logo
‘My great-grandfather invented rationing. Britain would be healthier if we brought it back'

‘My great-grandfather invented rationing. Britain would be healthier if we brought it back'

Telegraph03-07-2025
Video by Claudia Marquis
Like most of us in Britain, Claudia Marquis, a video journalist at The Telegraph, first learnt about wartime food rationing in a Year Six history class. But she had only ever known a restricted diet herself, after she was diagnosed with coeliac disease at the age of two.
Coeliac disease is triggered by gluten consumption and is an autoimmune disorder where cells inside the small intestine attack themselves, so most with it follow a strict gluten-free diet. That means avoiding products like bread, pasta, cakes and cereals.
'I had a special cupboard for my food at school, and I could never eat things at birthday parties or on trips away without checking all of the ingredients first,' Claudia recalls. Fortunately, with a great-grandfather like Fred Marquis – latterly the Lord Woolton, made in recognition of his work as Minister of Food – eating in a different way to most was never a cause for embarrassment.
Marquis himself had colitis, another autoimmune condition managed mostly through diet. Claudia's father, Marquis' grandson, remembers the Lord Woolton's diet to have been a plain and unvaried one.
What people ate during the ration, which lasted from January 1940 to the summer of 1954, was not unlike what Marquis had always eaten at home. The food minister had a task on his hands in getting the nation to accept it themselves, however. With supply lines under attack from the Axis powers, feeding the country at all would be extremely difficult, and ensuring fairness in access to food even more so.
While the wealthy ate well and obesity was scarce, food poverty and malnutrition was rampant in the poor working families that made up much of the population. A 1936 survey estimated that 4.5 million people had inadequate diets.
The picture is not so different today. According to a report by the charity FoodCycle, 7.2 million UK households struggle to afford healthy meals in 2025. Hunger may not be so widespread, but fresh food can often be out of reach to those on tight budgets, leading many to rely on ultra-processed products that are low in fibre and protein and high in salt, sugar and preservatives.
These foods are often far cheaper given their long shelf lives, but they are also delicious, and whatever the size of our wallets, too many of us have a dependence on them. We consume around 60 per cent of our calories from them each day, a major reason why one third of adult Britons are officially obese. What's more, one in five adults now live with diabetes or prediabetes, and we have the lowest life expectancy in Western Europe.
The health benefits of rationing
What would happen if ultra-processed foods were suddenly removed from our diets? Rationing was 'a unique opportunity to look at what happens when you level the playing field, which is what it was designed to do,' says Sam Rice, author of The Midlife Kitchen and The Telegraph's nutrition expert.
'General mortality rates went down. Rates of cardiovascular disease went down. Children tended to be taller if they were growing up in that period.' For all, but especially the least affluent, 'it was definitely a net benefit'.
Marquis averted disaster at home by ensuring that no one starved. People in other parts of Europe were not so lucky. One of the worst-hit countries was the Netherlands, where a German blockade in 1944 led to a huge famine. It was during this time however that a massive breakthrough was also made in the understanding of coeliac disease. 'A Dutch paediatrician called William Dicker found that a lot of his coeliac patients saw their symptoms disappear during that period, and come back once more foods became available,' says Rice.
The reintroduction of bread – and with it, gluten – was his 'eureka moment', and 'subsequently the first dietary treatments for coeliac disease were created, like the gluten-free diet'.
The 1940s were really 'the beginning of our understanding of gut health and gut conditions,' says Rice. What we know 80 years on is that the foods people ate during rationing would have been excellent for their gut health, and the health of our guts are crucial to everything from our risk of colorectal cancer and ability to maintain a healthy weight, to our moods, brains and memories.
The importance of seasonal eating
People 'would have been eating very seasonally', says Rice, meaning that they got the full benefit of the vitamins in their fruit and vegetables. A 'waste not, want not' attitude to eating encouraged people to use the skins and ends of vegetables, 'where most of the fibre is stored'.
Other foods such as the National Loaf, a wholewheat brown (or grey) bread that replaced refined white bread and used both germ and bran, was packed with yet more fibre and micronutrients. Milk was available in generous amounts, so people made it into yoghurt at home, which was high in prebiotics. 'That certainly would have been a big boost to their guts,' Rice says.
These days, people with coeliac disease are often advised to take good care of their gut health. Doing so limits inflammation and 'makes my gut more resilient to any foods containing gluten that I eat accidentally,' Claudia says. Recent research suggests that all of us could do with consuming gluten with greater moderation, as some studies have found that cutting down on gluten can improve digestion, reduce bloating and help to counteract fatigue.
Foods such as the Woolton Pie, so named for the Lord Woolton, were often made without gluten, as the flour ration was tight. The pie was filled with root vegetables including carrots, swedes and cauliflower, which weren't rationed as they could be grown at home. It was sometimes topped with wheatmeal pastry, but more commonly with a mixture of mashed potato and lard (to save on the butter ration).
The impact on gut health
The variety of vegetables, providing fibre and micronutrients, and the potato-based pastry on top 'would have been excellent for people's gut health,' says Rice. Even the lard would have had benefits: it is 'lower in saturated fat than butter, and higher in monounsaturated fats and polyunsaturated fats, including omega three, as well as being lower in cholesterol and containing some vitamin D'. Her only complaint by modern standards is that the pie 'didn't contain much protein'. These days, she says, you'd want to add a tin of lentils or beans to make up the difference.
The pie is still enjoyed today by Claudia's aunt, Lady Alexandra Elletson, who is Fred Marquis' granddaughter. 'I would have met him when I was three or four, but sadly I was too young to remember it. I would have loved to have a conversation with him about the war, because I think of him very highly,' Lady Elletson says. An avid cook, she always boils, fries or bakes from scratch, and she has an attitude to food that Marquis surely would have approved of.
'I love seasonal food,' Lady Elletson says. 'I don't want strawberries in October. I make a roast every Sunday, even if it's just my husband and I at home, and the meat does me in sandwiches or pies for the rest of the week.' The Woolton pie is a favourite because 'it's comfort food, it really fills everyone up,' she adds. 'All the men and women working during the war needed carbs to fuel them. A pie had to have that lovely pastry on top.'
Should we bring back rationing?
So, should we bring back rationing? Britain ended World War II in significantly better health than it had been when the conflict began. Obesity was extremely scarce, infant mortality decreased dramatically, and malnutrition was no longer the scourge on our health that it had been. A lot has changed for the worse since then.
William Sitwell, The Telegraph's restaurant critic, says he would love to see rationing return, 'but it would take a war', and ultimately, we are all much better off a little overweight and with sub-optimal gut health than we are 'dead on a battlefield'.
In any case, we would be far better 'teaching the country how to cook,' says Lady Elletson. 'Lots of people don't know how to cook today, or what should be on their plates. Your stomach is about the same size as your fist, and that's how much you should be eating.'
As for Claudia, she's glad to live in a time where she's free to choose how she eats, within the restraints of a gluten-free diet. 'I enjoy what I eat, and there are lots of options for people with coeliac disease and stomach conditions today,' she says, 'but rationing certainly taught people to think carefully about how they fuel their bodies, and we could all stand to learn from that.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Budget UK supermarket recalls popular chicken product over dangerous health risk as shoppers warned ‘do NOT eat'
Budget UK supermarket recalls popular chicken product over dangerous health risk as shoppers warned ‘do NOT eat'

