With billions on the line, New NM federal funding legislative subcommittee meets for the first time
Members of the recently created Federal Funding Stabilization Subcommittee met for the first time Wednesday for briefings on how federal funding is funneled into New Mexico and how current and future cuts might impact the state
The subcommittee formed in response to the loss of funds and threats of cuts from the Trump administration to programs that affect state residents, including Medicaid, federal nutrition programs and programs run by the various state agencies. Lawmakers started with an overall look at where federal funding is allocated throughout the state.
New Mexico Department of Finance Secretary Wayne Propst explained to the committee that according to a Federal Funds Information for States report released last week, New Mexico is the top state receiving federal funds. The report is based on data from fiscal year 2023.
'The study confirmed that New Mexico is number one in terms of federal funding coming into the state,' Propst said. 'For every $1 in taxes that we send to the federal government, we receive approximately $3.21 back in New Mexico. That includes those direct payments, but it also includes the funding for our military bases, our national labs and other items.'
He said the state's overall budget for Fiscal Year 2026 is $33.16 billion, with 43.5%, $14.44 billion, funded by federal money. The Health Care Authority receives the most federal money — more than $11 million, which makes up about 74% of its annual budget this fiscal year.
Propst also noted that if Congress ends up passing the budget bill — which made its way out of the U.S. House of Representatives last week and will now be considered by the Senate — New Mexico will see impacts to Medicaid; a $290 billion reduction in funding for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program; and a reduction in the federal oil and gas royalty rate from 16.67% to 12.5%.
NM reps say GOP bill will gut Medicaid and also reduce oil money that could help state save it
Eric Chenier, principal analyst for the Legislative Finance Committee, further broke down federal funding by state agencies, including the Early Childhood Education and Care Department, Higher Education Department, Department of Transportation and Department of Health. Chenier noted that as of May, the University of New Mexico, New Mexico State University and New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology reported losing $36 million, $27.2 million and $2.5 million in federal grant revenue respectively.
Legislative Education Finance Committee Director John Sena delved into how federal funds are used for public education in New Mexico. He explained that the state is aware of several areas that have lost federal funding, including $12.3 million for Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief, which was awarded to the state during the COVID-19 pandemic; $5.1 million for the Teacher Quality Partnership Program, which funded residency programs and mentoring for 68 people; and $5 million for school-based mental health services, which supported programs in Silver City and the Central Region Educational Cooperative and puts 18 positions at risk.
AG Torrez joins lawsuit over federal education funds
Sen. Bill Soules (D-Las Cruces), co-chair of the subcommittee, added that he wants to see flexibility from the group as more changes are announced from the Trump administration.
'There are going to be things that come up that we haven't thought about. For instance, we're getting into fire season and lots of the fire response often comes from the federal government. That's somewhat more in question now. Is the state going to be responsible to uphold all of those? That could be a major budget area,' Soules said. 'There also, I think, are areas where already we're seeing some of our small businesses, because of tariffs, are closing down, pulling back, have lower amounts and stuff, which means that's less revenue coming in on the state level as those businesses close or have to lay off workers or things of that sort.'
