Highlights of Trump's Time magazine interview
ON EXPANDING THE POWER OF THE US PRESIDENCY
"Well, I don't feel I'm expanding it. I think I'm using it as it was meant to be used. I feel that we've had a very successful presidency in 100 days."
"The prices of groceries have gone down. The only price that hasn't gone down is the price of energy. The cost of energy, I'm sorry, well, energy has gone down, excuse me ...
"And interest rates have essentially stayed the same. But almost every other thing."
ON U.S. ECONOMIC CONTRACTION
"If you look at all of the years that I've been doing this, I've been right on things. You're gonna—you're gonna have the wealthiest country we've ever had, and you're gonna have an explosion upward in the not-too-distant future."
WHY ARE RECENT SIZABLE JOB LOSSES ACCEPTABLE?
"Because we have to have an efficient country. And when the country gets down to bare knuckles ... you're going to see something the likes of which this world has never seen before."
HOW CAN US COMPANIES PLAN AMID TARIFF UNCERTAINTY?
"I had the head of Walmart. I had the head of Home Depot and the head of Target in my office. And I'll tell you what they think, they think what I'm doing is exactly right."
ON SUSPENDING TARIFFS AFTER U.S. BOND PRICES FELL
"I'm doing that until we come up with the numbers that I want to come up with ... The bond market was getting the yips, but I wasn't."
ON TRADE ROW WITH CHINA, AND PRESIDENT XI JINPING
"He's called. And I don't think that's a sign of weakness on his behalf ...
"Oh, there's a number at which they will feel comfortable. Yeah. But you can't let them make a trillion dollars from us. You can't let them make $750 billion."
WHAT IF TARIFFS ARE STILL 20-50% IN A YEAR'S TIME?
"Total victory ... Because the country will be making a fortune ...
"I will set a price, and when I set the price, and I will set it fairly according to the statistics, and according to everything else ...
"Over the next three to four weeks, and we're finished."
IF REPUBLICANS SEND TRUMP A BUDGET BILL THAT CUTS SOCIAL SECURITY, MEDICARE AND MEDICAID
"If it cuts it, I would not approve ... I would veto it, yeah. But they're not going to do that."
WHY IS ELON MUSK'S DOGE AMASSING SENSITIVE PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT EVERYDAY AMERICANS?
"Because we want to find waste, fraud, and abuse, and want to cut our costs."
ON IMMIGRATION
"People have been led into our country that are very dangerous. If you were walking down the street, and if you happen to be near one of these people, they could, they would kill you, and they wouldn't even think about it."
ON NOT BRINGING DEPORTED KILMAR ABREGO GARCIA BACK FROM EL SALVADOR, DESPITE SUPREME COURT RULING
"I leave that to my lawyers. I give them no instructions."
DO YOU THINK PEACE IS POSSIBLE IF VOLODYMYR ZELENSKIY REMAINS PRESIDENT OF UKRAINE?
"Yeah, I do. He is president now and I think we're going to make a deal."
ON THE TERMS OF A DEAL FOR UKRAINE
"Crimea will stay with Russia. And Zelensky understands that, and everybody understands that it's been with them for a long time ...
"I don't think they'll ever be able to join NATO ... that's I think what caused the war to start was when they started talking about joining NATO."
ON NUCLEAR DISPUTE WITH IRAN
"I think we're going to make a deal with Iran. Nobody else could do that."
DID TRUMP PREVENT ISRAEL ATTACKING IRAN'S NUCLEAR SITES?
"I didn't stop them. But I didn't make it comfortable for them, because I think we can make a deal without the attack."
WOULD THE US JOIN AN ISRAELI ATTACK ON IRAN?
"If we don't make a deal, I'll be leading the pack."
ON RELATIONS WITH CANADA
"We're taking care of their military. We're taking care of every aspect of their lives, and we don't need them to make cars for us ... We don't need their lumber. We don't need their energy. We don't need anything from Canada. And I say the only way this thing really works is for Canada to become a state."
DO YOU WANT TO BE REMEMBERED AS A PRESIDENT WHO EXPANDED AMERICAN TERRITORY?
"Wouldn't mind."
ON SECURING HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN PRO-BONO-WORK PLEDGES FROM MAJOR LAW FIRMS
"I think they felt that the election was rigged and stolen and they didn't want to be a part of it ... They gave it to me because they knew what they did wrong and they didn't want to get involved with it."
