Scientists found cut marks on a 850,000-year-old human neck bone. Was it ... cannibalism?
The researchers say the finding, announced July 24, is further indication of Paleolithic cannibalism at Gran Dolina cave in Spain's Sierra de Atapuerca, where signs of ancient humans butchering one another have been found for decades.
"This is direct evidence that the child was processed like any other prey," says Palmira Saladié, an archaeologist with the Catalan Institute of Human Paleoecology and Social Evolution (IPHES-CERCA) and one of the leaders of the excavations where the neck bone was unearthed.
Decapitation did not always mean meat from the dead individual was consumed, she says. But in the case of this child, who was between two and four years old, she believes it was almost certain the individual was also eaten.
The toddler's vertebra was found along with bones from nine other individuals, in a layer of sediment within the cave dated to about 850,000 years ago. Many of the bones also had cut marks, as well as fractures the researchers say seem to have been made to reach the marrow inside. But not everyone agrees with the team's conclusions.
Homo antecessor's cave
Gran Dolina and the Atapuerca site near the northern Spanish city of Burgos were uncovered in the 1890s, when a route for a new railway was cut through nearby mountains. Excavations since the 1960s have revealed broadly accepted evidence of cannibalism among the Homo antecessor group that lived there from about 900,000 years ago until their species went extinct, possibly a little more than 100,000 years later.
Scientists disagree on whether Homo antecessor was a direct ancestor of anatomically modern humans—Homo sapiens—or if it was a related species that died out.
Regardless, evidence from prehistoric archaeological sites—including the Mesolithic Gough's Cave in the west of England and the Neolithic Herxheim site in Germany—indicates that early Homo sapiens, too, were sometimes cannibals. Signs of cannibalism among earlier human species, such as Neanderthals, have been found at archaeological sites all over the world, including some of the earliest evidence from Kenya.
In a few cases, what was once thought to be evidence of hominin cannibalism might actually be something else: stripping flesh from bones for a "reburial" perhaps, which has been suggested for Neolithic remains in France.
Cannibal controversy
Some experts disagree if the newfound cut-marks are evidence the child was cannibalized.
"Cannibalism is very rare," says Michael Pante a paleoanthropologist from Colorado State University, who was not involved in the discovery. "It's just not a common thing that we see."
He says that although scientists claim to have found evidence of cannibalism from remains at several archaeological sites, and especially at Atapuerca, direct evidence of it is uncommon.
"This decapitation doesn't mean they consumed that individual," says Pante. "They were obviously cutting up a child for some reason, but there are a number of reasons they may have done that." A funeral ritual is one possibility.
Pante also disagrees with a suggestion made by the researchers that early humans at Atapuerca hunted rival humans as a food resource.
"There is not a lot of evidence of that," he says. Cannibalism among humans—even very early humans like these—was unusual for nutritional purposes and may have only occurred in rituals, he adds.
Other researchers are more convinced, however.
James Cole, an archaeologist and expert in early human cannibalism who was also not involved in the work, says the first evidence for cannibalism at Atapuerca was found almost 30 years ago.