The next subcommittee meeting is scheduled for July 1 and 2 in Santa Fe.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Buzz Feed
20 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
18 Trump Supporters Share Thoughts On Epstein Files
Tension surrounding the Trump administration's handling of information about Jeffrey Epstein and his crimes has been bubbling over the past couple of weeks — and it looks like it's not settling anytime soon. Between US Attorney General Pam Bondi claiming the Epstein files were sitting on her desk awaiting review (and then suddenly backtracking), the House GOP blocking an amendment that would force the Justice Department to release additional information about Epstein, and most recently, The Wall Street Journal reporting that Bondi told Trump back in May that his name appeared "multiple times" in the Epstein files, Donald Trump has, once again, found himself in hot water. But does Trump's potential connection to Jeffrey Epstein and his sex trafficking crimes have Trump supporters second-guessing their vote? Recently, Redditor u/Effective-Cream492 asked Reddit community members to share what their MAGA family members think about the Trump administration's handling of the Epstein files, and I'm disappointed but not entirely shocked: "I heard one of my MAGA uncles claim that Obama is actually the one in the files, and Trump is trying to preserve the dignity of the presidency by not releasing them. He said that Obama should be thanking Trump! Not sure why my uncle didn't say Clinton instead, but it's not my conspiracy." —TogarSucks "They're suddenly very quiet for people who used to scream about 'the list.'" "My dad doesn't care. He still think that it's Democrats trying to make Trump look bad." "'I don't love how they're handling the files, but overall, I stand by my vote.' Cue the eye roll." —grippysockgang "I have three MAGA family members who've touched on the subject. The first one didn't want to talk about it, the second one was like, 'Man, I don't know, we'll see,' and the third was like, 'Just put Vance in." So, out of a very narrow sample pool, I'd say they know how it all looks, even if they won't admit it." "They don't think it's a big deal. Like, they genuinely don't care." "They've been rather quiet lately." "'We were tricked, but so were you about Harris.' I'm not going to spend any time with Aunt Sherri anytime soon." —DarrenEdwards "My uncle won't call me back. Every time I call them, they refuse to answer. I told him I just want to talk about the Epstein case, but won't. That says it all." "Most of them are desperately trying to bury their heads in the sand. A few are in agreement that the list should come out, and that proven pedos should be buried under the prison, party be damned. But there are a few that don't know what's even going on since it's not an election year and they've already pulled the ladder up behind themselves." "My family believes Trump. They think all the Epstein stuff is a Democratic hoax. I try to provide facts and evidence, but any source I provide to them is either 'fake news' or 'out to get Trump.' It's exhausting." "They don't care. Trust me, Trump supporters don't care about anything — including each other." —indefilade "Some have come to their senses. Others are trying to make sense of it, but can't make the leap. I'm waiting to engage with others so that I can corner them into 'panic mode' and catch them saying some dumb shit they have to live with. I honestly spend way too much mental bandwidth having fictitious debates that never materialize. It's not healthy, but I need to find some way to productively contribute to slowing the collapse of our culture." "A person I know says that Trump is still better than a Democratic president. He doesn't really care about Trump scandals, including this one. I choose not to talk about this at all because they're clearly delusional." "I was told to leave Trump alone and 'let him have his four years' because 'they didn't pick on Biden this bad.' I'm fucking over these people." —nimrod823 "They're doing what they always do: turning their attention toward Obama/Clinton/Biden at the behest of the current administration and its allies in the media. They're taking the bait because it's a great opportunity for them to distract themselves from the actual controversy that may implicate their beloved president in heinous crimes." "My MAGA parents are suddenly acting like they don't watch the news; my MAGA husband suddenly doesn't care about politics and thinks that ALL the news channels reporting anything bad about Trump are compromised; my MAGA in-laws haven't said a word online, though we aren't speaking anyway, so I don't know. I thought this would be a wake-up call, but I guess it needs to get worse for some people to actually wake up." Lastly: "My dad believes that Trump is covering up for other people, not himself. He believes that Trump could be on the list, but that he never actually did anything. Like, Trump may have known what was going on, but never agreed with it or participated. And, according to my dad, if he never agreed, then it's fine." —cantyoukeepasecret If you have Trump-supporting family members, what do they think about how the Trump administration is handling the Epstein case? Let us know in the comments, or you can anonymously submit your response using the form below.


