logo
Any cut to cash Isa allowance ‘may not prompt savers to boost their investments'

Any cut to cash Isa allowance ‘may not prompt savers to boost their investments'

Glasgow Times16 hours ago
The comments follow speculation that plans to cut the annual tax-free cash Isa allowance could be announced in Chancellor Rachel Reeves's Mansion House speech on July 15.
The Government is looking at options for reforms to Isas to get what it feels is the right balance between cash and equities, to help savers earn better returns, boost the culture of retail investment, and support the push for growth.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has previously said there are around seven million adults in the UK with £10,000 or more in cash savings who may be missing out on the benefits of investing throughout their lives.
Sarah Coles, head of personal finance at Hargreaves Lansdown, said: 'Cash Isas are often a first port of call when people are starting out, and they'll often gradually move over into investments as they find their feet.
'If the speculation is accurate, it means they'll have less available to transfer into a stocks and shares Isa – effectively reducing investments rather than boosting them.
'This is an issue which requires a carrot not stick approach.
'We know through extensive research that the barriers to investing are behavioural, so it's through encouragement and increased confidence that we will all increase the number of retail investors.
'This week's announcement of radical changes to financial information, through targeted support and changes to the boundary between financial advice and guidance, is a major breakthrough in supporting people to find that confidence to make the first step.'
The FCA set out proposals earlier this week to help more people navigate tricky financial decisions and boost confidence when getting to grips with investments.
The proposals would enable firms to offer a new type of help called 'targeted support' and make suggestions to groups of consumers with common characteristics.
Brian Byrnes, head of personal finance at savings provider Moneybox, said: 'Over the last two decades since their introduction, Isas have grown to become a much loved and trusted tool by the British public and Isa wrappers have become synonymous with their £20,000 annual limit.
'The current speculation around potential changes to the cash Isa is undoubtedly already causing uncertainty and confusion for consumers, which will weigh particularly heavily on first-time savers and those with less financial confidence who will naturally be more hesitant to explore new products.
'Simply cutting the tax-fee allowance on cash Isas will not necessarily prompt equal inflows into investing products either.
'People opt to use cash Isas over their stocks and shares counterparts for a multitude of reasons, including risk aversion, and reducing the amount of money these savers can put into the cash Isa is unlikely to change this mindset.
'Cash Isas specifically are perfect for anyone looking to build up emergency savings and achieve their short to medium-term financial goals.
'Once people have the peace of mind and security that cash savings provide they are more likely to have the confidence to start investing for their future.'
Jeremy Cox, head of strategy at Coventry Building Society, said: 'The days of peaks and troughs in the cash Isa market are long gone.
'We used to see a rush to make the most of the cash Isa allowance by savvy savers at the beginning and end of each tax year.
'Since the recent uncertainty around the future cash Isa limit, and with higher interest rates eating into the tax-free personal savings allowance, more savers have been topping up their Isa contributions every month.'
He added: 'Changing limits around cash Isas would be a risky move for the Government – these accounts are extremely popular with millions of savers, many close to or in retirement who don't want the risk and uncertainty associated with investment in stocks and shares.
'The billions being saved every year are an indication of how tax policy can be really successful in encouraging people to save responsibly.'
But Michael Healy, UK managing director of trading platform IG, said: 'We're calling for the cash Isa to be scrapped altogether, so we can start channelling more tax relief and long-term wealth into reviving the UK stock market.
'Successfully building a culture of investing would have a seismic impact.'
In May, Ms Reeves confirmed she does not plan to reduce the overall £20,000 limit on the amount that can be put into Isas each year.
In an interview broadcast on BBC Newscast, the Chancellor was asked whether, in a few years' time, someone would be able to put a whole £20,000 per year into an Isa, as they are able to do now.
Ms Reeves told the BBC: 'First of all, very few people are able to save £20,000 a year … we still want people to be able to save and I'm certainly not going to reduce that limit.'
The Financial Times reported this week that, according to a Whitehall figure, discussions were still taking place about the precise level for the cash Isas.
While cash savings provide an important financial buffer, the Government also wants to see more consumers benefit from the long-term returns that investing can provide.
Ms Reeves has said: 'It's really important that we support people to save, to achieve their aspirations.
'I'm not going to reduce the £20,000 Isa limit but I do want people to get better returns on their savings, whether that's in a pension or in their day-to-day savings.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why govt's promise of 'biggest boost to affordable housing in a generation' may be overblown
Why govt's promise of 'biggest boost to affordable housing in a generation' may be overblown

