Police operation for Donald Trump visit to be biggest since Queen's death
Assistant Chief Constable Emma Bond, who is heading up the operation, told journalists at a press briefing it was set to be the biggest event for the force since the death of Queen Elizabeth at Balmoral in September 2022.
The Queen's coffin had to be transported from the Balmoral estate to Holyroodhouse in Edinburgh by road on a six-hour journey by hearse.
Asked if it was the biggest operation since then, Bond said: 'I think it probably is.'
READ MORE: 'Epstein Island' sign put up at Donald Trump's Scottish golf course
Questioned about whether it was a bigger event then the Queen's death for Police Scotland, she went on: 'I would need to go back and look at specific numbers.
'It is a significant and complex operation, it will have an impact on a number of parts of Scotland and the priority is to make sure that it passes off with the least amount of disruption and the focus is on making sure that the president is safe while he is here and can enjoy his time.'
It is not yet known where the president is planning to be on each day of his visit.
It has, however, been confirmed he will meet with Prime Minister Keir Starmer while in [[Aberdeen]] and plans are being put in place for the president to meet First Minister John Swinney.
Last time Trump visited in 2018 there were widespread protests and he was heckled as he played golf at Turnberry with his son Eric.
(Image: Colin Mearns) Police Scotland is now encouraging protesters to get in touch with them if they are planning to stage a demonstration.
Bond was asked specifically about what action might be taken around people showing support for Palestine Action and in particular whether people would be arrested if they wore t-shirts saying 'Genocide in [[Palestine]]. Time for Action'.
There have been a number of people arrested in recent days for wearing such t-shirts, which has attracted widespread concern.
Bond said she as unable to give assurances that people wearing these t-shirts would not be arrested.
On the point of Palestine Action, she said: 'Any support for Palestine Action, be that in terms of clothes worn, be that in terms of banners held, would be regarded as and is now an offence under the Terrorism Act and people are liable to arrest for those offences.'
She added: 'I couldn't be specifically proscriptive because it absolutely is down to what we assess on the ground and not everything is as clear cut as necessarily it might be in some circumstances.
READ MORE: Tory MP Kit Malthouse in stark 'Hague' warning to David Lammy over Gaza
'We have had some cases where individuals have worn a t-shirt that says I support Palestine Action, those sorts of things are far clearer than we might face in other circumstances so I couldn't be proscriptive. The onus will be on us to show how the actions demonstrate support for Palestine Action if there are arrests made, that would need to be a criteria met.'
Asked if people wearing the 'Genocide in Palestine, Time for Action' shirts could be assured they wouldn't be arrested because it's not a direct affiliation with Palestine Action, Bond said: 'No I can't give any assurances until I can understand the full context and circumstances because it may not just be what is being worn. It may be words that are being said alongside, so I think it would be wrong to look at one particular thing in isolation.'
The force has submitted a request for 'mutual aid' to the force in Northern Ireland ahead of Trump's first visit since he was elected for a second term.
A request for mutual aid is a formal agreement between different police forces to provide assistance to each other, especially during major incidents or when one force's resources are stretched.
The Scottish Police Federation said on Monday it was seeking legal advice over plans surrounding the visit.
General secretary David Kennedy said he was concerned Scotland does not have enough officers to handle such a major event.
Bond said she was confident that concerns raised by officers would be resolved.
'Officers are making sacrifices on a daily basis to keep communities in Scotland safe,' she said.