The Hill
20 minutes ago
- The Hill
House panel approves subpoenas of DOJ for Epstein files
A House Oversight subcommittee on Wednesday approved several subpoenas, including one directing the Department of Justice to turn over materials relating to the Epstein files. The federal law enforcement subcommittee also approved a motion to subpoena several high-profile Democratic officials, including former President Clinton, for their testimony. The panel approved the Epstein motion, offered by Rep. Summer Lee (D-Pa.), in an 8-2 vote, with Republican Reps. Nancy Mace (S.C.), Scott Perry (Pa.), and Brian Jack (Ga.) joining Democrats in favor. 'Today, Oversight Democrats fought for transparency and accountability on the Epstein files and won. House Republicans didn't make it easy, but the motion was finally passed to force the Department of Justice to release the Epstein files,' Rep. Robert Garcia, ranking member of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, said in a statement. 'Let's be clear: this is a huge win for the American people. The public deserves to know who was complicit in Epstein's heinous crimes, including people with immense power in our government. Today's vote was just the first step toward accountability, and we will continue pushing for the truth.' An amendment to Lee's motion from Rep. Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.) to include the release of all communications between President Biden or Biden Administration officials and the Department of Justice related to Jeffrey Epstein was adopted by voice vote. And an amendment from Mace to redacting the names of victims and any personally identifiable information of victims, as well as any possible material depicting child abuse, was also adopted by voice vote. The committee also approved by voice vote a motion from Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.) to 'expand the full committee's investigation' into the Epstein matter by also issuing subpoenas to a number of high profile former Democratic officials: Former President Bill Clinton, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, former FBI Director James Comey, former Attorney General Loretta Lynch, former Attorney General Eric Holder, former Attorney General Merrick Garland, former FBI Director and Special Counsel Robert Meuller. Perry's motion also called to subpoena three former GOP officials: Attorney General Bill Barr and former Attorney General Jeff Sessions, who served under Trump; and former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, who was appointed by former President George W. Bush. The motions for subpoenas come after the full Oversight committee on Tuesday approved a subpoena for Epstein's ex-girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell, who is in prison for aiding Epstein in child sex trafficking. House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) officially issued that subpoena on Wednesday. The flurry of subpoenas come as House GOP leaders moved to send members home for August recess a day early after disputes about the Epstein matter — and an unwillingness to face Democratic votes trying to squeeze Republicans on the Epstein issue in the House Rules Committee — stymied the House. But Democrats are seeing success in getting Republican support for their Epstein-related amendments in the Oversight panel.


Hamilton Spectator
20 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Senator says U.S. tariffs from Trump White House damaging for Washington state
Opponents from Washington state of U.S. President Donald Trump's tariff threats against Canada are vowing to fight, saying the ongoing trade war has delivered a heavy blow to American border communities. In a conference call led by Democrat U.S. Senator Patty Murray that included British Columbia Premier David Eby, Murray said regions such as Whatcom County bordering Canada get about 12 per cent of taxable retail income from Canadian consumers. Murray said the drop in Canadian tourists visiting her state has also resulted in economic uncertainty among ferry operators and in Point Roberts, where residents cannot access the U.S. mainland without travelling through Canada. Eby said it is difficult to continue asking British Columbians to keep their money in Canada but the U.S. boycotts are necessary in the trade war despite circumstances being 'miserable' on both sides of the border. Earlier this week, Eby responded to statements by the U.S. Ambassador to Canada who called Canadians mean and nasty over their travel and alcohol boycott, saying Canadians would be 'proud' to be considered mean for standing up for their sovereignty. Edmund Schweitzer, founder of Washington-based digital device maker Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, said during the conference call that his company is predicting the tariffs will cost it US$100 million in 'unanticipated federal taxes.' Schweitzer said that means each of the 7,000 employees who co-own the company will take a financial hit of US$14,000 from the tariffs. 'President Trump seems to have created the 51st state that he was talking about, which is the great state of uncertainty,' he said Wednesday. 'And this is affecting all of us.' Murray said she is working in the U.S. Congress to bring Democrats and Republicans to join in the fight to wrestle back the power to set tariffs from the White House and urges other Americans to join the cause. 'Who is responsible for this, and we all need to remember this, is the president of the United States who started this,' Murray said. 'We are raising our voices to say, 'Enough is enough … stop this.' B.C. is among several Canadian provinces that banned the sale of U.S. alcohol from government-run stores after the trade war began, and industry groups say such sales in Canada have fallen sharply in March and April. Statistics Canada figures show the number of Canadians returning home by car from south of the border fell to just over 33 per cent in June compared with the same period last year, and return trips by air fell to just over 22 per cent during the same period. 'No one wants this,' Murray said of the falling numbers and economic uncertainty. 'We did not ask for this. It's been imposed on us. And I think that the premier is making it clear he has to make it painful for the United States. 'That doesn't change our relationship with British Columbia. We've always been friends, allies. We have had challenges in the past, but we talk to each other. We work through it, and that's what we both want at the end of this.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 23, 2025.