Norway MPs reject call to stop wealth fund investing in occupied Palestinian territories
The £1.4tn oil fund, which is run by Norges Bank according to rules set by MPs, is the largest European investor in Israel's occupation.
Among the 45 proposals voted on in Wednesday's annual review of the oil fund – several of which related to Israel – was to instruct Norges Bank to divest the oil fund from companies that contribute to Israel's illegal occupation and what the proposals said were Israeli war crimes.
The vote came after dramatic scenes in Stortinget (parliament) in Oslo as several MPs delivered speeches about Gaza through tears. One politician, Marian Hussein, was asked by the speaker to remove her keffiyeh, which she kept on in protest. During the debate, sounds of shouting protesters outside echoed in the chamber.
Hussein, the deputy leader of the Socialist Left party, which brought forward one of the proposals, said in response: 'Speaker, I will not take off my Palestinian scarf. Those standing outside are shouting right now: 'Stop Norwegian involvement, withdraw the oil fund.''
She added: 'Why do we still show double standards in this hall? Why are some people worth less than others?'
After quoting from a famous Norwegian poem, Du Må Ikke Sove (Dare Not Sleep) from 1936, she cited Jens Stoltenberg, the former Nato secretary general who is now the finance minister in Norway's minority Labour government.
'We are a small nation which constantly talks about the need for a world order,' she said. 'We have a finance minister who has been a former Nato chief and prime minister. He knows very well what this means in foreign policy.'
During the debate, Stoltenberg said Norway had 'an established ethical regime for the fund'. He added: 'We divest from the companies that contribute to Israel's breach of international law, but we do not divest from all companies that are present on the ground.'
After the vote, Hussein told the Guardian: 'I'm incredibly disappointed. This should have been the easiest vote of our lives, especially for the Labour party and the Labour government.'
She added: 'We are not backing down. Shortly before the government recognised the state of Palestine, they voted against it in parliament. We will continue to put pressure on the other parties together with the massive movement in civil society.'
Before the afternoon vote, crowds gathered outside parliament for a protest organised by several organisations including the Palestinian Committee, the Action Group for Palestine and Amnesty International Norway.
Norway has played a historical role in the region, including by facilitating the Oslo peace accords between Israel and the Palestinians that led to a breakthrough deal in 1993. Last year it recognised the Palestinian state, one of a minority of European countries to do so.
Sign up to This is Europe
The most pressing stories and debates for Europeans – from identity to economics to the environment
after newsletter promotion
Last week, Norway's international development minister, Åsmund Aukrust, told the Guardian that Israel was setting a dangerous precedent for international human rights law violations in Gaza that was making the world more dangerous.
Line Khateeb, the leader of the Palestine Committee of Norway, said the vote was an opportunity for politicians 'to show that international law matters and that they do not want to make Norway complicit in the Israeli genocide and colonisation'.
Stoltenberg, she said, 'needs to take responsibility' and she called on the oil fund to divest from Israel as it had done from all Russian companies immediately after the invasion of Ukraine. She added: 'Even though the Norwegian oil fund is Europe's largest investor in the Israeli occupation, Stoltenberg claims that the current guidelines are good enough. That is appalling and needs to change.'
The discovery of one of the world's largest offshore oilfields off the Norwegian coast in 1969 and the huge revenue that came from selling it dramatically changed Norway's prospects, bringing rapid economic growth.
