logo
Israel will strike Iran again if threatened, defence minister says

Israel will strike Iran again if threatened, defence minister says

Reuters4 hours ago
JERUSALEM, July 10 (Reuters) - Israel will strike Iran again if it is threatened by Tehran, Defence Minister Israel Katz said on Thursday.
"Israel's long arm will reach you in Tehran, Tabriz, Isfahan, and anywhere you try to threaten or harm Israel. There is no place to hide", Katz said at an air force graduation ceremony, according to a statement from his office.
"If we must return, we will do so with greater force."
Israel launched a 12-day air war against Iran in June that raised fears of a broader regional conflict. The two sides agreed to a U.S.-brokered ceasefire, announced by President Donald Trump on June 23, to end hostilities.
Israel struck Iranian nuclear sites during the campaign, citing concerns that Tehran was nearing the development of a nuclear weapon, which Iran denies. The United States joined the campaign with strikes on Iranian nuclear sites.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump says Club World Cup trophy will remain in Oval Office after tournament's end
Trump says Club World Cup trophy will remain in Oval Office after tournament's end

The Guardian

time34 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Trump says Club World Cup trophy will remain in Oval Office after tournament's end

US president Donald Trump has claimed that the Club World Cup trophy that has featured prominently in the Oval Office will stay there, and that Fifa made a copy of the trophy that was awarded to Chelsea after their win in the tournament's final on Sunday. Trump attended the final along with numerous members of his cabinet and Fifa president Gianni Infantino. The pair of presidents jointly presented the trophy to Chelsea captain Reece James, with Trump staying front-and-center despite the apparent confusion of Chelsea players and the pleading of Infantino. The incident is just the latest in a long series of intersections between the US president and the world of Fifa, which began in earnest this year soon after Trump started his second term in office. Infantino unveiled the Club World Cup trophy for the first time in an event at the Oval Office in March, and the trophy has stayed there for all subsequent events in the historic space since. 'I said, When are you going to pick up the trophy? [They said] 'We're never going to pick it up. You can have it forever in the Oval Office. We're making a new one,'' Trump said in an interview with official Club World Cup broadcaster Dazn on Sunday. 'And they actually made a new one. So that was quite exciting, but it is in the Oval [Office] right now.' The exact differences between the trophies are unknown, if there are any. Fifa has been approached for clarification. At other points in the interview, Trump suggested he could put forth an executive order decreeing that soccer be called football in the United States, and said leaders of other countries have called the US 'the hottest country in the world,' in reference to economic activity and political positioning. 'It's about unity,' Trump said of Fifa's bringing of the Club World Cup and the men's World Cup to the United States. 'It's about everybody getting together and a lot of love between countries. I guess this is probably the most international sport, so it can really bring the world together.' Sign up to Soccer with Jonathan Wilson Jonathan Wilson brings expert analysis on the biggest stories from European soccer after newsletter promotion Planning for next year's World Cup has faced a few hurdles presented by the second Trump administration, including travel bans on countries that would impact fans hoping to travel to the United States to see the games (though there are exceptions for athletes and staff), threats of Ice raids at games, and long wait times for visas to get into the country.

US Supreme Court clears way for Trump to gut Education Department
US Supreme Court clears way for Trump to gut Education Department

Reuters

timean hour ago

  • Reuters

US Supreme Court clears way for Trump to gut Education Department

WASHINGTON, July 14 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday cleared the way for President Donald Trump's administration to resume dismantling the Department of Education, part of his bid to shrink the federal government's role in education in favor of more control by the states. In the latest high court win for Trump, the justices lifted a federal judge's order that had reinstated nearly 1,400 workers affected by mass layoffs at the department and blocked the administration from transferring key functions to other federal agencies. A legal challenge is continuing to play out in lower courts. The court's action came in a brief, unsigned order. Its three liberal justices dissented. A group of 21 Democratic attorneys general, school districts and unions behind a pair of legal challenges had warned in court papers that Trump's shutdown efforts threatened to impair the department's ability to perform its core duties. Created by Congress in 1979, the Department of Education's main roles include administering college loans, tracking student achievement and enforcing civil rights in schools. It also provides federal funding for needy districts and to help students with disabilities. Federal law prohibits the department from controlling school operations including curriculum, instruction and staffing. Authority over these decisions belongs to state and local governments, which provide more than 85% of public school funding. The department's Republican critics have portrayed the department as a symbol of bureaucratic waste, underlining the need for smaller federal government in favor of greater state power. In March, Trump sought to deliver on a campaign promise to conservatives by calling for the department's closure. "We're going to be returning education, very simply, back to the states where it belongs," Trump said on March 20 before signing an executive order to close the department to the "maximum extent" allowed by law. Trump said that certain "core necessities" would be preserved, including Pell grants to students from lower-income families and federal funding for disadvantaged students and children with special needs, though he said those functions would be redistributed to other agencies and departments. Trump in March directed that the department transfer its $1.6 trillion student loan portfolio to the Small Business Administration and its special education services to the Department of Health and Human Services. Although formally eliminating the department would require an act of Congress, the downsizing announced in March by Education Secretary Linda McMahon aimed to slash the department's staff to roughly half the size it was when Trump took office in January. Boston-based U.S. District Judge Myong Joun, an appointee of Democratic former President Joe Biden, concluded in a May 22 ruling that the mass firings would "likely cripple the department." He ordered the affected workers to be reinstated and also blocked the administration's plan to hand off department functions to other federal agencies. The plaintiffs, Joun wrote, are "likely to succeed in showing that defendants are effectively disabling the department from carrying out its statutory duties by firing half of its staff, transferring key programs out of the department, and eliminating entire offices and programs." The Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on June 4 rejected the Trump administration's request to pause the injunction issued by the judge. The Justice Department in a court filing asking the Supreme Court to lift Joun's order, accused him of judicial overreach. The plaintiffs warned that mass firings at the department could delay the disbursement of federal aid for low-income schools and students with special needs, prompting shortfalls that might require cutting programs or teaching staff. They also argued in court papers that Trump's shutdown effort would undermine efforts to curb discrimination in schools, analyze and disseminate critical data on student performance and assist college applicants seeking financial aid.

