ProKidney Reports Statistically and Clinically Significant Topline Results for the Phase 2 REGEN-007 Trial Evaluating Rilparencel in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
In Group 1 (n=24), kidney function stabilized in patients randomized to receive two rilparencel injections (one in each kidney). The annual decline in eGFR slope improved by 78% from -5.8 mL/min/1.73m2 in the pre-injection period to -1.3 mL/min/1.73m2 in the period following the last rilparencel injection. This 4.6 mL/min/1.73m2 per year difference was statistically significant (p<0.001) and clinically meaningful
In Group 2 (n=25), patients were randomized to receive a single rilparencel injection followed by a second injection only if kidney function worsened and a re-dosing trigger was met. The annual decline in eGFR slope improved by 50% from -3.4 mL/min/1.73m2 in the pre-injection period to -1.7 mL/min/1.73m2 in the period following the last rilparencel injection. This 1.7 mL/min/1.73m2 per year difference was not statistically significant (p=0.085) but suggests evidence of a dose response
No rilparencel-related serious adverse events were observed; the safety profile was consistent with previously reported study results and comparable to a kidney biopsy
FDA Type B meeting set for this summer to confirm ProKidney's approach to using eGFR slope as the surrogate endpoint in the ongoing Phase 3 PROACT 1 study for accelerated approval
WINSTON-SALEM, N.C., July 08, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- ProKidney Corp. (Nasdaq: PROK) ('ProKidney' or the 'Company"), a leading late clinical-stage cellular therapeutics company focused on chronic kidney disease (CKD), today reported statistically significant and clinically meaningful positive topline results from the full Group 1 modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population of the Phase 2 REGEN-007 trial evaluating rilparencel in patients with CKD and diabetes. Rilparencel is an autologous cellular therapy that has received Regenerative Medicine Advanced Therapy (RMAT) designation from the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) and is currently being evaluated in the ongoing Phase 3 REGEN-006 (PROACT 1) trial to demonstrate the therapy's potential to preserve kidney function in patients with advanced CKD and type 2 diabetes.
'We are very encouraged by the REGEN-007 topline results that demonstrated a robust improvement in eGFR slope following treatment with rilparencel in Group 1 as well as evidence of a dose response in Group 2. These data bolster our confidence in the design of our ongoing Phase 3 PROACT 1 study given the similarity between the dosing regimen in REGEN-007 Group 1 and PROACT 1. It is also worth noting that 15 of the 24 patients in Group 1 (63%) met key Phase 3 PROACT 1 inclusion criteria, and similar efficacy results were observed in this subgroup compared to the full Group 1 results. We plan to submit the full results from REGEN-007 to ASN's 2025 Kidney Week as a late-breaking clinical trial and are excited to share more details at that time with investors and the medical community,' said Bruce Culleton, M.D., CEO of ProKidney. 'We also look forward to our upcoming FDA Type B meeting in the coming weeks to confirm our approach to eGFR slope as a surrogate endpoint for accelerated approval. This meeting represents an important step toward our goal of expediting rilparencel's potential path to market in the U.S. where there remains a significant unmet clinical need in patients with advanced CKD and diabetes.'
Phase 2 REGEN-007 Overview and Topline ResultsREGEN-007 is a multi-center Phase 2 open-label 1:1 randomized two-arm trial in patients with diabetes, CKD, and an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 20-50 mL/min/1.73m². At randomization, patients were assigned to one of two treatment groups using different dosing regimens. Group 1 replicated the dosing schedule of the ongoing Phase 3 PROACT 1 study in which patients received two scheduled rilparencel injections (one in each kidney), approximately three months apart. Group 2 tested an exploratory dosing regimen to investigate whether disease progression triggers, rather than a time-based trigger, could optimize multiple administrations of rilparencel. In Group 2, patients received a single rilparencel injection in one kidney and a second injection in the contralateral kidney only if triggered by a sustained eGFR decline from baseline of ≥ 20%, and/or an increase in the urine albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR) from baseline of ≥ 30% and ≥ 30 mg/g.
