Supreme Court clears way for Trump's plans to downsize the federal workforce
By MARK SHERMAN
The Supreme Court on Tuesday cleared the way for President Donald Trump's plans to downsize the federal workforce despite warnings that critical government services will be lost and hundreds of thousands of federal employees will be out of their jobs.
The justices overrode lower court orders that temporarily froze the cuts, which have been led by the Department of Government Efficiency.
The court said in an unsigned order that no specific cuts were in front of the justices, only an executive order issued by Trump and an administration directive for agencies to undertake job reductions.
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson was the only dissenting vote, accusing her colleagues of a 'demonstrated enthusiasm for greenlighting this President's legally dubious actions in an emergency posture.'
Jackson warned of enormous real-world consequences. 'This executive action promises mass employee terminations, widespread cancellation of federal programs and services, and the dismantling of much of the Federal Government as Congress has created it," she wrote.
The high court action continued a remarkable winning streak for Trump, who the justices have allowed to move forward with significant parts of his plan to remake the federal government. The Supreme Court's intervention so far has been on the frequent emergency appeals the Justice Department has filed objecting to lower-court rulings as improperly intruding on presidential authority.
The Republican president has repeatedly said voters gave him a mandate for the work, and he tapped billionaire ally Elon Musk to lead the charge through DOGE. Musk recently left his role.
'Today's U.S. Supreme Court ruling is another definitive victory for the President and his administration. It clearly rebukes the continued assaults on the President's constitutionally authorized executive powers by leftist judges who are trying to prevent the President from achieving government efficiency across the federal government,' White House spokesperson Harrison Fields said in a statement.
Tens of thousands of federal workers have been fired, have left their jobs via deferred resignation programs or have been placed on leave. There is no official figure for the job cuts, but at least 75,000 federal employees took deferred resignation and thousands of probationary workers have already been let go.
In May, U.S. District Judge Susan Illston found that Trump's administration needs congressional approval to make sizable reductions to the federal workforce. By a 2-1 vote, a panel of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals refused to block Illston's order, finding that the downsizing could have broader effects, including on the nation's food-safety system and health care for veterans.
Illston directed numerous federal agencies to halt acting on the president's workforce executive order signed in February and a subsequent memo issued by DOGE and the Office of Personnel Management. Illston was nominated by former Democratic President Bill Clinton.
The labor unions and nonprofit groups that sued over the downsizing offered the justices several examples of what would happen if it were allowed to take effect, including cuts of 40% to 50% at several agencies. Baltimore, Chicago and San Francisco were among cities that also sued.
'Today's decision has dealt a serious blow to our democracy and puts services that the American people rely on in grave jeopardy. This decision does not change the simple and clear fact that reorganizing government functions and laying off federal workers en masse haphazardly without any congressional approval is not allowed by our Constitution," the parties that sued said in a joint statement.
Among the agencies affected by the order are the departments of Agriculture, Energy, Labor, the Interior, State, the Treasury and Veterans Affairs. It also applies to the National Science Foundation, Small Business Association, Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency.
The case now continues in Illston's court.
© Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Mainichi
2 hours ago
- The Mainichi
Tokyo stocks fall as firmer yen hits exporters, gains locked in
TOKYO (Kyodo) -- Tokyo stocks dropped Thursday as a stronger yen prompted selling of exporter shares and investors locked in gains after two straight days of advances. The 225-issue Nikkei Stock Average ended down 174.92 points, or 0.44 percent, from Wednesday at 39,646.36. The broader Topix index finished 15.82 points, or 0.56 percent, lower at 2,812.34. On the top-tier Prime Market, decliners were led by electric power and gas, oil and coal product and marine transportation issues. The U.S. dollar briefly weakened to the upper 145 yen range in Tokyo as U.S. Treasury yields fell after President Donald Trump again called on the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates, arguing the current benchmark rate is too high, dealers said. Stocks were weighed down by export-oriented auto and electronics issues due to a firmer yen, which decreases overseas profits of exporters when repatriated. Investors also sold shares as the Nikkei index climbed close to the 40,000 line over the past two days after Trump announced to impose a 25 percent tariff on imports from Japan, while setting an extended negotiation deadline of Aug. 1. "The market was pressured by shares that had advanced notably as the Nikkei approached the 40,000 mark, rather than by selling on concern about U.S. tariff policy," said Maki Sawada, a strategist at the Investment Content Department of Nomura Securities Co.