"The new find in this respect is perhaps unsurprising,' he says, 'but it is absolutely fascinating and hints at the rich story about our evolutionary past that the site still has to tell.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 hours ago
- Yahoo
The James Webb Telescope May Have Found Primordial Black Holes
JWST observations of light sources before the first galaxies should have formed are raising new questions about our galactic origins Since its launch in late 2021, the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) has been glimpsing some of the earliest epochs of cosmic time. Its observations have stretched cosmologists' timelines of when galaxies may have first started to form. And now some of the telescope's farthest observations yet have revealed sources of blue ultraviolet light from an epoch when stars shouldn't have existed yet. The observations indicate nine new light sources, with six at redshift 17 and three at redshift 25, when the universe was only 200 million to 100 million years old. 'It's the deepest by a factor of a few compared to any other data obtained by JWST in the whole mission,' says Pablo G. Pérez-González, an astrophysicist at the Center for Astrobiology in Madrid. He is lead author of a preprint paper reporting the findings that has been accepted for publication in the Astrophysical Journal. 'If we confirm that they are truly at those redshifts, the universe was much, much more active its first 200 million years' than astronomers had thought, Pérez-González says. [Sign up for Today in Science, a free daily newsletter] If accurate, the newly sighted objects don't merely expand the timeline of galaxy formation back to a much earlier period; they sit in direct conflict with astronomers' best cosmological models of when stars began to form during the cosmic dawn. For this reason, another group of astronomers have put forward a hypothesis to make sense of these puzzling findings. They have proposed that 'primordial' black holes created right after the big bang may have lit up the universe before the first stars. Their preprint paper has been accepted for publication in the journal Astronomy & Astrophysics. "If stars cannot explain the source of the luminosity and the numbers that we see, something else should be producing the light,' says Andrea Ferrara, an astrophysicist at the Superior Normal School (SNS) in Pisa, Italy, and co-author of the first paper. 'This can only be a primordial black hole.' In other words, it's possible that the first objects to bathe the early universe in light were not stars but rather hungry black holes that burst into existence mere seconds after the big bang itself. The Trouble with Early Galaxies The farther we peer out to our cosmic horizons, the further back in time we see. And because the universe itself is expanding, light traveling from extremely distant sources has stretched its wavelength all the way to the infrared part of the electromagnetic spectrum. This phenomenon is what astrophysicists refer to as redshift. The higher the redshift of a distant object is, therefore, the further back in time you are looking. Before JWST, the highest confirmed redshifted galaxy astronomers had observed was at redshift 9, when the universe was 600 million to 500 million years old. For the first couple of years after its launch, JWST spent a significant amount of its time confirming previously identified galaxies that had been observed by the Hubble Space Telescope (HST). Variables such as the concentration of dark matter—an invisible gravitational source that outweighs visible matter in the universe by six to one—and the necessary conditions needed for star formation provide cosmologists with constraints to determine a rough timeline for the evolution of galaxies in the early universe. But after the summer of 2022, as JWST began revealing galactic candidates at earlier epochs, astronomers started to realize something wasn't quite making sense. 'JWST is finding too many too massive galaxies too early in the universe,' says astrophysicist Allison Kirkpatrick of the University of Kansas, who specializes in galaxy evolution and was not involved in the new studies. To date, the oldest confirmed galaxies observed by JWST are at redshift 14, when the universe was only 300 million years old. 'So the idea here was to go beyond that, to redshift 15 and beyond,' Pérez-González says, "in search of the very first galaxies ever formed.' His team's report of nine new objects at even higher redshifts will need confirmation. To determine whether the objects are as far as they seem to be, astronomers must break up their light into specific wavelengths in a process called spectroscopy. Drawing on data collected by JWST's Near Infrared Camera (NIRCam) over two imaging surveys, Pérez-González and his team identified the new candidate galaxies from a pool of more than 80,000. After imaging a region of the sky with different filters for more than 100 hours, the astronomers were able to identify galaxies at different brightnesses and select the most promising candidates for further observation. Casting a wide net means their sample is less likely to be biased before they zoom in on the most interesting distant objects. The suspected galaxies Pérez-González and his team found shine with bright blue light in the ultraviolet range of the spectrum—exactly the light astronomers believe the massive first stars would have produced. The problem with this scenario, however, is that galaxy evolution models have an extremely tough time producing stars at such early stages of the universe's development. It's doubtful that this time frame would have allowed enough time for gas to cool and gather into clouds large enough to gravitationally collapse into the first generation of stars. 