logo
Supermarkets told to cut 100 calories from shoppers' baskets

Supermarkets told to cut 100 calories from shoppers' baskets

Telegraph5 hours ago

Supermarkets will be ordered to cut up to 100 calories from the average shopping basket under a new 'nanny state' drive to tackle obesity.
Ministers are set to impose a 'healthy food standard' that will force stores to curtail sales of sugary and salty snacks in favour of more fruit and vegetables.
Shops failing to meet the mandatory targets could face fines, which retail sources warned could see prices rise.
The measures will form the backbone of a 10-year plan to improve the nation's health, which will be unveiled by Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, this week. Downing Street hopes the changes can help avert the need for future tax rises by slashing the £11 billion a year that obesity costs the NHS.
But senior retail figures said they had been blindsided by the 'draconian' plans, which they said would add to a growing glut of red tape on business.
One called the proposals a 'nanny state' policy, while another industry source warned that the measures were being 'propelled by food propagandists' who did not believe in people taking responsibility for their own diets.
Andrew Griffith, the shadow business secretary, said: 'Labour want the nanny state sitting in every supermarket trolley.
'You'd have thought they'd be too busy with their policy U-turns or trying to fix the economy that Reeves broke with her tax rises – but no – it sounds like the miserable socialists have their sights on every small treat in our weekly shop.'
The exact target will be agreed in talks with major retailers, but ministers are expected to push for it to be set at around 100 calories per basket – the equivalent of two cubes of butter.
It will be underpinned by a new regime of mandatory reporting, meaning large shops have to submit data on how much of each product they sell.
Under the proposals, it will be left up to supermarkets to decide how they meet the requirements. Retailers could change the recipes of own-brand products, target discount offers or award shoppers more loyalty points for choosing healthier options.
Mr Streeting warned that, without taking action, the growing cost of obesity-related care risked making the NHS 'unsustainable' in the near future.
'Obesity has doubled since the 1990s and costs our NHS £11 billion a year – triple the budget for ambulance services,' said the Health Secretary. 'Unless we curb the rising tide of cost and demand, the NHS risks becoming unsustainable.
'Through our new healthy food standard, we will make the healthy choice the easy choice, because prevention is better than cure. By shifting from sickness to prevention, we will make sure the NHS can be there for us when we need it.'
Announcing the new policy, the Government cited research estimating that cutting the average person's intake by just 50 calories a day would lift 340,000 children and two million adults out of obesity.
However, experts questioned the claim. Tom Sanders, professor emeritus of nutrition and dietetics at King's College London, said it was 'not a view that most experts in nutrition would share'.
He added: ' Tackling obesity can only be effective if it changes the obesogenic environment, which is characterised by sedentary behaviour and over-exposure to high-calorie food.'
Sir Keir Starmer will unveil the plans on Thursday after tense negotiations with supermarket bosses over the details went down to the wire. The Telegraph has been told that late on Friday officials were scrambling to drum up support for the policy after a fierce backlash.
During the talks, retail giants warned that they would oppose any measures that would hit their profit margins, which are very tight.
Shops already face significant regulation over unhealthy food, including being required to move products with high salt and sugar away from the front of stores. Supermarket chiefs are understood to privately be concerned that further regulation would force them to raise prices in stores and pause new openings.
One senior industry figure said there was no evidence that such 'draconian regulation' had helped tackle obesity, adding: 'Proponents now want to go further.'
The insider claimed the agenda was 'propelled by food propagandists' who wanted a crackdown on ultra-processed products such as sliced bread, crisps, biscuits, and ham. Another source questioned why ministers were focusing solely on supermarkets rather than also including takeaway chains and high street bakeries.
But officials said that by introducing a 'level playing field' where all businesses faced the same terms, they would avoid creating a 'first mover advantage'.
However, Tesco and Sainsbury's, two of the country's biggest chains, said they welcomed the proposals. Health campaigners also backed the move, saying that improving people's diets would help cut rates of killer conditions such as heart disease and cancer.
Allies said the Health Secretary was acutely aware of the cost of living crisis and had rejected ideas that would have pushed up costs for shoppers, having blocked more radical proposals such as banning buy one, get one free promotions or introducing new 'sin taxes' on sugary and salty goods.
The 10-year strategy will also include plans to expand the use of pharmacies to treat conditions such as obesity, asthma, high blood pressure and diabetes. They will be handed greater powers to prescribe drugs and encouraged to offer people advice on lifestyle changes and nutrition.
The changes form part of a wider drive to cut the burden of people attending GP surgeries and A&E units for relatively minor complaints. Research by the National Pharmacy Association found that six million hours of A&E time could be saved every year by redirecting patients.
It said 325,000 people had attended a hospital in 2023-24 with a sore throat or cold, whilst 18,000 went for treatment for insect bites.
Mr Streeting said: 'The nation's high streets will join the front line of NHS care, as pharmacists get far more power to prescribe and manage a range of health conditions.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pride organisers warn Trump's DEI purge directly hitting UK events as corporate sponsorships drop
Pride organisers warn Trump's DEI purge directly hitting UK events as corporate sponsorships drop