'We work hard and the federation play an important role so we are working with them to make sure any issues or concerns they have are resolved but I'm confident with the plan we have in place and a key component of that is looking after the wellbeing and welfare of our officers.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
27 minutes ago
- The National
Steve Reed's water claims that of an incompetent charlatan
IN an article for The National, the Scottish Cabinet Secretary for Climate Change and Energy angrily responded to false statements made earlier this week by UK Environment minister Steve Reed. He attempted to defend his own Labour party's betrayal of its pre-election promise to nationalise England's failing, privately-owned water companies by claiming that nationalisation was not the solution to England's dirty and expensive water, stating that Scottish Water is publicly owned, yet "[water] pollution levels in Scotland are worse than they are in England". This is categorically untrue. Either Reed knew it was untrue and said it anyway, knowing he'd be unlikely to be challenged – in which case he's a charlatan and a liar –, or he didn't know it was untrue – in which case he's an incompetent charlatan, who uncritically leaps on false statements to get himself out of politically tricky situations. Reed also warned that nationalisation would cost £100bn and would slow down efforts to cut pollution. This claim has also been disputed. READ MORE: Anas Sarwar urged to break silence on Labour's 'nuclear tax' for Scots Estimates of the cost of renationalising the water industry in England range from £14.7bn, a figure estimated by the public services international research unit (PSIRU) at the University of Greenwich, to £99bn if company debts are included, a figure estimated by a thinktank commissioned by the water companies themselves. By citing the figure of £100 billion, it's clear that Reed and the Labour Government are siding with the profiteers of the English private water companies. This figure is based on a calculation of the maximum dividends, which starts from the purchase cost of the companies in 1990 when they were privatised, adding capital investment per year and inflation, but it takes no account of the actual market value of the companies. Crucially, these figures are predicated on the assumption that directors and shareholders who have extracted vast profits from the water companies over the years while piling debts on the companies should be financially compensated for nationalisation and not be left liable for the debt. Some claim that the cost of nationalisation could be close to zero. Thames Water is currently in debt to the tune of some £20 billion – even though its directors and shareholders have continued to profit, so it could be argued that the true value of the company is next to nothing. Thames Water is not alone. England's water companies are bust. They would not be financially viable if they had to meet the required standards without taking on huge amounts of debt. According to the latest independent water commission report, Scotland has a far higher percentage of its waterways in 'good' ecological condition than England and Wales. The Independent Water Commission found that 66% of Scotland's water bodies were of good ecological status, compared with 16.1% in England and 29.9% in Wales. READ MORE: Labour panned for foreign aid cuts as women and children to be hit hardest It is also worth noting that Scotland has some 32% of the UK land mass, is the part of the UK with the highest annual rainfall and has many more water bodies than England and Wales. Loch Ness alone is popularly claimed to contain more fresh water than the combined total of the rivers and lakes of England and Wales, holding 7.4 cubic km of clean Scottish water. Yet Loch Ness is neither Scotland's largest loch by surface area (that's Loch Lomond), nor is it the deepest – that's Loch Morar, whose maximum depth is 310m (1017 ft). Scotland contains truly vast amounts of water, most of which is in good condition. 87% of Scotland's entire water environment is assessed by SEPA as having a high or good classification for water quality, up from 82% in 2014. The claim about Loch Ness (below) containing more fresh water than all of England's lakes and rivers may just be a popular myth. It's not easy to find reliable statistics on the amount of water in all of England's rivers and lakes, but since the English water companies abstract 4.6 cubic km of water annually and don't extract every last drop of water – otherwise there would be no lakes or rivers left in England – the popular boast about Loch Ness seems unlikely to be true. However, what is unquestionably true, is that Scottish Water must manage much more water than all the water companies of England combined. It does so successfully, without siphoning off large amounts of cash for directors and shareholders and invests back into Scotland's water infrastructure. Steve Reed and this Labour government are terrified of nationalisation, so Reed would rather lie about Scottish Water. For him, that serves two purposes: allowing him to stick the boot into the Scottish Government, while defending the interests of the profiteers of England's private water companies. He does know knowing that he's not going to be challenged by a London centric media, which is all too happy to propagate the Anglo-British nationalist myth that 'parochial' wee Scotland could not possibly make a better fist of things than the all-mighty Westminster. Westminster goes into summer recess this week, and just prior to MPs going off for the summer, Energy Secretary Ed Miliband sneaked in an announcement that the energy bills of everyone in the UK, Scotland included, will increase by around £1 per month in order to cover the estimated £38 billion cost of the new Sizewell C nuclear power plant in Suffolk. The SNP's Westminster energy spokesman, Graham Leadbitter, said nuclear power was 'extortionate, takes decades to build and the toxic waste is a risk to local communities'. He added: "To make matters worse, Scots will be left to foot the bill with a levy on energy bills – you simply couldn't make it up, yet Anas Sarwar and Scottish Labour back this extortionate and wasteful plan that energy-rich Scotland will pay for through the nose. 'Meanwhile, Grangemouth has been shut down and Westminster's fiscal regime has ruined Scottish energy jobs – Scotland isn't just an afterthought, it's barely a thought at all.'
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Fife councillor guilty of sex offences against teenage girl
A Fife councillor has been found guilty of sexual offences against a teenage girl over a seven-month Graham, who was suspended from the Labour party two years ago, groomed and sexually abused the girl at a variety of locations in the Fife and Edinburgh areas in 43-year-old was convicted of offences involving sexual activity with a girl aged between 13 and 15 following a trial at Kirkcaldy Sheriff is due to be sentenced on 19 August. Speaking after Graham's conviction, Fife Council leader David Ross said details of the abuse revealed at the trial had been "truly shocking".The Labour councillor added: "This is appalling behaviour by anyone, let alone an elected councillor - and the sentence will reflect the seriousness of this case. "Our sympathies go out to the young person involved."It is impossible to express how badly David Graham has let down his colleagues and the people he was elected to represent."A Labour Party spokesperson said: "The party is taking immediate action to exclude David Graham from membership of the Labour Party following his conviction."Police Scotland Det Insp Graham Watson described Graham as "a manipulative individual who groomed and sexually abused his teenage victim".The officer added: "He was well-known and in a position of power when the offending took place."I would like to thank the female for her assistance in bringing him to justice."