Yomiuri Shimbun
2 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
In Expanding Trade War, Trump Digs U.S. into a Geopolitical Hole
On Monday, the White House launched new salvos in its widening trade wars. President Donald Trump threatened to impose tariffs of between 25 percent and 40 percent on imports from 14 countries, including Japan, South Korea, Thailand and Bangladesh, unless they address his concerns over perceived bilateral trade imbalances. The renewed tariff threats went down like a lead balloon in capitals across the world, including among some of the U.S.'s closest allies. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba described the developments as 'deeply regrettable.' His colleague, Itsunori Onodera, policy chief for Japan's ruling Liberal Democratic Party, said Trump's decision 'to notify a key ally with nothing more than a single letter is extremely disrespectful, and I feel a strong sense of indignation.' Secretary of State Marco Rubio's decision to drop stops this week in Tokyo and Seoul during a quick Asia trip underscored the fresh tensions. Various governments fitfully tried to hash out new understandings with the Trump administration to stave off the threatened tariffs. South African President Cyril Ramaphosa said that the 30 percent tariff Trump sought to impose on his country as a 'reciprocal' measure was 'not an accurate representation of available trade data.' Thailand's acting prime minister, Phumtham Wechayachai, bemoaned the 'contradiction' as Trump's latest edict seemed to undo the progress made amid trade talks just last week. Over the weekend, Trump also lashed out at the BRICS grouping of non-Western powers, threatening its 10 members and other partner states with additional tariffs because of the bloc being supposedly 'anti-American.' Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, who was hosting a BRICS leaders' summit in Rio de Janeiro, rebuffed Trump's bullying. 'The world has changed. We don't want an emperor,' Lula said, adding: 'This is a set of countries that wants to find another way of organizing the world from the economic perspective. I think that's why the BRICS are making people uncomfortable.' Trump had threatened 100 percent tariffs on the BRICS countries – which include putative Washington adversaries in Russia, China, and Iran, but also close partners such as India – if the bloc pursued attempts to break the global influence of the U.S. dollar. Some members had offered vague proposals for a new common currency to undercut dollar dominance, but the project has not got off the ground amid frictions within the bloc and wariness of courting Washington's wrath. Nonetheless, Celso Amorim, Lula's chief foreign policy adviser, said Trump's new threat 'reinforces the willingness of [BRICS] members and associated partners to chart our path and seek greater independence.' That's a calculation other U.S. allies are making as well. On a visit to Britain, French President Emmanuel Macron warned of Europe's overreliance on the United States and China. 'If we want to build a sustainable future for all children [we have] to de-risk our economies and our societies from these dual dependencies,' he said. France wants 'an open world,' Macron added, gesturing to the 'strategic autonomy' for the continent that he has long championed. 'We want to cooperate, but not to depend.' The frustrations and concerns being aired by world leaders are borne out by public sentiment. A Pew poll published Tuesday found that a significant proportion of citizens of U.S. allies see Trump's America in a gloomy light. Majorities in Canada and Mexico view their neighbor as the 'greatest threat' facing their country, marking significant increases since a similarly worded survey in 2019. Further afield, more than a third of South Africans, 40 percent of Indonesians, 30 percent of all Turks, and almost a fifth of respondents in Japan – a treaty ally protected by U.S. forces – also singled the United States out for the singular threat it posed. Trump and his allies cast their trade wars as a necessary effort to restructure global trade and bring more manufacturing home. Whatever the merits of their case, analysts see their approach as potentially damaging to the geopolitical interests of the United States. 'The president is determined to light a fire under those trading partners who he thinks are not moving fast enough,' Wendy Cutler, vice president of the Asia Society Policy Institute and a former U.S. trade negotiator, told my colleagues. 'But to hit two of our closest allies [Japan and South Korea] with high tariffs – particularly when we have benefited from cooperation with them on semiconductors and energy and chip building, and when their companies invest a lot in the United States – it is hard for me to circle the square here.' 'Many in Asia are going to ask, 'Is this how the U.S. treats its friends?'' Manu Bhaskaran, chief executive of Centennial Asia Advisors, a research firm, told the New York Times. 'Will there be permanent damage to American standing and interests in Asia and elsewhere through these crude threats and unpleasant language?' Oliver Stuenkel, an associate professor of international relations at the Getulio Vargas Foundation in São Paulo, said Trump's broadsides against the BRICS shook up a rather sleepy summit that various heads of state, including the Russian and Chinese presidents, had chosen to skip. The bloc had put out a careful joint statement that expressed disapproval of Israel's conduct of the war in Gaza and concern over the strikes on Iran, but did not call out U.S. involvement in either instance. 