‘House is gone. Cars are gone': Paul Whelan's life one year after his release from a Russian prison
'You're literally starting over,' he told CNN ahead of the one-year anniversary of the sweeping US-Russia prisoner exchange deal that secured his release.
'For people like me who have come home after five-and-a-half years, we really don't have very much. House is gone. Cars are gone. Employment's gone. No health insurance,' he said.
His post-traumatic stress disorder gets triggered in hotel rooms, after he was 'violently arrested' in one in 2018 while visiting Moscow for a friend's wedding. It was that arrest on espionage charges that started his nearly six-year nightmare of Russian detention.
Returning to his home in Michigan was an adjustment, he said, and he had even developed new seasonal allergies from being away so long.
'It took a little bit of time for me to kind of feel comfortable driving down the same streets that I used to or going to a park or doing things that I used to do, especially with my dog when she was alive,' Whelan told CNN. His dog passed away while he was in Russia.
'Doing routine things that I hadn't done for five-and-a-half, six years, and then I was doing them again, and it did take a few months just to kind of get back into the hang of it.'
Whelan hasn't been able to get a new job. Some companies won't hire people who've been in prison, regardless of whether that imprisonment was wrongful, he explained, and he's competing with people who don't have a nearly six-year gap on their resume.
'Most people understand the wrongful detention issue,' he told CNN. 'They don't know what to do with it. It doesn't necessarily fit into their policies or procedures.'
Whelan has been working with Michigan Democratic Reps. Debbie Dingell and Haley Stevens and others to pass a law 'that would fund the medical, dental and psychological care listed in the Levinson Act that was never funded, as well as to provide compensation and things like that for former hostages who were wrongfully detained,' he said.
The Levinson Act codified key parts of US hostage policy into law, including the position of the Special Envoy for Hostage Affairs, and set out criteria for making wrongful detention determinations. Additional amendments have sought to increase support for families of US hostages and wrongful detainees.
'Congresswoman Dingell has worked closely with Paul Whelan to understand and address the challenges that political prisoners face when they return home,' Dingell's deputy chief of staff Michaela Johnson told CNN. 'One of these is ensuring they have the medical treatment and mental health resources they need to recover from their traumatic experience.'
'She is working on legislation to address these issues that have been raised in her experience working with Paul,' Johnson said.
Whelan also wants to meet with President Donald Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio to discuss the matter.
Keeping in touch with former inmates
Whelan keeps in touch with fellow inmates who were imprisoned with him in a Russian penal colony in Mordovia.
That facility, IK-17, has now closed and will instead house Ukrainian prisoners of war, Whelan said. His friends have been scattered around the country, but they describe the situation as poor.
'The food is worse than what we had. Russia is having a tremendous problem with the economy. The prison guards aren't happy. There aren't enough guards to go around,' he recounted.
Prisoners, especially foreigners, are being told that if they want to get out, they have to go fight in Ukraine, he said.
Whelan also is in contact with fellow former wrongful detainees, he said, including Evan Gershkovich, who was freed with him last year. Russian-American journalist Alsu Kurmasheva and Putin critic Vladimir Kara-Murza, who is a US permanent resident, were also released as part of the sweeping exchange.
There's a sense of camaraderie among the former detainees, Whelan said, likening it to 'the Island of Misfit Toys' from the Christmas movie 'Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer.'
'It's a unique club of people from all different backgrounds were brought together not by their choosing, and we have shared experiences,' Whelan said.
Looking ahead to how he will commemorate the one-year anniversary of being freed, Whelan said, 'There's a special bottle of scotch that I have that I'll probably open, and I think I've got a box of cigars sitting around.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Buzz Feed
20 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
AI Interview With Deceased Parkland Teen Sparks Outrage
Former CNN host Jim Acosta faced backlash on Monday after sharing what he called a ' one-of-a-kind interview ' with an AI version of Parkland school shooting victim Joaquin Oliver, a bot created by his parents to honor their son on what would have been his 25th birthday. The interview — shared to Acosta's SubStack page — depicts Oliver, one of 17 who died in the 2018 massacre, remarking on the cause of death and stressing why it's 'important' to talk about gun violence in schools. The AI — when asked for its 'solution' to gun violence — emphasized a need for a mix of stronger gun-control laws, mental health support and community engagement. The bot of Oliver proceeded to speak in a noticeably higher tone before discussing the late teen's interests in the Miami Heat and Star Wars. Acosta — who declared that the technology left him 'speechless' — called the conversation 'so insightful,' telling the late teen's father, Manuel Oliver, that it felt like the first time he really got to know his son. 'People say, 'Well, AI, you know, it could be bad, it could cause all these destructive things.' This is an example of how it might actually do some good, it might help some people who have suffered tremendous losses like your family have a way to hold on to who this person was, which I think is a beautiful thing.' A show you don't want to miss at 4p ET / 1p PT. I'll be having a one of a kind interview with Joaquin Oliver. He died in the Parkland school shooting in 2018. But his parents have created an AI version of their son to deliver a powerful message on gun violence. Plus Texas State… — Jim Acosta (@Acosta) August 4, 2025 @JimAcosta Manuel Oliver and his wife, Patricia Oliver — co-founders of the gun-control advocacy group Change the Ref — have been involved in other projects that demand action against gun violence, including a school shooting video game, a play and a site that uses AI to recreate victims' voices for calls to Congress. Manuel Oliver — in a video shared to X, formerly Twitter — acknowledged that the AI was his and his wife's idea, adding that Acosta shouldn't be blamed for 'what he was able to do' in the 'interview.' 'If the problem that you have is with the AI, then you have the wrong problem,' he said. 'The real problem is that my son was shot eight years ago. So if you believe that that is not the problem, you are part of the problem.'