'Galaxies cannot form quickly because the gas in the early universe is very hot, preventing it from collapsing into galaxies and stars,' Kirkpatrick says. 'Instead dark matter structure grows first, and the immense gravity funnels gas to the center to grow the first stars and galaxies. This all takes time, more time than 100 million years.' Black Holes from the Very Beginning To get around this problem, Ferrara and his collaborators propose that primordial black holes—a distinct population of black holes that may have emerged in the first few seconds after the big bang—were consuming gas in the early universe. This feeding frenzy could have released light that we are now detecting with JWST at periods before the first stars formed. Bizarrely, black holes, not stars, might have been the first significant sources of light in the early universe. Typically, black holes form when massive stars collapse after they run out of fuel or when a large cloud of gas directly collapses in on itself, bypassing the stellar phase. Primordial black holes, however, are different. 'What we are proposing is that primordial black holes formed less than one second to five seconds after the big bang,' Ferrara says. 'These have been essentially there forever, from the beginning.' Initially, these black holes would have started out small, 'no larger than the size of an atom,' Kirkpatrick says. Scientists think that within the first second of the universe as we know it bursting into existence, a rapid period of expansion, known as inflation, caused space to increase in size by 35 orders of magnitude, equivalent to an atom stretching to the size of the solar system. 'This has a lot of consequences, including the creation of very small black holes,' Kirkpatrick says. Although starting out tiny, after 100 million years, these black holes may have swelled to 10,000 times the mass of the sun, Ferrara and his team suspect. When gas gets near a black hole, it gets heated to scorching temperatures, and this superheated matter emits light. From a distance, it might look similar to the atmosphere of a star. For this reason, the difference between the primordial black hole explanation and the stellar explanation, based on the current imaging data, is nearly impossible to disentangle. But there may be other clues. One way to distinguish if these light sources are primordial black holes or first-generation stars would be to look at the sizes of galaxies. If they appear more pointlike, then the primordial black hole explanation would make more sense because a massive black hole is still tiny compared with a whole galaxy. But if the light sources are diffuse and extended, then they might be more likely to be stars. "So we measured the sizes, and some of the candidates are, to the best of our knowledge with the data that we have, pointlike but not all of them. Some of them are extended. So maybe 30 percent of them are consistent with what a primordial black hole might look like," Pérez-González says. Right now the data are hardly definitive. Because primordial black holes have hypothetically been around since the very beginning of the universe, they should also leave traces in the cosmic microwave background (CMB), a snapshot of the universe as it existed 380,000 years after the big bang. 'Our pictures of the CMB maps are still a little bit too blurred in order to see the fine-structure details that primordial black holes may have introduced,' Ferrara says. For now, a definitive answer is just beyond reach. The possible presence of primordial black holes may, however, make sense of another cosmological conundrum: the existence of supermassive black holes at the centers of galaxies at early epochs. 'We haven't yet proved how the first supermassive black hole seeds form, and this could be one pathway. It would help resolve some of the tension with JWST observations and cosmological models,' Kirkpatrick says. 'These observations are difficult, and we are pushing the JWST to its limit,' Ferrara says. 'We have to be careful because maybe these galaxies could turn out to be contaminants or lower-redshift galaxies or something else.' But whether these mysterious black beacons outshone the first stars is a question we may soon have an answer to. It's Time to Stand Up for Science Before you close the page, we need to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and we think right now is the most critical moment in that two-century history. We're not asking for donations or charity. If you become a Digital, Print or Unlimited subscriber to Scientific American, you can help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized. Click here to subscribe. Solve the daily Crossword


Medscape
a day ago
- Medscape
Non-Invasive Test May Transform Infant Meningitis Screening