The prespecified primary endpoint for REGEN-007 is the difference in annual eGFR slope (calculated using a linear mixed effects model) in the pre-injection period versus the period following the last rilparencel injection. The pre-injection period included all historical eGFR values collected up to 24 months before the screening visit as well as the on-study central laboratory eGFR results prior to first rilparencel injection. The period following the last injection included eGFR values from the last rilparencel injection to the end of study (EOS) visit. Median follow-up after the last injection was approximately 18 months in both Group 1 and Group 2.
Fifty-three patients were randomized in the study, of whom 49 patients (mITT population) received at least one rilparencel injection. Four patients did not receive any rilparencel injections. The majority of patients were male (69%), and the mean age was 60 years. At baseline, 38 of 49 patients (78%) had type 2 diabetes mellitus and 11 (22%) had type 1 diabetes. Thirty-nine (80%) patients were receiving an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) or an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), and 18 (37%) were receiving a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i). At baseline, the mean (SD) eGFR was 33±10 mL/min/1.73m2. Notably, the median UACR was higher in Group 1 (792 mg/g) compared to Group 2 (229 mg/g).
Annual eGFR Slope (mL/min/1.73m2)
Group
N (mITT)
Pre inj
Post last inj
Absolute benefit
Relative benefit
1
24
-5.8
-1.3
4.6
78%
2
25
-3.4
-1.7
1.7
50%
In Group 1 (n=24), kidney function stabilized after receiving rilparencel. The annual decline in eGFR slope improved by 78% from -5.8 mL/min/1.73m2 in the pre-injection period to -1.3 mL/min/1.73m2 in the period following the last rilparencel injection. This 4.6 mL/min/1.73m2 per year difference1 was statistically significant (p<0.001) and clinically meaningful. Of the 24 patients in Group 1, 15 (63%) met key Phase 3 PROACT 1 inclusion criteria, and similar efficacy results were observed in this subgroup compared to the full Group 1 results. As a reminder, the Phase 3 PROACT 1 protocol was amended in 1H 2024 after a similar eGFR efficacy signal was observed in the Phase 2 RMCL-002 study subgroup analysis (n=23) of high-UACR, Stage 4 CKD patients with type 2 diabetes.
In Group 2 (n=25), the annual change in kidney function as measured by eGFR slope was -3.4 mL/min/1.73m2 in the pre-injection period versus -1.7 mL/min/1.73m2 in the period following the last rilparencel injection, resulting in an improvement of 50%, or 1.7 mL/min/1.73m2 per year. This difference was not statistically significant (p=0.085) but suggests evidence of a dose response. Out of the 25 patients in Group 2, 15 (60%) met the re-dosing trigger and received a second rilparencel injection. The median time between the first and second injections in these 15 patients was approximately 11 months.
No rilparencel-related serious adverse events were observed across all patients in the study who received at least one rilparencel injection (n=49). The safety profile was consistent with previously reported study results and comparable to a kidney biopsy.
Full results from REGEN-007 are being held and will be submitted to the American Society of Nephrology (ASN) 2025 Kidney Week as a late-breaking clinical trial.
Phase 3 PROACT 1 Regulatory ProgressAs previously communicated, the FDA confirmed during a Type B meeting in Q4 2024 that the accelerated approval pathway is available for rilparencel if an acceptable surrogate endpoint, such as eGFR slope, is used. ProKidney has an upcoming FDA Type B meeting this summer to confirm the approach to using eGFR slope as the surrogate endpoint for accelerated approval. Additional details are expected in mid-2025.
About Chronic Kidney DiseaseCKD is a progressive condition characterized by the gradual decline of kidney function, which can ultimately lead to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) requiring dialysis or transplantation. An estimated 37 million adults in the U.S. have CKD, though many remain undiagnosed in the early stages. Diabetes is the leading cause of CKD, and individuals with both conditions face significantly elevated risks of cardiovascular events, hospitalization, and mortality. ProKidney is developing rilparencel for patients with Stage 3b/4 CKD and diabetes, a population that includes 1 to 2 million people in the U.S. While current treatment options aim to slow disease progression, there remains a substantial unmet need for therapies that can stabilize kidney function and delay or prevent the need for dialysis in patients with advanced CKD.