Norway's oil fund, officially called the Government Pension Fund Global, was established in 1990 to preserve revenues for future generations in the knowledge that the oil supply will one day run out. The first deposit was made to the fund in 1996 and since then it has been invested only outside Norway.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
2 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
US blasts ‘reckless' Macron as France is first G7 nation to recognise Palestine state – in ‘face slap' to Oct 7 victims
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) AMERICA has hit out at Emmanuel Macron for being "reckless" after he announced France will officially recognise a Palestinian state. The White House described President Macron's controversial decision as a "slap in the face to the victims of October 7". Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 7 The US has hit out at Emmanuel Macron for being 'reckless' after he announced France will officially recognise a Palestinian state Credit: AFP 7 Palestinians have been living out of tents in Khan Yunis surrounded by rubble for almost two years now Credit: Getty 7 France will become the first G7 nation to view Palestine as its own state starting in September Credit: AFP France will become the first G7 nation to view Palestine as its own state starting in September, Macron said on Thursday. Just 140 out of 193 UN members currently view the State of Palestine. Notable exceptions include the US, UK, Italy, Germany, Canada and Japan. Macron announced the move on X as he wrote: "True to its historic commitment to a just and lasting peace in the Middle East, I have decided that France will recognise the State of Palestine. read more in Palestine PUTIN'S USEFUL IDIOTS Pro-Palestine protesters damage military equipment headed to UKRAINE "We must also guarantee the demilitarisation of Hamas, and secure and rebuild Gaza. "Finally, we must build the State of Palestine, ensure its viability, and ensure that by accepting its demilitarisation and fully recognising Israel, it contributes to the security of all in the Middle East. "There is no alternative." A formal announcement will be made at a session of the UN General Assembly in New York in five weeks time. Macron has already sent a letter to Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas confirming his decision. The US was quick to condemn Paris as Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Washington "strongly rejects" the announcement. Starmer's barmy one in one out migrants plan has a fundamental flaw which means it WON'T work Rubio issued a scathing statement on social media as he said: "This reckless decision only serves Hamas propaganda and sets back peace. "It is a slap in the face to the victims of October 7th." The US has been one of Israel's main allies since the Hamas terror attack sparked an all out war in Gaza back in 2023. In the almost two years since, Israel has launched several military operations targeting those who helped to orchestrate the massacre. The airstrikes, ground offensives and constant bombardments of the Gaza strip have led to serious concerns over the safety and future of Palestinian civilians. At least 59,106 people have been killed in Gaza since, according to the Gazan health ministry. And almost two million Palestinians have reportedly been displaced from the region. Israel has vowed to continue on the war path until they have secured the release of all of the remaining hostages snacthed on October 7. 7 French President Emmanuel Macron meets with Palestinian President Mahmud Abbas last year Credit: AFP 7 The US was quick to condemn Paris as Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Washington 'strongly rejects' the announcement Credit: Getty 7 Hundreds of Palestinians seized trucks carrying flour as they entered in Khan younis the southern Gaza Strip on Thursday Credit: Shutterstock Editorial Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has also been adamant that Hamas must be wiped out in its entirety so they cannot attack ever again. Netanyahu issued his own aggravated statement on France's move as he said it "rewards terror". He also warned it "risks creating another Iranian proxy" in the Middle East where Israel has already been facing constant attacks from Hamas and the Houthis. "A Palestinian state in these conditions would be a launch pad to annihilate Israel – not to live in peace beside it," Netanyahu said in a post on X. "Let's be clear: the Palestinians do not seek a state alongside Israel; they seek a state instead of Israel." Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz described the move as "a disgrace and a surrender to terrorism". Hamas praised Macron and said France's decision was a "positive step in the right direction" and urged all other countries to follow their lead. Paris' decision is now set to place further pressure on those nations yet to declare a Palestinian state like the UK. Sir Keir Starmer faces mounting calls, including from his own MPs, to join France and recognise a State of Palestine. Starmer is yet to announce any such move but did release a statement on Thursday saying statehood is an "inalienable right of the Palestinian people". But he believes a ceasefire in the region is a much more pressing issue to end the bloodshed. Sir Keir said a temporary pause on the conflict would "put us on a path to the recognition of a Palestinian state and a two-state solution". An "emergency call" between the UK, France and Germany is due to take place today to discuss "what we can do urgently to stop the killing".
