencers. Karpathy consolidates the subject nicely. He emphasizes that in real-world, industrial-strength LLM applications, the challenge entails filling the model's context window with just the right mix of information. He thinks about context engineering as both a science—because it involves structured systems and system-level thinking, data pipelines, and optimization —and an art, because it requires intuition about how LLMs interpret and prioritize information. His analysis reflects two of my predictions for 2025 one highlighting the increasing impact of uncertainty and another a growing appreciation of knowledge. Tech mortals offered further useful comments on the threads, two of my favorites being: 'Owning knowledge no longer sets anyone apart; what matters is pattern literacy—the ability to frame a goal, spot exactly what you don't know, and pull in just the right strands of information while an AI loom weaves those strands into coherent solutions.' weaves those strands into coherent solutions.' 'It also feels like 'leadership' Tobi. How to give enough information, goal and then empower.' I love the AI loom analogy, in part because it corresponds with one of my favorite data descriptors, the "Contextual Fabric". I like the leadership positivity too, because the AI looms and contextual fabrics, are led by and empowered by humanity. Here's my spin, to take or leave. Knowledge, based on data, isn't singular, it's contingent, contextual. Knowledge and thus the contextual fabric of data on which it is embedded is ever changing, constantly shifting, dependent on situations and needs. I believe knowledge is shaped by who speaks, who listens, and what about. That is, to a large extent, led by power and the powerful. Whether in Latin, science, religious education, finance and now AI, what counts as 'truth' is often a function of who gets to tell the story. It's not just about what you know, but how, why, and where you know it, and who told you it. But of course it's not that simple; agency matters - the peasant can become an abbot, the council house schoolgirl can become a Nobel prize-winning scientist, a frontier barbarian can become a Roman emperor. For AI, truth to power is held by the big tech firms and grounded on bias, but on the other it's democratizing in that all of us and our experiences help train and ground AI, in theory at least. I digress. For AI-informed decision intelligence, context will likely be the new computation that makes GenAI tooling more useful than simply being an oft-hallucinating stochastic parrot, while enhancing traditional AI - predictive machine learning, for example - to be increasingly relevant and affordable for the enterprise. Context Engineering for FinTech Context engineering—the art of shaping the data, metadata, and relationships that feed AI—may become the most critical discipline in tech. This is like gold for those of us in the FinTech data engineering space, because we're the dudes helping you create your own context. I'll explore how five different contextual approaches, all representing data engineering-relevant vendors I have worked for —technical computing, vector-based, time-series, graph and geospatial platforms—can support context engineering. Parameterizing with Technical Computing Technical computing tools – think R, Julia, MATLAB and Python's SciPy stack - can integrate domain-specific data directly into the model's environment through structured inputs, simulations, and real-time sensor data, normally as vectors, tables or matrices. For example, in engineering or robotics applications, an AI model can be fed with contextual information such as system dynamics, environmental parameters, or control constraints. Thus the model can make decisions that are not just statistically sound but also physically meaningful within the modeled system. They can dynamically update the context window of an AI model, for example in scenarios like predictive maintenance or adaptive control, where AI must continuously adapt to new data. By embedding contextual cues, like historical trends, operational thresholds, or user-defined rules, such tools help ground the model's outputs in the specific realities of the task or domain. Financial Services Use Cases Quantitative Strategy Simulation Simulate trading strategies and feed results into an LLM for interpretation or optimization. Stress Testing Financial Models Run Monte Carlo simulations or scenario analyses and use the outputs to inform LLMs about potential systemic risks. Vectors and the Semantics of Similarity Vector embeddings are closely related to the linear algebra of technical computing, but they bring semantic context to the table. Typically stored in so-called vector databases, they encode meaning into high-dimensional space, allowing AI to retrieve through search not just exact matches, but conceptual neighbors. They thus allow for multiple stochastically arranged answers, not just one. Until recently, vector embeddings and vector databases have been primary providers of enterprise context to LLMs, shoehorning all types of data as searchable mathematical vectors. Their downside is their brute force and compute-intensive approach to storing and searching data. That said, they use similar transfer learning approaches – and deep neural nets – to those that drive LLMs. As expensive, powerful brute force vehicles of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), vector databases don't simply just store documents but understand them, and have an increasingly proven place for enabling LLMs to ground their outputs in relevant, contextualized knowledge. Financial Services Use Cases Customer Support Automation Retrieve similar past queries, regulatory documents, or product FAQs to inform LLM responses in real-time. Fraud Pattern Matching Embed