About the Phase 3 REGEN-006 (PROACT 1) Clinical TrialREGEN-006 is an ongoing Phase 3, randomized, blinded, sham controlled safety and efficacy study of rilparencel in subjects with advanced CKD and type 2 diabetes. The study protocol was amended in 1H 2024 to focus on a subset of patients with Stage 4 CKD (eGFR 20-30 mL/min/1.73m²) and late Stage 3b CKD (eGFR 30-35 mL/min/1.73m²) with accompanying albuminuria (UACR less than 5,000 mg/g for patients with eGFR 20-30 mL/min/1.73m² and 300-5,000 mg/g for patients with eGFR 30-35 mL/min/1.73m²). The total planned enrollment is approximately 685 subjects. Subjects are randomized (1:1) to the treatment group and the sham control group prior to kidney biopsy or a sham biopsy procedure, respectively. The primary objective is to assess the efficacy of up to two rilparencel injections (one in each kidney) using a minimally invasive percutaneous approach. The primary composite endpoint is the time from first injection to the earliest of: at least 40% reduction in eGFR; eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73m², and/or chronic dialysis, and/or renal transplant; or renal or cardiovascular death.
About ProKidney Corp.ProKidney, a pioneer in the treatment of chronic kidney disease through innovations in cellular therapy, was founded in 2015 after a decade of research. ProKidney's lead product candidate, rilparencel (also known as REACT®), is a first-in-class, patented, proprietary autologous cellular therapy being evaluated for its potential to preserve kidney function in diabetic patients at high risk of kidney failure. Rilparencel has received RMAT designation from the FDA. For more information, please visit www.prokidney.com.
Forward-Looking StatementsThis press release includes 'forward-looking statements' within the meaning of the 'safe harbor' provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. ProKidney's actual results may differ from its expectations, estimates and projections and consequently, you should not rely on these forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. Words such as 'expect,' 'estimate,' 'project,' 'budget,' 'forecast,' 'anticipate,' 'intend,' 'plan,' 'may,' 'will,' 'could,' 'should,' 'believes,' 'predicts,' 'potential,' 'continue,' and similar expressions (or the negative versions of such words or expressions) are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include, without limitation, the Company's beliefs that the FDA agrees that the Company's Phase 3 REGEN-006 (PROACT 1) trial could be sufficient to support a potential BLA submission and full regulatory approval and that the Company could consider using eGFR slope as a surrogate endpoint on an accelerated approval pathway for rilparencel, expectations with respect to financial results and expected cash runway, including the Company's expectation that current cash will support operating plans into 2027, future performance, development and commercialization of products, if approved, the potential benefits and impact of the Company's products, if approved, potential regulatory approvals, the size and potential growth of current or future markets for the Company's products, if approved, the advancement of the Company's development programs into and through the clinic and the expected timing for reporting data, the making of regulatory filings or achieving other milestones related to the Company's product candidates, and the advancement and funding of the Company's developmental programs, generally. Most of these factors are outside of the Company's control and are difficult to predict. Factors that may cause such differences include, but are not limited to: disruptions to our business or that may otherwise materially harm our results of operations or financial condition as a result of our recent domestication to the United States; the inability to maintain the listing of the Company's Class A common stock on Nasdaq; the inability of the Company's Class A common stock to remain included in various indices and the potential negative impact on the trading price of the Class A common stock if excluded from such indices; the inability to implement business plans, forecasts, and other expectations or identify and realize additional opportunities, which may be affected by, among other things, competition and the ability of the Company to grow and manage growth profitably and retain its key employees; the risk of downturns and a changing regulatory landscape in the highly competitive biotechnology industry; the risk that results of the Company's clinical trials may not support approval; the risk that the FDA could require additional studies before approving the Company's drug candidates; the inability of the Company to raise financing in the future; the inability of the Company to obtain and maintain regulatory clearance or approval for its products, and any related restrictions and limitations of any cleared or approved product; the inability of the Company to identify, in-license or acquire additional technology; the inability of Company to compete with other companies currently marketing or engaged in the biologics market and in the area of treatment of kidney diseases; the size and growth potential of the markets for the Company's products, if approved, and its ability to serve those markets, either alone or in partnership with others; the Company's estimates regarding expenses, future revenue, capital requirements and needs for additional financing; the Company's financial performance; the Company's intellectual property rights; uncertainties inherent in cell therapy research and development, including the actual time it takes to initiate and complete clinical studies and the timing and content of decisions made by regulatory authorities; the fact that interim results from our clinical programs may not be indicative of future results; the impact of geo-political conflict on the Company's business; and other risks and uncertainties included under the heading 'Risk Factors' in the Company's most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company cautions readers that the foregoing list of factors is not exclusive and cautions readers not to place undue reliance upon any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. The Company does not undertake or accept any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements to reflect any change in its expectations or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based.
