logo
China faces public sector wage crisis

China faces public sector wage crisis

Qatar Tribune3 days ago
Agencies
Beijing
In late June, widespread reports emerged across China showing that public employees—civil servants, teachers, healthcare workers, and state-owned enterprise workers—are not being paid on time.
On Douyin, the Chinese version of TikTok, a growing number of users are posting about wage delays across cities, from Shenyang to Wuhan to Nanjing. A Shenyang blogger went viral when he put out a list of public departments in Yuhong Distric which have not paid salaries to its workers for the last six months.
'Even public kindergartens have stopped paying staff,' the post said. Other netizens followed, listing wage arrears in their own regions. Such posts are close to the hearts of frustrated people which proves beyond doubt that China's public sector is in shambles.
For decades, public-sector jobs in China were called 'iron rice bowl' positions—guaranteed income, benefits, and stability. That myth is now shattering. Social media has become the only venue where these grievances can surface, as state-run media maintain total silence. In a viral post Shenyang worker wrote that his wife is about to give birth but he cannot afford the hospital bill.
A retired official says in a post that he spent his youth serving the government. Now he is really scared of his future. Civil servants—once among the most secure—and even retirees are being dragged into the economic chaos. The roots of this crisis are systemic. For years, China's local governments relied heavily on land sales to generate revenue. After the collapse of real estate market, money has gone.
Meanwhile, debt has ballooned to unprecedented levels. Many local governments operate through Local Government Financing Vehicles (LGFVs)—opaque entities that borrow heavily and are now estimated to hold $7 to $11 trillion in off-balance-sheet debt. As those loans come due, cash-strapped municipalities are prioritizing bond payments over paying public workers.
Even wealthier provinces like Guangdong and Zhejiang are slashing bonuses, delaying wages, and cutting back on basic services. In poorer inland areas, the damage is worse. Teachers in Shandong reportedly haven't been paid for over six months. A nurse in Sichuan complained that monthly pay had dropped to barely $180 and that bonuses had not been issued in months. In some cities, pension payments have also been delayed. Workers who once formed the backbone of China's social and bureaucratic machinery are being pushed to the margins. The human cost is staggering. Families are skipping meals. Workers are borrowing money just to survive. Some have taken to the streets, silently protesting outside local government buildings or publishing video testimonials online. Expressway and construction workers staged demonstrations in Hebei and Guangxi. Public servants are now marching alongside the migrant laborers they used to manage. The grievances are no longer limited to factory floors—they're now coming from teachers, nurses, and police.
Predictably, the government response has been to suppress rather than solve. Protesters have been labeled 'malicious' or 'disturbing public order.' Online posts are scrubbed, hashtags deleted, and videos removed. Courts are rushing to mediate disputes over wage arrears, but enforcement is weak. In some places, local governments are selling state assets or dipping into temple donations to fund salaries—a clear sign of financial desperation. None of these measures fix the underlying problem: a broken fiscal system built on borrowed time and borrowed money. The central government has tried to step in. In late 2024, Beijing announced a massive $1.4 trillion bond-swap program aimed at easing local debt pressure. It followed that with a central pay raise for government workers—about 500 yuan per month—but even that has failed to reach many of those still awaiting back pay. The so-called raises often appear as backdated bonuses and are meaningless for employees who haven't been paid in months.
What this crisis exposes is not merely a temporary fiscal squeeze—it's a breakdown in China's governance model. The country's growth for the past 20 years has been driven by debt-fueled infrastructure and real estate development. Local officials borrowed heavily, counting on continuous growth and land sales. Now, with growth slowing and land values plummeting, the model has imploded. The costs are falling on the very people who served and upheld the state. The betrayal runs deep. Public sector employees are forced to believe that there is stability in the country; They accepted modest wages in exchange for security and predictability. Now they are being sacrificed to maintain the illusion of control. Loyalty is no longer rewarded, and the regime's priorities are clear: protect debt repayments, suppress dissent, and save face.
This is a moral failure as much as a financial one. China's leaders refuse to confront the truth. Instead of auditing and restructuring debt transparently, they hide liabilities in LGFVs. Instead of committing to pay wages first, they service loans and suppress voices. People are suffering but there is no accountability. The crisis is spreading and will worsen. Unless China undergoes sweeping fiscal reform—starting with full disclosure of local government debts, restrictions on off-book borrowing, and a restructuring of its entire public finance system—the decay will accelerate. Wage delays are only the first visible symptom of a broader collapse.
Ultimately, this is not just about unpaid salaries—it's about a failing contract between the Chinese state and its people. The promise of the 'iron rice bowl' has been broken. A regime that can't even pay its own workers is one whose authority is hollow. Behind the sanitized headlines and deleted posts, the truth is plain: China's foundation is cracking, and the consequences will reverberate far beyond its borders.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Clash between European Union and China over green technology escalates
Clash between European Union and China over green technology escalates

