logo
‘Nationalisation not on the cards': SingPost reports underlying net loss in H2; to merge Singapore, international segments

‘Nationalisation not on the cards': SingPost reports underlying net loss in H2; to merge Singapore, international segments

Business Times15-05-2025
[SINGAPORE] Singapore Post (SingPost) on Thursday (May 15) ruled out the possibility of a nationalisation of the postal service provider, even as it said it is working with the Singapore government to come up with an operating model that is profitable and sustainable.
'Nationalisation is not on the cards,' said SingPost group chief financial officer Isaac Mah at a media briefing following the release of its earnings for the full year ended Mar 31.
'The government acknowledges that right now we do not have a sustainable operating model, especially for the post office network, and we are engaging them on correcting that model so that it's sustainable,' he added.
Mah said this could involve changes in what is required on the ground in terms of the postal network.
Another option, he added, could be an increase in postal rates.
'That is definitely one of the potential outcomes in this dialogue with the government,' Mah said. 'But I do not want to run ahead of myself… and at this point, we do not have any concrete details to share.'
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
'We are looking at all options,' he added.
Meanwhile, amid a cloudy global economic outlook marked by ongoing trade tensions, SingPost on Thursday also announced that it has 'reintegrated' its international cross-border business into the Singapore postal and logistics business.
'Given the challenging environment and the risks around the geopolitical tensions, we've decided to move away from the space and refocus on our core competencies here in Singapore,' Mah said.
The cross-border business will continue to be part of SingPost's product offering, leveraging the international postal network. SingPost said this is 'to achieve business synergies and drive operational efficiencies'.
'The operating environment does look challenging, and the management is very conscious of it. We are keeping an eye on it, which is why we have proposed the restructure, or the reintegration of International into Singapore, so that we can unlock savings there,' Mah said.
'On top of that, we are continuing to invest in key areas like sortation because that will create advantages for us and optimised margins as well,' he added.
To this end, SingPost has invested S$30 million in a new automation system to expand processing capacity for small parcels at the Regional eCommerce Logistics Hub facility.
At the same time, following the divestment of its Australian business, Mah noted that SingPost is now in a net cash position.
'We've actually strengthened our balance sheet to a position where we can then refocus and grow in Singapore,' Mah said.
Earnings disappointment amid headwinds
Shares of SingPost closed 11.8 per cent or S$0.075 lower at S$0.56 on Thursday, after the group reported an underlying net loss of S$461,000 for the second half-year ended Mar 31, from its net profit of S$28.1 million in the year-ago period.
Meanwhile, revenue was down 12.1 per cent at S$387.5 million for the half-year period, from S$440.6 million previously.
H2 net profit surged 232.7 per cent to S$222.5 million, from S$66.9 million in the corresponding year-ago period. However, this was mainly due to the recording of an exceptional gain from the divestment of its Australia business. The gain of S$222.2 million comprises largely of a gain on disposal of SingPost Australia Investments of S$302.1 million, as well as fair-value gains on properties of S$15.2 million.
This was partially offset by impairment charges of S$79.6 million, primarily for Quantium Solutions. On Apr 16, SingPost and Alibaba agreed to unwind their respective minority cross-shareholdings on Quantium Solutions. The logistics company was majority-owned by SingPost, which paid Alibaba S$36.9 million for its stake.
SingPost proposed a special dividend of S$0.09 a share, following the divestment of SingPost Australia Investments. The date payable and record date will be announced later.
Earnings per share (EPS) stood at S$0.0989 including distribution to perpetual securities holders, from S$0.0297. Excluding the distribution, EPS stood at S$0.0965, up from S$0.0273.
For the full year, net profit jumped 212.9 per cent year on year to S$245.1 million from S$78.3 million. Revenue was down 7.5 per cent at S$813.7 million, from S$879.2 million.
Underlying net profit fell 40.3 per cent to S$24.8 million, from S$41.5 million the previous year.
By segment
SingPost's operating profit in H2 for its Singapore postal and logistics segment fell 55.5 per cent year on year to S$7.4 million, from S$16.6 million. The group noted that the post office network remained unprofitable.
But in its property segment, operating profit for the period was up 17.8 per cent at S$24.5 million from S$20.8 million previously. This came largely from higher rental income from SingPost Centre.
SingPost's international business posted a wider operating loss of S$5.3 million, from S$559,000 in the previous year, attributable to challenging business conditions in the cross-border business.
Its freight-forwarding business posted an operating profit of S$12 million, up 31 per cent from S$9.2 million, as the group benefited from higher sea freight rates.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Invest smarter - core, satellites, and not your friend's cafe
Invest smarter - core, satellites, and not your friend's cafe