Investor Contacts:
ProKidneyEthan HoldawayEthan.Holdaway@prokidney.comLifeSci Advisors, LLCDaniel Ferry Daniel@lifesciadvisors.com
1 Difference in values is due to rounding.Sign in to access your portfolio
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Motor Trend
5 minutes ago
- Motor Trend
How the One Big Beautiful Bill Will Affect Car Buying and Ownership
On July 4, President Trump signed the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' Act into law. The budget reconciliation bill made big changes to federal spending, taxes, and regulation, some of which will have big effects on car owners, enthusiasts, and the automotive industry. We've read through the 879-page bill and outlined the parts that'll affect your next car purchase, the price of gas, and your commute. The "One Big Beautiful Bill" affects car buying by altering tax deductions on auto loans, ending EV tax credits, reducing CAFE penalties to zero, and cutting grants for clean vehicles. It also impacts gas and power prices by changing drilling and energy policies. This summary was generated by AI using content from this MotorTrend article Read Next Because this is a reconciliation bill, which modifies existing budget legislation rather than starting from scratch, there are limits to what can be included in the legislation. Everything in the bill has to be directly related to government spending and taxation, so some of the changes are creatively written in order to make the cut. (As always, please consult your tax professional before making financial decisions. The below is provided for information purposes only and is not tax or financial advice.) 'No' Tax on Car Loan Interest This one is confusing, and 'no' is in quotation marks because it's misleading. Car buyers looking to finance their next purchase may be able to write off some—but not all—of the interest charged on the loan each calendar year on their taxes. That's not the same as abolishing or suspending the tax altogether, as the claim implies. There are also a number of rules for qualifying which will cut off a lot of buyers. First and foremost, the vehicle you're buying has to be assembled in the U.S. That will be confusing for some buyers, because some of the bestselling vehicles in the U.S, such as the Toyota RAV4 and Chevrolet Silverado, are built in multiple plants, not all of them in the U.S. The IRS will know where your vehicle is made because you have to supply the VIN when claiming the tax deduction, and that number includes a digit that represents the country of origin. The tax deduction doesn't apply to leases, either, only purchases. It appears to apply to both new and used vehicle purchases, as the legislation makes no distinction. Vehicles with salvage titles and parts cars don't count, either. Similarly, it doesn't apply to anything with a gross vehicle weight rating over 14,000 pounds (which is the rating of a Ford F-350, as an example). Commercial vehicles qualify but only if they're for personal use, not business use. Business fleet purchases don't qualify, so be careful if you're planning to register your vehicle to your small business in order to take advantage of other tax incentives. If your purchase qualifies, there are still more rules. The tax deduction is capped at $10,000 per calendar year, so if you pay more than that in interest, the balance will still be taxed. If you make more than $100,000 per year as an individual or $200,000 per year as a joint filer (married or similar), the amount of interest you're able to deduct goes down by $200 for every $1,000 of income you earn over $100,000 (individual, or $200,000 combined). Do the math and it means no tax credit for anyone making over $150,000 individually or $250,000 combined. Finally, the tax credit is only available for a limited time. You can't start counting interest payments towards a deduction until January 1, 2026, so the rest of this year doesn't count. The tax credit will expire on December 31, 2029 unless Congress extends it. EV Tax Credits End September 30 The (up to) $7,500 federal tax credit for new and used EVs now expires on September 30 of this year. Previously, both tax credits were scheduled to expire on December 31, 2032. Likewise, the tax credit for commercial EVs expires the same day. State tax credits are not affected. On a related note, the federal tax credit for installing an EV charger or renewable fuel dispenser at your home or business will expire even sooner, on July 30 of this year. Tax credits have been a huge driver of EV sales to date, so the end of them could cause final vehicle sale prices to rise and sales to plummet. A large drop in sales could lead automakers to discontinue some or all of their EVs, reducing choice in the market. Lower cost EVs with smaller profit margins would be vulnerable, which could lead to only more expensive EVs on the market. Less Help With Bad Auto Loans