CBS News
21 minutes ago
- CBS News
Michigan lawmakers pitch earmarks, including a critic who called them "quid pro quo"
State Rep. Jim Desana has argued earmarks should be banned from the Michigan budget, but not the kind he's asking for: A $1.75 million grant to renovate a baseball stadium in his district at Taylor's Heritage Park. That's in part because the House has added new layers of transparency to the process, including hours of public hearings this week, the Carleton Republican told Bridge Michigan. "I think that an earmark that benefits a private individual or a private company is especially egregious, but this earmark just benefits the downriver communities, especially Taylor," DeSana said. A baseball fanatic, DeSana helps run a collegiate summer team, the Michigan Monarchs, and he personally offers pitching and batting training through a business he operates out of his home in Carleton. The $1.75 million in taxpayer money he is requesting would be used to help renovate a Taylor baseball stadium that hosts the Junior League World Series. Each year, teams from around the world come to compete for the championship — Taiwan has something of a dynasty at the moment. The money, along with matching funds from the city of Taylor and private donors, would mean "a new edifice, grandstand, new chair-back seating, press box and lighting," DeSana said. The request is a first for DeSana, a staunch conservative who has been a strident critic of earmarks, calling them a form of "quid pro quo" that allows lawmakers to pick " winners and losers " instead of seeking competitive bids, which leads to more expensive projects with more waste. But his request is different, DeSana argued in a recent interview, because the baseball field is in a public, city-owned park, and the World Series draws thousands to the area each year, generating economic activity. "I think that legitimately, this falls under that whole broad category of how to improve your community parks and recreation," he added. Michigan's earmark process has been rife with controversy for years, in part because lawmakers have tucked away requests in huge spending bills that were passed in the dead of night. Some have raised eyebrows, including grants to private firms and projects led by major donors. Others have led to criminal investigations or charges, including millions for rockets and projects led by people with political connections. But House Republicans have moved to reform the process this year under Speaker Matt Hall, R-Richland Township. Under new transparency rules he pushed, lawmakers were required to submit any earmark requests by May 1 – long before any House votes – to allow for public review. Collectively, lawmakers requested nearly $3.4 billion for 791 projects, including money for a therapy program in Warren, bridge repairs in Sheridan Township, services for 'New Americans' in Madison Heights, clock tower repairs at Jackson Community College and more. The House Labor and Economic Opportunity Subcommittee held three marathon hearings on the earmark requests last week, taking testimony from a host of lawmakers and local officials on a litany of requests for taxpayer funding. "There's a lot of needs out there, and it's just a matter of sorting through those and finding out which ones the state can and should be funding," said Rep. Nancy Jenkins-Arno, a Clayton Republican who chairs the subcommittee. Most of the requests were relatively mundane, such as a request for $2.5 million to build a jetty at the mouth of the Black River in Alcona County. "They're just dredging and dredging where, if we put the money towards the jetty to stop the sand, they would no longer have to dredge," said Rep. Cam Cavitt, a Cheboygan Republican who sponsored the request. Even as the House works through its newly transparent process, it's not yet clear what earmarks will make it into the final state budget. The Democratic-led Senate has not adopted the same earmark process, but Hall has been adamant: Grant requests that don't comply with new House rules won't make it into the budget. "I don't care who the politician is. I don't care what the program is. We're not making an exception," Hall told reporters in late April. In a statement to Bridge Friday, Hall indicated he isn't backing down, arguing the reforms "have made Lansing uncomfortable. That's a good thing." "House Republicans voted to prevent any vote on earmarks that haven't been disclosed, and the House is now bound by that rule. Senate Democrats will now have to adapt to a more open government," he added. But with both chambers locked in negotiations after missing a July 1 budgetary deadline, it's become less clear how the standoff will resolve. Gov. Gretchen Whitmer called for reforming the earmark process in her 2025 State of the State address, and at the time Brinks had sounded open to change. "The transparency issues in terms of earmarks — it's something that we've already been working on in the Senate over the last two years, so we will continue that work," Brinks told Bridge immediately following the speech. A spokesperson for Brinks didn't immediately reply to a request for comment on this story. The Senate in June approved a budget without any apparent earmarks, but legislators close to negotiations said they still expect some to make it into any final deal. The grants have usually not appeared in the state budget until shortly before final votes. The House has yet to pass a general government budget, but has passed a proposal for school funding. House Democrats joined Republicans in filing advance earmark requests but did not participate in this week's hearings, aside from a staffer for state Rep. Karen Whitsett, a Democrat who has sided with Republicans on issues in the past. In a statement, House Democrats' spokesperson Jess Travers called the hearings a "political stunt" and accused Republicans of "delay tactics" rather than passing a full state budget. "House Democrats are focused on passing a full budget that protects school lunches, SNAP and Medicaid," she added.
