India debunks claims of U.S. using Indian airspace for Iran strikes, PIB Fact Check confirms
India on Sunday (June 22, 2025) dismissed as 'fake' claims by certain social media handles that the U.S. fighter jets used Indian airspace to launch strikes against Iran.
Also read: Israel-Iran conflict updates
The U.S. bombed three nuclear sites in Iran on Sunday (June 22, 2025), with U.S. President Donald Trump warning of additional strikes if Iran retaliates.
Several social media accounts have claimed that Indian Airspace was used by the United States to launch aircrafts against Iran during Operation #MidnightHammer#PIBFactCheck
❌ This claim is FAKE
❌Indian Airspace was NOT used by the United States during Operation… pic.twitter.com/x28NSkUzEh — PIB Fact Check (@PIBFactCheck) June 22, 2025
'Several social media accounts have claimed that Indian airspace was used by the United States to launch aircraft against Iran during Operation #MidnightHammer. This claim is fake,' PIB Fact Check said in a post on X.
'Indian Airspace was NOT used by the United States during Operation #MidnightHammer,' said the fact check unit of the Press Information Bureau that functions under the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting.
It said that the Joint Chiefs of Staff Chair Gen. Dan Caine had explained the route used by U.S. aircraft during a press briefing.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
33 minutes ago
- First Post
Trump revives proposal for Israel-Hamas ceasefire in Gaza, release of hostages: Report
After a ceasefire between Israel and Iran, US President Donald Trump has revived talks for a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas in the Gaza Strip and the release of remaining hostages taken during the October 7 terrorist attack, according to a report. read more Israeli military patrols near the Al Shifa Hospital compound in Gaza City amid the ongoing ground operation against Hamas in the northern Gaza Strip on November 22, 2023. (Photo: Reuters) After brokering a ceasefire in the Israel-Iran war, US President Donald Trump has revived talks to end the war in the Gaza Strip, according to a report. The Israel-Hamas deal reached in January collapsed in March and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel ordered the resumption of attacks. Several thousands of Palestinian casualties have been reported since the resumption of attacks, many of them as they gathered to receive humanitarian aid. The Jerusalem Post has reported that Trump has revived talks for a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas in Gaza and the release of remaining hostages taken during the October 7 terrorist attack. A US source said that the administration was 'optimistic' about reaching the deal. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump came to power with the promise of ending wars in Gaza and Ukraine. Instead, he entered a new war with Iran. Moreover, instead of ending the war in Gaza, he has become party to the conflict by announcing the takeover of Gaza and conversion of the strip into a resort town after the expulsion of all Palestinians. The declaration, which critics say amounts to ethnic cleansing, would effectively killed the two-state solution. 75% work done for Israel-Hamas deal: Source A source told The Post that 75 per cent of issues have been resolved in recent weeks. 'The remaining 25 per cent includes key matters such as the humanitarian situation, the conclusion of the war itself, and the guarantees Israel is demanding to prevent Hamas from rearming,' the source said. One option being discussed is the exile of Hamas leaders from Hamas once a ceasefire is reached, according to the newspaper. Hamas has previously rejected the idea. Around the same time that the report emerged, it was reported that Netanyahu held a meeting with senior ministers and defence officials on Sunday to discuss the war in Gaza. The Post reported that that one of the questions discussed in the meeting was whether Israel should send a delegation for indirect talks with Hamas either to Qatar or Egypt.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
33 minutes ago
- First Post
Iran's fatwa against Trump and Netanyahu: How serious is this threat?