The Sun

time27 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Budget UK supermarket recalls popular chicken product over dangerous health risk as shoppers warned ‘do NOT eat'

A MAJOR supermarket has urgently recalled a product over a possible health risk. Customers have been warned not to eat the popular item as it could be lethal. Lidl has pulled out Tempura 4 Chicken Steaks off the shelves as it has undeclared allergens. The item contains milk but does not emphasise it in bold in the ingredients list. It poses a dangerous health risk to anyone with an allergy or intolerance to milk. Customers should look out for boxes with best before dates of 11/12/2026, 16/12/2026, 22/12/2026, 30/12/2026. The Food Standards Agency issued a warning to shoppers today saying "do not eat it." A point-of-sale notice has also been issued to customers explaining why the product is being recalled and instructing them what to do if they have bought it. Shoppers are advised to return the product to the point of sale where they will receive a full refund with or without a receipt. It comes just days after the viral Dubai-style chocolate bar was recalled for having an undeclared ingredient. Shops selling the product were warned to immediately stop sales and undertake product withdrawals. The internet sensation contained peanuts which was not declared on the packaging. Thousands of contaminated tablets are urgently recalled in UK as Brits fall ill with 'antibiotic resistant Salmonella' It posed a health risk to anyone with a peanut allergy or peanut intolerance. Businesses had been supplied the chocolate by a company called Black Sea Trading Ltd, who had "so far been uncontactable." Shoppers were urged not to buy the product and not to eat the chocolate if they had already bought it. Anyone who had purchased the chocolate was encouraged to dispose of it at home. The Food Standards Agency encouraged customers to contact their local Trading Standards and report where they had purchased the chocolate. Your product recall rights Chief consumer reporter James Flanders reveals all you need to know. Product recalls are an important means of protecting consumers from dangerous goods. As a general rule, if a recall involves a branded product, the manufacturer would usually have lead responsibility for the recall action. But it's often left up to supermarkets to notify customers when products could put them at risk. If you are concerned about the safety of a product you own, always check the manufacturer's website to see if a safety notice has been issued. When it comes to appliances, rather than just food items, the onus is usually on you - the customer - to register the appliance with the manufacturer as if you don't there is no way of contacting you to tell you about a fault. If you become aware that an item you own has been recalled or has any safety noticed issued against it, make sure you follow the instructions given to you by the manufacturer. They should usually provide you with more information and a contact number on its safety notice. In some cases, the manufacturer might ask you to return the item for a full refund or arrange for the faulty product to be collected. You should not be charged for any recall work - such as a repair, replacement or collection of the recalled item

