How a wall in Surrey helped the Allies on D-Day
Dozens stroll past the huge wall that runs through the wood each day, but few will know of the key role it played in the D-Day landings.
By the end of 1942, German-occupied Europe stretched from the Atlantic coast of France in the west to the Russian Ural Mountains in the east.
But Hitler felt the coastline to the west was vulnerable to invasion, so ordered forts be built on 2,000 miles (3,218km) of shoreline along France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Denmark and the northern tip of Norway.
The defence system would inevitably fail, thanks in part to the tests carried out hundreds of miles away in Surrey in 1943.
Royal Canadian Engineers based in the area built a replica section of wall in the woodland using plans smuggled from France, which showed how the real wall was built.
The Army then began blowing the wall to pieces using two new armoured test vehicles.
One of the vehicles was the AVRE mortar-firing tank, which was then used to break through the real Atlantic Wall during the D-Day landings.
"It was about creating new armoured vehicles, vehicles that would be able to breach this wall," said military historian Paul McCue.
"The people who built this went ashore during the invasion of France and many lost their lives.
"There's a plaque on it but it's quite a modest one and it's tucked away, so people will walk past it and not see it."
Today, it is clear to see the chasms that were blown out of the wall during tests, with metal rods still poking from moss-covered rubble.
Follow BBC Surrey on Facebook or X. Send your story ideas to southeasttoday@bbc.co.uk or WhatsApp us on 08081 002250.
D-Day veteran says friends' sacrifice a 'waste of life'
Why has a knitted tank rolled into Llandudno?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Woman 'Annoyed' After Friends Order Her Food Before She Even Arrives at the Restaurant — Then Expect Her to Split the Bill
"Is this some kind of weird power play, or what?" the woman asked as she sought advice on a community forumNEED TO KNOW A woman sought advice on the U.K. community forum Mumsnet about an awkward dynamic with some friends, a married couple On two separate occasions, a member of the couple ordered food for her before she arrived at the restaurant, and expected to split the bill "Is this some kind of weird power play, or what?" the woman askedA woman is seeking advice about an awkward situation with her friends. She shared her story in a post on the U.K. site Mumsnet's "Am I Being Unreasonable?" forum, beginning by explaining that she and her partner recently met up at a restaurant with her friend and her husband — and arrived to find they had started the meal without them. "We turned up bang on time, to find that the husband had already ordered garlic pizza as a starter and expected us all to share it and not order starters of our own," the OP (original poster) wrote. She was a bit put off as she had planned to order something different for herself. "I particularly wanted a starter that's unique to that restaurant, and had been looking forward to it all day, and had to really stick to my guns as the husband tried to bully me into sharing the starter I didn't want," she recalled. At the time, the OP assumed the food ordering issue "was the husband" and brushed it off. When she later got together with just her friend, she inquired about it. "I asked what was going on with 'Fred' ordering for us, and she said it was just him," she wrote. "But it happened again recently, so I'm not so sure," she continued. On the second occasion, the OP arrived 10 minutes late to lunch but made sure to text her friend ahead of time to apologize for her tardiness. "This was the first time I have ever been late meeting her in 25 years," she noted. When she got to the restaurant, she discovered that her friend had already ordered — "what I usually, but not always, eat and drink." "It was 12:40, I hadn't made her desperately late getting lunch, and she's not diabetic or anything else that would need her to eat at a particular time to within 10 minutes," the OP wrote. The OP said that for both restaurant outings, the expectation was that the bill would be split in half, despite her not getting to order for herself. "AIBU [am I being unreasonable] to be a bit annoyed? Is this some kind of weird power play, or what?" she asked fellow Mumsnet users. In the comments, most people agreed that the couple's behavior was "strange and controlling" and advised the OP to speak up about it. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. "It's weird, and I wouldn't like this. Either tell them firmly before the event that 'let's all order for ourselves' or you stop dining with them," one reader wrote. "Just say very firmly in advance, 'Please don't order for me! I like to choose for myself,' " another commenter said. Yet another person suggested: "Order your own food when you get there. Let the friend pay for the meal she ordered. Make it her problem. It won't happen again!" Still, a small minority of commenters pointed out that, at least in the second instance, the OP's friend may have thought she was being helpful by ordering food for her since she was running late. "Ordering your lunch is weird, but you've known her for 25 years so she probably thought she was helping you," one person wrote. However, another user chimed in to say that the friend still could have given the OP the option to choose her own food. "Occasionally, someone might mean to be helpful, particularly if you're running late. I've ordered for a friend in that situation, but only after I've texted her and given her the menu options so she can let me know what she wants," they wrote. "Everyone has a mobile phone these days, it's not difficult!" Read the original article on People Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
