Angus King, Susan Collins ask Trump administration to reverse 'illegal' Job Corps cuts in Maine
King and 39 other senators on Monday asked the U.S. Department of Labor to rescind "unconstitutional and illegal" cuts to Job Corps that they say are harming communities in Maine and across the country. Collins, who has repeatedly pushed to keep the program running, sent a separate but similar letter May 28.
The Trump administration last month indefinitely paused operations at 99 Job Corps sites, including two in Maine, citing budgetary and performance issues.
"Job Corps was created to help young adults build a pathway to a better life through education, training and community," Department of Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer said in the announcement. "However, a startling number of serious incident reports and our in-depth fiscal analysis reveal the program is no longer achieving the intended outcomes that students deserve."
Chavez-DeRemer said the administration would support students in advancing their training and connecting them with education and employment opportunities. The centers will close by June 30.
The Loring Job Corps Center in Limestone and the Penobscot Job Corps Center in Bangor serve a combined 500 students in Maine.
The Bangor location opened in 1980 and the Loring center opened in 1997, just a few years after the closure of the Loring Air Force Base. The Loring Job Corps Center is now one of the largest employers in rural Maine, with 129 employees, according to Collins, R-Maine. They're both large "feeder" programs for Bath Iron Works and the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard, and the Penobscot center has the Job Corps' only advanced marine pipefitting training program.
The center directors said they are not permitted to speak about the closures and directed all media inquiries to the Department of Labor.
In a letter Monday to Chavez-DeRemer, King and the other senators said the administration's decision to terminate Job Corps center operations has left 25,000 students and thousands of staff members "in the lurch."
"The sudden 'pause' of operations at Job Corps centers puts young people's lives at risk, especially a significant number of students who were experiencing homelessness before arriving to the program," they wrote. "Local communities will pay a steep price, especially the thousands of individuals who work at the centers and will lose their livelihoods."
Job Corps, established in 1964, is the largest free residential education and job training program in the country. It helps young people ages 16-24 in rural communities finish high school, learn technical skills and get good-paying jobs.
But according to the Department of Labor, it also has serious flaws.
In April, the department published its first Job Corps Transparency Report, based on the financial performance and operational costs from 2023.
The report found that Job Corps only had a 38% graduation rate and cost more than $80,000 per student, per year. It also found almost 15,000 infractions, including drug use and acts of violence.
Collins said that while Job Corps isn't perfect, it still works.
At a budget hearing last month, Collins questioned Chavez-DeRemer on the decision to eliminate the Job Corps.
"I, for the life of me, do not understand why the administration wants to eliminate this valuable program. And I know we've had a discussion on the cost. It is so much more expensive if someone, because of the influence and lack of support, ends up addicted, or sex trafficked, or in jail, than it is to have them go to a Job Corps Center and receive the guidance and skills that they need to turn around their lives," she said.
She spoke of Adais Viruet-Torres, a graduate from the Loring Center (and later Husson University) who now works as a nurse practitioner.
Viruet-Torres had been experiencing homelessness and living in a dangerous situation in Connecticut when she learned about the Job Corps program by chance, Collins said.
'LITERALLY SAVED HER LIFE'
"Job Corps literally saved her live, and she has been in the medical field ever since," Collins said.
The Department of Labor announced in April that it would not take new enrollments at the Penobscot and Loring Job Corps centers in Maine, saying the facilities "continue to face ongoing sustainability issues due to rising costs." The announcement said the department would continue to evaluate those and other facilities.
Collins also sent a letter to the secretary in April, asking the administration to reverse the decision to pause enrollment.
"Penobscot and LJCC have both supported the economic vitality and community development of their respective areas for decades and losing these centers would be detrimental to both communities as well as to the young people they serve," she said at the time.
Now, King, I-Maine, and the other senators — all Democrats, plus Vermont independent Bernie Sanders — are asking the administration to immediately reverse its decision to prevent a lapse in education and services for students. They also asked the Department of Labor to restart enrollments, resume background checks and make any contract extensions or modifications needed to ensure there are no interruptions or delays.
Collins sent a similar request late last month.
Congress passed the Full-Year Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act of 2025, which includes $1.76 billion for Job Corps and ensures that Job Corps Centers are funded for the new program year that begins on July 1.
Copy the Story Link
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
6 hours ago
- Business Insider
BYD (BYDDF) Kicks Off EV Production at the New Brazil Plant
Chinese electric vehicle giant BYD (BYDDF) has officially kicked off production at its new Camaçari plant in Brazil. This facility, located in Bahia, marks a major milestone in its global expansion strategy. Don't Miss TipRanks' Half-Year Sale Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Make smarter investment decisions with TipRanks' Smart Investor Picks, delivered to your inbox every week. The plant that was built in just 15 months, rolled out its first model, the Dolphin Mini, which has become Brazil's best-selling EV with over 34,000 units sold to date. BYD plans to add a compact crossover SUV, Song Pro, and a compact sedan, King, to the production lineup in the coming weeks. With a $1 billion investment and an annual capacity of 150,000 vehicles, the facility uses smart systems to adjust production based on demand. BYD says the plant will support 20,000 jobs, both directly and through its local supply chain. BYD's Global Expansion Strategy This expansion comes as BYD continues its robust global growth. The company reported a 33% increase in global sales, reaching 2.1 million vehicles in the first half of 2025, with 464,000 units sold outside of China. Further, BYD's expansion into Brazil's EV market is a strategic move, as the country's NEV sales have surged 39% in the first five months of 2025. Apart from Brazil, the company has launched or announced facilities in Thailand, Hungary, and Turkey, part of a strategy to localize manufacturing and bypass rising tariffs in key markets. Importantly, BYD aims to sell 10 million vehicles annually by 2030, with 50% of sales coming from outside China, targeting regions like Europe and Latin America where EV demand is surging. Is BYDDF a Good Stock to Buy Now? Turning to Wall Street, analysts have a Strong Buy consensus rating on BYDDF stock based on 10 Buys assigned in the past three months. Furthermore, the average BYD stock price target of $22.89 per share implies 46.43% upside potential.