The Independent

time17 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Pride organisers warn Trump's DEI purge directly hitting UK events as corporate sponsorships drop

UK Pride faces a 'critical' funding crisis amid warnings that Donald Trump 's assault on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in the US is having a direct impact on firms in Britain. The UK Pride Organisers Network said 75 per cent of Pride events across the UK seen a decline in corporate sponsorships this year, with a quarter experiencing funding drops of more than 50 per cent. Meanwhile, GoFundMe has reported a 'remarkable' 82 per cent increase in organisers resorting to crowdfunding events to bridge the gap in funding. Pride organisers have told The Independent that big corporations who have long sponsored them are 'pulling back their funding in all aspects', especially those with head offices in the US, after Trump issued a series of executive orders targeting diversity programmes in the public and private sectors, with many corporations such as Amazon and Google scaling back their DEI efforts since February. While Pride has grown as a movement across the UK for a decade, Dee Llewellyn, chair of UK Pride Organisers Network and director of partnerships and growth for London Pride, said corporate funding has 'fallen off a cliff', causing a number of events across the country close their doors, including big events such as Liverpool. The situation has led one expert to warn that 'the golden era of corporate sponsorship might be over' for LGBTQ organisers. Mrs Llewellyn fears the LGBTQ community could experience 'five years of difficulty and struggles' as Trump fully implements the DEI cuts, adding 'it is the start of that process now.' 'I think we will see more global brands declining, not because they don't want to participate, but because they don't have the EDI budget to do so,' she added. 'It's not the people on the ground in the UK either, I've had brands that have withdrawn this year that were absolutely devastated to have to do it. 'But they've had their budgets cut from America and there was absolutely nothing they could do to argue or fight that in the UK.' Pride events across the country receive a bulk of funding from big businesses, varying on a scale of a minimum of 50 per cent funding to events like London, where approximately 95 per cent of the funding comes from corporate partnerships. Gary Richardson, an organiser from Worthing Pride whose regional celebrations were almost cancelled this year, said: 'It very much seems if they've got offices overseas, specifically in America, the DEI conversations that are happening there seem to be drip feeding into the economy over here'. John Hyland, former co-chair of Liverpool Pride and the Community Partnerships and Individual Giving Lead for LGBTQ charity Sahir, close supporters of Pride celebrations in the city, echoed Mr Richardson's point: 'When America sneezes, we all catch a cold.' 'Businesses seem to be a bit more reluctant to support LGBT organisations, which is having a massive impact on the likes of Pride,' he added. Pride in Liverpool had to cancel its plans this year due to 'significant financial and organisational challenges, which have impacted timescales and resulted in it reverting to an almost entirely volunteer-led operation.' Organisers severed ties with key sponsor Barclays in May after the bank's boss said it would prohibit Trans women from using female toilets in its buildings following the Supreme Court Ruling which ruled that the terms 'woman' and 'sex' in the 2010 Equality Act 'refer to a biological woman and biological sex'. 'I think definitely in light of what's happened with the Supreme Court ruling, we've had a number of number of transgender community-led protests happen in Liverpool,' said Mr Hyland. 'If there's a year where we need Pride to happen, it's this year and our community has been very vocal about that.' As well as a decrease in corporate sponsorships, organisers have cited that local communities have struggled to fill the financial hole in Pride events planning due to the cost of living. Mr Hyland said that calls for support from local businesses in Liverpool fell through because 'they haven't got that kind of money.' On an average year where it costs around £140,000 to produce Worthing Pride over a weekend, 60 per cent of budgeting comes from sponsorship, while the rest comes from ticket sales. This year, the organisers are aiming for 70 per cent from ticket sales and 30 per cent from sponsors. Instead of receiving support from five to six big sponsors, they've managed to accrue 20 small sponsorships instead, with a number of companies offering pro bono support. Dr Francesca Ammaturo, senior lecturer in in Sociology and International Relations at London Metropolitan University, author of forthcoming book The Politics of Pride Events: Global and Local Challenges, said that while big businesses have taken on Pride as an issue of corporate responsibility, organisers have relied on corporate sponsorship because public funding has not always been accessible to the LGBTQ+ community. 'Pride events have become really dependent on them,' she said. 'Now when you insert the rollback that Trump is enacting on DEI policies, that is sending shockwaves not just across the US, but also across the globe because of globalisation. She added: 'The repercussions for these companies to sponsor pride events even beyond the US could be creating some backlashes at home. 'It's quite difficult for LGBT organisers today to accept that the golden era of corporate sponsorship might be over, at least for now until we realise what is the next political that we will encounter.' Dr Ammaturo added that big business involvement in Pride had always been 'a very superficial commitment' more akin to 'a marriage of convenience which was conducive to a certain veneer of rainbow washing'. Mrs Llewellyn said that despite the radical funding cuts, Pride will persist in the UK, adding: 'It's essential now more than ever, really more than it has been over the past 10 years for us to be able to stand together as a community to have that safe space for us to join together. 'Pride is a protest. That is what it was born and rooted in,' she added. 'We've been through lots of hardships as a community, but when we stand together and we unite our voices, that is when we're strongest.'