Forbes
21 minutes ago
- Forbes
Baseball's Antitrust Exemption Again Nears Possible Supreme Court Review
In a July 21, 2025 decision, the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed a lower court's ruling that baseball's exemption from antitrust laws – which dates to 1922 – extends to the Liga de Béisbol Profesional Roberto Clemente, Puerto Rico's top professional baseball league. Nevertheless, in so doing, the court acknowledged the Supreme Court's description of the exemption as 'unrealistic,' 'inconsistent,' and 'aberrational.' Yet the exemption has evaded the Supreme Court's review, including through a 2023 settlement of a lawsuit concerning minor league affiliates. The First Circuit's decision nonetheless may put the exemption back in the Court's crosshairs. Baseball's Antitrust Exemption In 1915, the professional baseball league known as the Federal League was forced to fold after just two seasons of play because it was unable to acquire sufficient talent. At that time, clubs in the National League and American League (operating then as Organized Baseball and known today as Major League Baseball (MLB)) forced players to sign contracts containing restrictive reserve clauses, which effectively barred players from playing for any other club without their approval. Rather than pursue litigation, the owners of seven clubs in the Federal League accepted $50,000 payments and interests in MLB clubs. The eighth and final club, hailing from Baltimore, refused the payoffs and instead initiated litigation arguing that MLB's reserve clause system violated Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act, which prohibits two or more parties in a market from reaching an agreement which unreasonably restrains that market. In this case, the Baltimore club alleged that the MLB clubs had unlawfully agreed not to compete or permit competition for the services of professional baseball players. A jury initially ruled in Baltimore's favor, awarding damages of $240,000. However, an appellate court reversed, holding that because baseball was not interstate commerce (generally a predicate for the application of federal legislation), the Sherman Act did not apply. In 1922, the Supreme Court affirmed that legal conclusion. The decision was based in part on the Supreme Court's narrow interpretation of interstate commerce in the early twentieth century and also a likely bias in favor of America's pastime. Thus was born baseball's exemption from federal antitrust law. The Supreme Court reluctantly upheld the exemption 1953 when a minor leaguer challenged the reserve system (Toolson), reasoning that baseball had developed for more than 30 years based on the understanding that it was exempt from antitrust laws and that any change to the exemption should come from Congress. In fact, legislation concerning the exemption was heavily considered in the 1950s, but no action was ultimately taken. In the same decade, the Supreme Court ruled that the exemption was limited to baseball and did not extend to other sports. The Supreme Court reached the same conclusions in 1972, turning away another challenge to the reserve system, this time by long-time major leaguer Curt Flood. At the same time, the Court clarified its position that professional baseball is interstate commerce but described the Federal Baseball decision as 'an anomaly' and 'an aberration.' After a players' strike in 1994 caused the World Series to be cancelled for the first time since 1904, Congress finally took some action. In the Curt Flood Act of 1998, Congress repealed the exemption insofar as it concerned MLB players but left it alone with regard to other areas of baseball. The Narrow Save in Nostalgic Partners In 2020, MLB and its clubs made the decision to pare down the number of minor league affiliates from 160 to 120. As had happened more than 100 years earlier, it is believed that the owners of many of the minor league teams that were cut accepted payments from MLB in lieu of litigation. But a few clubs – including the Staten Island Yankees owned by Nostalgic Partners, LLC – took the route chosen by the Federal Baseball Club of Baltimore and sued, alleging that the actions of MLB and its clubs violated the Sherman Act by refusing to do business with the excluded clubs, known as a group boycott. The clubs, represented by legendary sports law litigator Jim Quinn and his former firm Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, acknowledged their claims were likely barred by baseball's antitrust exemption. Consequently, they requested the courts to recognize the legitimacy of their claims if it were not for the exemption and then to dismiss the case as fast as possible so that they could appeal to the Supreme Court. The strategy largely worked. The case was filed in December 2021 and by September 2023, the plaintiffs had filed a robust and promising petition for