logo
There is no such thing as "decarbonized oil"

There is no such thing as "decarbonized oil"

It takes a lot to make Simon Donner lose his cool. The co-chair of the feds' advisory group on climate policy has a daily practice of swimming in the Pacific and braves the frigid water all winter long. But he couldn't bear the blather about 'decarbonized oil' spilling from the first ministers' meeting this week.
The prime minister and premiers emerged from their meeting in Saskatoon last Monday and jointly declared they would 'work urgently to get Canadian natural resources and commodities to domestic and international markets, such as critical minerals and decarbonized Canadian oil and gas by pipelines, supported by the private sector….'
Donner took to social media to denounce the whole notion of 'decarbonized oil' as 'Orwellian.' It was strong language from the co-chair of the federal Net-Zero Advisory Body (NZAB). Donner is a climate scientist at UBC studying oceans and the intersection of climate science and policy. In that role, he gets to call the fouls as he sees them. But when people accept official government advisory roles, their criticisms usually devolve into gracious gibberish.
So, it was refreshing to hear Donner push back on the statement by Carney et al. The whole idea is just plain 'silly,' he said. There is no such thing as 'decarbonized oil' — 'Oil contains carbon and emits CO2 when combusted.'
Oil is, after all, a hydrocarbon. Along with methane gas and coal, the combustion of these fossil fuels is the primary driver of climate change. You already knew that, I'm sure. But the reason it's important to spell it out is that you're in the minority. Everyone knows there's a conflict between Big Oil and the greenies. But after decades of climate denial, online disinformation and general gaslighting, there is still widespread confusion about the most basic facts — just under half of Canadians pick out 'burning fossil fuels' even when given a list of possible sources most responsible for climate change.
The marketing spin about 'decarbonized oil,' isn't new. The oil and gas industry and various agencies were talking about carbon capture on oil production last century. More recently, Natural Resources Canada published a Roadmap for the Decarbonization of Canada's Oil and Gas Sector in the Trudeau years.
The nonsensical term is a close cousin to the attempts at marketing deep offshore drilling in the Atlantic as 'net-zero.' And adjacent to the most brazen branding effort to date — so-called 'ethical oil.'
Decarbonized oil doublespeak may not be new but it was jarring coming from the mouth of Prime Minister Mark Carney, who has an undeniable grasp of the impacts of hydrocarbons. @chrishatch.bsky.social writes for @nationalobserver.com
The decarbonized doublespeak may not be new but it was jarring coming from the mouth of our new PM, who has an undeniable grasp of the impacts of hydrocarbons but nevertheless talked about 'decarbonized barrels' at the press conference following the first ministers' meeting. And it was particularly painful considering the venue — a province under a state of emergency where more than 15,000 people have fled wildfires.
Extended families are crammed into single hotel rooms and sleeping in parking lots. While the first ministers discussed their nation-building plans in Saskatoon, a group of evacuees held a protest in the city demanding more resources for firefighting and evacuation support.
It is still only Spring, but over 33,000 Canadians have already been forced to evacuate. John Vaillant, the author of Fire Weather relayed a startling conversation this week: the CEO of Red Cross Canada told him that when he started with the organization 17 years ago, 'eighty per cent of our work was outside Canada. Now, eighty per cent of our work is inside the country.'
The early-season heatwave and fire conditions on the Prairies are 'at least five times more likely than they would be in a world without climate change,' according to attribution scientists. 'These conditions, which set the stage for dangerous wildfires, will only become more frequent and more severe if we continue burning fossil fuels,' said Dr. Kristina Dahl, VP of Science at Climate Central.
The contrast was too much for another member of NZAB. ''Decarbonized oil and gas' does not exist,' wrote Catherine Abreu. '[It is] a complete contradiction in terms, and a dangerous lie that Canadian government after Canadian government has tried to spin under the spell of industry lobbying.'
It may be too early to tell who's doing the spinning and what kind of spell they're casting. Alberta Premier Danielle Smith sounded positively enthusiastic about an emerging 'grand bargain' to satisfy the demands of the oil and gas industry. But some political watchers suspect Mark Carney is spinning a political web of his own.
CNO's Max Fawcett argues that Carney is effectively calling Smith's bluff — a kind of judo move that avoids direct confrontation and puts the pressure back on her: 'He will, as Smith demanded, create the conditions for a more rapid assessment of infrastructure projects. But it's clear that one of those conditions will be the net-zero targets that Smith and Alberta's oil and gas industry have repeatedly committed themselves to.'
Politics is the art of the possible, as they say. And perhaps there's a method behind the oxymorons and doublespeak. But it's hard to shake the sense that we're kidding ourselves and avoiding the basic reckoning. Still muttering about decarbonizing hydrocarbons even as the flames close in.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Fact Check: A look at White House claims about Canada's fentanyl fight ‘failure'
Fact Check: A look at White House claims about Canada's fentanyl fight ‘failure'

Winnipeg Free Press

timean hour ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

Fact Check: A look at White House claims about Canada's fentanyl fight ‘failure'

