logo
‘Unfailing ability to cheer me up': why The Rebel is my feelgood movie

‘Unfailing ability to cheer me up': why The Rebel is my feelgood movie

The Guardian07-04-2025
For me, memorable and/or uplifting film experiences tend to be around individual moments – the resurrection scene in The Matrix for example, or Dizzy's 'I got to have you' in Starship Troopers. (Do either really hold a candle to Mel Brooks's A Little Piece of Poland number in the To Be Or Not to Be remake? The jury is still out.) But without wanting to sound like either a retro bore or a they-don't-make-'em-like-they-used-to fuddy-duddy, I turn to Tony Hancock's yuk-heavy feature vehicle from 1961 for its unfailing ability to cheer me up.
I think I must have first watched it in the 1980s on TV, after my dad solemnly recited one of the film's great moments, when Hancock offers a hunk of cheese to a blue-lipsticked beatnik Nanette Newman and says, with a sort of slack-jawed terror: 'You do eat food?' Newman, as it happens, is perhaps The Rebel's most amazing sight: otherwise known as the apparently-prim English star of the first Stepford Wives movie, a middlebrow popular-culture staple in the UK for her washing-up liquid TV commercials, she is tricked out here in a fantastic exi get-up – dead-white face paint, Nefertiti eyeliner, lank copper-coloured hairdo – at almost the exact same moment in time that the Beatles were being talked into ditching their teddy boy quiff.
The Rebel in fact is stuffed with great moments: Hancock's opposite-platform ruse to get a seat on a packed commuter train (no longer even theoretically possible, sadly); Hancock appalling waitress Liz Fraser by refusing 'frothy' coffee; Oliver Reed glowering in a Parisian cafe as he argues about art, of all things; and Hancock's epic action-painting sequence complete with bicycle and cow. And of course, the chef's kiss: the exquisite moment when connoisseur critic George Sanders chortles dismissively about Hancock's 'infantile school' picture of a foot ('Who painted that – the cow?')
US readers might know the film as Call Me Genius, as that reportedly was the title it was released under there, but quite possibly they won't know it at all; Hancock, acclaimed in Britain, never made headway in Hollywood or on US TV. But the alternative title is actually as accurate a summary of the film as the original one; although the script (by Hancock confreres Galton and Simpson) appears to mock the pretensions of the art world, its target is really the delusional nature of Hancock's Walter Mitty-ish office drone, who ends up back in his suburban bedsit after a meteoric rise and fall in Paris's avant-garde circles.
It's a character that draws fully on the persona that Hancock had made his own over the preceding decade: the intellectually ambitious but unfailingly thwarted nobody, hanging on like grim death for better times around the corner but fatalistically resigned to submergence in a tidal wave of mediocrity. I can't think of any equivalent in the US; Hancock is, I sense, far too defeated and self-pitying a figure ever to command a giant audience. George Costanza is probably the closest, but Hancock has little of Costanza's frenzied self-hate.
Well, there is something rather wonderful about seeing Anthony Aloysius St John Hancock in full and living colour, operating at the height of his powers, the man who his writers described as 'the best comic actor in the business'. And of course the film is a wonderful portal to a vanished world, a net-curtained Britain just on the cusp of its transformation by 60s pop culture. Lucian Freud called The Rebel the best film ever made about modern art; well, he should know, but for me it's more than that – there's an extra joy in remembering the hours I spent tittering at it with Dad as we lolled on the three-piece suite back in my gormless teenage years. If anything makes me feel good, it's that.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

This New York landmark is one of the best pet-friendly hotels in the U.S.
This New York landmark is one of the best pet-friendly hotels in the U.S.

Time Out

timean hour ago

  • Time Out

This New York landmark is one of the best pet-friendly hotels in the U.S.