Aldi's 89p bakery staple will repel flying ants from your home for good – they hate the smell & it lasts for weeks
Aldi's 89p bakery staple will repel flying ants from your home for good – they hate the smell & it lasts for weeks

The Sun

time44 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Aldi's 89p bakery staple will repel flying ants from your home for good – they hate the smell & it lasts for weeks

EXPERTS have warned Flying Ant Day could be one of the biggest in recent years, but Aldi's cupboard staple will keep the pests out of your home. The affordable and simple solution is a toxin-free way to keep a potential ant problem at bay. Pest control experts swear by it To deter these pesky insects from infiltrating your home, experts recommend Ground Cinnamon, and you can get it for less than £1 in Aldi. For only 89p, shoppers can pick up this household essential, which is known to solve the pest problem. Chemical methods can be effective, but for shoppers wanting to find a non-toxic and harmless remedy to the issue, cinnamon is the perfect option. Will it kill the ants? Put simply, no, using cinnamon in your home does not kill the ants, but it will deter them. President of Black Pest Prevention, Nicole Carpenter explained: "The scent of cinnamon itself doesn't kill ants. However, it makes the life of ants much more difficult. "Cinnamon is a product with a strong scent, and this strong scent can create an unfavourable environment for ants, making them want to leave your space." Similar products like vinegar or essential oils also emit a similar strong scent and work by intercepting the pheromone trails, which they use to find food. Getting started There are different ways to use cinnamon to prevent ants. The simplest option is to sprinkle ground cinnamon along the ant's entry points and trails, creating a barrier to stop the pests infesting your home. However, it's not the most permanent option, as a strong wind or movement can blow the cinnamon away. What's more, for some homeowners, the idea of having cinnamon scattered around their home is not an appealing solution. Experts also suggest using cinnamon sticks as a mess-free option. For a solution which is less likely to blow away, lay the sticks in any location where you have seen the ants to have a similar non-toxic deterrent. To level up this hack, experts said essential cinnamon oil is also an effective method. Mix 60 ml of water with the same quantity of vodka (optional) and add 20-25 drops of the cinnamon oil. 3 The vodka is used to keep the solution together after it has been shaken. This solution can be sprayed in the problem areas, and can be applied when necessary, which means you do not have to see the cinnamon scattered around your home. Experts are warning that this year's Flying Ant Day could be the biggest in recent records due to the summer's high humidity. The high humidity encourages ants to swarm and can wreak havoc on your summer plans. But as Paul Blackhurst, Head of the Technical Academy at Rentokil Pest Control, said: "While flying ants may disrupt your picnic, barbeque, or pub garden pint, they play a vital role in the ecosystem.' He added: "This natural event, when vast numbers of winged ants, known as a lates, take to the skies at once in search of mates from other colonies, could be one of the most prolific for years." Experts have suggested that year's Flying Ant Day - the annual mating flight where millions fill the skies in synchronised displays - could be one of the biggest in recent years.