Europe urged to raise plight of Iran's political prisoners in any future talks
Europe urged to raise plight of Iran's political prisoners in any future talks

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Europe urged to raise plight of Iran's political prisoners in any future talks

Iranian human rights groups are urging MEPs and European governments to escalate the issue of Tehran's mistreatment of political prisoners, arguing that the crackdown on internal dissent must be on the agenda in any talks about future relations between Europe and Iran. The Iranian foreign ministry appears to be in no rush to stage further talks with the west without clear US assurances that it will not be attacked again. Abbas Araghchi, the foreign minister, travelled to China on Monday for a summit between foreign ministers in Shanghai, implying talks with the US were not imminent. Iran's foreign ministry spokesperson, Esmail Baghaei, on Monday defended the principle of future negotiations but said: 'We will not enter into such a process until we are sure of the effectiveness of diplomacy and the negotiation process.' But Iranian human rights groups say Tehran has used the delay to move against those it has long opposed, weakening groups urging national unity. A debate has been raging inside Iran whether the upsurge in patriotism created by the Israeli attacks, which began on 12 June, could be nurtured by freeing political prisoners and commuting some of the death sentences. Emadeddin Baghi, a human rights activist, said he had recently been invited to Iran's interior ministry for a meeting with senior government officials and a minister along with other civil activists. He said: 'I spoke about several imprisoned and death-sentenced women and men, and the minister of interior gave promising assurances for discussions with the judiciary.' As many as 60 political prisoners are listed for execution. But there are widespread concerns of further repression as the security forces elide political dissent with espionage. Attention has focused on the fate of five Kurdish men, especially Rezgar Babamiri, a farmer who was arrested in 2023 in connection with the 'women, life, freedom' protests after the death of Mahsa Amini. He faced charges both in the criminal and revolutionary courts. Babamiri's supporters say he was detained after providing aid and medical supplies to wounded protesters in the north-western Iranian city of Bukan. Initially, he was sentenced to 15 years in prison by Iran's criminal court on charges of complicity in the murder of a member of the Basij paramilitary force – a verdict rights groups say was based on confessions extracted under torture. However, Iran's revolutionary court also sentenced him to 15 years for collaborating with the Mossad and possession of a Starlink device. His situation escalated dramatically when, at the point of sentencing, a new and severe charge was abruptly introduced – plotting to assassinate the supreme leader, Ali Khamenei – a charge absent from all previous investigations and court hearings. The charge was derided on social media, since Babamiri had been in prison at the time of the alleged conspiracy, but on 7 July human rights lawyers reported he had been given the death sentence, suggesting reconciliation is not high not on the judiciary's agenda. Zhino Babamiri, his 24-year-old daughter who has been tirelessly advocating for his release at the European parliament, has written to the Norwegian government urging it to raise his and other cases if Oslo acts as host for the planned talks between the US and Iran. Norway's foreign affairs minister, Andreas Kravik, has said he is aware of the Babamiri case from local NGOs and opposes the death penalty in all circumstances – a message regularly conveyed as part of Norway's dialogue with Iran. Norway also condemned the Israeli attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities. Zhino believes her father and others have been falsely accused of murder in order to justify their execution and deter further unrest. She said the punishments are meant to send a message. 'They're using my father to scare others into silence,' she said. 'If they are truly confident my father is guilty, they should allow him a fair trial and the right to defend himself.' The reputation of the ministry of intelligence has suffered after Israel was able to penetrate Iran's security so completely that it was able to bomb a secret meeting of the supreme national security council, injuring the president, Masoud Pezeshkian. The prospect of a breakthrough in talks with the US remains hazy after two meetings between Benjamin Netanyahu and Donald Trump ended without any public resolution on how to handle the security threat posed by Iran. Netanyahu made a new demand that Iran should not be allowed to possess missiles with a range longer than 300 miles (480km). Araghchi responded by saying: 'Having miserably failed to achieve any of his war aims in Iran and compelled to run to 'daddy' when our powerful missiles flattened secret Israeli regime sites, which Netanyahu is still censoring, he is openly dictating what the US should or shouldn't say or do in talks with Iran.' Araghchi's remarks are part of an Iranian government pattern of trying to drive a wedge between the US and Israel.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store