Glasgow Times
an hour ago
- Glasgow Times
Trump visit will ‘undoubtedly stretch' police resources, superintendents warn
Chief Superintendent Rob Hay, president of the Association of Scottish Police Superintendents (Asps), said the visit of the US President would require a 'significant operation across the country over many days' from Police Scotland. His comments come in the wake of similar concerns from the Scottish Police Federation (SPF) – the body which represents rank and file officers. A major police operation will be put in place this weekend when the US President makes a private visit to Scotland (Jane Barlow/PA) However Scottish First Minister John Swinney has insisted policing will not be put in a 'detrimental position' as a result of the visit. Mr Trump is due to arrive in Scotland on Friday for a five-day private visit to his his golf resorts in both Ayrshire and Aberdeenshire. During his time in Scotland the President will meet both Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and Mr Swinney. However, police officers are raising concerns about the impact of the trip, with Mr Hay stating: 'The private visit of President Donald Trump to Scotland at the end of July will require the Police Service of Scotland to plan for and deliver a significant operation across the country over many days. 'This will undoubtedly stretch all our resources from local policing divisions to specialist and support functions such as contact, command and control.' Chief Superintendent Rob Hays said a 'significant' policing operation would be required for the period of the visit (Association of Scottish Police Superintendents/PA) Police superintendents and chief superintendents will have 'key leadership roles' for the visit, he added, saying they would be taking responsibility for areas such as planning and resourcing, intelligence gathering, command and control communications, armed operations, public order, and other specialist functions. Mr Hay urged the public to be aware of the 'significant demands that will be placed on policing services during this period' – adding these result from not only the Presidential visit but the 'many popular events that Scotland hosts in the summer months, which bring thousands of tourists to our country and rely upon partnerships with policing to support their safe delivery'. His comments came as SPF general secretary David Kennedy warned the police response to the visit could impact on the service it provides to the public in Scotland. A major policing operation is being put in place both the visit and any protests that may spring up as a result of it, with Police Scotland seeking officers from other areas of the UK to bolster its numbers. Asked about the visit, Mr Kennedy told BBC Radio Scotland: 'Anyone who says it won't affect it (policing in Scotland), I can't believe that's the case. 'It will affect it. 'You may be waiting in the past for so many hours for a police officer to arrive, that could double now, you may be waiting for more time for them to arrive. 'Obviously, emergency calls will take priority, but it will affect communities in Scotland. 'We've been asking long and weary to have more police officers in our communities in Scotland and all this does is take them away from that at this time.' Asked if the quality of policing will be impacted by the visit, Mr Kennedy added: 'It will be seriously affected, it has to be. 'There's not enough police officers for it not to be affected.' Concerns have also been raised about the cost of the policing operation, with officers likely to cancel rest days to ensure adequate staffing. David Kennedy is the general secretary of the Scottish Police Federation (Andrew Milligan/PA) But speaking to the PA news agency on Tuesday, Mr Swinney said talks are ongoing between Police Scotland and the Scottish and UK governments on funding, asserting that policing in Scotland will not be put in a 'detrimental position' as a result. Mr Kennedy also reiterated calls from Assistant Chief Constable Emma Bond for those seeking to protest to do so peacefully. Ms Bond has already said a 'policing plan will be in place to maintain public safety, balance rights to peaceful protest and minimise disruption'. She added: 'The visit will require a significant police operation using local, national and specialist resources from across Police Scotland, supported by colleagues from other UK police forces as part of mutual aid arrangements. 'Officers make sacrifices every day to keep people safe, and their dedication and professionalism is the reason we manage to deliver significant operations.' Mr Swinney meanwhile told the PA news agency it was important that Mr Trump's visit is 'handled with care'. While the First Minister accepted the need for 'security around the President' has also said there 'has to be the legitimate right for individuals in our country to make their voices heard, to protest'. Mr Swinney stated: 'We are a democratic society and people must be able to protest within the law and the policing operation will be designed to ensure that is the case.' With the President's visit expected to include the opening of a second golf course at the Menie resort in Aberdeenshire, Mr Swinney said: 'I obviously spend a lot of my time as First Minister encouraging investment in our country, so I welcome investment in the facilities that are being taken forward.'
