National Assembly agrees to revive motion to investigate statutory rape
Parliament has backed a revived motion to investigate statutory rape, with all parties united in their sense of urgency over rising abuse and teenage pregnancy rates.
The National Assembly (NA) hosted a sitting on Tuesday, where lawmakers considered a motion to revive the investigation into the issue of statutory rape in South Africa and possibly change the law around it.
Each party either declared its support for the motion or confirmed its backing without formal declarations.
Statutory rape, harshest abuses on children
ANC chief whip Mdumiseni Ntuli said the ANC supported the motion, citing the high rate of teenage pregnancies and the need for comprehensive sexual education.
'Statutory rape is one of the harshest abuses to our children. It strips them of their right to be children,' Ntuli said.
The chief whip said the provisions of South African law and the statistics of statutory rape allude to a disjuncture.
ALSO READ: Child rape in South Africa deserves real justice
The ANC called for a collective effort to address teenage pregnancies.
DA chief whip George Michalakis confirmed his party's support and stressed the need for decisive action to combat statutory rape.
'It does cut across various departments, and I think that statutory rape, especially of young girls in this country, has become a crisis that needs to be dealt with decisively by this Parliament,' Michalakis said.
National emergency
MK party MP Hazel Mbele said Parliament shouldn't even be debating the motion, arguing that statutory rape demands a national emergency. She highlighted the growing crisis in townships, rural villages, and schools.
'Let's be clear, statutory rape is not a scandal. It is a crisis. It is a kind of power, of manipulation, of betrayal, and it is happening on our watch,' she said.
Mbele said South Africa's laws are not weak, but the implementation of them is weak. She also expressed concerns regarding the police's ineffectiveness in dealing with cases of statutory rape.
ALSO READ: Statutory rape in South Africa: How many offenders were found guilty in last 10 months?
'This is traumatisation. We need to stop thinking that statutory rape is a mistake or a relationship gone. This is not Romeo and Juliet; this is a child being manipulated, violated and often impregnated by someone who should know better,' she said.
Mbele said the motion must pass, not because it is politically convenient, but because South African children are not safe.
Urgent need for comprehensive interventions
EFF MP Hlengiwe Mkhaliphi reminded the House of a previous motion the party tabled on statutory rape.
She also cited the numerous teenage pregnancy cases reported on Christmas Day and New Year's Eve to stress the urgent need for comprehensive interventions.
'A critical area of focus is the enforcement of mandatory reporting by teachers and nurses, which is essential in bridging the gap in current protective measures,' Mkhaliphi said.
She said the party supports the revival of the motion to ensure justice for victims and called for stronger interdepartmental coordination.
ALSO READ: DNA test reveals Limpopo man did not impregnate 13-year-old girl
The IFP, Patriotic Alliance, ACDP, UDM, Bosa, ATM, and ActionSA expressed their support for the motion, advocating for a more comprehensive and broader approach to the issue at hand.
Parties unanimously agreed to revive motion
Following declarations from all the parties, there were no objections, and all parties unanimously agreed to revive the motion.
The National Assembly tasked the portfolio committee on women and children to lead the investigation. The committee must collaborate with the committees on basic education, social development, police, health, and justice.
The House has extended the deadline for the committee to report back to 30 November.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
13 minutes ago
- IOL News
Urgent call from Deputy Minister Masondo: Pass the 2025/26 Budget to protect vulnerable South Africans
Deputy Minister of Finance David Masondo warns that it will ultimately be the most vulnerable members of society who will suffer the most when the Budget is not passed by Parliament. Image: GCIS Deputy Minister of Finance David Masondo on Thursday called on parties not to prolong the passing of the 2025/26 Budget or vote against the Appropriation Bill. Speaking during debate on the first reading of the Bill, Masondo said the passing of the Bill by Parliament will allow the national government to spend R1.23 trillion to deliver services to protect the vulnerable and invest in the country's shared future. 'This R1.23 trillion is not just a number. It represents school meals, hospital beds, social grants, and infrastructure projects that will directly impact the lives of many South Africans,' he said. Masondo made the statement as MPs debated the Appropriation Bill as part of the process to pass the overall Budget with each of the departments' votes and schedules. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ The debate centres on whether parties agree with the overall principles of the Bill, and should the National House vote 'no', the entire Bill will be deemed rejected and will be referred back to the standing committee for further consideration. Masondo said the absence of the Appropriation Bill will mean that the government may only spend 45% of the previous year's budget until the end of July, and thereafter only 10% of the previous budget. 'Our estimation overall by October is that the government will be without authority when we reach 100% last year's appropriation." He also said failure to pass the Budget would delay critical priorities of the government. 