ON A POTENTIAL THIRD TERM AS PRESIDENT
"I have more people begging me to run again, but I haven't looked at even the possibility ... there are some loopholes that have been discussed that are well known. But I don't believe in loopholes. I don't believe in using loopholes."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
3 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump blasts Democrats over what he calls the ‘Epstein SCAM' and ‘CON JOB'
A furious Donald Trump once again blasted the 'Radical Left Democrats' over the ongoing fallout over the so-called 'Epstein files,' describing it as a 'SCAM' and a 'CON JOB.' In a late-night post on Truth Social Thursday, the president fumed over an alleged attempt to 'distract and obfuscate' from his administration's first 'GREAT six months of service to America ... the results of which many are saying is the BEST six months in Presidential history.' '[The Democrats] have gone absolutely CRAZY, and are playing another Russia, Russia, Russia Hoax but, this time, under the guise of what we will call the Jeffrey Epstein SCAM,' Trump bellowed online. 'As things are revealed and, I hope will take place quickly, you will see that it is yet another Democrat CON JOB. Hopefully, the Grand Jury Files will put an end to this HOAX. Everyone should see what is there, but people who are innocent should not be hurt. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!'
Reuters
3 minutes ago
- Reuters
India's equity benchmarks to open flat as market weighs UK trade pact
July 25 (Reuters) - India's equity benchmarks are expected to open little changed on Friday as investors weigh the newly signed trade pact with Britain, which will cut tariffs of goods ranging from textiles to whisky and cars. The Gift Nifty futures were trading at 24,993.5 points as of 8:04 a.m. IST, indicating that the Nifty 50 (.NSEI), opens new tab will open near Thursday's close of 25,062.1. "Signing of the India-UK FTA, which is expected to boost bilateral trade by about $34 billion annually, is hugely significant in the present context when India is eager to reach a deal with the U.S. on trade and tariffs," said VK Vijayakumar, chief investment strategist at Geojit Investments. Shares of textiles, automakers, leather, footwear and other companies will be in focus as UK exports become duty-free. While the India-UK agreement should boost sentiment, the market is unlikely to see major upside until there is clarity on U.S. trade negotiations, analysts said. India is making "fantastic" progress in talks with Washington, Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal told Reuters on Thursday, but played down the importance of deadlines. Earlier this week, two Indian government sources said prospects for an interim deal before U.S. President Donald Trump's August 1 deadline had dimmed amid deadlock over tariff cuts on key agricultural and dairy products. ** Bajaj Finance ( opens new tab beat analysts' estimate for quarterly profit on Thursday, as healthy loan growth countered a decline in the non-bank lender's asset quality ** Indian Energy Exchange ( opens new tab posts higher revenue and profit for the first quarter, driven by a nearly 15% increase in electricity volume. The stock tanked about 30% on Thursday on the regulator's market coupling norms ** SBI Life Insurance ( opens new tab posts higher profit in June quarter, thanks to healthy premiums from policy renewals
The Guardian
4 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump effort to ditch greenhouse gas finding ignores ‘clearcut' science, expert says
One of the architects of a landmark 16-year-old finding on pollution's impact on health that the Trump administration now wants to eliminate says that doing so would ignore 'clearcut' science that has only become clearer today because of extreme weather. The Trump administration plans would sweep away the US government's legal authority to limit greenhouse gases in order to address the climate crisis. A proposed rule from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) would rescind the so-called 'endangerment finding', the federal government's 2009 conclusion that carbon dioxide, along with five other greenhouse gases, harm the health of Americans. The finding has underpinned the US government's legal authority to deal with the climate crisis under the Clean Air Act and its removal would effectively dismantle limits on the pollution coming from cars, trucks and power plants that is dangerously heating the world. Several sources confirmed the draft plan, which was first reported on by the New York Times. A former EPA official who oversaw the crafting of the endangerment finding said there was little doubt among government scientists about the harm caused by greenhouse gases, with their findings borne out by escalating temperatures and disasters since 2009. 'The science and the impacts were clear then and are only more clear today,' said Jason Burnett, who was associate deputy administrator of the EPA during George W Bush's administration. 