The everyday hairstyle making Brits go bald & the easy trick to solve it, according to a hairdresser
The everyday hairstyle making Brits go bald & the easy trick to solve it, according to a hairdresser

The Sun

timean hour ago

  • The Sun

The everyday hairstyle making Brits go bald & the easy trick to solve it, according to a hairdresser

A HAIR expert has revealed that brushing wet hair may cause more permanent damage to hair follicles than many people realise - and can lead to you going bald. Dr Roshan Vara, from Treatment Rooms London, said this common post-shower habit weakens hair structure at a molecular level, potentially leading to increased breakage and thinning over time. 3 They shared: "Wet hair has a lot of physical differences to hair when it's dry and that can affect its ability to handle stress from brushing. 'Water affects the hair shaft, and as a result, it experiences stretches in the cuticle because of swelling and that leads to breakage due to the strain.' Hair researchers have found that wet hair can stretch more than dry hair before breaking, but this apparent elasticity is misleading. Dr Roshan explained: "Wet hair causes stretching which damages the protein structure, leading to weaker hair over time.' So how do you combat this? SAFE SOLUTION Wide-tooth combs should be used instead of brushes, for wet hair, according to the hair transplant expert. Dr Roshan continued: "If you haven't brushed your hair before you wet it, don't use a standard brush, use a wide-tooth comb and start from the ends and work your way up. 'Never start brushing from the roots when hair is wet - you must avoid doing this to prevent damage.' According to Dr Roshan, styling techniques that combine wetness and heat exacerbate the damage. They added: "Using a hairdryer on soaking wet hair is particularly damaging, even if many may do that without even thinking. My hair's so thin you can see my scalp but miracle £8 buy fixes it in seconds 'The speed of which water is removed from the hair shaft can cause essentially a rupturing effect which pushes out the cuticle and leads to hair falling out as it isn't as strong as it needs to be." The protection of the hair cuticle continues its decline as a result of aggressive brushing on wet hair. Fine hair and chemically treated hair – whether coloured, permed or relaxed – are especially susceptible to wet brushing damage because their protein structure is already altered. TINA Farey, Editorial director at Rush Hair, shares her advice… HOW TO RESTORE DAMAGED HAIR Whilst you can't fully reserve the effects of damaged hair, you can stop the problem from growing. Depending on the condition of your hair, I'd recommend getting a trim every six to eight weeks - this will prevent any split ends from travelling further up the hair shaft, which weakens the hair's overall structure and leads to more breakage. Even just an inch of the ends will completely transform the appearance of your hair – trust me. When it comes to products to help restore damaged hair, Goldwell's Rich Repair Treatment Mask is a firm favourite – strengthening damaged locks to be healthy and shiny once again. HOW TO PREVENT DAMAGE My number one tip is to always use a heat protectant – even if you're only blow-drying your hair. Consistent heat styling without one will leave your hair open to heat damage. I'd also recommend refraining from over-washing your hair as this can strip the hair of its natural oils – nobody wants a dry and irritated scalp! And finally, swap your sleek, slick back for a hair down day! They may be in fashion at the moment, but over time all that tension on your strands from being pulled will wreak havoc on your hair follicles – this could lead to thinning and bald spots in areas where the hair is constantly pulled.

I'm a 29-year-old who spends £600 a month (including £375 on gym memberships) to look this ripped
I'm a 29-year-old who spends £600 a month (including £375 on gym memberships) to look this ripped

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

I'm a 29-year-old who spends £600 a month (including £375 on gym memberships) to look this ripped

As a 29-year-old woman, you'd think my biggest outgoings would be clothes, nights out, beauty treatments and my Octopus Energy bill. But those cost a snip compared to the £375.97 I spend on gym memberships each month. I don't get blow-dries or Botox (yet) and I rarely go clubbing. I'm more concerned about looking ripped while maintaining a healthy mind space, and I'm willing to spend a hefty chunk of my salary each year to get it.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store