The Independent
5 hours ago
- The Independent
It's time for the UK to recognise Palestine
Time and again, the UK's actions in relation to the Israel-Palestine conflict have come too little, too late. Keir Starmer has an opportunity to act now. Britain must follow France and recognise a state of Palestine while there is still a Palestine to recognise. The position of the United Kingdom has long been that the only acceptable settlement is the two-state solution. Yet we only recognise one of those states. The recognition of Palestine has been Labour policy since I was shadow foreign secretary. It was in the manifesto on which we were elected last year. And immediate recognition is supported by the majority of the Foreign Affairs Committee, which I chair, and which publishes a report into the Israel-Palestine conflict today. When I ask the government when it will happen, they tell me they will recognise at the moment of maximum impact. But we cannot wait forever for a perfect moment that may never come. I can think of many opportunities when recognition might have had a significant effect, had we taken that step. We cannot let another opportunity pass us by. On Monday, the long-awaited French-Saudi conference on the two-state solution will take place in New York. Ahead of it, President Macron has announced that he will recognise a Palestinian state in September. It is no secret that Macron has been pushing the UK government to recognise Palestine alongside the French. He told Parliament as much when he addressed us last week. He is right. A unified move by the signatories to the secret Sykes-Picot agreement which carved up the Middle East more than a century ago would demonstrate our sincere commitment to a two-state solution. The leaders' meeting at the UN in September offers that opportunity. Of course, the most urgent need is for an immediate ceasefire and for UN-administered aid to flood into Gaza. Recognition does not secure peace on its own. But it should be the start of a renewed commitment by Britain to engage with our allies, particularly Gulf and Arab states, to build a plan for a sustainable peace. It would signal that our engagement is sustained and sincere. And it would show the Israeli government that the UK is prepared to take the kind of decisive action promised in the Foreign Secretary's statement alongside 27 allies on Monday. That must include tough and direct action on violent extremist settlers and the companies who facilitate settlements. Their behaviour imperils the two-state solution by taking over the very land which should be Palestinian. My committee's report argues that the UK must extend sanctions against them and prevent the import of settlement goods. The natural reaction of the British public to the scenes of starvation and death in Gaza is to call on their politicians to do something. The challenge for politicians is to ensure that what they do makes a real difference. The recognition of Palestine as part of a renewed commitment by the UK to work with others to build a peace process would be just that. Britain has said it wants to work with France when it comes to the recognition of Palestine. Now that France has said it will recognise in September, is it not fair to expect the government to join them? I, my committee, and the British public will be watching with anticipation. Emily Thornberry is Labour MP for Islington South and Finsbury and chair of the Foreign Affairs Select Committee
The Guardian
11 hours ago
- The Guardian
There is a dangerous disconnect: on Gaza, politics no longer speaks for the people
It was meant to be a cosy conversation about cooking and new motherhood. But BBC Radio 4's Woman's Hour took an unexpectedly bleak turn on Thursday morning, when the chef Yasmin Khan turned suddenly tearful in the middle of promoting her new cookbook, saying she couldn't talk about her own struggles to breastfeed without mentioning the mothers in Gaza unable to provide for their literally starving babies. It was a striking illustration of how far this medieval horror has broken through, bleeding across the everyday lives even of people who don't usually follow politics. You don't have to know anything about the Middle East to understand what those newspaper pictures of emaciated children, with their drawn little faces and heartbreakingly visible ribs, mean. This is what famine looks like, right down to the return of Bob Geldof, begging the world to act just as he did 40 years ago at Live Aid. Except this time it's no natural disaster, but what the World Health Organization calls a man-made mass starvation: the chillingly avoidable consequence of an aid system forcing people to choose between risking their lives for a bag of flour, or dying for lack of one. More than 1,000 people have been killed by Israeli forces while seeking food in Gaza since May, according to the UN. Médecins Sans Frontières says even its staff, lucky enough still to be earning salaries, are now going hungry: there's almost nothing left to buy in the markets. The newswire Agence France-Presse spoke of watching helplessly as its Palestinian freelancers, who have risked everything to get news