Judge restores funds for lawyers representing children in immigration court
Nonprofits representing unaccompanied minors challenged the administration in U.S. District Court Northern District California after the government notified them March 21 their contract would be terminated. The program provides legal representation to about 26,000 children, some too young to read or speak.
The groups held the government is legally obligated to provide representation to vulnerable children under a 2008 anti-trafficking law.
The government argued that funding was discretionary and the matter of a contract dispute.
U.S. District Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguín of San Francisco granted the nonprofits including Los Angeles-based Immigrant Defenders Law Center a restraining order Tuesday night.
'Terminating funding for direct legal representation for unaccompanied children, without any plan to ensure continuity in representation, potentially violates Congress's express directive in the TVRPA,' she said referencing the anti-trafficking law.
The Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008 provides special protections to children vulnerable to exploitation. It requires the government 'shall ensure, to the greatest extent practicable,' all unaccompanied children receive legal counsel to represent them in 'legal proceedings.'
The relief is temporary, but Martínez-Olguín said 'continued funding of legal representation for unaccompanied children promotes efficiency and fairness within the immigration system.'
Johnathan Ross, who represented the government, said despite the cuts, the groups was free to continue offering pro bono services and pointed out that other parts of the contract including a know your rights program remained.
Immigrant Defenders Law Center had begun laying off dozens of staff, as had other groups. And lawyers for them said ending the program could immediately harm children with scheduled asylum appointments and court hearings.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
33 minutes ago
- New York Times
FEMA will deny funding grants to states and cities that boycott Israeli firms.
States and cities that boycott Israeli companies will be denied grants from the Federal Emergency Management Agency, according to grant notices posted by the agency in recent days. The new eligibility criteria could restrict access to at least $1.9 billion earmarked for search-and-rescue equipment, emergency manager salaries and backup power systems used during blackouts, Reuters reported. To be eligible for federal funds, the grant notices say that states and cities must follow the 'terms and conditions' set forth by the Department of Homeland Security, the parent agency of FEMA. Since April, D.H.S. has prohibited grantees from 'limiting commercial relations specifically with Israeli companies.' The policy underscores how the Trump administration has linked its stance on Israel to unrelated federal funding, including billions of dollars in research grants for colleges and universities. But the move to restrict FEMA grants may be largely symbolic, because no states — and only a handful of cities — have enacted laws or policies that prohibit state agencies from doing business with Israeli firms. Still, the policy could prevent wildfire response funding from flowing to cities like Richmond, Calif., where the city council voted last year to divest from companies doing business in Israel. It also comes as the Atlantic hurricane season heats up, with Tropical Storm Dexter forming in the western Atlantic late Sunday but not forecast to be a threat anywhere on the East Coast.
New York Times
33 minutes ago
- New York Times
House Democrats Renew Effort Calling for Palestinian Statehood
More than a dozen House Democrats have signed a draft letter urging the Trump administration to recognize a Palestinian state, and the leader of the effort said on Monday that he planned to introduce a resolution to codify the push. 'We believe recognizing Palestinian statehood and obligating Palestinian leaders to abide by the international law binding on states and their governments will make that far more achievable and sustainable than decades of statelessness and repression have,' said the letter, which 13 progressive lawmakers have signed so far. The letter is expected to gather additional signatures before it is sent to President Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio next month. No Republicans have joined the effort or signaled their support, making it unlikely that the letter will influence policy decisions from the president or the State Department. The effort began last week, when Representative Ro Khanna, Democrat of California, circulated a draft, a standard practice to build consensus before a public announcement. Mr. Khanna said the letter, which was reported earlier by Jewish Insider, was leaked in an attempt to derail the effort, a move he criticized but said would not slow him down. 'You cannot sabotage an idea whose time has come,' he said in a statement on Monday. The push builds on similar efforts in the last Congress, and lawmakers leading the effort said they expected it would draw additional support from colleagues alarmed by the worsening humanitarian crisis in Gaza who have become more willing to publicly criticize the actions of the Israeli government. The letter also reflects recent actions by some of Israel's closest Western allies. The leaders of Britain, Canada and France have announced in recent weeks that they intend to recognize a Palestinian state.
Washington Post
33 minutes ago
- Washington Post
U-Va. selects interim leader following former president's resignation
The University of Virginia's board of visitors has selected longtime law professor Paul G. Mahoney to lead the school following the resignation of its former president amid intense pressure from the Trump administration. The university's board met Monday to discuss how it would select interim and permanent leaders during a time of tumult for the flagship in Charlottesville. U-Va. has been the target of a Justice Department investigation over alleged racial preferences in the school's admissions and what officials called a failure to cut DEI initiatives completely, among other allegations.