I tried: These award winning cheeses made in Gwent
JAMES Joyce once described cheese as 'the corpse of milk.' As a veteran cheddar sceptic there's nothing more corpsey than cheddar 'cheese'. I also regard adding faddish ingredients to cheese as pointless. Cheese is just milk, culture and time. So, when challenged to try a cheddar that has cider and marmalade added to the mix, I envied those munching - or slurping - on pot noodles. I had long dismissed cheddar as dairy's beige wallpaper, fit only for grilling, a workday sarnie filler or to placate uncouth guests with a token cheese plate. Proper cheese, I insisted, should challenge the palate, not comfort it. So, when I was dared to try Blaenafon Cheddar infused with onion marmalade and taffy apple cider, I braced myself for disappointment, culture shock and possible revulsion. My last brave food assignment was trying what was billed as 'Wales's best hot dog' at Aimmee's Street Food, and was impressed by the top dog! I do believe in food redemption, but not in miracles, so I didn't hold out much hope for cheddar from Blaenavon with added bits. Taste test: Ok, I was completely wrong about cheese and my own palate! From the first bite, it was clear this was no ordinary cheddar. The texture was a revelation, buttery and still as crumbly as any quality mature cheddar. The mouthfeel was exquisite, the combination of complexities made me search for cheese accompaniments and pretentious foodie words like 'umami'. The flavour was layered and complex. The mature cheddar brought a deep, savoury hit, while the onion marmalade added a smoky sweetness that contrasted the crisp cider vibe. It was sweet and sharp, rustic and refined, a cheese with true character. This is no sandwich filler, toastie griller or sop to uncultured palates. It was a conversation starter, a centrepiece, a must-try for anyone who thinks cheddar has to be dull - fromage ennui! This delightful cheese challenged me and taught me something I didn't know - that cheddar is a great cheese and deserves its place on any discerning plate. Blaenafon Cheddar has earned its place not just on my cheese board, but in my heart. It is proof that even the most familiar cheeses can surprise you, if you give them the chance. These cheddars are handmade, vegetarian-friendly, and wax-coated, which gives it a six-month shelf life. The above reviewed taffy apple cider and onion marmalade-infused cheese is an award-winning cheddar and is among several products that use local alcohols that act as natural preservative. The 1868 cheddar is aged in the cellars of The Lion Hotel. The Pwll Mawr cheese is matured in Big Pit coal mine, 300ft below the surface. All wax casings show Blaenavon industrial heritage designs. Eat them all, you'll have no regrets.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Dear Richard Madeley: My husband wants us to get a new dog, but I'm still grieving for our old one
Dear Richard, Our much-loved Cairn Terrier recently died – she had got to a good age but it was quite sudden when it happened. My husband felt we should get a puppy of the same breed at the earliest opportunity, so we didn't get out of the habit of looking after a pet, and also so our children could get to know it before they went back to university. But I felt we should wait: it was just too soon for me and I didn't want to betray our dog's memory, if that's not a silly way of putting it. I also suggested it would be more ethical to get a rescue, but he was very hostile to the idea. The problem is that a pure-bred Cairn puppy has become available and of course she is absolutely gorgeous. If we don't snap her up someone else will. I am now genuinely torn, but I still feel my plan – to wait six months and then find a rescue – is the right one. If I insist on that plan, my husband won't refuse, but I can feel myself wavering. What do you think? – B Dear B, I think the unstated tension in your letter – because you may genuinely be unaware of it – is the difference in the way individuals grieve, whether that's for a parent, or a sibling, or a child, or, yes, a much-beloved pet. I think that differential is largely what's at play here. Your husband wants to 'move on'; meanwhile you need time to come to terms with your loss. There's nothing wrong with either response – it's just that they don't match up and you're beginning to glare at each other across the gulf. So... our old friend 'compromise' enters the frame. You need time; he craves action. You're going to have to negotiate the healing process. All I can suggest is that you talk it through, with kindness and gentleness, to find the least painful solution for both of you. I can't believe that the opportunity to secure a Cairn puppy won't repeat itself, so perhaps it's your husband who should consider giving way. But be kind to each other. This is all about coping with grief. We all have our different ways. Good luck. You can find more of Richard Madeley's advice here or submit your own dilemma below. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more. Solve the daily Crossword