TOPLINE: A high-resolution ultrasound-based device demonstrated excellent accuracy in detecting elevated white blood cell (WBC) counts in cerebrospinal fluids, showing promise as a non-invasive screening tool for meningitis in neonates and infants with a permeable fontanel and potentially offering an alternative to lumbar puncture. METHODOLOGY: The diagnosis of meningitis requires an invasive lumbar puncture to collect cerebrospinal fluid for detecting elevated WBC counts; however, this procedure carries inherent risks and practical limitations. Researchers conducted a prospective study across hospitals in Spain, Mozambique, and Morocco to validate the safety and accuracy of Neosonics — a non-invasive high-resolution ultrasound-based device that can detect signals from WBCs in the cerebrospinal fluid via the anterior fontanel — in neonates and infants younger than 24 months with suspected meningitis against the gold-standard techniques. High-resolution images of the cerebrospinal fluid were captured and used to train a deep learning model that identified and classified cerebrospinal fluid patterns on the basis of lumbar puncture-confirmed WBC counts, with ≥ 30 cells/mm 3 defined as a case. defined as a case. The accuracy of the trained algorithm was tested on 3782 high-resolution images of 76 patients. TAKEAWAY: The Neosonics device correctly identified 17 of 18 meningitis cases and 55 of 58 controls participants without meningitis, yielding a sensitivity of 94.4% and a specificity of 94.8%. Overall, the device achieved an accuracy of 94.7% in detecting elevated WBC counts in the cerebrospinal fluid. Misclassified participants either had low WBC counts or were microbiologically confirmed cases without elevated WBC counts. IN PRACTICE: "The non-invasive WBC counter, can lead to a more accurate indication for LP [lumbar puncture] and/or indications of treatment, resulting in better patient outcomes and in a reduction of the risk of long-term sequelae, along with a likely more cost-effective use of resources in all settings," the authors wrote. SOURCE: This study was led by Sara Ajanovic and Quique Bassat, ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain, and Fernando Cabañas, Quirónsalud Madrid University Hospital, Madrid, Spain. It was published online on July 23, 2025, in Pediatric Research. LIMITATIONS: This study faced challenges in obtaining reliable gold-standard comparison results. The device's precision decreased in participants with thicker fontanels, and it misclassified three participants with very narrow cerebrospinal fluid spaces. Moreover, the image acquisition time was suboptimal. DISCLOSURES: This study was supported, in whole or in part, by the Gates Foundation in Mozambique and Morocco; funded by Instituto de Salud Carlos III and co-funded by the European Union in Spain; and funded by the Spanish Agency of Cooperation in Morocco. Five authors were employees of Kriba, the company developing Neosonics. One author and the ISGlobal Biomedical Data Science team disclosed receiving honoraria, training fees, and consulting fees from Kriba. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Experts issue warning as 'alien monster' spider spreads around the globe on cargo ships — here's why it's so dangerous
Experts issue warning as 'alien monster' spider spreads around the globe on cargo ships — here's why it's so dangerous Australia may soon be invaded by a spider that scientists have called an "alien monster." What's happening? The New Zealand false widow spider, a native of the Canary Islands and Madeira in Spain, is an invasive species that is spreading rapidly via cargo shipments. According to the International Business Times, the spider that scientists have labeled an "alien monster" is believed to be making its way to Australia. The false widow is known for adapting well to urban environments and can be found everywhere from mailboxes to garden sheds, so it will thrive in areas of Australia with similar environments. However, this invasive species offers a double whammy with its bites, which is what earned it the label of "alien monster." Though the species is less aggressive than some other spiders found in Australia, its venom is neurotoxic and can cause swelling, pain, tissue necrosis, and low blood pressure. Fatalities from the bite of this spider are rare; however, hospitalizations are not. Even worse, though, is the fact that the false widow spider is a host for a plethora of antibiotic-resistant pathogens, meaning antibiotics don't always work on bites from this species. Why are invasive species concerning? Any kind of invasive species is a major concern for the country it invades, as they can cause immense damage to native species and local ecosystems. As evidenced by the false widow spider in New Zealand, invasive species spread rapidly. They outcompete native species for vital resources, such as food, and introduce new diseases into local populations (or in this case, new neurotoxins and antibiotic-resistant pathogens). Some invasive species can also impact human food supplies, destroy native plants, alter soil chemistry, and even exacerbate extreme weather conditions. Protecting and prioritizing native species is a crucial way to help conserve natural resources, safeguard food supplies for both animals and humans, and limit the spread of new diseases. Do you worry about air pollution in your town? All the time Often Only sometimes Never Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. What's being done about the New Zealand false widow spider? Unfortunately, there's only so much that experts can do to stymie the tide when it comes to invasive species, especially in cases like this one where the species is small and can hide in cargo to enter the country. According to IBT, experts in Australia have urged the government to increase the monitoring of imported goods, educate the public about the species, and make investments in containment measures to mitigate the risks associated with the false widow spider. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet. Solve the daily Crossword