Fire erupts near Microsoft office in southern Israel as Iran continues offensive: Reports
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
Israel's southern city of Beer Sheva witnessed several fires on a street close to a tech park that includes a Microsoft office, Reuters reported, citing CNN.According to CNN, emergency services are responding to the fires Israel's military said it intercepted an Iranian missile.The southern district saw several parts targeted by munitions said Israel Police, adding that there was property damage but no reports of casualties.Yesterday, a major hospital in Beer Sheva, the Soroka Medical Center, was damaged in an Iranian attack.Beer Sheva is in the Negev desert, where Israel's Nevatim airbase is located.On Thursday, a direct hit on a hospital in the southern part was reported, Israel Defense Forces said in a post on Thursday.The Soroka Medical Center, targeted by Iran, is the main hospital in Israel's south and has over 1,000 beds and provides services to the approximately 1 million residents of the area."Several hits were identified as a result of the missile barrage—one of them hitting the largest hospital in southern Israel," the IDF posted on X.According to Magen David Adom rescue service, at least 40 people were wounded.As per AFP, a spokesperson for the hospital said that damage has been caused to the hospital and extensive damage in various areas. "We are currently assessing the damage, including injuries. We ask the public not to come to the hospital at this time," they said.Many hospitals in Israel are said to have activated emergency plans in the past week, converting underground parking to hospital floors and move patients underground, especially those who are on ventilators or are difficult to move quickly.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
33 minutes ago
- Time of India
Tigers are not out of the woods yet
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel The figures speak for themselves. In 1947, India's human population was 340 million and there were an estimated 40,000 tigers; when Project Tiger was launched in 1973, there were just 268 of them left although humans in India had nearly doubled to 584 million by then. So, since Independence 1,600 tigers had been killed per year, more than during the British Raj actually, although it was the white sahibs who had made large-scale hunting of the big feline a fashionable "sport".Till it was banned in 1972, people may recall that shikar was a tourism draw in India, with "game hunters" coming to shoot these magnificent animals, much as they kill lions in Africa now. That was probably justified then (as it is in some countries in Africa even now) as a legitimate economic activity, as there's such a "surplus" of them. What is a surplus? Surely if any species is "surplus" right now, it's humans but sport is not considered a way to remedy for "sport" or pleasure not food was always a pastime for Indian monarchs. But in the 19th century it became so democratised that every burra sahib, feudal and local notable worth his khidmatgars shot tigers, leopards and even the cheetah (the latter to extinction) by the mid-20th century. And to this day, hundreds of stuffed animals or their skins and heads adorn old forts, palaces and mansions. But people cringe at the very idea of displaying human skulls. Why?The human population of India has quadrupled from the 1947 figure to a whopping 1.4 billion now, but the tiger population has also increased over 10 times from 1972's abysmal three-figure to over 3,700 now. That we have managed to do this is nothing short of amazing even though there are alarming photos all the time of hordes of noisy, camera-wielding desi tourists in our tiger reserves and national parks. And that highlights a piquant to retired Forest Service stalwarts speaking on World Tiger Day at the Tollygunge Club in Kolkata last week, it was clear that unless people feel invested in tigers, they will not be motivated to protect them. The official focus, of course, is on villagers who live next to tiger reserves and often feel sidelined in favour of the endangered species. Their concerns-especially regarding compensation for families of those killed by tigers-are being addressed so that they do not regard the animals as enemies or harbingers of death and financial ruin. But what about the millions of tourists?Roads cutting through core areas, more vehicles accessing sanctuaries and staying longer hours inside, hotels hemming in the jungle and the sheer pressure of human interest in tigers and other large wildlife like lions, rhinos, elephants, gaud (bison) are scary developments. But the monetary lure of the insatiable Chinese market for wild tiger parts is also a perennial threat. So, could curtailing public access in order to protect tiger habitats then actually aid poaching?India's human population growth has slowed hugely; we now have to continue to demonstrate to the world the efficacy of our different approach to "managing" wildlife too. When India banned the fashionable "sport" of hunting and decided to save the tiger, the world sniggered. Seeing 268 become 3,700, they cannot deny the success of Project Tiger. With the Chinese spectre always looming, India also needs to think imaginatively now to resolve the current tiger-tourism conflict too.
Time of India
33 minutes ago
- Time of India
NIA charges 3 HuT operatives with plotting to promote outfit's ideology
(You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel The National Investigation Agency (NIA) on Friday said it had chargesheeted three members of Hizb ut-Tahrir (HuT) in a conspiracy to propagate the banned terrorist group's ideology and raise funds for promoting its agency said the three - Kabeer Ahmed Aliya, Aziz Ahamed and Bava Bahrudeen - had been charged under relevant sections of Indian Penal Code and Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967. It said the accused had entered into a criminal conspiracy with HuT office-bearers to establish an Islamic Caliphate in India by seeking military assistance from forces inimical to India, and enforce the constitution written by HuT's founder, Taqi al-Din al-Nabhani. Investigation revealed that the trio had also planned to secure support from the Pakistan Army through Haj and Umrah travellers, according to the accused were engaged in recruiting vulnerable youths to the secret classes of the HuT and were radicalised into the ideology of the international pan-Islamist group, which was banned, along with all its manifestations and front organisations, by India in October NIA said in a statement that the accused had also organised an exhibition showcasing the military might of Islamic nations such as Iran, Turkiye, Egypt and Pakistan, with the intention of inviting them to overthrow the lawfully established government of India through violent jihad and war.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Top court junks plea to bring political parties under PoSH
(You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel The Supreme Court Friday refused to entertain a plea seeking to bring political parties under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition, and Redressal) Act, 2013.A division bench headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) BR Gavai said the issue would fall "only in the domain of the parliament". The bench refused to entertain the plea. Eventually, the petitioner was given the liberty to withdraw his petitioner, Supreme Court advocate Yogamaya MG , had moved the court highlighting non-compliance with the PoSH Act by political parties, particularly when it comes to constitution of internal complaints committee (ICC) to deal with sexual harassment petitioner sought that the definitions of "workplace" and "employer" under the PoSH Act be harmoniously interpreted to make the Act applicable to political parties. The petitioner had earlier also approached the apex court over the same issue. However, the court had then asked the petitioner to first approach the Election Commission of India (ECI).
