‘Mr. Loverman' Is a Rich, Stylish and Riveting Mini-Series
'Loverman,' arriving Wednesday, on BritBox, is based on the novel by Bernardine Evaristo and follows Barrington Jedidiah Walker (James), an Antiguan native who has been living in London for decades. He is a self-described 'man of property, man of style,' a dapper dresser and a Shakespeare enthusiast, husband to a devout Christian woman, father to two adult daughters and grandfather to a teen boy.
He is also closeted. His long-term partner, Morris (Ariyon Bakare, who also won a BAFTA for his work here and is also fantastic), has been his best friend and lover since they met in Antigua as young men; he is Uncle Morris to Barry's children, a constant presence, a secret and not a secret, a betrayal but also a devotion.
But Barry balks at labels, and he says he isn't a homosexual but rather 'a Barry sexual.' Barry swears he is about to leave his wife, about to tell her the truth. But he has sworn that before.
The show weaves among the characters' perspectives, and long flashbacks depict the pivotal moments that carve each person's reality. We hear their internal monologues, though none sing quite as melodically as Barry's does.
'Loverman' is polished and literary, practically silky — sublime, even. It's natural to be baffled by other people's choices: Why would you do that? Why didn't you say anything? Why would you stay? Why would you leave? A lot of contemporary shows — even plenty of good ones — fall back on pat just-so stories for their characters' backgrounds, but the picture here is deeper and fuller than that. Fear and pain, love and loyalty: They're never just one thing.
There are eight half-hour episodes of 'Mr. Loverman.' I couldn't resist bingeing it, not because it's so propulsive, per se, but because it's so lovely.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Laurence Fox ‘paedophile' posts would not have been taken seriously, appeal told
Social media posts by Laurence Fox referring to two people as paedophiles likely would not have been taken 'seriously' by many people, the Court of Appeal has heard. The actor-turned-activist was successfully sued by now-Stonewall CEO Simon Blake and drag artist Crystal over a row on Twitter, now known as X. Mr Fox called Mr Blake and the former RuPaul's Drag Race contestant, whose real name is Colin Seymour, 'paedophiles' in an exchange about a decision by Sainsbury's to mark Black History Month in October 2020. Mr Fox called for a boycott of the supermarket and was called 'a racist' by the pair, as well as broadcaster Nicola Thorp, before he responded with the 'paedophile' tweets which led to the libel claims. In two judgments in 2024, Mrs Justice Collins Rice ruled in favour of Mr Blake and Mr Seymour and said Mr Fox should pay the pair £90,000 each in damages. The judge dismissed Mr Fox's counter claims against the pair and Ms Thorp over tweets accusing him of racism. The 47-year-old is now challenging the rulings at the Court of Appeal in London, attending the first day of the hearing on Monday. Patrick Green KC, for Mr Fox, said in written submissions that the judgment which found Mr Fox had libelled the pair should be quashed due to 'errors of approach' by the judge, including over whether Mr Blake and Mr Seymour were caused serious harm. Mr Green said: 'Her conclusions were in any event, plainly wrong, on any fair consideration of the evidence.' The barrister added that Mrs Justice Collins Rice had wrongly decided damages for the two men, who, along with Ms Thorp, are opposing the appeal. Mr Green said that the decision on damages did not consider the actual words Mr Fox used 'and the likelihood that many or the vast majority of readers would have not have taken them seriously, particularly in their context'. The barrister said that in one of her rulings, the judge 'ignores the actual words used, or their all important context'. He also said the judge 'failed to account adequately or at all' for an apology Mr Fox made, or alleged misconduct by Mr Blake and Mr Seymour in 'exaggerating' the harm and distress caused. Mr Fox told the original trial in November 2023 that his use of the term was 'rhetorical', and 'there was no inference at any point that I thought they were a paedophile'. 'I was diminishing the ridiculousness of calling me a racist,' he said. And on Monday, Mr Green said it was clear Mr Fox was being rhetorical. The barrister told appeal judges: 'He's not saying 'I am a racist and they are paedophiles' and everyone understood it in that way.' Adrienne Page KC, for Mr Blake, Mr Seymour and Ms Thorp, said in written submissions that Mr Fox's appeal was 'lacking in merit'. She continued: 'The 'paedophile' tweets did not embody the appellant's opinions about Mr Blake and Mr Seymour. 'They conveyed factual imputations of the most serious defamatory character.' The barrister added there was 'no meaningful retraction or apology' by Mr Fox. She later said: 'Whichever way one looks at it, the judge was fully entitled to reach the factual conclusions that she did on the serious, real-world, reputational impact of the appellant's tweets, for the reasons which she gave. 'There was nothing wrong with her analysis in fact or law.' Ms Page added that Mr Fox's case at trial had been 'largely devoted to hypothesising, as already noted, a series of different scenarios as to the various ways or settings in which his tweets may have appeared to different readers'. 'After very careful and conscientious evaluation, the judge was, unsurprisingly, not persuaded of this on the facts,' she continued. Ms Page continued that the sums of £90,000 in damages awarded to the pair were 'unexceptionable'. The hearing before Lord Justice Dingemans, Lady Justice Elisabeth Laing and Lord Justice Warby is expected to conclude on Tuesday.
