&w=3840&q=100)
Ahmedabad plane crash: Did Air India flight deploy RAT seconds after takeoff? What does it mean?
Members of Indian Army's engineering arm prepare to remove the wreckage of an Air India aircraft, bound for London's Gatwick Airport, which crashed during take-off from an airport in Ahmedabad, June 14, 2025. Reuters
The Air India AI-171 flight crash has sparked questions about the cause of the disaster that killed more than 200. On June 12, the London-bound Air India plane crashed into a residential area in Ahmedabad, moments after take-off.
At least 270 people died, of whom 241 were passengers and crew of the ill-fated Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner. Several theories have emerged about the factor(s) behind the crash. Now, some are claiming that the Ram Air Turbine (RAT) was activated shortly after the Air India flight took off from Ahmedabad.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
What is it? And what does its activation mean? We will explain.
What is RAT?
Ram Air Turbine (RAT) is an emergency power source for an aircraft when the main engines fail to generate power for essential systems.
The small propeller-like device uses wind speed to generate emergency power.
It is deployed automatically when the flight experiences dual engine failure, the loss of total electrical power or hydraulic failure.
The emergency back-up turbine can also be activated manually through a switch or lever in the cockpit.
After a power loss is detected, the RAT, located behind the landing gear console that deploys into the airstream, gets activated automatically. It generates power based on the speed of the aircraft.
Once deployed, the RAT powers key systems, such as flight controls or flight-critical instrumentation, navigation and communication equipment, according to SKYbrary.
ALSO READ: How is the Air India investigation unfolding? Why are UK, US involved?
Was RAT deployed in doomed Air India plane?
The Air India plane was airborne for 30 seconds before it came crashing down on a doctors' accommodation building at the BJ Medical College and Civil Hospital last week.
Captain Sumeet Sabharwal, the pilot of the Air India flight, issued a mayday call to air traffic controllers in Ahmedabad almost immediately after takeoff.
A clearer video of the last moments of the plane purportedly indicates that the RAT was activated. The footage captured by Class 12 student Aryan Asari appears to show that the emergency back-up turbine was down.
Aviation experts cite the testimony of the sole survivor of the Air India plane crash to support this claim.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Vishwash Kumar Ramesh, a British national, had told the media that it felt the aircraft got stuck midair within moments of takeoff. He said he heard a 'loud bang' and the light went out. Then a green light flashed and the plane accelerated but could not gain altitude.
A video of the Air India flight crash shows the AI-171 plane flying low over residential areas before rapidly descending and disappearing behind trees and buildings, before a huge explosion erupts in the sky.
Captain Steve Scheibner, who is reportedly a former US Navy pilot, has claimed that the RAT was deployed on the doomed Air India flight.
In a video on YouTube, he said, 'In the middle of the circle, you see kind of a protrusion on the belly of the aircraft… just underneath that you see a little grey dot… that little grey dot is the RAT.'
Analysing the video of the Air India flight crash, Scheibner pointed to the 'high-pitched squeal' to support his claim of the RAT deployment. He said the lone survivor's statement signals what occurs during the RAT deployment.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The aviation expert's new video comes after Scheibner previously claimed that pilots' failure to set the wing flaps properly could be a possible reason for the crash.
A regulatory source told Indian Express that the loud bang that the sole survivor heard could mean a lower hatch gave way and the RAT was deployed automatically. However, the person said there could be other reasons for the loud sound.
What does it mean?
If the RAT was deployed, it is likely that the Air India flight faced a dual engine failure, aviation expert Captain Sahil Bhalla told Financial Express.
Bhalla said that the RAT is deployed within seconds of engine failure, which means the aircraft has lost power from both engines. 'The activation of the RAT is almost instantaneous. It tells us that the aircraft was relying on emergency backup systems due to a significant loss of power," he said.
A view shows the wreckage of the tail section of an Air India aircraft, bound for London's Gatwick Airport, which crashed during take-off from an airport in Ahmedabad, India June 12, 2025. Reuters
The RAT is the last resort to power the aircraft when everything stops working. However, it is more useful when the plane is at higher or cruising altitudes, providing ample time for pilots to land at the closest airfield.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
This was not the case with the Air India flight, which was at an altitude of just 625 feet before crashing.