Business Times

time20 minutes ago

  • Business Times

Invest smarter - core, satellites, and not your friend's cafe

Most of us know we're supposed to diversify. But beyond the basics, what does smart portfolio construction really look like especially when markets are swinging like a pendulum? Enter the 'core–satellite' strategy. It sounds like something only fund managers use. It is. However, it's also surprisingly useful for retail investors trying to balance stability with upside. In this episode of Money Hacks, a podcast from The Business Times hosted by Howie Lim, we unpack the logic behind this approach with Amanda Ong, CEO of Arta Finance Singapore, and Samuel Rhee, chairman and CIO of Endowus. The duo breaks down how retail investors can apply institutional thinking in a way that's simple, strategic and not boring. Because let's be honest, it's easy to get swept up in hype stocks or thematic trends. But without a solid core in your portfolio, you're not investing, you're just winging it. Why listen? Because your portfolio needs a centre of gravity BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up The 'core' is your globally diversified anchor. Built for the long term and built to last. Because thematic investing is fun, but not foolproof 'Satellites' let you express conviction in things like AI, crypto or sustainability without risking your son's university fund. Because retail investors often over-diversify or overlap Yes, two ETFs can hold the same five stocks. And yes, it matters. Because rebalancing is more than a buzzword Learn how often to do it, and how to avoid accidentally drifting into a risk zone you didn't sign up for. Because FOMO is not a strategy Good investing starts with your needs, not what your friends are doing. Money Hacks is the flagship personal finance podcast from The Business Times, hosted by Howie Lim. Catch past episodes including recent insights on how to teach your kids good money habits, data centres and gold on Spotify, Apple Podcasts or at . Have a burning question or an episode idea? Email the team at btpodcasts@ . --- Written and hosted by: Howie Lim (howielim@ With Amanda Ong, CEO, Arta Finance Singapore and Samuel Rhee, co-founder, chairman and chief investment officer of Endowus Edited by: Howie Lim & Claressa Monteiro Produced by: Howie Lim & Chai Pei Chieh A podcast by BT Podcasts, The Business Times, SPH Media --- Follow BT Money Hacks podcasts every Monday: Channel: Amazon: Apple Podcasts: Spotify: YouTube Music: Website: Do note: This podcast is meant to provide general information only. SPH Media accepts no liability for loss arising from any reliance on the podcast or use of third party's products and services. Please consult professional advisors for independent advice. --- Discover more BT podcast series: BT Correspondents: BT Market Focus at: BT Podcasts at: BT Branded Podcasts at:

As Trump's tariffs bite, investors should ensure the companies they own have strong fundamentals
As Trump's tariffs bite, investors should ensure the companies they own have strong fundamentals

Business Times

time11 hours ago

  • Business Times

As Trump's tariffs bite, investors should ensure the companies they own have strong fundamentals

