
Ukrainian officials arrested in ‘large scale' drone bribery scheme
Just three days after Zelensky restored the independence of Ukrainian's top anti-corruption agencies following fierce public backlash, the prez said the National Anti-corruption Bureau of Ukraine and the Specialized Anti-corruption Prosecutor's Office unveiled a plot by a sitting lawmaker, two local officials and several national guard service members to skim money meant to defend their nation.
'The essence of the scheme was to conclude state contracts with supplier companies at deliberately inflated prices,' the agencies added Saturday in a statement, noting the kickbacks to the officials were up to 30% of the contracts' inflated costs.
Advertisement
4 At least four Ukrainian officials were arrested in an alleged kickback scheme involving the government's purchase of drones.
Getty Images
4 The charges came days after Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky (center) and lawmakers were pressured to restore the independence of Kyiv's top two anti-corruption agencies.
UKRAINIAN PRESIDENTIAL PRESS SERVICE/AFP via Getty Images
The plot involved heads of district and city military civil administrations who allegedly helped cook the books on the purchases of drones and electronic jamming equipment — vital tools used to intercept the ever-escalating bombardments from Ukraine's Russian invaders.
Drones have proven to be key to Ukraine's attacks on Moscow, too, with the majority of Ukrainian attacks on Russian military assets involving UAVs, including a recent overnight strike on an oil depot.
Advertisement
'Unfortunately, these corruption schemes involved the procurement of electronic warfare systems and FPV drones. … There must be full and fair accountability for this,' Zelensky said on social media.
'There can only be zero tolerance for corruption. Clear teamwork to expose corruption and, as a result, a just sentence,' he said.
4 The scheme involved a Ukrainian lawmaker, two local officials and National Guard Service members, authorities said.
REUTERS
Advertisement
While Ukrainian officials did not name the suspects in the case, the president said four people have been arrested so far.
Ukraine's Interior Ministry added that the National Guard personnel implicated in the scheme were removed from their positions as the prosecutor's office moves forward with the case.
The arrests come after the independence of NABU and SAPO were secured Thursday following nationwide protests over Zelensky ratifying a bill that would have put a political appointee in charge of the agencies.
4 The procurement of the jamming equipment used to defend Ukraine from Russia's ever-escalating missile and drone attacks also was involved in the bribery plot.
via REUTERS
Advertisement
While Zelensky initially defended the move as a means to weed out Russian influence in the agencies, he later agreed to let the agencies operate as they were.
NABU and SAPO were born following Ukraine's Revolution of Dignity in 2014, which called for a major clean up of Kyiv after ousting pro-Russian President Viktor Yanukovych, whose administration was marred in corruption.
The agencies have previously targeted some of Zelensky's close allies, including former Deputy Minister Oleksiy Chernyshov, with the cases often causing major shakeups in Kyiv while its leadership tries to focus on the war.
Critics have warned Zelensky that ongoing corruption undermines Ukraine's ability to fight back against Russia, as well as threatens the country's hopes of joining the European Union.
With Post wires
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
22 minutes ago
- The Hill
The Memo: Putin and Netanyahu vex Trump on the world stage
Two foreign leaders have become more vexing to President Trump than he expected: Russian President Vladimir Putin and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Each of them has complicated the political calculus for Trump on the world stage, owing not only to the suffering each of them has imposed on Ukrainians and Palestinians, respectively, but also to their reluctance to change course. The president's shift in attitude has been starkest in relation to Putin, who has resisted Trump's urging to bring down the curtain on the war in Ukraine. Russia started the war by invading its neighbor in February 2022. On Friday, Trump announced he had ordered two nuclear submarines to unspecified 'appropriate regions' in response to 'highly provocative statements' from Moscow. The backstory to that move lies in Trump's declaration earlier in the week, during a trip to Scotland, that he was tightening his deadline for Russia to work toward a ceasefire. The president said he was bringing the time frame down to '10 or 12 days.' Moscow responded with a shoulder shrug, however. A Kremlin spokesperson said the nation had developed 'a certain immunity' to such threats. The sequence of events — and the general tone toward Putin — is a massive difference from late February, when Trump and Vice President Vance berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in the Oval Office for his supposed ingratitude over American assistance. Several times earlier in the year, Trump appeared to blame Ukraine for starting the war. In April, he said of Zelensky: 'When you start a war, you've got to know that you can win the war, right? You don't start a war against somebody that's 20 times your size and then hope that people give you some missiles.' The reason for the recent change in tone is straightforward. Trump wants to bring the war in Ukraine to an end and Putin is not playing ball. Trump has seemed especially irritated about Putin's propensity to have constructive or even friendly phone conversations with the president — only for Russia to launch ferocious bombardments against Ukrainian cities hours later. 'We get a lot of bulls‑‑‑ thrown at us by Putin, if you want to know the truth,' Trump said in early July. 'He's very nice all the time, but it turns out to be meaningless.' One reason for Trump's ire, presumably, is that Putin's recalcitrance places the president in a tough political spot. During last year's presidential campaign, he promised he would be able to bring the war in Ukraine to an end 'within 24 hours.' That promise has proved hollow, and no breakthrough seems close at hand. On the other hand, it seems highly unlikely that Trump will shrug off his long skepticism about U.S. aid to Ukraine entirely. That leaves the president in a kind of uncomfortable limbo, neither ending the war nor shifting the tide in Ukraine's favor. The specifics are very different with Netanyahu. But in that case, too, there are reasons for political discomfort on Trump's part. Trump's relationship with Netanyahu is in some ways even more turbulent than with Putin. The president is extremely pro-Israeli in his overall outlook. In his first term, he moved the U.S. Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem and came up with a 'peace plan' so aligned with Israeli priorities that it was dismissed out of hand even by the comparatively moderate Palestinian Authority. But Trump also fell out with Netanyahu after the Israeli prime minister recognized former President Biden's victory in the 2020 election. His annoyance then led him to air a complaint that the Israeli prime minister had allegedly backed out of what had been originally conceived as a joint operation to kill the head of Iran's Quds Force, Qassem Soleimani. The U.S. went ahead alone, killing Soleimani in January 2020. 'Bibi Netanyahu let us down,' Trump said in late 2023. Trump's actual policies have remained staunchly pro-Israeli in the first six months of his second term, but his tone has pitched in wildly different directions. He nudged the Israelis toward a ceasefire even before he took office — but seemed fairly unbothered when they broke it off in March, blocking all aid from getting into Gaza for more than two months. Trump has talked up the idea of moving the Palestinians out of Gaza, even suggesting transforming one of the most benighted places on earth into some kind of coastal resort. But he also broke early this week with Netanyahu's insistence that there is no starvation in Gaza. Trump averred that he had seen footage of children who 'look very hungry,' adding 'you can't fake that.' On Friday, Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff and the U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee visited an aid distribution site in Gaza run by the controversial Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. Witkoff said part of the purpose was to 'help craft a plan to deliver food and medical aid to the people of Gaza.' Back at home, there have been signs that the traditionally staunch support Israel has received from the right is beginning to fray, further complicating the picture for Trump. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) recently became the first prominent Republican to call what Israel is doing in Gaza a 'genocide.' Influential commentators within Trump's base, from Tucker Carlson to podcasters like Theo Von and Joe Rogan, have become more inclined to criticize Israeli policies and their effects. But none of that guarantees that the Israeli prime minister will shift. Among the counterweights are Netanyahu's repeated assertions that the war aim is not only the release of all hostages held by Hamas but 'total victory'; his desire to keep together his governing coalition, which includes extremely hard-line figures from minor parties; and his presumed interest in continuing to delay his long-running corruption trial. Trump could play hardball with Netanyahu more easily than with Putin, given the massive aid the U.S. gives to Israel. But whether he has the urge to do so is widely open to question. For the moment, it seems likely that the Russian and Israeli leaders will cloud Trump's political outlook for some time to come.


New York Post
22 minutes ago
- New York Post
CNN data guru dubs Trump the ‘most influential president this century'
CNN data guru Harry Enten has dubbed President Trump the 'most influential president this century' while rattling off the major transformations he has ushered in on tariffs, immigration and other issues. Enten argued that the president 'has been tremendously influential to a historic degree' just over half a year into his second term. 'Love it, like it, lump it — Trump's remaking the United States of America,' Enten said as he began a weekend segment on the cable news network. 'I can't think of a more influential president during this century.' Enten noted that the highest average US tariff rate in effect on another country has jumped from 2% last year up to about 18%, which is the largest rate in America since the 1930s. 3 CNN data guru Harry Enten cited President Trump's work on tariffs, immigration and executive orders to back up his assessment of 'historic' influence of the commander in chief. CNN 3 Trump has made overhauling US trade a key objective of his second term. AFP via Getty Images On immigration, the data buff noted that net migration into the US appears to be trending down sharply, by at least 60%, from 2.8 million last year. 'We may be dealing with — get this — negative net migration to the United States in 2025,' Enten said. 'That would be the first time there is negative net migration in this country in at least 50 years.' 'Trump has always run on tariffs, and he's running a hawkish line on immigration,' Enten said. 'And on both of those issues — we are seeing record-high tariff rates for this century, and when it comes to immigration, net migration, we are seeing record low levels.' 3 The president has also mounted a significant clampdown at the US-Mexico border and stepped up enforcement of immigration laws. REUTERS Based on those two factors, Enten contended that Trump is the most influential president 'probably dating a good [chunk back] into the 20th century.' Another example Enten cited was Trump's use of executive orders, having signed 180 of them halfway through his first year of his second term, surpassing all of his predecessors dating back to Franklin D. Roosevelt. Trump is one of two presidents to serve two nonconsecutive terms as president, alongside Grover Cleveland.

Wall Street Journal
23 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Ukrainians' Anticorruption Victory
Ukraine passed a law Thursday to restore the independence of two key anticorruption institutions, which is a positive end for the country's biggest political crisis since Russia invaded in 2022. Breathe a sigh of relief and give credit to the Ukrainian people for a public outcry that forced President Volodymyr Zelensky and parliament to reverse course. Lawmakers voted on July 22 to give a presidential appointee control over Ukraine's anticorruption prosecutor's office and the National Anticorruption Bureau. Mr. Zelensky argued he was trying to clear out Russian influence. Yet Ukraine has made meaningful strides against graft over the past decade, and one reason is that these anticorruption bodies were shielded from political interference. The Ukrainian public saw the danger. If safeguards against corruption are seen as faltering, Western partners will be less inclined to send weapons for the front lines and provide financing for domestic Ukrainian arms production. Backsliding on good governance would also jeopardize Ukraine's hope of eventual European Union accession. Allegations of wartime corruption are politically corrosive, and Ukrainians knew the Kremlin would try to exploit the change to sow division. That's why thousands of people in cities across Ukraine peacefully protested the law, forcing the government to backtrack last week. Their stand shows a reassuring cultural shift toward zero tolerance for corruption. Mr. Zelensky's quick signing of the reversal also illustrates that even under martial law Ukraine's leaders are accountable to its people.