Stopping predatory auto loans had been a major focus for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau during the Biden administration, but enforcement is likely to drop off substantially after the passage of this bill. Funding for the bureau is cut by 54 percent, which will drastically reduce the number of investigations and actions it's able to execute. No Penalties for CAFE Violations Because this is a reconciliation bill, Congress could not make changes to vehicle emissions and fuel economy laws. Rather than replace or abolish the Corporate Average Fuel Economy program (CAFE), this bill keeps all the existing rules in place but reduces the penalties for breaking them to $0.00. This means automakers are free to ignore federal fuel economy regulations as the EPA cannot meaningfully enforce them. This could potentially affect consumers in multiple ways. If automakers stop following CAFE rules, fuel economy could go down and emissions could go up. Any savings on R&D could then be passed on to the consumer. This is unlikely, however. Automakers plan as much as a decade in advance, so vehicles for sale today were engineered years ago and the money already spent. Future iterations of Congress and future presidents could also reinstate the penalties in a few years, which would wipe out any savings and put automakers behind on R&D. Fuel economy regulations elsewhere in the world aren't changing, so there's little incentive for automakers to cut R&D spending regardless, meaning no reduction in pricing is likely. No More Money for Clean Commercial Vehicles Businesses and local governments around the country have taken advantage of federal grants to help offset the cost of replacing older heavy duty commercial vehicles with EVs. These grants were commonly used to replace old, diesel school busses with new, electric versions and also covered installation of chargers and training employees to work on those vehicles and chargers. Any grant money not already spent has been taken away. Similarly, grants for reducing diesel exhaust emissions in low income and disadvantaged areas have been cut, with all unspent money withdrawn. Funding has also been cut for an EPA program which studies the health and environmental effects of fuel additives. Reduction in Tax Credits for Commuters If your employer provides a transit passes, vanpool reimbursement, parking passes, or a bicycle commuting reimbursement, the amount you're able to deduct on your taxes is going down. Previously, you could deduct up to $175 per month each for your vanpool, transit pass, or parking pass. Now, you can only deduct up to $175 total per month for any combination of those services. The deduction for bicycle commuting has been eliminated entirely. No More Money or Credits For Home Solar and Battery Backups This is tangential to car buying and ownership, but if you were planning to take advantage of tax credits to install solar panels and battery backups in your home to offset the cost of charging an EV, you're out of luck. Any money not already spent on those grants and tax credits has been rescinded. Likewise, the business tax credit for building specifically energy efficient new homes has been cut, along with business tax credits for training contractors to install solar panels, batteries, and more efficient appliances. Gas and Power Prices Could Be Affected Portions of the bill addressing oil drilling and the Strategic Petroleum Reserve may have a small impact on gas prices in the future. Various provisions restart new oil and gas drilling leases both in the U.S. and offshore in its oceans, which would eventually add to the global oil supply and potentially push down prices. However, it will take years for any new leases to be acquired, explored, drilled, and turned into production wells, and oil companies are already sitting on a large number of unexplored leases. Because oil is a globally traded commodity, adding more supply doesn't necessarily change the price of a barrel of oil, nor the price of a gallon of gas. The bill also requires the government to abandon a plan introduced during Trump's first term to sell down part of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. Instead, it requires the government to buy more oil it can store for future emergencies. Presidents like to draw on the Strategic Petroleum Reserve during times of high gas prices, but the quantities withdrawn are typically so small they have little to no impact on lowering the price at the pump. With regard to electricity generation, the bill paves the way to reopen old, closed power plants and cuts tax credits for wind and solar farms. Old power plants will now be able to reopen without any retrofitting of modern pollution controls, which could make them economically viable, although it depends on the individual plant. New wind and solar farms now have a shorter window to begin operations