'Trump's attack was counterproductive,' Stuenkel told me. 'If his intention was to make countries move away from BRICS, I think that's probably not going to work out.' Instead, Trump's antagonism might provide more impetus for the bloc's diverse membership to find genuine common cause. 'The rank unilateralism and casual abandonment of international law when it comes to regions such as the Middle East and arenas such as global trade call for a stabilizing countercurrent that can strengthen norms of cooperation,' wrote Sarang Shidore, director of the Global South program at the Quincy Institute, a Washington think tank. 'Global South states, as weaker actors, rely even more on international cooperation in their attempts to achieve security and prosperity for their people.' During the Cold War and its initial aftermath, the United States worked with a host of partners to strengthen 'a community of shared values, compatible political ideals, international institutions and mutual support within those institutions,' wrote Andrea Oelsner, a professor of international relations at San Andrés University in Argentina. 'In recent months, the Trump administration has sharply eroded the country's credibility with these friends,' she added. 'And credibility and trust are much more easily destroyed than built … never mind rebuilt.'
Yomiuri Shimbun
3 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Trump's Crackdown on Renewable Energy Has Just Begun
President Donald Trump issued an executive order Monday evening ordering his administration to crack down on remaining loopholes allowing access to renewable energy tax breaks, after Congress voted last week to overwhelmingly roll back the subsidies. The order aims to placate the right-wing House Freedom Caucus, which argued the One Big Beautiful Bill Act signed by Trump on July 4 should have gone further to cut subsidies and reduce the law's impact on the deficit. Share prices of at least a dozen solar companies, including Enphase Energy and Sunrun, dropped after the order was signed. A last-minute deal between Senate and House Republicans last week agreed to allow wind and solar facilities that break ground within 12 months to receive subsidies for several years. Democrats uniformly opposed the bill, which gutted the Inflation Reduction Act, President Joe Biden's signature climate law. Deficit hawks in the Freedom Caucus signed onto the deal after the White House assured them it would take further action to strictly enforce those rules in a bid to cut back the number of projects that qualified for subsidies. 'We met with President Trump and he did a masterful job of laying out how we could improve it, how he could use his chief executive office to make the bill better,' said Rep. Ralph Norman (R-South Carolina) told CNBC on Thursday. 'We accepted the bill as-is. What is different is President Trump is going to use his powers to – like on the subsidies – to make sure a lot of these subsidies won't remain in effect from here on out.' In a statement Tuesday, Norman praised Trump for keeping his pledge by issuing the executive order. The White House did not respond to a request for comment. Monday's order directed the treasury secretary to narrowly define what it means for projects to be 'under construction' by the deadline. The order says the department should prevent projects from circumventing rules about what counts as beginning construction, 'unless a substantial portion of a subject facility has been built.' Restricting that loophole could reduce the number of projects that qualify for the tax breaks and potentially save the government hundreds of millions of dollars, said Thomas Pyle, president of the Institute for Energy Research, a conservative think tank. 'The Trump administration could, when they issue guidance, tighten up the definitions and make it very specific in terms of what is under construction,' Pyle said. 'There's attention on the language that the administration, when it issues guidance, will be doing so in a way to make sure these guys aren't gaming the system.' Manish Bapna, president of the environmental Natural Resources Defense Council, an advocacy group, said the executive order could be used merely to enact the One Big Beautiful Bill Act – or it could be used to overstep and go beyond what the law mandates. 'The real question is whether this is more bark than bite,' Bapna said. 'If we see this go beyond the letter and intent of the law, we will take the administration to court.' The order also directs the Interior Department to eliminate any policies that give preferential treatment to wind and solar. Trump's order appears to be targeting established tax rules that are aimed at allowing for a realistic timeline for financing energy projects of all kinds, including solar and wind, said Abby Hopper, president of the Solar Energy Industries Association, in a statement. 'We will continue to make the case that business certainty, predictability, and even-handedness are bedrocks of federal policy that cannot be undone by the stroke of a pen,' Hopper said. 'We expect the Treasury Department to follow the law.'