out of Gaza when foreign journalists can't get in, become too weak to work. Meanwhile, back in Britain, people who want to see arrests for war crimes read instead about clampdowns on pro-Palestine activists. That ministers have been quick to empathise with the frustrations of a very different crowd protesting at the housing of asylum seekers in hotels merely adds salt to the wounds. Labour MPs are openly desperate now for their government to do something more than issue dramatically worded threats of future action that never quite materialises. Even cabinet ministers are publicly lobbying for the formal recognition of Palestinian statehood while (in the words of Wes Streeting, who could easily lose his marginal Ilford North seat over this war) there's still a Palestine left. Recognition would be a largely symbolic act of solidarity, which in itself would do little to fill hungry bellies in Gaza. But ministers' problem is that there seems increasingly little reason for not doing it now: the longstanding argument that this prize should be saved for the right moment, to help unlock progress towards a two-state solution, made more sense when the two-state dream wasn't being actively crushed in front of us. But perhaps the real plea here is for Keir Starmer to recognise the country he actually leads. After the horrors of the 7 October 2023 massacre, there was broad acceptance that Israel could not be expected simply to sit back and do nothing. Even a year into what was by then a highly divisive war, YouGov found that more than half of Britons still felt Israel had been justified in going into Gaza. But critically, only 14% felt its use of force there was proportionate. Sympathy has drained away as Israel's war of self-defence began to resemble first one of vengeance, and then something darker. In language no former Israeli prime minister uses lightly, Ehud Olmert has described a proposal to corral Palestinians into a settlement on the ruins of Rafah and prevent them leaving as in effect a 'concentration camp'. More than half of Britons now favour financial sanctions like those slapped on prominent Russians over Ukraine, or suspending arms sales. These arguments are now mainstream, cross-party – the veteran Tory MPs Kit Malthouse and Edward Leigh made passionate cases in parliament this week for recognising Palestine – and driven not by the kind of creeping antisemitism Starmer was quite right to confront in his own party, but by what people see every morning, scrolling through their phones. David Lammy's rhetoric is already about as strong as a foreign secretary's can get – this week he condemned Israel's 'inhumane' and 'dangerous' new aid system, and what he called 'settler terrorism' in the West Bank – and many Labour MPs suspect he'd privately like to go further than the sanctions and restrictions on arms sales he listed. But Downing Street is said to be wary of getting ahead of Donald Trump at a crucial stage in ceasefire negotiations (with Israel's parliament going into summer recess, relieving some pressure on the minority government of its prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, it's hoped there is a window for a deal). Britain has always argued that our influence over Israel is best magnified by synchronising efforts with the US, and though the chaos of this White House makes that harder, Trump's is still the only voice Netanyahu really hears. Yet while everyone prays for that ceasefire deal to be done, a dangerous gap is opening in Britain between parliament and people. A year into power, Starmer is increasingly adept at foreign policy, but much less so at handling the emotive domestic blowback from it. Without seeing the intelligence reports crossing the desk of the home secretary, Yvette Cooper, I wouldn't second-guess her decision to proscribe Palestine Action as a terror group. A breach of security at RAF Brize Norton was never going to be taken lightly. But, inevitably, the process of police officers trying to figure out in real time what elderly vicars can or can't now say in public about Palestine has caused its share of farce and fury. After a retired teacher was arrested for allegedly holding a sign featuring a Private Eye cartoon about the proscription, West Yorkshire police issued an unusual statement saying they were sorry if he was 'unhappy with the circumstances' of his arrest. As with this summer's other prospective powder keg, the protests building up outside some asylum seeker accommodation, doubtless everyone is learning as they go. There is, however, only so much policing can do to resolve what are really political conflicts, born in both cases of frustration with what both sets of protesters (in their very different ways) see as political failure to act. To hold together all these volatile, mutually hostile parts of a fractured society through a hot and angry summer will be head-spinningly complicated, a daunting ask even for an experienced government. Yet that's the nature of the job Starmer applied for last July. A year on, we must all hope he is equal to it. Gaby Hinsliff is a Guardian columnist Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.