before the tax credits are cut off, and the lack of credits is expected to make new such farms economically unviable in the future. Fewer wind and solar farms means energy prices are less likely to go down or remain flat, while old power plants coming back online could partially offset their absence at the cost of greater air pollution in those communities. The bill also undoes several provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act, which provided loans and grants for electrical infrastructure improvements nationally, including transmission line improvements in particular, as well as integrating offshore wind farms into the power grid and improving electrical infrastructure on tribal land. Any reductions in electricity prices or increases in reliability these improvements may have provided are off the table. Similarly, by cutting the clean hydrogen production credit several years earlier than planned, the bill will likely slow or halt the adoption of clean sources of hydrogen and slow or stall the nascent hydrogen vehicle industry, both for private and commercial vehicles. Most hydrogen today is produced from gas and oil, which is both cheaper and dirtier than clean alternatives.


Gizmodo
5 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
The Hidden Cost of OpenAI's Genius
OpenAI is the undisputed poster child of the AI revolution, the company that forced the world to pay attention with the launch of ChatGPT. But behind the scenes, a desperate and wildly expensive battle is raging, and the cost of keeping the company's geniuses in-house is becoming astronomical. According to a recent report from The Information, OpenAI revealed to investors that its stock-based compensation for employees surged more than fivefold last year to an astonishing $4.4 billion. That figure isn't just large; it's more than the company's entire revenue for the year, accounting for a staggering 119% of its $3.7 billion in total revenue. This is an unheard-of figure, even for Silicon Valley. For comparison, Google's stock compensation was just 16% of its revenue the year before its IPO. For Facebook, it was 6%. So what's going on? In short, OpenAI is fighting for its life in an unprecedented talent war, and its chief rival, Meta, is on the offensive. Mark Zuckerberg has been personally courting top AI researchers with massive compensation packages, successfully poaching several key minds from OpenAI's core teams. This has reportedly prompted a crisis at OpenAI, forcing it to 'recalibrate compensation' and promise even more rewarding pay packages to prevent a catastrophic brain drain. While stock-based compensation doesn't immediately burn through a company's cash reserves, it creates a major risk by diluting the value of shares held by investors. Every billion dollars in stock handed to employees means the slices of the pie owned by major backers like Microsoft and other venture capital firms get smaller. OpenAI is trying to sell this strategy as a long-term vision. The company projects that this massive expense will fall to 45% of revenue this year, and below 10% by 2030. Furthermore, OpenAI has reportedly discussed a future plan where its employees would collectively own roughly one-third of the restructured company, with Microsoft also owning another third. The goal is to turn employees into deeply invested partners who have a massive incentive to stay and build. But the 'Meta effect' is throwing a wrench in those neat projections. The aggressive poaching and the ensuing pay bumps mean OpenAI's costs are likely to remain sky-high. This high-stakes financial strategy puts OpenAI in a precarious position. The company is already spending billions of dollars a year as it spends heavily on the computing power needed to run its models. Adding billions more in stock compensation puts immense pressure on the company to dramatically increase revenue and find a path to profitability before its investors get spooked. While Microsoft seems locked in for the long haul, other investors may grow weary of having their ownership diluted so heavily. It forces a countdown timer on the company to deliver a massive financial return to justify the cost. OpenAI was founded with a mission to build artificial general intelligence (AGI) that 'benefits all of humanity.' This costly talent war, fueled by capitalist competition, puts immense pressure on that founding ideal. It becomes harder to prioritize safety and ethics when you're burning billions to keep your top minds from joining the competition. Ultimately, OpenAI is betting these billions to ensure it has the best talent to win the race to create the world's first true superintelligence. If they succeed, the financial cost will seem trivial. If they fail, or if a competitor gets there first, they will have spent themselves into a hole for nothing. OpenAI did not immediately respond to a request for comment.