The United States made good on its promise to slap hefty tariffs on Canada Friday as the countries failed to reach a trade deal by U.S. President Donald Trump's deadline. A fact sheet from the White House said Canada's 'failure' to address the opioid crisis was part of the reason for going ahead with the 35 per cent tariffs on certain goods from Canada. Here's a look at some of the claims made in the White House announcement, as well as the facts behind them: CANADA'S DRUG ENFORCEMENT 'FAILURE' 'Given Canada's continued failure to arrest traffickers, seize illicit drugs, or co-ordinate with U.S. law enforcement … further presidential action is necessary and appropriate to protect American lives and the national security and foreign policy of the United States,' the White House fact sheet states. THE FACTS In December, after the newly elected Trump began to press Canada about the flow of fentanyl into the United States, Canada pledged to invest $1.3 billion to bolster security at the border and strengthen the immigration system. A fentanyl czar, Kevin Brosseau, was appointed in February to co-ordinate the response. Since then, the federal government says it has invested heavily in fighting illicit drug production and trafficking, including another $200 million to target organized crime, enhanced border surveillance and staffing, 15 surveillance towers and other detection tools added to ports of entry. Canada has also deployed at the border new drones, four Black Hawk helicopters and a specialized plane for aerial surveillance, which collectively utilize infrared, heat-seeking and other advanced detection capabilities. The Canadian government says it's teaming up with the United States through a variety of joint efforts. 'Canada and the U.S. count on each other to share information, identify and protect against threats,' the Canada Border Services Agency told The Canadian Press in a statement. 'The CBSA and (U.S. Customs and Border Protection) each have officers embedded in our respective targeting centres and regularly share intelligence as well as several dedicated liaison officers working out of Canada's embassy in Washington, D.C.' The agency also pointed to its investigation in February and March, Operation Blizzard, which led to more than 2,600 seizures of suspected narcotics and precursors across the country transported through postal shipments, air cargo and shipping containers. The seizures included 1.73 kilograms of fentanyl, of which 1.44 kilograms were headed to the United States. Of the total drug seizures, the agency said, just 17.5 per cent was destined for the United States while 67.5 per cent had entered from south of the border. From Jan. 1 to April 30 this year, the agency said it seized 2.14 kilograms of fentanyl headed for the United States and 28 grams headed from the United States into Canada. Canadian law enforcement has shut down 47 fentanyl labs since 2018, data from Brosseau's office shows. SEIZURES AT NORTHERN BORDER The fact sheet says fentanyl seizures at the northern border this fiscal year 'have surpassed total seizures of the past three years combined.' THE FACTS U.S. Customs and Border Protection data shows 33.6 kilograms, of fentanyl has been seized at the northern border so far in fiscal year 2025, which ends Sept. 30. That is indeed more than the combined 26.8 kilograms seized in the 2022, 2023 and 2024 fiscal years, but it pales in comparison with the amount of fentanyl seized at the border with Mexico. The same data shows around 3,992 kilograms of fentanyl has been seized at the southwestern border of the United States so far this fiscal year. The amount of fentanyl seized coming into the United States through the northern border is 0.8 per cent of the total amount of fentanyl seized by border enforcement this fiscal year. DRUG POTENCY The White House claimed the amount of fentanyl seized at the Canadian border in the 2025 fiscal year 'could have killed more than 16 million Americans due to the drug's potency.' THE FACTS The United States Drug Enforcement Administration estimates that around two milligrams of fentanyl could be lethal. By that measure, the 33 kilograms seized at the Canadian border potentially could kill 16 million people. However, the actual number of opioid overdose deaths in the United States is measured in the thousands, not millions. Provisional data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention shows synthetic opioid deaths in the United States are trending downward, with 46,651 deaths recorded over the 12 months ending January 2025, compared with 72,718 in the previous 12-month period. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 5, 2025.

Carney expected to face trade war questions as higher tariffs remain
Carney expected to face trade war questions as higher tariffs remain

Global News

time2 hours ago

  • Global News

Carney expected to face trade war questions as higher tariffs remain

Prime Minister Mark Carney is expected to face questions about the status of trade talks with the United States on Tuesday as higher tariffs imposed last week by U.S. President Donald Trump remain in place. Carney will visit a wood product manufacturing facility, his office said and speak to reporters after the visit. That comes as Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand and Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne head to Mexico to meet with Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum on their two-day visit. They will also meet with Canadian and Mexican business leaders, 'including key players supporting North America's integrated economy, trade infrastructure and supply chains,' Anand's office said. 3:56 Ford tells Carney not to 'roll over' to Trump on U.S.-Canada trade deal On Friday, after the U.S.-imposed target date for a trade deal between Canada and the U.S. expired, Trump increased the tariffs on Canadian goods from 25 per cent to 35 per cent. Story continues below advertisement Carney said he was 'disappointed' by Trump's move. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy 'While the Canadian government is disappointed by this action, we remain committed to CUSMA, which is the world's second-largest free trade agreement by trading volume,' Carney wrote in a letter posted on X early Friday. Some in Canada have called for further retaliation. 'Canada shouldn't settle for anything less than the right deal. Now is not the time to roll over. We need to stand our ground,' Ontario Premier Doug Ford said in a statement. 'The federal government needs to hit back with a 50 per cent tariff on U.S. steel and aluminum.' Nova Scotia Premier Tim Houston indicated that his province is considering retaliatory measures of its own. 'Our government will continue its part to support our province and the rest of Canada. Make no mistake: at the provincial level, we will not hesitate to implement retaliatory measures again if they are needed,' Houston said in a statement.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store