Qatar Tribune

time5 hours ago

  • Qatar Tribune

Clash between European Union and China over green technology escalates

Agencies Brussels As the world races toward a low-carbon future, the geopolitical undercurrents of climate action are becoming increasingly turbulent. Nowhere is this more evident than in the escalating tensions between the European Union and China, where green technology has become both a symbol of cooperation and a flashpoint of conflict. The recent Financial Times article, 'EU and China stand-off over climate action before Xi and von der Leyen meet,' captures this friction, highlighting how the EU's anti-subsidy probe into Chinese electric vehicles (EVs) has provoked a sharp rebuke from Beijing. But beneath the surface of trade disputes lies a deeper story, one that reveals the strategic ambitions of Xi Jinping and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to dominate the global green economy while resisting external scrutiny. The EU's investigation into Chinese EV subsidies is not merely a bureaucratic exercise; it is a direct challenge to China's state-led industrial model. For years, Beijing has poured vast subsidies into its clean tech sector, enabling Chinese firms to flood global markets with low-cost solar panels, batteries, and EVs. While this has accelerated the global green transition, it has also raised alarms in Brussels and Washington about unfair competition and strategic dependency. Xi Jinping's government has responded with characteristic defiance. Framing the EU's actions as protectionist and politically motivated, Beijing has warned of retaliatory measures, signalling that it views climate-linked trade disputes as part of a broader Western effort to contain China's rise. This narrative fits neatly into the CCP's domestic messaging, which portrays China as a victim of Western double standards while asserting its right to industrial self-determination. Under Xi, China's green industrial policy is not just about environmental stewardship; it is a pillar of national strategy. The CCP has identified clean technology as a domain where China can leapfrog traditional powers and assert global leadership. This ambition is backed by a sprawling network of state-owned enterprises, subsidies, and regulatory protections that have enabled Chinese firms to dominate key segments of the green supply chain. Rare earths, solar panels, and EV batteries are not just commodities; they are instruments of geopolitical leverage. The EU's dependence on Chinese inputs for its green transition places it in a precarious position. Brussels faces a dilemma: how to enforce fair competition without jeopardizing its own climate goals. Xi's government is acutely aware of this dependency and has not hesitated to exploit it, using export controls and diplomatic pressure to remind Europe of the costs of confrontation. While China has made impressive strides in renewable energy deployment, its climate governance remains tightly controlled by the CCP. Xi's top-down approach to environmental policy, often described as 'authoritarian environmentalism,' prioritizes state control over market mechanisms or civil society engagement. This model allows for rapid mobilization of resources but lacks transparency, accountability, and public participation. Critics argue that this approach enables greenwashing and data manipulation, undermining global trust in China's climate commitments. Moreover, the CCP's suppression of environmental NGOs and independent researchers has stifled domestic scrutiny, making it difficult to assess the true environmental impact of China's industrial policies. In this context, the EU's push for fair competition and regulatory transparency is not just an economic issue; it is a challenge to the CCP's governance model. The EU's decision to launch an anti-subsidy probe marks a turning point in its relationship with China. For years, Brussels pursued a policy of engagement, hoping that economic integration would encourage political convergence. That illusion has faded. The green tech standoff reflects a broader strategic awakening in Europe, where concerns about dependency, coercion, and systemic rivalry are reshaping policy. Yet Europe's position remains constrained by its reliance on Chinese supply chains. The EU's climate ambitions are entangled with its economic vulnerabilities. This interdependence complicates efforts to decouple or diversify, especially in the short term. Xi Jinping understands this dynamic and is likely to use it as a bargaining chip in upcoming negotiations with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. Xi's leadership style is defined by calculated brinkmanship, pushing boundaries while avoiding outright rupture. In the climate domain, this means presenting China as an indispensable partner while resisting external pressure for reform. The CCP's strategy is to shape global norms from within, leveraging its market size and technological prowess to dilute Western influence. However, this approach carries risks. If China is perceived as weaponizing green trade or undermining fair competition, it could trigger a backlash that accelerates efforts to diversify supply chains and tighten trade rules. Already, the U.S. and EU are exploring new alliances and regulatory frameworks to counter China's dominance. Xi's challenge is to maintain China's centrality in the green economy without provoking a coalition of resistance. The upcoming meeting between Xi and von der Leyen will be more than a diplomatic formality; it will be a test of whether two interdependent yet adversarial powers can find common ground in the face of mounting tensions. For Xi Jinping and the CCP, the stakes are high. Their vision of green leadership is inseparable from their broader quest for global influence and domestic legitimacy. But if that vision relies on coercion, opacity, and strategic dependency, it may ultimately undermine the very cooperation needed to address the climate crisis. The EU, for its part, must navigate a delicate balance—asserting its values and interests without derailing the green transition. In this high-stakes standoff, the path forward will require not just diplomacy, but a rethinking of how power, policy, and the planet intersect.

