Social Security's go-broke date pushed up in new report
The report projected that the program's Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) would be able to cover '100 percent of total scheduled benefits until 2033,' while the Disability Insurance (DI) trust fund is estimated to be able to pay '100 percent of total scheduled benefits through at least 2099.'
But when the projections are combined, the resulting fund is estimated to only be able to cover '100 percent of total scheduled benefits until 2034, one year earlier than reported last year.' Once the reserves are depleted, the report estimated the total fund income would be able to pay 81 percent of scheduled benefits.
The report said the depletion dates for the funds had advanced by about three-quarters compared to the previous year's projections.
The report cited last year's passage of the Social Security Fairness Act as a key factor behind the shift in the funds' projected depletion dates.
The bipartisan bill, which former President Biden signed into law back in January, repealed two tax rules that proponents say have unfairly reduced benefits for many Americans who also receive government pensions.
But many experts sounded the alarm over its expected price tag and raised questions of fairness around the legislation.
The new report said on Wednesday that the repeal of the tax rules 'increased projected Social Security benefit levels for some workers, relative to projected benefit levels in last year's report,' while singling out the legislation's impact as 'the primary contributor to the change' in the combined trust fund depletion date this year.
Two other factors the board pointed to were the trustees' extension of the 'assumed period of recovery from historically low levels of fertility by 10 years' and its lowering of 'the assumed long-term share of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) that accrues to workers in the form of labor compensation.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
18 minutes ago
- Axios
Social Security recipients set to face an $18,000 benefit cut in just seven years
Retirees are facing the prospect of substantial Social Security cuts in just seven years, sooner than projected, due to the "big, beautiful bill," per an analysis out Thursday from the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. Why it matters: If policymakers don't stop this from happening, it would at least double the poverty rate of America's seniors, per several estimates. By the numbers: The new analysis projects a 24% cut to benefits by late 2032. That's equal to an $18,000 annual benefit cut for a dual-earning couple who both retire in 2033. They also might experience reduced healthcare access, per the analysis, due to an 11% cut in Medicare hospital payments. The percentages would grow over time, as the population ages and fewer young Americans are paying into the system. How it works: The trust fund is effectively the money the federal government takes in from Social Security taxes. For decades, the system took in more in taxes than it paid out, the Treasury department then invested the surplus. In 2021, it started tapping reserves to keep paying benefits. Once the reserves are depleted, benefits would be "pay-as-you-go," paying out money as taxes come in. That the trust fund would be depleted in the 2030s has long been known. Zoom in: The tax cuts in the big bill and the increase in the deduction for seniors, specifically, would reduce Social Security's incoming tax revenue — and speed up depletion by about a year, per the CRFB. The big picture: Social Security is arguably the most popular government benefit — most Americans either receive benefits or know someone who does — the vast majority of Americans believe in its importance, according to recent polling. The bottom line: Most policy wonks and Social Security advocates believe that it's highly unlikely that Congress would sit back and watch benefits get cut like this.
The Hill
18 minutes ago
- The Hill
Top Biden aide Ron Klain answers questions in GOP mental acuity probe
Former White House chief of staff Ron Klain answered questions in an interview with the House Oversight and Accountability Committee in its investigation into former President Biden's mental acuity and use of an autopen. His approach contrasts with some other former Biden aides who refused to answer questions, invoking their Fifth Amendment rights. House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) said that Klain was 'fairly responsive' to the panel's questions as the interview broke for a lunch break, expecting to continue questioning into late afternoon. 'I found Mr. Klain to be very credible. He answered every single question. He was fully cooperative,' Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), a member of the committee, said of Klain's interview. Khanna added that Klain was 'forthcoming' about private conversations he had with Biden and did not avoid questions. Rep. Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.), another member of the committee, said that Klain was 'not trying to avoid answering the questions,' and was 'answering the questions carefully.' 'I think he is telling what he knows accurately,' Biggs said. 'He's trying to be accurate.' Several other former aides from the Biden administration invoked their Fifth Amendment rights and refused to answer the committee's questions in recent depositions: Anthony Bernal, former Chief of Staff to First Lady Jill Biden; Deputy Director of Oval Office Operations Annie Tomasini; and Biden's former White House doctor Kevin O'Connor. Others, though, have answered questions in depositions with the committee: Former Biden aides Ashley Williams and Neera Tanden. 'Americans what to know, was Joe Biden in fact aware of what the auto pen was being used to sign his name on, or was in fact some family members or high-level officials in the Biden administration just acting unilaterally as president of the United States and using the autopen,' Comer said ahead of Klain's interview. One Biden ally told The Hill that former aides to the president will take different approaches to the investigation that they see as an exercise in political retribution. 'People are going to take different approaches. Some might speak to committee, while others may invoke their fifth amendment rights. But none of it changes the fact that this investigation isn't about oversight—it's about political retribution,' the Biden ally said.