Is Keir already lining up his next U-turn? Starmer faces fresh rebellion from Labour MPs over his 'family farm tax'
Is Keir already lining up his next U-turn? Starmer faces fresh rebellion from Labour MPs over his 'family farm tax'

Daily Mail​

time44 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Is Keir already lining up his next U-turn? Starmer faces fresh rebellion from Labour MPs over his 'family farm tax'

Sir Keir Starmer has been put on notice of a fresh Labour rebellion over the Government's 'family farm tax'. More than 40 Labour MPs are said to be considering a bid to water down looming changes to agricultural and business inheritance tax relief. It comes after the Prime Minister performed a trio of embarrassing U-turns in recent weeks. Sir Keir has reversed his position on axing the winter fuel payment for millions of pensioners, a national grooming gangs inquiry, and welfare cuts. This has left Labour rebels feeling emboldened that they can force the Government into further policy changes. According to the Telegraph, a group of Labour backbenchers are considering using amendments to legislation to exempt small family farms from a planned tax raid. At last year's Budget, Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced farmers will pay a 20 per cent rate of inheritance tax on land and property they inherit worth more than £1million. The Government has insisted the measures - dubbed the 'family farm tax' and set to be in place from April 2026 - will only affect the wealthiest quarter of landowners. But the National Farmers' Union (NFU) and others say the impact of Ms Reeves' measures will be much more widespread. Critics claim the move could wipe out family-run farms with tight margins, as they will be forced to sell up in order to pay death duties. There have been months of demonstrations by farmers in response to the Chancellor's tax raid, including tractor protests in Wesminster. A 'rural growth group' of Labour MPs is now proposing the raising of the £1million cut-off point at which estates lose their tax reliefs. They have suggested estates receive full tax relief on the value of agricultural properties up to £10million, 50 per cent to £20million, and nil thereafter. Sam Rushworth, Labour MP for Bishop Auckland, who is a member of the group, told the newspaper they would 'consider what amendments to put down'. Mr Rushworth said: 'We are all keen to avoid amendments. I don't want it to get to that point. I am a Labour MP and I broadly support the Government. 'I would like to see them bring forward different recommendations in the Bill.' Ex-Cabinet minister Louise Haigh, who was a leading rebel over the Government's now partially-reversed welfare cuts, has called for Sir Keir to 'reset' his relationship with the British public. 'I think this is a moment and an opportunity to reset the Government's relationship with the British public and to move forward, to adopt a different approach to our economic policy and our political strategy,' she told the BBC in the wake of the PM's climbdown on welfare changes. 'And I think that has been accepted from within government and a lot of people, both in the parliamentary Labour Party, but crucially, the country will really welcome that.' The Government's original welfare package had restricted eligibility for Personal Independence Payment (PIP), which is the main disability payment in England. It also cut the health-related element of Universal Credit. But, after Sir Keir offered concessions to rebel MPs, the changes to PIP will now only be implemented in November 2026 and apply to new claimants only. All existing recipients of the health element of Universal Credit will also have their incomes protected in real terms. A Government spokesman said: 'Our reforms to agricultural and business property relief are vital to fix the public services we all rely on. 'Three quarters of estates will continue to pay no inheritance tax at all, while the remaining quarter will pay half the inheritance tax that most people pay, and payments can be spread over 10 years, interest-free. 'We're investing billions of pounds in sustainable food production and nature's recovery, slashing costs for food producers to export to the EU and have appointed former NFU president Baroness Minette Batters to advise on reforms to boost farmers profits.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store