Iran's top Shiite cleric has issued a fatwa labelling Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu as enemies of Islam, urging Muslims to resist them. Framed in religious language and referencing divine punishment, the fatwa follows renewed tensions in West Asia. But is this decree a serious threat or a symbolic act? read more US President Donald Trump meets with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, US, April 7, 2025. File Image/Reuters A fatwa (powerful religious decree) has been issued by Grand Ayatollah Naser Makarem Shirazi, one of Iran's top Shiite clerics, naming United States President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as enemies of the Islamic community. This fatwa — delivered following recent escalations between Iran, Israel and the United States — directly identifies both leaders as mohareb, or individuals who wage war against God. The religious order explicitly calls on Muslims globally to confront those who 'threaten the leadership and integrity of the Islamic Ummah.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Under Iranian Islamic law, the designation of mohareb is a serious one, legally warranting harsh penalties that may include execution, crucifixion, amputation of limbs, or exile. 'Those who threaten the leadership and integrity of the Islamic Ummah are to be considered warlords,' Makarem declared. Further urging the faithful to act, the fatwa states that Muslims who endure hardships in their opposition to these leaders would be considered mujahid fi sabilillah — warriors in the path of God. 'May God protect the Islamic community from the evil of the enemies and hasten the reappearance of the Master of the Age and Time,' the ruling added, alluding to the Shiite messianic figure known as the Mahdi. The fatwa arrives shortly after a period of armed conflict now being referred to as the '12-Day War.' On June 13, Israeli airstrikes targeted Iranian nuclear and military infrastructure, resulting in the deaths of prominent scientists and military commanders. In retaliation, Iran launched ballistic missiles at Israeli cities. The United States soon entered the conflict by striking three nuclear sites in Iran. This conflict was the culmination of months of rising tensions, marked by repeated warnings from Trump himself that any move by Iran toward weapons-grade uranium enrichment would prompt US intervention. What we know about fatwas A fatwa, by definition, is a legal or theological ruling made by an Islamic scholar or authority. These decrees have historically spanned a wide spectrum — ranging from legal clarifications on ethical matters to highly politicised calls for violence. While many fatwas are benign or even humanitarian in their focus, others have been used to justify violent acts against individuals seen as blasphemous or adversarial to Islam. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The case of Salman Rushdie remains the most well-known example in modern history. In 1989, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini issued a fatwa condemning Rushdie to death following the publication of The Satanic Verses. The decree, though non-binding in a legal sense, had life-altering consequences. Rushdie spent years in hiding and survived a near-fatal stabbing in 2022 — 33 years after the fatwa was first declared. Despite Iran's political shifts over the years, including the more moderate presidency of Mohammad Khatami in the late 1990s, that fatwa was never officially rescinded. Religious decrees of this nature are not bound by time. There is no expiry. In the eyes of many believers, a fatwa from a revered authority is eternal and sacred. In his post on X (formerly Twitter), British-Iranian commentator Niyak Ghorbani criticised the recent fatwa against Trump and Netanyahu, describing it as a calculated act of state-endorsed extremism. ⭕️Very Important: This is not just a threat to Iranians — it's a global danger. A top Iranian cleric has issued a fatwa openly calling for violent jihad against Western leaders, not just Iranian dissidents. This is a clear act of state-backed incitement to international… — Niyak Ghorbani (نیاک) (@GhorbaniiNiyak) June 29, 2025 STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'The West must realise: the Islamic Republic is not only targeting its own people — it is preparing for global violence in the name of religion,' he wrote. A history of fatwas inciting violence The global implications of such fatwas are not theoretical. In many cases, they have resulted in violence, assassinations, and lasting fear. In 1992, Egyptian intellectual Farag Fouda was shot dead by Islamist militants after being accused of apostasy. His assassination followed a fatwa from religious scholars labeling him an enemy of Islam. Two years later, Egyptian Nobel laureate Naguib Mahfouz was stabbed in the neck by an extremist influenced by another fatwa. Several Western figures have also been targeted. Dutch filmmaker Theo van Gogh, who co-created a short film critical of the treatment of women in Islam, was murdered in Amsterdam in 2004. He was shot and stabbed by a Dutch-Moroccan Islamist who reportedly acted in line with religious directives. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Dutch politician Geert Wilders received death threats after his statements on Muslim immigration led to a fatwa calling for his beheading, issued by Australian imam Feiz Muhammad in 2010. In the United States, television host David Letterman became a target when a Muslim militant called for his assassination after he joked about the killing of an Al Qaeda figure on his show. The creators of South Park, Matt Stone and Trey Parker, were similarly threatened after depicting the Prophet Mohammed — albeit in a bear suit — sparking outrage and warnings of violent retaliation. Even religious figures outside Islam have been fatwa targets. Jerry Falwell, the American evangelical pastor, once described Prophet Mohammed as a terrorist in a 2002 interview. A fatwa for his death followed, though Falwell later died of natural causes. Fatwas can also lead to mass political consequences. Al-Qaeda's 1998 fatwa calling for jihad against Americans and Israelis followed the US embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD That fatwa, signed by Osama bin Laden, justified its stance as a response to perceived Western aggression against Muslims. Not just extremism: Fatwas can also be peaceful While many fatwas attract attention due to their violent implications, others highlight peace, ethics, and coexistence. In 2005, a group of North American Islamic scholars issued a fatwa declaring all acts of terrorism forbidden in Islam. They stated, 'It is haram, forbidden, to cooperate or associate with … any act of terrorism or violence.' The fatwa also encouraged Muslims to work with law enforcement in protecting civilians. Fatwas reflect the intentions and beliefs of the clerics issuing them, and their weight largely depends on the influence and credibility of those scholars among their followers. In places like India, institutions such as the Darul Uloom in Deoband (Uttar Pradesh) issue thousands of fatwas each year. These rulings often address questions of daily life, ethics or personal conduct within an Islamic framework. The Darul Uloom's 12-volume fatwa compilation has even been compared to US Supreme Court proceedings in terms of its complexity and reach. So how serious is the threat against Trump and Netanyahu? Although fatwas are non-binding religious opinions, their danger lies in how they are interpreted and acted upon. Clerics with a vast audience can mobilise not only devout followers but also extremists willing to act violently. In a world already polarised by ideology and religion, a fatwa from a prominent authority can be seen as a divine command. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD As history has shown, even decades-old fatwas can incite violence long after their original context is forgotten. Rushdie's near-fatal stabbing in 2022 serves as a chilling reminder. It is not only sanctioned operatives that carry out such attacks — self-radicalised individuals, lone actors or religious vigilantes often act without state direction. The fatwa from Ayatollah Makarem thus poses a long-term risk. While it may not lead to immediate action, it could inspire attacks in the years to come, carried out by individuals who believe they are fulfilling a religious duty. With Makarem calling for Trump and Netanyahu to be made to 'regret their words and mistakes,' the fatwa stops short of a direct death order, but the implications are clear to those familiar with such rhetoric. Also Watch: With inputs from agencies
Indian Express
36 minutes ago
- Indian Express
How Zohran Mamdani turned his Hinge match into a political strategy for Gen Z voters
When a political leader casually mentions meeting their spouse via an app-assisted meet-cute, it catches your attention. When they go on to say, 'There is still hope in those dating apps,' it screams #relatable. Zohran Mamdani, the Democratic candidate for New York's mayoral elections, an Internet sensation and the chosen Gen Z messiah, is proof that a politician's love life doesn't need to be a scandal or a secret. The 33-year-old Indian-American got one step closer to being the next mayor of NYC by winning the Democratic primary election on June 24 against his main challenger, and party veteran, Andrew Cuomo. His campaign strategy so far points to a fundamental shift in what it takes for younger generations to feel the sparks between them and their representatives. Mamdani shared that he met his partner, Syrian-American artist Rama Duwaji, on Hinge during a podcast interview. In another social media post with Indian comedian Kaneez Surka, Mamdani made modern-day romance (or the lack of it) an electoral matter. Surka rather cheekily asks Mamdani, 'New Yorkers want to know how are you going to help single people find love.' Mamdani reiterated how he met his partner, and added, 'The love of your life may currently be too stressed about whether they can afford the most expensive city in the US to find you. Affordability is about romance!' The answer hit more than just a campaign check box. It spoke to a generation which has just begun venturing into the political arena. A 2023 survey found that one-third