
Countries should keep their statehood if land disappears under sea, experts say
States should be able to continue politically even if their land disappears underwater, legal experts have said.
The conclusions come from a long-awaited report by the International Law Commission that examined what existing law means for continued statehood and access to key resources if sea levels continue to rise due to climate breakdown.
Average sea levels could rise by as much as 90cm (3ft) by 2100 if climate scientists' worst-case scenarios come true, and recent research suggests they could even exceed projections. This is particularly important for small island developing states because many face an existential threat. But as well as the direct loss of land, rising sea levels cause flooding, threaten drinking water supplies and make farmland too salty to grow on.
Having waded through international law and scholarship and analysed state views and practices, legal experts concluded that nothing prevents nations from maintaining their maritime boundaries even if the land on which they are drawn changes or disappears. These boundaries give countries navigation rights, access to resources such as fishing and minerals, and a degree of political control.
There is also general agreement that affected nations should retain their statehood to avoid loss of nationality. Legal experts say these conclusions are essential for maintaining international peace and stability.
Speaking at the UN Oceans conference in Nice, Penelope Ridings, an international lawyer and member of the ILC, said the commission's work was driven by the 'fundamental sense of injustice' that sea level rise would be felt worst by the most vulnerable states, which had also contributed the least to the problem. Research has found that a third of present-day sea level rise can be traced to emissions from the 122 largest fossil fuel producers and cement manufacturers.
The Pacific nation of Tuvalu has been particularly vocal in its concerns. Sea levels on its nine islands and atolls have already risen by 4.8mm and are expected to get much higher over the coming decades.
Australia was the first country to recognise the permanence of Tuvalu's boundaries despite rising sea levels. In 2023, it signed a legally binding treaty committing to help Tuvalu respond to major disasters and offering special visas to citizens who want or need to move. Nearly a third of citizens have entered a ballot for such a visa. Latvia followed with a similar pledge of recognition.
At the oceans conference, the Tuvaluan prime minister, Feleti Teo, said his citizens were determined to stay on their land for as long as possible. The government has just finished the first phase of a coastal adaptation project, building concrete barriers to reduce flooding and dredging sand to create additional land.
Teo noted that the US$40m scheme was 'very expensive' and it had taken years to secure money from the Green Climate Fund. He urged Tuvalu's development partners to be 'more forthcoming in terms of providing the necessary climate financing that we need to be able to adapt. And to give us more time to live in the land that we believe God has given us and we intend to remain on'.
Ridings said it was now up to states to take the commission's work forward.
Sign up to Down to Earth
The planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essential
after newsletter promotion
Bryce Rudyk, a professor of international environmental law at New York University and legal adviser to the Alliance of Small Island States (Aosis), said the ILC had been very responsive to small states, which have traditionally not had their voices heard in matters of international law but are increasingly at the forefront of legal advances on climate change and marine degradation.
In recent years, Aosis and the Pacific Islands Forum have both declared that their statehood and sovereignty, as well as their membership of intergovernmental organisations such as the UN, will continue regardless of sea level rise.
The international court of justice, which will issue a highly anticipated advisory opinion on climate change in the coming months, was petitioned by Aosis to affirm this.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


STV News
an hour ago
- STV News
Starmer's disability benefits U-turn risks pleasing no one
Once the number of rebels was there in black and white, a UK Government U-turn on cuts to disability benefits was inevitable. This isn't the first time Keir Starmer has had to yield to political pressure from within his own party to change course – there have been some major about-faces already during the first year of his premiership. But this might end up being the one that people remember, that historians point back to as the moment his authority crumbled and his government went wrong. The first reason is that despite watering down his proposed welfare reforms, Starmer still faces what could be the biggest rebellion by Labour MPs since he took over as leader, when the legislation comes to a vote on Tuesday evening. While the changes are believed to have won over the majority of the 120-odd MPs who had signed a wrecking amendment, dozens of Labour parliamentarians remain who simply won't back the reforms on principle. The hardcore opponents say that cutting support for the disabled and vulnerable is un-Labour and not why they went into politics. A significant chunk of the Labour vote will agree with them. The official government analysis released on Monday, showing that the reforms will still push 150,000 people into relative poverty across the UK, rather than 250,000, will add to their argument. So will media coverage of people with debilitating long-term health conditions losing out on benefits they would previously have received – even if those currently getting support are no longer at risk of losing it. Campaigners will keep up the pressure in public, and likely in the courts, over what they say will be a two-tier benefits system. Meanwhile, the Tories will argue that the cuts to the ballooning welfare bill fall short of what's needed to get spending under control. In short, if no one is happy with the outcome, there isn't much upside for the Prime Minister. The U-turn also leaves Rachel Reeves scrambling to find £3bn more, now that the cuts won't be as deep as expected. The Chancellor was already facing questions about how she was going to stick within her fiscal rules, which prevent her from boosting borrowing, and also keep her promise not to raise more taxes. At the Budget later this year, she is widely expected to have to do one or the other – since more cuts are now seen to be politically unacceptable to Labour MPs. That all leaves Reeves' own future in doubt – and she's the only Cabinet minister so indispensable to the Starmer project that he's taken the unusual step of saying he wants to keep her in her job until the end of the Parliament. The episode has left Labour MPs in despair at the standard of political leadership from 10 Downing Street. The Prime Minister's top advisers and the party whips have blamed each other, and negative briefings have emerged about Starmer's chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney, and his relationship with his boss. Unhappy MPs have claimed the Prime Minister and his government are aloof and don't listen to outside voices that could help them avoid mistakes. When he took power, Starmer made a virtue of his qualities as a good manager rather than a political performer. His critics now say the prime minister's lack of political instinct has let him down. For Scottish Labour MPs—some of whom have broken with the government for the first time over this issue—the political damage is even greater. With less than a year until the Holyrood elections, this gives the SNP more ammunition. It all has the whiff of a government heading into its final chapters, rather than just getting started only a year after a landslide general election victory. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country


Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Global leaders tackle poverty and climate goals at Spain summit
SEVILLE, June 30 (Reuters) - A once-in-a-decade summit kicked off in Seville on Monday as global leaders face mounting pressure to accelerate progress on poverty reduction, climate change and sustainable development goals that are increasingly at risk of falling short. The U.N. chief, Antonio Guterres, said the event aimed "to repair and rev up" a system of cooperation where "trust is fraying and multilateralism is strained." While more than 50 world leaders were due to attend, a notable absentee was U.S. President Donald Trump, after the world's biggest economy pulled out of the event and refused to back a plan of action hammered out over the last year. "The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development — our global promise to transform our world for a better, fairer future — is in danger," Guterres told the opening conference session, as the region sweltered under a heat wave. "The Sevilla Commitment document is a global promise to fix how the world supports countries as they climb the development ladder," he said, even as many richer nations make deep cuts to development aid. With two-thirds of the UN's Sustainable Development Goals lagging, more than $4 trillion a year in funding was needed, and the world's financial system needed to be retooled even more quickly to make it happen. As well as helping countries raise more tax to spend on development, Guterres said reform of world development banks needed to be stepped up so they could lend more and draw in private capital. Tied to that was a need to reform the world's credit rating system to be fairer to developing countries as they attempt to invest in projects that will improve their risk ratings over time. "Countries need — and deserve — a system that lowers borrowing costs, enables fair and timely debt restructuring, and prevents debt crises in the first place," Guterres said, citing a plan to create a single debt registry for transparency, and efforts to lower the cost of capital through debt swaps.


The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Amber heat health alert extended further across England
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.