'We should not prolong or object to the passing of this Bill. It is ultimately the most vulnerable members of society who depend on grants, public schools, and clinics, who will suffer the most due to our inaction,' Masondo said. However, the two big parties outside the Government of National Unity (GNU), the EFF and MK Party, indicated earlier that they will vote against the Appropriation Bill. Some of the small parties have stated that they will vote in principle in favour of the Bill, but just against some of the individual votes of departments. MK Party's Sanele Mwali said there was no time for technicalities but a focus on bold and courageous measures. Mwali said Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana, the GNU, and the ANC missed the opportunity to redefine the economic trajectory and set South Africa on a new path of sustainable growth and development. 'When we debate budgets, there is an attempt to limit Parliament from exploring other available economic alternatives,' Mwali said. He said the government continued to pursue the same economic, fiscal, and monetary policy that failed to bring change and impoverished millions of people. EFF MP Omphile Maotwe said her party made proposals on all department votes. 'We did not come to play internal coalition games but to make sure the voices of communities are heard in this House,' Maotwe said. She said the Budget was not for transformation, redistribution, or to fight unemployment, poverty, and inequality. 'It is a compromised Budget negotiated in smoke-filled backrooms to keep a sinking coalition afloat,' Maotwe said. ActionSA's Alan Beesley said the Budget was supposed to focus on industrial development, but it allocated crime to the very departments. Beesley also said Appropriation Bill lacked vision, coherence, and urgency. He complained about money being lost to corruption, cadre deployment, and bloated bureaucracy. 'There is enough money to run this country well, but there is not enough to run a bloated Cabinet and feed the greed of ANC comrades,' Beesly added. When the Bill was put to a vote, it easily secured the majority votes. This after the ANC, DA, and other parties voted in favour of it with 262 votes, while the EFF, MK Party, ATM, National Coloured Congress, and United African Transformation garnered 90 votes. This means the Bill has passed the first hurdle for the day. The parties are busy making declarations on each of the department votes before the approval of the full schedule of votes and the second reading of the Bill later this afternoon.
IOL News
15 minutes ago
- IOL News
South African market resurgence new opportunities for traders
South Africa's financial markets are entering a pivotal phase marked by renewed political clarity, structural reform, and increasing global relevance. But as headline risks like US tariffs, rand volatility, and the upcoming G20 summit take centre stage, local retail traders are presented with not only greater opportunity, but more complexity. Against this backdrop, choosing the right trading partner becomes an essential decision - one that can define not just how you trade, but how well you respond to a market in transformation. Political stability and fresh optimism Since the formation of South Africa's new Government of National Unity in 2024, investor sentiment has meaningfully shifted. Markets have rallied, the longstanding 'SA discount' has narrowed, and policy momentum is driving a new level of optimism. Structural reforms aimed at restoring 3% GDP growth are gaining traction, and both domestic and international investors are beginning to reprice the South African opportunity. This renewed confidence is visible not only in equity performance but also in trade volumes across bonds and listed instruments. South Africa remains one of the few global markets where price formation still occurs primarily on-book, on-exchange; an essential feature of a healthy, transparent market ecosystem. The robustness of this infrastructure, supported by a deep institutional backbone, gives retail traders a rare level of access to clean price discovery and liquidity. South Africa is no longer merely a domestic trading hub; it is actively transforming into a globally relevant platform. With its advantageous time zone, regulatory frameworks increasingly aligned with international standards, and the rise of dual listings, the country is well positioned to serve both local and international traders. What sets this evolution apart is its ability to embrace innovation and global relevance without compromising the pragmatic resilience of its foundational ecosystem. Global trade and G20 pressures South Africa is hosting the G20 finance chiefs in Durban this November, placing it at the forefront of global economic discourse. Global uncertainty however still looms large, with President Trump having announced 30% tariffs on South African exports starting August 1, potentially impacting up to 100,000 jobs in the agriculture and automotive sectors. South African Reserve Bank (SARB) Governor, Lesetja Kganyago, has called for increased intra-African trade amidst the tariff wars. This volatility means one thing for South African traders—opportunity is rife, risk management is imperative, and robust infrastructure is a must. While global markets rush to implement changes like T+1 settlement, South Africa retains the flexibility to adopt reforms deliberately, with the depth and resilience to remain stable amid shifts. All of this makes South Africa one of the most exciting emerging markets today, but also one of the most nuanced. That's why the role of a trading partner becomes more than transactional. It becomes strategic. How to unlock long-term success In today's increasingly sophisticated trading landscape, local traders are no longer just participants but strategic actors navigating a dynamic intersection of global opportunity and local nuance. Choosing the right trading partner is no longer a matter of convenience; it's a critical decision that can define long-term success. Selecting the ideal partner begins with seeking out a firm that combines global-grade technology with deep local insight, underpinned by a compliance-first mindset aligned with FSCA regulation. A