Fox News
19 minutes ago
- Fox News
DAVID MARCUS: Biden's autopen poised for $10M payday
When I heard Joe Biden is getting $10 million to pen a memoir which will address his presidency, I thought the same thing you probably did: Is it a coloring book? I mean, come on. First of all, the odds are good that Grandpa Joe cannot remember what he had for breakfast today, much less the detailed doings of the White House for four long years. But also, nobody on Planet Earth thinks this man is capable of writing so much as a thank-you card. I've written a book. It's difficult, unenjoyable and requires mental stamina. To state it clearly, if Joe Biden is writing a book, then I'm the Dalai Lama. Of course, nobody is surprised when former presidents or other celebrity types get big-money book deals thrown at them, or that many employ ghostwriters. But the ghost of William Faulkner couldn't get a book's worth of sensible commentary out of Ol' Joe. This is the same former president who could barely manage a 10-minute interview with The New York Times this month. At that rate, this book would take a hundred years to finish, even if his son Hunter filled some pages with his lovely illustrations. No, it will not be Joe Biden who composes this fabulous work of fan fiction. It will likely be crafted by many of the same people who have their fingerprints all over the infamous White House autopen. This guy makes Jimmy Carter look like Cicero, and this book might be the very last chance to restore any respect and dignity at all to Scranton Joe. This inner circle that served both Joe and Jill Biden for years, from Ron Klain, to Anthony Bernal, to Susan Rice, seem to have been the real people running the country. But that's not what Biden's book will say about them. Biden's memoir will really be their day in court, especially now that many have pleaded the Fifth Amendment when asked about Biden's decline by Congress. In this way, even if Joe has no clue this book is even being written, it could still wind up an important document insofar as it will serve as the official Biden camp version of events, a sneak peek of which Hunter Biden may have given us this week. On the "Channel 5" podcast the former first son, painter, and Ukrainian gas executive, gave a profanity-laden performance that felt like an audition for a David Mamet play. Take this gem, describing the Democrats who turned on his dad: "James Carville—who hasn't run a race in 40 f--ing years—and David Axelrod, who had one success in his political life, and that was Barack Obama. And that was because of Barack Obama—not because of f---ing David Axelrod." Actually, if Joe's book reads anything like this, it could be a bestseller. Democrats have been cursing up a storm lately, but Hunter actually seems to be good at it, as his father was rumored to be in private. Democrats may be about to find out that hell hath no fury like a Biden scorned, and even if Joe himself thinks he's having lunch with long-dead Maggie Thatcher tomorrow, those closest to him know where all the bodies are buried. For Joseph Robinette Biden, this book deal, this cool 1$0 million, is likely the final payout of a long and very lucrative career in public service. Make of that combination what you will, but for those loyal to him, it is much more. Biden's legacy and reputation in the pantheon of American politics is as low as it can be. This guy makes Jimmy Carter look like Cicero, and this book might be the very last chance to restore any respect and dignity at all to Scranton Joe. So for whomever is writing this book, here is a piece of advice. Do the American people and Joe Biden a favor and just tell the truth. We can handle it, and even if the truth is bad, the perception of it is already very, very bad. Biden can't undo the terrible harm he did as president, the crushing inflation, the surging border or the feckless and facile foreign policy disasters. But those in charge of this book have a chance to set the record straight now. Let's pray that they take it, even though we know, they almost certainly will not.