'The science is clearcut, the impacts are clearcut and the law is clearcut. The challenge should be how we reduce emissions rather than debate whether there's a problem.' Donald Trump, who as president has moved to squash pollution rules, stymie clean energy and boost fossil fuel production, had ordered a review of the endangerment finding. Lee Zeldin, Trump's EPA administrator, said in March of the review that the administration 'will not sacrifice national prosperity, energy security, and the freedom of our people for an agenda that throttles our industries, our mobility and our consumer choice while benefiting adversaries overseas'. The endangerment finding followed a key 2007 supreme court ruling that greenhouse gases are pollutants that the EPA is obligated to regulate. A subsequent 210-page assessment by the EPA documented the growing evidence of harm caused by the buildup of greenhouse gases through heatwaves, stronger storms, strained water resources and impacts upon agricultural yields. Burnett said: 'When I was working on this 17 years ago, it was a question of future impacts but today we are seeing and feeling those impacts as devastating events. People are having their lives upturned by floods in Texas or fires in California or hurricanes in Florida and all of these things are made worse by climate change. What is most tragic to me is that this administration won't have any answer for those people.' An avalanche of scientific research since 2009 has underscored the multitude of harm caused by the climate crisis, with researchers repeatedly reaffirming the strengthening case of the endangerment finding during this period. Since the EPA's finding, eight of the 10 hottest years in recorded US history have occurred, along with more frequent extreme weather events that have helped spur 255 disasters that have each cost $1bn or more in damages. The US government's latest climate assessment in 2023, a report since yanked offline by the Trump administration, states that the 'effects of human-caused climate change are already far-reaching and worsening across every region of the United States'. It adds that 'without rapid and deep reductions in global greenhouse gas emissions from human activities, the risks of accelerating sea level rise, intensifying extreme weather and other harmful climate impacts will continue to grow'. A repeal of the finding, however, would not only eliminate current limits to the pollution worsening this situation but also hamstring any future administration that sought to resurrect the US's effort to curb global heating. 'For the EPA to repeal the 2009 finding borders on criminal negligence,' said Robert Howarth, an environmental scientist at Cornell University. 'The science was clear in 2009 and has become much stronger and clearer since,' he added. 'Climate disruption is a large and growing problem, it is caused primarily from our use of fossil fuels and the resultant emissions of carbon dioxide and methane; and it is a deadly problem.' The EPA plan isn't expected to directly deny the overwhelming evidence of damage caused by planet-heating emissions, but rather claim that the agency doesn't have the legal authority under the Clean Air Act to make such a wide determination upon a group of different pollutants. The plan will also set in motion the reversal of regulations placed upon cars by Joe Biden's administration that were intended to slash emissions from transportation, the largest sectoral source of carbon pollution in the US. Currently, the rollbacks are listed as being under review by the White House. 'The proposal will be published for public notice and comment once it has completed interagency review and been signed by the administrator,' an EPA spokesperson said. The plan, once finalized, will almost certainly be legally challenged by environmental groups that will point to the 2007 supreme court ruling as compelling the endangerment finding. 'My view is the administration is very unlikely able to win this in litigation given they are operating on theories that are inconsistent with the way the EPA has dealt with matters for the past 50 years,' said Richard Revesz, an expert in environmental policy at the New York University School of Law. 'The legal grounds are very flimsy. But this will all take a lot of time and bring a lot of uncertainty to the landscape.' Should the finding be repealed, though, Revesz said the impact would be 'devastating' and compound other actions by the administration to eviscerate the EPA of scientists and reverse the agency's oversight of pollution. 'They are attacking all of the elements necessary to protect the health and safety of the American people, their actions will literally lead to tens of thousands of premature deaths every year,' he said. 'This is orders of magnitude more extreme than Donald Trump's first term.' Even if the scrapping of the endangerment rule is ultimately overturned by the courts, environmental groups warned that the reversal would have lingering impacts. 'The American people know that climate change is a threat to public health and welfare – not just because the science has been clear for decades, but because they can see it with their own eyes,' said Lena Moffitt, executive director of Evergreen Action, who called the EPA plan 'cruel and absurd'. 'This move won't hold up in court, but in the months or years it takes to work through the legal process, corporate polluters will be able to inflict irreversible damage that the rest of us will be paying for years to come,' she added.