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Microsoft announces another round of layoffs, affecting 9,000 roles
Microsoft has announced its second significant round of layoffs in recent months, affecting approximately 9,000 employees, or nearly 4% of its global workforce. The technology firm began issuing layoff notices on Wednesday 2 July 2025, impacting divisions such as its Xbox video game segment and other departments, reported The Associated Press. This wave of job cuts is the largest the company has implemented in more than two years. The layoffs will impact various teams worldwide, including the sales division, as part of organisational adjustments aimed at enhancing Microsoft's competitiveness in a rapidly changing market. In a memo to staff within the gaming division, Xbox CEO Phil Spencer mentioned that these changes are intended to steer the business towards long-term success by focusing on strategic growth. The layoffs also include 830 employees from Microsoft's headquarters in Redmond, Washington, as per a notification sent to state officials. The company did not disclose the total number of layoffs but confirmed it represents about 4% of the workforce reported a year ago, when Microsoft had 228,000 full-time employees as of June 2024. Microsoft had previously laid off around 6,000 workers in May 2025, marking its largest job reduction in more than two years before this current announcement. In addition, Microsoft's Spain-based King division, responsible for developing the Candy Crush video game, is reducing its workforce by 10%, equating to roughly 200 positions. These recent cutbacks coincide with Microsoft's continued substantial investments in data centres and AI infrastructure components like specialised computer chips. The company expects these expenses to amount to approximately $80bn in the current fiscal year which commenced earlier this week. Financially, Microsoft reported significant growth in its third-quarter results for fiscal year 2025. Revenue reached $70.1bn, marking a 13% increase from the previous year. Net income rose by 18% to $25.8bn, with operating income growing by 16% to $32bn. The tech giant attributed this positive performance to heightened demand for AI solutions and sustained adoption of cloud infrastructure by enterprises. "Microsoft announces another round of layoffs, affecting 9,000 roles" was originally created and published by Verdict, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Los Angeles Times
17 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
How martial law made the American Revolution
On this Fourth of July, with federal troops still on the ground in Los Angeles, our own American Revolution provides a surprising lesson on the perils of military overreach in domestic affairs. Notably, the nation's political and military leaders should consider the British blunders of the 1770s as they weigh the prospect of militarizing American streets, now and in the future. Parliament's Stamp Act tax of the mid-1760s ignited the Anglo-American conflict. Yet, as historians broadly agree, it was escalating martial law in Boston under different legislation, the Coercive Acts of 1774, that transformed American resistance into full-scale revolution. Let's start by recalling what had happened four years earlier during protests over the Townshend duties, a series of taxes Parliament added to everyday goods, including tea, exported to the colonies. The British ministry responded to the unrest by stationing approximately 2,000 redcoats in Boston. On the night of March 5, 1770, in an accidental bloodbath set off by the pelting of soldiers with snowballs, the British opened fire on a crowd of unarmed civilians outside the Custom House, killing five and wounding others. 'Let me observe,' Sam Adams soon wrote about the Boston Massacre, 'how fatal are the effects, the danger of which I long ago mentioned, of posting a standing army among a free people.' The problem worsened after the Boston Tea Party. The hacking to pieces of 342 crates of tea owned by the East India Co. in late 1773 was, of course, criminal activity. As such, it warranted the full application of colonial and municipal law against the offenders. Instead of leaving justice to the locals, however, Parliament passed the four draconian bills known as the Coercive Acts. To enforce them, in a fatal progression, King George III's ministers dispatched a military governor and occupying army to Boston, in effect imposing martial law on the entire colony for the unlawful actions of a few. Each of the Coercive Acts struck at the heart of Massachusetts self-rule. The Boston Port Act shut down all trade through Boston Harbor and its surrounding waterways, while the Massachusetts Government Act dissolved the colony's assembly, courts and town meetings. The remaining two acts allowed trials to be relocated overseas and forced residents to house British troops at the governor's discretion. Taken together, the Coercive Acts constituted an unprecedented assault on the rights and freedoms of the American people. Colonists decried them as 'barbarous,' 'diabolical' and 'Tyrannic' — the work of a 'Despotic power.' What followed is familiar to many Americans. Massachusetts, under martial law, summoned the other colonies to a continental congress in Philadelphia. In reaction, the king and Parliament declared the colonies to be in a state of rebellion, ordering thousands of additional redcoats across the Atlantic to crush dissent and make arrests. A conflict the British thought they could resolve with boots on the ground only escalated. On April 19, 1775, in another tragedy of unintended carnage — this time triggered by a stray bullet — the king's troops gunned down eight colonials on Lexington Green, turning protest into civil war. Fifteen months later, as a remedy of last resort, the colonies declared independence, highlighting Britain's regime of martial law as the first cause of the breach. The declaration pointedly charges King George with 'abolishing our most valuable laws,' 'suspending our own Legislatures' and '[keeping] among us, in times of peace, standing armies, without the consent of our legislatures.' History doesn't deliver road maps, but it does abound in examples of military overreach sparking unpredictable violence. In the case of the American Revolution, we are reminded that deploying an army on the streets where one's own citizens live and work provokes tension, fear and anger — and sometimes, by the twin forces of accident and escalation, bloodshed and lasting civil discord. Eli Merritt is a political historian at Vanderbilt University. He writes the Substack newsletter American Commonwealth and is the author of 'Disunion Among Ourselves: The Perilous Politics of the American Revolution.'