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Prince Harry's peace summit with King Charles could take place within weeks – but duke has no plans to see William
Prince Harry is ready to speak to his estranged father, King Charles, after approving a so-called peace summit between their aides, according to insiders. The Duke of Sussex's press team was seen meeting up with the monarch's communications secretary for a top-secret meeting in London last week. And according to insiders, the 'Spare' author was the one who gave his press reps, Meredith Maines and Liam Maguire, the go-ahead to meet with the cancer-stricken king's secretary, Tobyn Andreae. The meeting, which took place at the Royal Over-Seas League — a private members' club just minutes from Clarence House — reportedly saw the trio discuss best steps to mending bridges between both camps, The Sun reports. However, sources told the outlet that a proposal for the Invictus Games founder, 40, to return to the royal fold was not on the agenda. Still, it seems as though a royal reconciliation may well be on the cards as Harry is plotting a return to the UK in September for the annual WellChild Awards. His impending arrival on British soil has opened up the prospect of a potential meeting between the pair, which would mark their first in 18 months. The Post has reached out to Prince Harry's reps for comment. Last week's meeting also underscored another element to the rift as the Prince and Princess of Wales's communications team was not in attendance. It was revealed earlier this week that not only Prince William and Princess Catherine's camp were absent, they weren't even told that the meeting was taking place at all. The Post understands that Maines' London dash was officially part of her routine duties. Maines, who is the Sussexes' chief of staff and communications director, met with the UK-based communications team, media, stakeholders and senior figures connected to Harry's patronages. The trans-Atlantic trip was part of ongoing planning and engagement. However, sources told The Telegraph that Harry and the 'Suits' alum, 43, were 'frustrated' that the meeting was leaked to the press. The meeting came just weeks after Harry told the BBC that he would 'love a reconciliation' with his estranged father, though he claimed the king 'won't speak' to him. 'There have been so many disagreements between myself and some of my family,' he told the outlet. 'I would love reconciliation with my family. There's no point continuing to fight anymore, life is precious,' the Invictus Games founder said, adding that he has since 'forgiven' them for their many 'disagreements.' While a September meet-up between the father-son duo hasn't been confirmed just yet, it may put the King in a tricky position as he's set to welcome President Donald Trump at Windsor Castle for his upcoming state visit, slated for September 17. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Prince William and Kate Middleton's reaction to secret meeting between Harry and King Charles' aides revealed
Prince William and Kate Middleton were not in the know about last week's rumored peace talks between Prince Harry's communications team and King Charles' press rep, according to insiders. The Prince and Princess of Wales's press reps were notably absent from the top-secret meeting that featured Meredith Maines and Liam Maguire, who head up the Duke and Duchess of Sussex's communication team, and Tobyn Andreae, the monarch's communications secretary. According to palace insiders, the future king's team was not notified about the secret meet-up. 'It's no coincidence that William and Catherine did not have a representative at the Royal Over-Seas League,' a source told the Daily Mail. 'They were not asked to send anyone and will be treating the talks with extreme caution.' 'The fact that it ended up in the newspapers tells you all you need to know,' the insider added. While the nature of the conversation was not immediately clear, an insider told People that the fact a conversation even took place is 'a good first step.' 'It is always better to be talking,' they added. The Post has reached out to Kensington Palace for comment. The informal interaction took place at the Royal Over-Seas League, a private members' club just minutes from Clarence House. The trio initially convened on the club's balcony before moving the conversation indoors for privacy. The Post understands that Maines' London dash was officially part of her routine duties. Maines, who is the Sussexes' chief of staff and communications director, met with the UK-based communications team, media, stakeholders and senior figures connected to Harry's patronages. The trans-Atlantic trip was part of ongoing planning and engagement. However, sources told The Telegraph that Harry and the 'Suits' alum were 'frustrated' that the meeting was leaked to the press. The meeting came just weeks after the 'Spare' author, 40, told the BBC that he would 'love a reconciliation' with his cancer-stricken father, though he claimed the king 'won't speak' to him. 'There have been so many disagreements between myself and some of my family,' he told the outlet. 'I would love reconciliation with my family. There's no point continuing to fight anymore, life is precious,' the Invictus Games founder said, adding that he has since 'forgiven' them for their many 'disagreements.' Solve the daily Crossword