of Gen Z voters wished they had known more about the candidates running in the 2022 US midterm elections, compared to 21 per cent of Millennials and 11 per cent of those from Generation X. A lot has already been written about Mamdani's earnest, no-holds-barred social media clips. The boomers may sneer at his 'flippant' campaign style, but the youngsters were hooked. Mamdani calls his approach the 'politics of no translation', meaning direct communication without intermediaries. As he explained to The Guardian: 'We believe in a politics of no translation, one that is both direct to the struggles of working people's lives and also delivered directly.' For decades, campaigns of largely older sections of political leaders operated through carefully controlled information flows: press releases and heavily media-trained public appearances. Personal details were either completely off-limits or structured to serve narratives. Politicians spoke about their families in terms that revealed nothing genuinely candid. Mamdani broke this mould. He has owned up to his immigrant story (he moved to New York when he was seven), cringed at his rap past as 'Mr Cardamom' and even used a mango lassi analogy to explain the electoral process to his desi voters. From Deewar edits and Karz dialogues to a reel making fun of himself for awkward hand-waving in videos, Mamdani is a man after the Gen Z heart. When Mamdani shared how he navigated (and successfully at that) the awkward realities of modern-day romance, he validated an entire generation's lived experiences. It is also a nod to a crucial demographic. Most dating app users are in their late 20s and early 30s, which overlaps almost perfectly with the age group now becoming the most politically active. A 2023 article on 'TikTok's influence over Generation Z's Political Behavior' in the Journal of Social Media in Society demonstrates that social media can be an important instigator of political participation, depending on how it is used. Mamdani's approach taps into this reality with an awareness that voters who meet partners online, build careers through LinkedIn, and organise communities via social media seek leaders operating in the same digital ecosystem. It's also a strategic recognition of the 'chronically online' Gen Z's tendency to form parasocial relationships with Internet icons, now including politicians. The generational disconnect isn't unique to New York City. In India, Parliament has been getting older significantly over time. The average age of elected representatives rose from 46.5 years in 1952 to 55.6 years in 2024. This growing gap explains the lack of youth participation both as leaders and voters. When enamoured young Indians comment, 'My mayor (I'm from India)' or 'I live in New Delhi. Can I still vote for him?' on Mamdani's posts on social media, they express a desire for political leaders who understand their reality. These voters are drawn to someone speaking their language, acknowledging the digital-first 'normal' we inhabit. The 'window' of possibilities Mamdani's Hinge story suggests that the 'Overton Window of Political Possibility', a model based on how ideas in society change over time and influence politics, has shifted. What could once be put away as 'too personal' for politics is now validating and even relatable. It points to a need to acknowledge that younger voters' 'normal' experiences include digital-mediated relationships and social media-driven community building. For information-hungry voters, the trust built by 'keeping it real' has the potential to extend credibility to policy discussions. Now, voters who believe the Democratic nominee is open enough to be honest about his dating life are more likely to listen keenly to his political platform about rent freezes, free city buses, and public childcare. When communication across the board is not conventionally packaged, complex policy stances feel accessible and urgent. Mamdani's success offers a blueprint for leaders to allow themselves to be real people with real experiences, even if that means a perfect 'swiped right' story. A generation growing up online demands leaders who meet voters where they are rather than where age-old political playbooks suggest they should be. Vibha B Madhava is a sub-editor at the news desk for She is interested in writing about gender, culture and politics of ableism. Having specialised in digital journalism, she is keen to explore various forms of interactive, multimedia storytelling. Apart from that, she also likes to experiment with social media. Qualification, Degrees/other achievements: Bachelor's degree in Media and Communication from Manipal Institute of Communication, Manipal Academy of Higher Education. PG Diploma in Integrated Multimedia Journalism from Asian College of Journalism, Chennai. With The Indian Express, this is Vibha's first stint in pursuing journalism in a full-time capacity. Previous internship experience: Deccan Herald, Bengaluru; The News Minute, Bengaluru; The Mojo Story; Radio Indigo 91.9 and Fever FM 94.3 (Hyderabad) You can find her on Twitter as @VibhaBMadhava , on LinkedIn (Vibha B Madhava), or write to her at ... Read More
