logo
City recognised with a host of energy efficiency awards

City recognised with a host of energy efficiency awards

Hedyn (formerly Melin Homes and Newport City Homes) won the Housing Association/Landlord of the Year Award.
Green Energy Solar - Cefn Mably Farm Park with the support of Newport City Council, took home the Small Scale Project of the Year Award.
And a project at Barrack Hill, Newport, won the Large Scale Project of the Year Award.
Energy Efficiency Awards chairman Gary Braybrooke said: 'The winners are leaders in energy efficiency in the UK and these awards, now in their 11th year, are testament to their innovation, expertise and dedication to a greener future for us all.
"They are at the heart of transforming the way that energy is used, making a real difference to businesses and households throughout the country."
Event organiser Kenneth Campbell said: 'These awards recognise the organisations and individuals driving real progress towards a more sustainable future.
"Each of our awards recipients has set new benchmarks for what is possible in reducing energy consumption, cutting carbon emissions, and making a lasting impact on businesses, communities, and the environment. We hope that these awards not only celebrate past and present achievements, but also inspire others to push the boundaries of energy efficiency in the future.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

If one green energy plant costs £36bn, there's no hope for net zero
If one green energy plant costs £36bn, there's no hope for net zero

Telegraph

timea day ago

  • Telegraph

If one green energy plant costs £36bn, there's no hope for net zero

It is reliable, safe, and while it is not one hundred per cent carbon-free once you factor in the impact of mining for all the minerals, it is about as green as you can possibly get. There are plenty of strong arguments for increasing Britain's supply of nuclear energy, and the Energy Secretary Ed Miliband has made the right decision today in approving the Sizewell C power station. There is just one catch. The cost has doubled over the last five years, and will double again before its reactors are switched on. In reality, Miliband and the Green Commissars around him are allowing red tape and bureaucracy to drive the cost of the green transition to astronomical levels – and that will destroy the whole project. It will at least help make sure we have enough power to keep the lights on when the wind turbines aren't working. The Sizewell C nuclear power plant will generate enough power for about six million homes once it is finished. The Government will own a majority stake, but the British Gas-owned Centrica, France's EDF, along with some investment funds, have been strong-armed into taking stakes, while the taxpayer-financed National Wealth Fund will provide much of the finance. 'It is time to do big things and build big projects in this country again,' boasted Miliband as he announced the project. Here's the problem, however. The plant will cost £38bn, almost double the £20bn that was estimated when it was first under discussion five years ago. If anyone believes it will actually get delivered at anything close to that figure I have a 'pre-loved' windmill I would like to sell them. Given the atrocious cost overruns that plague every major infrastructure project in the UK the final cost will be well over £60bn and perhaps as high as £80bn. It is going to be an incredibly expensive piece of kit. It does not have to be this way. Nuclear power plants can be built at far lower cost. In France, a new plant costs an estimated €11-12bn euros, and even the Flamanville Plant, which suffered significant cost overruns, only came in at €13bn euros. Sure, costs vary according to their size, and type of reactor. But Britain Remade, a think tank, estimated Britain has the second highest costs in the world behind only the United States (which prefers to focus on its abundant fracking industry). In this country, nuclear costs an estimated £9.4bn per megawatt to build, compared with £4.4bn in France, and £2.2bn in South Korea. Given that upfront capital costs are the major expense with nuclear power – once it is up and running it is very cheap – that means energy bills will be two or three times higher for homes than they would be if we could build at the same price as South Korea. We all know the reason why. Britain has allowed the cost of building even a minor pedestrian bridge, never mind something as controversial as a nuclear power station, to be smothered in red tape. Planning reports run to tens of thousands of pages, legal challenges are allowed at every step of the way, and every form of wildlife is prioritised over the long-suffering British taxpayer. If Miliband was serious about hitting his net zero targets he would ruthlessly slash red tape until we got down to South Korean levels. If he could do that, we could take the cost of Sizewell C down to £10bn. And yet, the harsh truth is this. Miliband and the Green Commissars care even more about rules, regulations and state control than they do about saving the environment. If Miliband let the market work he could deliver green energy on time, at reasonable cost – but none of us should hold our breath waiting for that to happen.