[SINGAPORE] It seemed like Groundhog Day again when US President Donald Trump unveiled revised reciprocal tariffs on imports from dozens of countries last Thursday (Jul 31). The adjusted rates came just one day before the previously announced reciprocal tariffs were due to kick in; the new duties will take effect only on Aug 7. To me, it initially appeared that Trump was once again delaying the full implementation of his tariffs while maintaining pressure on America's trading partners to open their markets. Some observers think Trump might be reaching his endgame on the country-specific tariffs, though. This could be good news. The revised tariff rates for many countries are, with a few notable exceptions, below the rates announced on Apr 2. For instance, the reciprocal tariffs on the European Union, Japan and South Korea are now all down to 15 per cent, from 20 per cent, 24 per cent and 25 per cent, respectively. India is down to 25 per cent from 26 per cent. Closer to home, reciprocal tariffs on Cambodia, Indonesia and Malaysia are now all down to 19 per cent, from 49 per cent, 32 per cent, 24 per cent, respectively. The reciprocal tariff on the Philippines is now also 19 per cent, although this is up from the 17 per cent announced on Apr 2. Vietnam is down to 20 per cent, from 46 per cent previously. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up The bad news, however, is that these revised tariffs would still add to the squeeze on global trade when they are implemented. By some estimates , the revised tariffs will push the average US tariff rate up to 15.2 per cent – from 13.3 per cent currently, and from only 2.3 per cent back before Trump took office. The economic impact of higher tariffs was blunted in the first half of 2025 by US importers front-loading their orders. Market sentiment has also been buoyed by massive investment in the artificial intelligence field. The remaining months of the year will probably be tougher for investors. Trump's tariffs are likely to create a demand shock in Asia, resulting in slower growth and deflation. On the other hand, the US could suffer a supply shock that results in slower growth as well as higher inflation – leading to politically charged policy dilemmas. Politics and policymaking Last week, Trump ramped up his campaign to oust Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell for refusing to cut rates, insinuating during a visit to the Fed's headquarters that the cost of renovating its buildings was out of control. Trump also fired the commissioner of the US Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) last week, after US job numbers for July came in weaker than expected . The BLS said on Aug 1 that total nonfarm payroll employment increased by only 73,000 last month. Adjustments for the previous two months were also larger than normal. Revised data showed US employers added only 19,000 jobs in May and 14,000 jobs in June, versus the previously reported 144,000 jobs and 147,000 jobs, respectively, for the two months. These political overtones could make it all the more complicated for investors to navigate the markets in the months ahead, as the full impact of Trump's tariffs is felt on growth, inflation and corporate earnings. At its policy meeting on Jul 29-30, the Fed decided to hold the target range for the federal funds rates unchanged, at between 4.25 per cent and 4.5 per cent. Two members of the 12-person rate-setting committee – Michelle Bowman and Christopher Waller – preferred a 25-basis-point cut and voted against the decision. This was reportedly the first time since 1993 that two members dissented at a single meeting. A third member, Adriana Kugler, was absent and did not vote. On Aug 1, the Fed said Kugler had submitted her letter of resignation to Trump and would step down on Aug 8. She has served as a governor of the Fed since 2023. Tariff impact in 'early days' Powell said during the post-meeting press conference that the impact of the tariffs on inflation is not only uncertain, but is probably still in its 'early days'. 'What we're seeing now is substantial amounts of tariff revenue being collected, on the order of US$30 billion a month,' he said, adding that most of this is currently being paid by companies that are 'upstream from the consumer'. Powell went on to say that many companies have indicated their intention to eventually push the cost of the tariffs onto their customers. 'But, you know, the truth is they may not be able to in many cases.' The state of the US labour market is also something of a puzzle. While the pace of job creation has been weakening, the unemployment rate in July was little changed from previous months, at 4.2 per cent. 'What that's telling you is that demand for workers is slowing, but so is the supply,' Powell said. He added, 'Because of immigration policy, really, the flow into our labour force is just a great deal slower.' This suggests underlying weakness in the seemingly robust US economy. 'I think you've got downside risks in a world where unemployment is being held down because both demand and supply are declining. And, I think that it's worth paying close attention to it,' Powell said. Less forgiving markets These macro concerns do not appear to be hurting the US corporate earnings for now, though. On Aug 1, financial data provider FactSet said 82 per cent of the S&P 500 companies that have reported their results for Q2 2025 delivered positive earnings-per-share (EPS) surprises. Also, 79 per cent achieved positive revenue surprises. The market is, however, rewarding positive surprises slightly less than it has in the past, and punishing negative surprises more severely. S&P 500 companies that have reported positive earnings surprises for Q2 2025 have seen an average stock price increase of 0.9 per cent over the period spanning two days before their earnings release and two days after. This is below the five-year average of a 1 per cent increase. On the other hand, S&P 500 companies that reported negative earnings surprises for Q2 2025 have seen an average price decrease of 5.6 per cent – versus a five-year average price decline of 2.4 per cent. Among the notable losers last week was Apple, which saw its shares tumble 5.4 per cent despite reporting financial numbers that topped expectations . The S&P 500 ended last week 2.4 per cent lower. The Nasdaq 100 was down 2.2 per cent. The Singapore market was equally unforgiving last week, with the Straits Times Index suffering a 2.5 per decline. Among the notable losers was Seatrium – which ended last week 5.4 per cent lower, despite reporting sharply higher revenue and earnings for H1 2025 and drawing a line under its past involvement in a corruption scandal in Brazil. Singapore Airlines fell 9.9 per cent during the week, after reporting a steep slump in earnings for the quarter to Jun 30 that seemed to catch analysts off-guard and sparked a wave of 'sell' recommendations . Then, there was OCBC – the first of the three local banks to report financial numbers for H1 2025 – which suffered narrower net interest margins as interest rates sank. OCBC ended last week 2.3 per cent lower. DBS and UOB, which are both scheduled to report their H1 2025 numbers on Aug 7, ended last week down 3 per cent and 2.9 per cent, respectively. As Trump's tariffs begin to bite, investors should carefully parse the financial statements of companies in their portfolios to ensure their micro fundamentals are strong enough to weather the tough months ahead.

Ninth generation Pictet family member of leading the group beyond 220 years.
Ninth generation Pictet family member of leading the group beyond 220 years.

Business Times

time12 hours ago

  • Business Times

Ninth generation Pictet family member of leading the group beyond 220 years.