When you think of pampered pups, you probably picture velvet couches, shiny chandeliers—and maybe a little 24-carat gold. At The Plaza, that fantasy is very much a reality. The iconic New York City hotel, beloved by everyone from Eloise to the Beatles, just landed a spot on USA TODAY's 10Best Readers' Choice Awards list of Best Pet-Friendly Hotels in the U.S. for 2025. Coming in at No. 7, The Plaza doesn't just welcome pets; it elevates them to five-star status. Located at the southeast corner of Central Park, this 1907 landmark makes a strong case for skipping the dog sitter. The property allows two dogs per room of any size (no tiny-teacup-only policy here) and charges no extra pet fee, an unexpected grace in a city where everything has a price tag. The Plaza's Canine Companions Package includes food and water bowls, a plush dog bed and serious bragging rights. Beyond the suite life, guests are steps from Central Park, where pups can stroll, sniff and chase squirrels to their hearts' content. Need a break from the leash? The park's morning off-leash zones at nearby entrances make for ideal romping grounds. Inside, humans can bask in the opulence that defines The Plaza: gilded fixtures, crystal chandeliers and afternoon tea under a stained-glass dome at The Palm Court. Your dog may not appreciate the Champagne Bar's caviar service, but they'll love curling up at your feet while you enjoy it. And if you forget a treat or leash? No problem. The concierge can handle it. (Seriously.) The Plaza's inclusion on the 10Best list places it in top-tier company with other luxe, pet-loving properties across the country, from beachfront stays in California to sprawling ranches in Montana. But only The Plaza offers pets the chance to live like Manhattan royalty—for a night or two, anyway.

Ringo Starr says he asked for changes in Beatles movie script
Ringo Starr says he asked for changes in Beatles movie script

The Guardian

time3 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Ringo Starr says he asked for changes in Beatles movie script

Former Beatles drummer Ringo Starr said that he personally intervened in the script of the forthcoming four-film Beatles biopic directed by Sam Mendes to clarify the depiction of himself and his then wife Maureen. In an interview with the New York Times, Starr said that he had met Mendes in London in April and spent two days discussing the script for the section of the project focusing on him. Having gone through the script in detail, Starr said that Mendes 'had a writer [involved] – very good writer, great reputation, and he wrote it great, but it had nothing to do with Maureen and I,' Starr said. 'That's not how we were. I'd say, 'We would never do that.'' Starr met Maureen Cox in 1962 when the Beatles were performing at the Cavern club in Liverpool and they were married in 1965; they divorced in 1975 and she subsequently married Isaac Tigrett, co-founder of the Hard Rock Cafe. She died in 1994 from leukaemia. Her and Starr's son Zak Starkey also became a drummer, with Starr recently defending him after he was fired by the Who. According to New York Times writer Lindsay Zoladz, Starr is now 'much more satisfied with how he's depicted in the script' and that he sends director Mendes 'peace and love'. Starr will be played in the films by Irish actor Barry Keoghan, star of The Banshees of Inisherin and Saltburn, whose casting was accidentally revealed by Starr in November in an interview with Entertainment Tonight. Keoghan's role in the project was officially announced in April, alongside castmates Joseph Quinn (George Harrison), Harris Dickinson (John Lennon) and Paul Mescal (Paul McCartney). Keoghan recently talked about meeting Starr to prepare for the role, saying he was too nervous to look at him. In an appearance on Jimmy Kimmel Live, Keoghan said he was 'in awe' and 'just froze'. 'When I was talking to him, I couldn't look at him. I was nervous … he was like, 'You can look at me'.' He added: 'My job is to observe and take in kind of mannerisms and study, but I want to humanise him and bring feelings to him, not just sort of imitate him.' Mendes is acting as producer on all four films along with regular collaborators Pippa Harris and Julie Pastor. In May reports emerged that he had hired award-winning writers Jez Butterworth, Peter Straughan and Jack Thorne to work on the films. Mendes' Beatles films are scheduled to be released in 2028.

Why small acts of affection may be the key to feeling more loved yourself
Why small acts of affection may be the key to feeling more loved yourself

Times

timea day ago

  • Times

Why small acts of affection may be the key to feeling more loved yourself

It has been 55 years since the Beatles concluded their swansong album Abbey Road with a wistful epigram: 'And in the end, the love you take is equal to the love you make.' A team of researchers has now put the hypothesis to the test. Judging from their findings, Paul McCartney, who wrote those lyrics, was onto something. The study tracked 52 volunteers, aged between 19 and 65, over four months. They were contacted by smartphone half a dozen times a day and asked to report whether they had expressed love — either romantic or platonic — since the last check-in. This could include small acts of kindness such as spending time with someone, giving a gift, or using words to express affection. Participants were also asked: 'How much do you feel loved right now?' and responded on a scale from 0, not at all, to 100, extremely. In addition, they were asked about their general happiness and whether they felt they were 'flourishing'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store