With inputs from agencies
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Indian Express
2 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Human error, inadequate infra at Goa airport caused Air India plane's aborted take-off: AAIB report
NEW DELHI: Human error and the lack of adequate infrastructure at Goa's Manohar International Airport led to the aborted take-off of an Air India flight to Hyderabad last December, the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) has said in its final report on the incident released on Monday. The incident involving Air India flight AIC 2592, carrying 151 passengers and 7 crew members, occurred on the night of December 5, 2024. The flight was stopped mid-roll just as it was accelerating for take-off. The AAIB, which investigated the event under the Aircraft Rules, 2017, has now released its 16-page final report. The Airbus A320 was rolling down the taxiway at 124 knots around 9.17 pm when the Air Traffic Control (ATC) noticed the aircraft was not on the assigned runway. Visibility at the time was 3,000 metres. The flight had mistakenly entered Taxiway 'A' instead of Taxiway 'A5', which had been assigned for take-off on Runway 28. The aircraft was immediately ordered to abort take-off, and the pilots complied. The AAIB classified the incident as a "serious incident." Specifying the probable causes for the incident, the probe report said there was a "Situational Awareness Deficit" on the part of the crew. The take-off clearance given by the ATC likely caused the crew's cognitive focus to shift entirely towards the take-off.


Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
AI apologises for roaches on SFO-Mum flight
New Delhi: Air India "apologised" for cockroaches on last Saturday's San Francisco-Mumbai (via Kolkata) flight due to which seats of some flyers had to be changed en route India. The aircraft, a relatively new ex-Delta Boeing 777 (VT-AEH), was "deep cleaned" during its technical (fuelling) halt in Kolkata and the airline will initiate "a comprehensive investigation to determine the source/cause of this incident and implement measures to prevent recurrence". The aircraft landed in Mumbai early Monday. "…two passengers were unfortunately bothered by the presence of a few small cockroaches on board. Our cabin crew, therefore, relocated the two passengers to other seats in the same cabin, where they were comfortable thereafter," a spokesperson said. tnn

Hindustan Times
4 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Why United Airlines flight made emergency landing at Washington Dulles International Airport? ‘Attention all aircraft…'
An engine of United Airlines' plane with over 200 passengers on board suddenly collapsed, forcing the aircraft to make an emergency landing. United Airlines flight engine failure: The Federal Aviation Administration announced that it is looking into 'possible engine issues' that may have occurred on the United flight.(REUTERS) More than two hours after its scheduled departure time, Flight 108 left Washington Dulles at approximately 8 pm on Friday, July 25. After approximately 30 minutes in the air, the 12-year-old Boeing 787 Dreamliner returned to the airport, which is located just outside the country's capital. The Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority and United both issued different statements claiming that this was due to 'a mechanical issue.' More information about the incident was provided in air traffic control audio that was first posted to YouTube and then published by Also Read: Who is Los Angeles mass shooting suspect and what was the motive? United flight declares 'emergency, mayday' The flight bounded for Germany's Munich declared 'an emergency, mayday, mayday, mayday,' following the engine failure, as per the cockpit and air traffic control audio published on the YouTube channel You can see ATC. 'Engine failure, left engine,' a pilot can be heard stating. 'Attention all aircraft, fuel dumping in progress, 10 miles west of Dulles,' the tower can be heard sending an alert. United Airlines flight issues statement In a statement on Monday, United announced that the Boeing 787 carrying 219 passengers and 11 staff members had to return for Dulles International Airport when Flight 108 was en route to Munich. As the jet emptied fuel to make sure it was the right weight for landing, the records showed that the pilot and air traffic control calmly facilitated the return arrangements. The plane 'returned to Washington Dulles shortly after takeoff to address a mechanical issue,' as per the statement. 'The plane landed safely, and all passengers deplaned normally at the gate,' the Chicago-based jet continued. 'The flight was subsequently canceled and we arranged alternate travel arrangements to take customers to their destination as soon as possible.' FAA announces probe In a statement, the FAA announced that it is looking into 'possible engine issues' that may have occurred on the United flight. At 5:40 p.m. EST, Flight 108 was supposed to depart Dulles, fly over the Atlantic all night, and touchdown at Munich International Airport at 5:40 a.m. CEST the following day. However, the airline monitoring database FlightAware reports that this particular aircraft, Flight 108, departed Dulles at 6:11 p.m. EDT and returned to the same airport at 8:49 p.m.