China needs to cut 2025 steel output to meet decarbonisation target, report says
China needs to cut 2025 steel output to meet decarbonisation target, report says

Reuters

time2 days ago

  • Reuters

China needs to cut 2025 steel output to meet decarbonisation target, report says

BEIJING, July 22 (Reuters) - China needs to cut steel output from the coal-powered blast furnace process by more than 90 million metric tons from 2024's level to achieve its green steel target this year, researchers said in a report published on Tuesday. The global steel industry is responsible for around 8% of the world's carbon dioxide emissions and China accounts for more than half of global steel output. If China could meet its target of producing 15% of steel from electric arc furnace facilities this year, it could cut CO2 emissions by more than 160 million tons, nearly equivalent to the European Union steel sector's carbon footprint, analysts at the Helsinki-based Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air said. China has lagged far behind its global peers in terms of electric arc-furnace steel share. The average share is around 30% globally, 71.8% in the United States, 58.8% in India and 26.2% in Japan, the centre said. From 2021 to the first half of 2025, China's blast furnace capacity utilisation rose from 85.6% to 88.6%, while electric-arc furnace utilisation fell from 58.9% to 48.6%, it added. "A credible strategy to curb emission-intensive production and rein in excess capacity would not only tackle the sector's structural issues but also ease global tensions," said Belinda Schaepe, an analyst at the Helsinki-based centre. China produced 1.005 billion tons of crude steel in 2024, with around 90% from blast furnace facilities. China's steel sector has been plagued by overcapacity, which has depressed prices and sparked growing protectionist backlash from global trade partners amid its burgeoning steel exports. The cleaner electric arc facilities have faced headwinds of high power costs, unstable scrap supply and growing losses.

British Gas boss warns Miliband against ‘outrageous' energy bill divide
British Gas boss warns Miliband against ‘outrageous' energy bill divide