Russia, China begin joint military drills in Sea of Japan
Russia, China begin joint military drills in Sea of Japan

Qatar Tribune

time5 hours ago

  • Qatar Tribune

Russia, China begin joint military drills in Sea of Japan

Agencies Moscow China and Russia have begun joint naval drills in the Sea of Japan as they seek to reinforce their partnership and counterbalance what they see as a United States-led global order. The Chinese and Russian governments have deepened their ties in recent years, with China providing an economic lifeline to Russia in the face of Western sanctions over Moscow's invasion of Ukraine. The Joint Sea-2025 exercises began in waters near the Russian port of Vladivostok and will last for three days, China's Ministry of National Defence said in a statement on Sunday. The two sides will hold 'submarine rescue, joint anti-submarine, air defence and anti-missile operations, and maritime combat'. Four Chinese vessels, including guided-missile destroyers Shaoxing and Urumqi, are participating in the exercises, alongside Russian ships, the ministry said. After the drills, the two countries will conduct naval patrols in 'relevant waters of the Pacific'. China and Russia have carried out annual drills for several years, with the 'Joint Sea' exercises beginning in 2012. Last year's drills were held along China's southern coast. With this year's drills in the Sea of Japan, in its annual report last month, Japan's Ministry of Defence warned that China's growing military cooperation with Russia poses serious security concerns. 'The exercise is defensive in nature and is not directed against other countries,' the Russian Navy Pacific Fleet said earlier this week, according to a report by the US Naval Institute's online news and analysis portal. On Friday, the Chinese Defence Ministry said this year's exercises were aimed at 'further deepening the comprehensive strategic partnership' of the two countries. China has never denounced Russia's more than three-year war nor called for it to withdraw its troops, and many of Ukraine's allies, including the US, believe that Beijing has provided support to Moscow. European leaders asked China last month to use its influence to pressure Russia to end the war, now in its fourth year, but there was no sign that Beijing would do so. China, however, insists it is a neutral party, regularly calling for an end to the fighting while also accusing Western countries of prolonging the conflict by arming Ukraine.

Chinese sellers scramble as US closes e-commerce loophole
Chinese sellers scramble as US closes e-commerce loophole

Qatar Tribune

time5 hours ago

  • Qatar Tribune

Chinese sellers scramble as US closes e-commerce loophole

Agencies Washington's decision to suspend the 'de minimis' tariff exemption for all countries – expanding on an earlier move that targeted Chinese shipments – is set to disrupt and ultimately reshape the global cross-border e-commerce sector, analysts said. The White House announced the order on Wednesday as part of efforts to close loopholes used to evade tariffs and smuggle 'deadly synthetic opioids as well as other unsafe or below-market products' into the United States. It will come into effect on August 29. In May, the US eliminated the exemption – which had allowed small packages worth less than US$800 to enter the country duty-free – for goods from move aimed to close what many considered a regulatory loophole exploited by Chinese platforms like Temu and Shein to rapidly scale their said the latest action marked a return to trade normality and left Chinese exporters with limited options: either compete in an already saturated domestic market, or battle fellow Chinese sellers abroad. 'Before, they could source from other countries to get around rules — that's no longer viable, as the pathways to the US market are all blocked,' said Zhuang Bo, global macro strategist at Loomis Sayles Investment Asia, an affiliate of Natixis Investment Managers. While expected, the move marks a significant setback for China's digital trade dominance, as the whole 'business model was largely driven by Chinese firms, both operationally and in market share', he added. 'We'll likely see Chinese outbound FDI become far more common, as companies seek to maintain market access Sellers will now either continue the brutal price competition at home or face off with fellow Chinese firms in markets beyond the US.' The most effective solution, Zhuang added, would be to accept slower growth and allow industrial capacity to normalise. 'But as long as national policy still targets high growth, companies will be forced to keep cutting prices to defend market share.' Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Guo Jiakun said on Thursday that Beijing had 'taken note' of the latest US move. He urged Washington to uphold 'the principles of fair competition' and provide a 'fair, just and non-discriminatory business environment' for all foreign firms. In early February, Trump sought to revoke the 'de minimis' exemption for low-value parcels from China and Hong Kong, citing trade imbalances. The move was part of an executive order he signed on February 1 that also raised tariffs on Chinese goods by 10 per cent. While the rule briefly took effect, it was quickly delayed to give US agencies more time to establish systems for collecting duties – effectively pausing enforcement. The exemption had played a crucial role in driving the growth of China's cross-border e-commerce sector, allowing vendors to send small shipments directly to US consumers without incurring import duties or facing customs checks. Over the past decade, shipments entering the US under the exemption have surged by more than 600 per cent – from about 139 million in the 2015 financial year to over 1 billion in the 2023 financial year, according to US Customs and Border Protection. For small Chinese businesses, the news did not come as a surprise. Many have already shifted their focus to the domestic market or diversified to alternative export destinations.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store