robust platform should do more than facilitate transactions. It should unlock access to JSE-listed equities, global indices, currencies, and commodities through a secure, intuitive interface. For traders seeking to hedge effectively without amplifying risk, the ability to trade in ZAR is not just a feature, it's a strategic advantage that mitigates currency exposure, often overlooked by global-first platforms. But access alone is not enough. In a market shaped by structural shifts, SARB rate decisions, and geopolitical volatility, traders need more than tools—they need clarity. A partner that delivers timely insights, actionable strategies, and a commitment to education empowers traders to make informed decisions with confidence. Whether you're entering the market or scaling your strategy, resources like a dedicated education hub and deep research coverage provide a learning edge that evolves with your ambitions. Above all, trust is the cornerstone of sustainable trading. In a market re-engaging with global capital, traders need a partner rooted in local credibility. This includes FSCA oversight, on-the-ground support, and a nuanced understanding of South Africa's regulatory and trading environment. It's a level of support that can provide traders with the assurance they need to grow and succeed. South Africa's financial future looks increasingly optimistic. The yield story remains strong. Foreign capital is returning. The market is diversifying. And with more listings and deeper liquidity, retail traders can now operate with a confidence that wasn't possible just a few years ago. But as the opportunity expands, so too does the need for precision, discipline, and guidance. In this moment of change, a strong trading partner isn't just a convenience—it's a competitive advantage. In a market defined by complexity and opportunity, that distinction matters. Because in South Africa's new market reality, the real advantage lies in who stands beside you, not just what stands in front of you.
IOL News
43 minutes ago
- IOL News
APRAV raises alarm over RABS Bill's impact on road accident victims
Ngoako Mohlaloga, deputy chairperson of APRAV, and Chairman Pieter de Bruyn addressed the media on what they deem the dangers of reintroducing the RABS Bill as a replacement for the RAF. Image: Zelda Venter The Association for the Protection of Road Accident Victims (APRAV) has voiced concern and strong opposition to the reintroduction of the Road Accident Benefits Scheme (RABS) Bill to Parliament, saying a broken system cannot be fixed by stripping away the rights of road accident victims. 'RABS is not reform; it is regression,' Ngoako Mohlaloga, APRAV's deputy chairperson, said on Wednesday. He and the chairman of the association, Pieter de Bruyn, addressed the media during a briefing held in conjunction with the National Press Club on the 'flaws' of the proposed Bill. APRAV's response follows the reintroduction of RABS by Transport Minister Barbara Creecy, a Bill previously rejected three times by Parliament due to its limitations, unaffordable structure, and impractical design. Trade union Cosatu recently voiced its support for the Bill, which it called a progressive measure aimed at protecting the poor. But De Bruyn, however, warns that it will do the opposite, and explains that it will deny victims access to justice, limit financial support, and overwhelm an already dysfunctional Road Accident Fund (RAF). 'This Bill offers less money, fewer rights, and no path to challenge the system when it fails you. If implemented, it will turn the RAF from a safety net into a bureaucratic trap,' he said. In explaining how it will work, De Bruyn said under RABS, road accident victims will no longer receive once-off compensation. Instead, they will receive monthly annuities, regardless of the severity of injury or loss of income. These payments will be capped, and they will terminate immediately if the victim dies. 'You can't pay for trauma surgeries, prosthetics, or settle urgent debt with a few thousand rand a month. RABS shifts the financial burden to victims when they are at their most vulnerable,' De Bruyn said. RABS also removes the right of victims to take their case to court or to access legal assistance. The system places full administrative control in the hands of the RAF, leaving victims with no way to challenge underpayments, delays, or rejections. As it is based on a no-fault model, RABS ensures that even negligent or intoxicated drivers can qualify for compensation. It erases accountability and creates a system vulnerable to fraud, while victims receive reduced and delayed payouts, De Bruyn explained. He added that RABS will also exclude children over 18 who lose a parent, elderly victims over the age of 60, and foreign nationals, as well as informal workers, caregivers, and those not formally employed. APRAV calls this a system of exclusion — not protection. 'If your 19-year-old son depends on you and you're killed in a crash, he will get nothing,' Mohlaloga explained. APRAV has, meanwhile, presented Parliament with a 10-point evidence-based action plan which it said requires minor practical changes to existing legislation. It called for a transparent, public engagement process to determine what is in the best interests of road accident victims. According to the government, the proposed RABS Bill aims to create a more efficient and equitable system for compensating victims of road accidents by focusing on social security principles rather than individual liability. It also proposes that a new body be established to administer the scheme, replacing the current RAF. The proposed RABS Bill has faced considerable opposition in the past, which has delayed its progress. De Bruyn, however, said while APRAV wants the system to be fixed, the proposed Bill is not the answer. He proposed that the RAF should get back on track and settle claims rather than fighting for a law that has failed three times to pass muster. [email protected]