Telegraph

time3 days ago

  • Telegraph

British Gas boss warns Miliband against ‘outrageous' energy bill divide

Forcing households with gas boilers to pay higher green taxes than those with heat pumps would be an 'abomination', the boss of British Gas has warned. In a stark warning to Ed Miliband, Chris O'Shea said that removing net zero levies from electricity bills would punish the poor and amount to a 'terrible distortion of the market'. It comes amid reports that the Energy Secretary is considering stripping green levies from electricity in a bid to encourage the adoption of heat pumps. Instead, the costs would be moved on to gas, making a boiler more expensive to run. Mr O'Shea, the chief executive of British Gas owner Centrica, warned Mr Miliband to resist such an 'outrageous' overhaul and instead focus on protecting billpayers from the soaring cost of net zero. 'It's a preposterous idea,' Mr O'Shea told The Telegraph. 'The idea you'd put the levies on gas bills will mean those better-off people with heat pumps will be subsidised by those poorer people with gas boilers. That's nonsense. 'I think those of us with the broadest shoulders should help those of us who have the most need. 'To put them on gas bills would be an abomination, outrageous and a terrible distortion of the market. It would also be unfair because the people [who have] gas boilers the longest will also be those who can least afford to pay higher bills. 'I have heard the argument that it will encourage more people to use electricity. But encouraging people to use subsidised electricity by forcing gas users to pay just doesn't make any sense.' Mr O'Shea said the Government should shift the cost of green levies on to general taxation rather than creating an energy bill divide between households. 'Hostage to fortune' The Climate Change Committee, a Government quango, has urged Mr Miliband to remove the taxes from electricity bills to encourage more people to buy heat pumps and electric cars. However, experts have warned such a move risks increasing the average gas bill by £120 a year. Mr Miliband is considering the reforms as part of a radical rethink on clean power, as he fights to defend Britain's goal of reaching net zero by 2050. An announcement is expected this autumn. Mr O'Shea's plea to protect households with gas boilers came as he warned that Mr Miliband's net zero targets would be challenging. 'I don't think they are a work of fiction, and it's good that we have stretching targets,' he said. 'But even if you were to speak to those who helped to set them, then even they would say it will be difficult. But I don't think it's impossible.' The Centrica boss also cast doubt over Mr Miliband's pledge to cut household energy bills by 2030, supposedly aided by Britain's move to a greener economy. Mr O'Shea said he was sceptical that the Energy Secretary's promise to lower bills by £300 this parliament was 'achievable'. 'The energy transition is not cheap and it is not simple,' said Mr O'Shea. 'If it were, then we would have done it already. He urged the Government to take a more honest approach when it came to net zero. 'What renewables will do is give you more price stability,' he said. 'You will get fewer highs and fewer lows. Home-grown renewables give you more security than imported gas. 'But I wouldn't have made the £300 statement because it makes you a hostage to fortune.' As Britain's second-largest energy supplier behind rival Octopus, Centrica takes an 'agnostic' view when it comes to net zero, according to Mr O'Shea. That means the company is as comfortable building gas-fired power stations as it is investing in heat pumps. However, he said the business has abandoned wind and solar investments in the UK because they do not make enough money. Instead, Centrica is exploring wind investments in Ireland. Mr O'Shea was also critical of Mr Miliband's pledge to ban all new drilling in the North Sea, even though Centrica no longer conducts any exploration activity in the basin. 'I don't agree with the decision,' he said. 'If you take it from an environmental point of view, we import LNG [liquefied natural gas]. 'If you produce gas domestically, then it will have a lower carbon content than the LNG that we import. And the reason is the cost of shipping and the cost of turning the gas into a liquid.' Zonal pricing row By taking a less fiercely aggressive approach on net zero, Mr O'Shea has set himself apart from Greg Jackson, his counterpart at Octopus, who has made a virtue of being a clean-energy champion. This distinction came to the fore in recent months amid the fierce debate over zonal pricing. Unlike British Gas, Mr Jackson was a vocal supporter of plans to divide up the country into different energy pricing zones in an effort to incentivise developers to build wind and solar farms where demand – and prices – are highest. However, the proposals were highly controversial because they would have in practice meant higher bills in the South for electricity than in the North. 'It has been a very divisive debate,' said Mr O'Shea. 'We did not want a postcode lottery.' Mr Miliband recently abandoned the proposal, which British Gas believes was the right decision. Octopus disagrees and claims the Energy Secretary missed a vital opportunity to lower bills by billions of pounds. Mr O'Shea said: 'There was one very, very vocal proponent of it, and I think the benefits were all quite theoretical. 'For a company that purports to put the customer first, I don't know why they would want a system that would be more complex. I think they missed the point. 'I don't know why they went so hard on it and why they were so vicious about the Government's decision. One of their guys made a post on social media saying 'good game, well played'. This is not a game. People are struggling to pay their energy bills. 'I think that a lot of things have become too polarised. And energy is no different.' Rough decisions Now that the battle over zonal pricing is over, Centrica is turning its attention to Rough, the gas storage facility it runs 18 miles off the coast of East Yorkshire. It accounts for about half of the capacity the UK has to store gas. However, Mr O'Shea has warned that Rough risks closure by the end of the year unless ministers agree to help fund the site's redevelopment. 'Rough is going to lose about £100m this year and we can't sustain that,' he said. 'I think we have probably got to see something by the end of this year. 'If we get towards the end of the year and we've got a situation whereby we've got no prospect of making a profit, then we're just throwing good money after bad. It would be like a charitable donation, and that's not our business.' Rather than securing a handout, Centrica has asked ministers for a so-called cap and floor mechanism to help transform the 40-year-old site to store hydrogen as well as natural gas. This would provide a guaranteed minimum revenue level for the project - the floor – as well as limited excessive profits – the cap. Centrica has already stopped filling the facility amid mounting losses. Mr O'Shea said a full closure would involve the loss of hundreds of jobs. As well as impacting the local community, such a move threatens to deal a hammer blow to Britain's energy security, just years after the country recovered from one of its worst-ever energy crises following Russia's invasion of Ukraine, Worse still, it also sends the wrong message to our allies in Europe, according to Mr O'Shea. 'If Rough closes, then the UK has just six days of gas storage available, compared to 100 in France, Netherlands and Germany. 'If we get into a crisis and the UK hasn't invested in gas storage, then I am not sure it will flow from the Continent. 'Politically, if you're the prime minister of France or Germany and you look at a country that hasn't invested in gas storage, then I am not sure that will work. There is a need for us to recognise the risk that no one likes a freeloader.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store