review by the Supreme Court. Along the way they received some helpful language from the lower courts and briefs in support from a wide range of parties, including the United States Department of Justice, both Democratic and Republican politicians, local governments, and academics. In November 2023, before the Supreme Court had decided whether to take the case, the parties settled. While the terms of the settlement were confidential, it is generally understood that MLB paid a considerable sum to the complaining clubs in exchange for preserving its antitrust exemption. The Cangrejeros Case In July 2022, while the Nostalgic Partners' case was under consideration by a federal court in New York, another challenge to baseball's antitrust exemption was filed. But this time, MLB was not involved. In October 2019, Thomas Axon, a financial professional from New York, bought the controlling share of Cangrejeros de Santurce, one of six teams playing in the Puerto Rican professional league. The club played its home games at the Hiram Bithorn Stadium, a publicly-owned facility in the capital of San Juan. Axon and the mayor soon fell out over the stadium's condition and Axon threatened to move the club to Humacao, a city about an hour away. The league, led by President Juan A. Flores-Galarza, apparently did not take kindly to Axon's proposal. According to the allegations in Axon's lawsuit, Flores-Galarza sent a letter to Axon advising him that he had engaged in conduct 'detrimental to baseball' and to the league in violation of the league's Constitution. Flores-Galarza, with the support of the owners of the other five clubs, then voted to suspend Axon for two years. Axon sued in a Puerto Rican court to stop the suspension. However, the court curiously determined that because Axon was suspended, he was no longer a member of the league and therefore was not entitled to the protections and procedures of the league's Constitution. The league thereafter permanently seized Axon's interests in the club and sold it to Impulse Sports, with the support of the San Juan government. Axon and his business entity sued, alleging that the actions of the league, its clubs, Flores-Galarza, and Impulse Sports violated the Sherman Act and Puerto Rico's antitrust statute. Axon also alleged violations of contractual and due process rights under federal and Puerto Rican law. Of note, Axon is represented in the matter by Jeffrey Kessler of Winston & Strawn LLP, perhaps the world's most prominent sports litigator, who got his legal career started under Quinn at Weil Gotshal. In June 2023, the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico dismissed Axon's case in its entirety, primarily based on a finding that the alleged wrongful conduct was protected by baseball's antitrust exemption. On July 21, 2025, the First Circuit affirmed in part and reversed in part the lower court's decision. While acknowledging the 'longstanding criticism' of Federal Baseball, the First Circuit recognized that it 'must apply' the antitrust exemption unless and until it is reversed by the Supreme Court. Additionally, the court rejected the plaintiffs' argument that the exemption was limited to MLB, noting that the Supreme Court regularly described the exemption as applying to the 'business of baseball.' While some courts have found certain cases outside the exemption, the court found that the conduct complained of here squarely fit within the definition of the 'business of baseball.' The First Circuit nevertheless reinstated the plaintiffs' claims under Puerto Rico law. Notably, the court held that the Sherman Act did not preempt Puerto Rico's antitrust law under the circumstances since the Puerto Rican baseball league operates entirely within that territory and therefore may not 'impermissibly burden interstate commerce.' The Next At Bat The plaintiffs could have, but did not, seek review from the entire panel of First Circuit judges. The case is therefore being remanded back to the District Court for reconsideration of the plaintiffs' claims under Puerto Rico law. Alternatively, the plaintiffs have until October 20, 2025 to file a petition for review with the Supreme Court. There are reasons to believe the Supreme Court would be interested and would finally reverse Federal Baseball – the Supreme Court has been more willing in recent years to overturn long-held precedents, it has recently unanimously ruled against both the NFL and NCAA in antitrust cases, and Justice Samuel Alito in particular has written and spoken about the errors of Federal Baseball. Settlement also appears less likely given that the Puerto Rican defendants do not have the deep pockets of MLB. Consequently, baseball's antitrust exemption may finally get the Supreme Court review and reversal that has been decades in the making. Axon's counsel, Winston & Strawn LLP, did not respond to a request for comment.