transaction descriptions and retrieve similar fraud cases to help the model assess risk or flag suspicious behavior. Time-Series, Temporal and Streaming Context Time-series database and analytics providers, and in-memory and columnar databases that can organize their data structures by time, specialize in knowing about the when. They can ensure temporal context—the heartbeat of many use cases in financial markets as well as IoT, and edge computing- grounds AI at the right time with time-denominated sequential accuracy. Streaming systems, like Kafka, Flink, et al can also facilitate the real-time central nervous systems of financial event-based systems. It's not just about having access to time-stamped data, but analyzing it in motion, enabling AI to detect patterns, anomalies, and causality, as close as possible to real time. In context engineering, this is gold. Whether it's fraud that happens in milliseconds or sensor data populating insurance telematics, temporal granularity can be the difference between insight and noise, with context stored and delivered by what some might see as a data timehouse. Financial Services Use Cases Market Anomaly Detection Injecting real-time price, volume, and volatility data into an LLM's context allows it to detect and explain unusual market behavior. High-Frequency Trading Insights Feed LLMs with microsecond-level trade data to analyze execution quality or latency arbitrage. Graphs That Know Who's Who Graph and relationship-focussed providers play a powerful role in context engineering by structuring and surfacing relationships between entities that are otherwise hidden in raw data. In the context of large language models (LLMs), graph platforms can dynamically populate the model's context window with relevant, interconnected knowledge—such as relationships between people, organizations, events, or transactions. They enable the model to reason more effectively, disambiguate entities, and generate responses that are grounded in a rich, structured understanding of the domain. Graphs can act as a contextual memory layer through GraphRAG and Contextual RAG, ensuring that the LLM operates with awareness of the most relevant and trustworthy information. For example, graph databases - or other environments, e.g. Spark, that can store graph data types as accessible files, e.g. Parquet, HDFS - can be used to retrieve a subgraph of relevant nodes and edges based on a user query, which can then be serialized into natural language or structured prompts for the LLM. Platforms that focus graph context around entity resolution and contextual decision intelligence can enrich the model's context with high-confidence, real-world connections—especially useful in domains like fraud detection, anti-money laundering, or customer intelligence. Think of them as like Shakespeare's Comedy of Errors meets Netflix's Department Q. Two Antipholuses and two Dromios rather than 1 of each in Comedy of Errors? Only 1 Jennings brother to investigate in Department Q's case, and where does Kelly MacDonald fit into anything? Entity resolution and graph context can help resolve and connect them in a way that more standard data repositories and analytics tools struggle with. LLMs cannot function without correct and contingent knowledge of people, places, things and the relationships between them, though to be sure many types of AI can also help discover the connections and resolve entities in the first place. Financial Services Use Cases AML and KYC Investigations Surface hidden connections between accounts, transactions, and entities to inform LLMs during risk assessments. Credit Risk Analysis Use relationship graphs to understand borrower affiliations, guarantors, and exposure networks. Seeing the World in Geospatial Layers Geospatial platforms support context engineering by embedding spatial awareness into AI systems, enabling them to reason about location, proximity, movement, and environmental context. They can provide rich, structured data layers (e.g., terrain, infrastructure, demographics, weather) that can be dynamically retrieved and injected into an LLM's context window. This allows the model to generate responses that are not only linguistically coherent but also geographically grounded. For example, in disaster response, a geospatial platform can provide real-time satellite imagery, flood zones, and population density maps. This data can be translated into structured prompts or visual inputs for an AI model tasked with coordinating relief efforts or summarizing risk. Similarly, in urban planning or logistics, geospatial context helps the model understand constraints like traffic patterns, zoning laws, or accessibility. In essence, geospatial platforms act as a spatial memory layer, enriching the model's understanding of the physical world and enabling more accurate, context-aware decision-making. Financial Services Use Cases Branch Network Optimization Combine demographic, economic, and competitor data to help LLMs recommend new branch locations. Climate Risk Assessment Integrate flood zones, wildfire risk, or urban heat maps to evaluate the environmental exposure of mortgage and insurance portfolios. Context Engineering Beyond the Limits of Data, Knowledge & Truths Context engineering I believe recognizes that data is partial, and that knowledge and perhaps truth or truths needs to be situated, connected, and interpreted. Whether through graphs, time-series, vectors, tech computing platforms, or geospatial layering, AI depends on weaving the right contextual strands together. Where AI represents the loom, the five types of platforms I describe are like the spindles, needles, and dyes drawing on their respective contextual fabrics of ever changing data, driving threads of knowledge—contingent, contextual, and ready for action.