Geek Vibes Nation
20 minutes ago
- Geek Vibes Nation
What Should You Look For In Onboarding HR Software
The choice of onboarding HR software is crucial for an organization's hiring process. An efficient system simplifies processes, improves the new hire experience, and keeps your company compliant. Understanding key features and benefits can go a long way in maximizing the efficacy of onboarding solutions. User-Friendly Interface A simple interface makes onboarding easy for managers and new hires. Onboarding HR software features intuitive navigation, which ensures ease of use and reduces the time needed to train staff. Users can get things done on a platform with clear instructions and an easy-to-use design. An interface that caters to different devices improves accessibility, making it easier for team members joining remotely or on-site to use the platform. Comprehensive Integration Integration capabilities are among the most critical functions in HR software onboarding. Integrating this tool should be seamless with the current systems, ensuring data consistency on all platforms. Such harmonization helps in avoiding repetition and makes the work easy and efficient. Integrating payroll, performance management, and communication tools can create a holistic network that benefits all parties Customization Options Since every organization has peculiar requirements, customizing it is crucial. It should bring flexibility to accommodate unique business needs. Customize workflows, forms, and processes to align with the organization's goals. This customization helps organizations retain their unique identity and leverage the software to the maximum. Automated Workflows Automating repetitive tasks helps save time and minimizes errors. The streamlined nature of onboarding HR software with workflows automating processes allows HR teams to develop a strategic plan rather than spending time on manual tasks. The entire process is streamlined: automatic document generation, document reminders, progress tracking, and more. Such automation ensures a seamless transition for the new hires, delivering a delightful onboarding experience. Compliance Management Compliance with both legal and organizational requirements continues to be a key focus. Onboarding software should include tools that make it easy for employees to follow every policy and regulation. It should also include built-in compliance management tools for tracking required documentation, certifications, and training. Organizations protect themselves from potential legal risks by reducing the risk of non-compliance. Fun Onboarding Process Onboarding is the starting point of a new employee's journey. Software that encourages interaction and engagement fosters a sense of belonging and encouragement. Specialties such as interactive modules, personalized welcome messages, and virtual tours create a friendly atmosphere. When new team members realize their worth, they will be even more productive and happy at work. Analytics and Reporting Statistics and data-driven insights are increasingly used to drive decision-making and process improvement. The leading onboarding HR software with a robust analytics and reporting feature provides key metrics. It identifies areas for improvement by analyzing completion rates, feedback results, and time-to-productivity. This ensures the onboarding process continuously improves based on these insights. Scalability and Flexibility Scalability is critical when organizations scale. HR software for onboarding must scale efficiently without any performance degradation. Solutions that provide seamless transitions can effectively support a growing workforce through transitions. Companies are building a foundation to cater to changing business landscapes and future growth with scalable software. Security Features Safeguarding proprietary information is still a top priority. Security is a must for onboarding software; this includes encryption, access controls, and regular audits. By protecting employee information, organizations also ensure trust and confidence in keeping it safe. By putting in place strong security, a business can reduce the chances of data breaches. Feedback Mechanisms Feedback is critical in understanding how the user experience goes once the onboarding software is in place. Continuous feedback offers clues to strengths and weaknesses. Survey and rating forms and comment sections foster direct communication with new employees and HR teams. Such a collaborative approach also ensures that all onboarding processes are constantly enhanced. Final Thoughts Onboarding itself is a small part of a much larger picture, and selecting an HR software solution to meet your needs means you have to weigh several factors before you make your choice, most importantly, ease of use, integration, customization, and more. Features like automation, compliance management, and security make things more efficient and make the system operate more reliably. Focusing on engagement and scalability prepares organizations for effective employee onboarding. Making better-informed decisions will help improve onboarding, thus benefiting the organization as a whole.