[GENEVA] Striving not for size but 'to be the finest, as a wealth and asset manager known for superior returns and exceptional client experience' is what drives 46-year-old Francois Pictet, managing partner of Pictet Group. He is a ninth-generation member of a family who became associated with Pictet Group in 1841. The Geneva-headquartered organisation, which turns 220 this year, traces its roots even further back, to its founding in July 1805. Francois Pictet followed the footsteps of his father, grandfather and great-grandfather into the top echelons of the group's management. Today, Pictet Group is Switzerland's second-largest financial institution, behind UBS, and the largest privately held financial institution in Europe. Francois Pictet sits alongside his cousin, senior partner Marc Pictet, and five other managing partners at the apex of the company's management. The seven top partners – six men and one woman, all of whom are based in Geneva – are a close-knit group, who meet thrice a week, for several hours per session, to discuss strategies and investments. 'You cannot invite as managing partners people who want to decide everything and don't want to listen to others. This type of profile will not make it,' said Francois Pictet. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up He pointed out that while Pictet Group is unique in having a long association with his wider family, having the name alone does not mean guaranteed entry into the group's top leadership. In addition to the seven managing partners, Pictet Group also has 43 equity partners. New partners buy shares at book value; when partners exit, they sell their shares at book value, which has hopefully grown during their tenure. Partners adhere to the retirement age of 65. To date, Pictet Group has grown organically and not done any mergers and acquisitions. Also, the group has stayed out of business lines such as commercial banking, retail banking and investment banking. 'Why would you make an acquisition unless you want to show growth to your shareholders? In finance, growth by hiring the right people is more effective,' said Francois Pictet, adding that making acquisitions can harm the corporate culture. He likes the group's business model, which he sees as being differentiated from other financial institutions and bringing stability to the business and clients. 'Stability nowadays is in very rare supply, and I think this is a key advantage that we have,' he said. He argued that by being conservative in how Pictet Group uses its balance sheet, space is freed up to be innovative in serving clients. 'Our usage of the balance sheet is extremely conservative, we don't play with it at all,' he said. Personal journey Francois Pictet, who became a managing partner in 2022, currently leads the group's technology and operations division, as well as the private wealth management's Asian and Middle East commercial efforts. Trained in law, he said that it was 'initially not really my intention' to join the family business. He spent over a decade working for organisations including UBS, the former Credit Suisse and US private equity firm AEA Investors before joining Pictet Group in 2015. Asked if carrying the Pictet name within Pictet Group is a privilege or a burden, he admitted that 'with the family name comes the pressure as well'. He described working at Pictet Group as being at 'a place where you have your name on the door and the responsibility of not undoing the work done by eight generations before you'. Still, when the opportunity to join the group came while he was in his thirties, he said it would have been a waste not to seize it. With Pictet Group today being considerably larger than in his father's time, Francois Pictet thinks family members who want to join now or in future should spend some years outside the group to chalk some achievements before coming on board. 'It's very important for our managing partners to have seen the world out there and also proven themselves outside the firm,' he said. In the private wealth management business, Pictet Group serves clients with a net worth of five million Swiss francs (S$8 million) or more. Francois Pictet sees no reason to lower this threshold for the sake of acquiring a larger customer base. He emphasised that in the private wealth management business, much time is spent on understanding clients and their worry with money. Investment solutions then come on the back of understanding client needs. He noted this is unlike 'the brokerage model, where you start the discussion by talking about products'. 'Our time horizon is not a quarter, not even 10 years. It is really generations with our clients,' he stressed. Francois Pictet noted that amid geopolitical fragmentation, wealthy families have become more mobile, requiring all sorts of combinations of booking and servicing centres. With its stability, he observed that Singapore has been on the rise as a booking centre for the whole of Asia for several years. Other megatrends that he sees in the private wealth management business include generational wealth transfer, the rise of Asia, the growing importance of private equity and the need to invest more in technology as well as risk and compliance. Generational wealth transfer Honora Ducatillon, head of family advisory at Pictet Wealth Management, said that with dynastic families, Pictet Group is seeing growing demand for help in crafting a family charter, as a framework for long-term success. Dynastic families are defined as those having a net worth of US$100 million or more. Typically, a family charter may cover areas such as family mission, family values, code of conduct, conflict resolution, succession in ownership and management, governance bodies, access to capital, family members, employment, ownership policy and education of family members. Ducatillon said wealthy families are evolving with trends such as longevity and the rise of the 100-year-old chief executive. Also contributing to this evolution are accelerating shifts in sociocultural values; the increase in blended families; the rise of women wealth owners, the move from top-down to collaborative governance models; and technology's role in transforming how families institutionalise wisdom across generations. Citing a McKinsey report, she noted that some US$5.8 trillion in assets will be transferred across generations in Asia-Pacific between 2023 and 2030 by wealthy families, and that many family offices report that preparing the next generation to take on wealth responsibly is a major challenge.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store