Glasgow Times
17 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Carter: England looked scared in Euro 2025 defeat to France
After Alessia Russo's goal was disallowed on VAR review, the defending champions conceded two goals in the space of three minutes in the first-half, making their route to three points all the more difficult. Despite a late stirring of pressure that followed Keira Walsh's 87th minute strike from range, England fell to defeat - the first-ever for Sarina Wiegman at a major tournament. Starting left-back Carter, who was given the challenge of dealing with Delphine Cascarino, believes England were too concerned by their opponents heading into the match. 'We played like we looked scared today. We weren't aggressive enough. We worried about their threats in behind and what they could do rather than doing what we could do,' she explained. 'We didn't do as well on the ball or off the ball. I feel like the only positive to take is that last 10 minutes. 'For me, watching it from the side, I really believed that we would get a goal and I really felt that we could get a second goal. 'We have to focus on that 10 minutes that we did have at the end and take that into the next game.' Thanks for your fantastic support in Zürich and back home ❤️ Now it's time to recover and reset - we'll see you all on Wednesday, #Lionesses fans 👊 — Lionesses (@Lionesses) July 5, 2025 That final 10 minutes was inspired in part by the introduction of 19-year-old Michelle Agyemang in the 86th minute, and further spurred on by Walsh's consolation goal a minute later. The Chelsea midfielder collected the ball on the edge of the box from a corner before taking a touch and sublimely firing home for just her second England goal. But it was Agyemang who brought intent as a fourth attacker in place of centre-back Alex Greenwood, providing the travelling supporters with a reason to cheer in a grandstand finish. 'She's great. She's an incredible talent and, even better, she's an incredible person,' said Carter of the England youngster. 'Having someone like her to bring on, I think that we do have depth in our subs and the players that came on today really showed that and made a really big impact. 'I'm really happy that Michelle's in the squad because she's been a great asset for us.' The damage, however, was already done and the scoreline arguably flattered England. Sarina Wiegman's side struggled to get back into the game after Russo's goal had been ruled out for Beth Mead's offside in the build-up, though the margin was a matter of millimetres. What ensued was a series of misplaced passes, sloppy turnovers and squandered chances as the Lionesses struggled to regain a foothold in a game that France dominated. 'We all have days where we're having a bit of a mare on the ball and, unfortunately, today there was more than one player doing that,' reflected Carter. 'We all made a lot of mistakes today that we wouldn't normally make. As much as we need to go over it and make sure we do it better, there's also a lot of mistakes in there that were just uncharacteristic of the players to be making. 'The only thing that we can do is review it and try our best to work on those things in training and do better for the next game.' Doing better is now a must if England are to progress from the group stages. They have arguably the toughest billing of fixtures in the so-called 'group of death' as they face a Netherlands side on Wednesday buoyed by 3-0 victory over Wales. For Carter, though, despite the loss the task remains the same as it always has: win. 'I don't think [the aim] is any different than before the tournament started,' she said. 'We knew that we had to win games and we set out to win every single game and that doesn't change now. 'We go to the Netherlands and we try to win the same way we would have, even if we'd have won tonight.'