Sky News

timean hour ago

  • Sky News

Why govt's promise of 'biggest boost to affordable housing in a generation' may be overblown

Angela Rayner is set to announce plans to build 180,000 new social homes in the next decade, as the government seeks to "turn the tide on the housing crisis". It would be six times greater than the number of social homes built in the 10 years up to 2024 - and forms part of a drive to build 300,000 new social and affordable properties by 2035. The plan is backed by a £39bn investment announced by Chancellor Rachel Reeves in last month's spending review. 2:29 The deputy prime minister called on the social housing sector to "work together to turn the tide of the housing crisis", and said the investment was "the biggest boost to social and affordable housing in a generation". "We are seizing this golden opportunity with both hands to transform this country by building the social and affordable homes we need, so we create a brighter future where families aren't trapped in temporary accommodation and young people are no longer locked out of a secure home," she said. Ms Rayner's target for social and affordable housing is part of a wider long-term plan - also due to be published on Wednesday - setting out how the government will build both more houses and improve housing standards. Here, Sky News looks at what the plan will mean for the country, how it compares to previous programmes, and how it could be affected by the increased cost of construction. 3:17 Crunching the numbers The £39bn 10-year Affordable Homes Programme is an ambitious investment in affordable housing, representing a real terms increase from the previous programme of over £1bn annually. However, claims of the "biggest boost in a generation" may be slightly overblown. When factoring in inflation, the annual investment of £3.9bn falls short of the equivalent £4.5bn annually from 2008 to 2011 under the previous Labour government. This was however a notably short-term uplift, and the sector will welcome the stability of the new settlement which secures funding for 10 years - compared with five years or fewer under previous programmes. The programme sets out to deliver 30,000 affordable homes per year on average, with at least 18,000 of those being for social rent, rather than other tenures such as shared ownership. This would be more than twice the number under the previous programme, which is estimated to have delivered about 8,000 homes annually for social rent by its completion. Similarly, however, it is fewer than were delivered by the previous Labour Affordable Homes Programme, which was over 30,000 a year from 2008 to 2011. A further challenge to the government's goal of a "generational" uplift is the increasing cost of building, meaning they may face diminishing returns on their investment. The previous Affordable Homes Programme initially aimed to deliver 180,000 homes, which was revised down significantly to between 110,000 and 130,000 due to increasing costs and delays. This government can expect to face a similar economic landscape, particularly with an ambition to deliver a greater share of socially rented homes - the most expensive type of affordable housing to build.

Overseas students using higher education as ‘backdoor' to stay in UK
Overseas students using higher education as ‘backdoor' to stay in UK

Leader Live

timean hour ago

  • Leader Live

Overseas students using higher education as ‘backdoor' to stay in UK

A paper from centre-right think tank Policy Exchange has called for the graduate visa route to be scrapped for all students other than those on postgraduate research degrees. The current model is 'not working' as individuals are using the student visa as a route to longer-term migration, the report has suggested. In May, the Labour Government announced plans to reduce the graduate visa route, which allows overseas students to live and work in the UK for up to two years after their studies, to 18 months. Under changes introduced by the former Conservative government in January 2024, international students in the UK have been banned from bringing dependants with them since – apart from some postgraduate research courses or courses with government-funded scholarships. But the report said the changes do not go 'far enough' and it called for bolder action to ensure study at UK universities is not 'a migration backdoor'. The paper said: 'Most fundamentally, the purpose of student migration should be to study, not to provide a backdoor route to longer term migration or settlement. 'Yet increasingly studying in the UK has become a pathway for widespread and sustained immigration.' The number of international students in the UK increased by 66% between 2014/15 and 2023/24, the report suggested. Two in five (40%) of those who arrived on student visas transferred to a different visa type within one year in 2023 – up from just 3% in 2019, according to the paper. Zachary Marsh, research fellow in education at Policy Exchange and author of the report, said: 'UK universities must return to the business of selling education, not immigration. 'Whilst international students can provide valuable economic benefits, the current system drives migration by those who have no interest in study but instead see the student and graduate visa as an open door to working in the UK. 'The Government and universities must go further to clamp down on those gaming the system. 'A more muscular approach is needed to restore public confidence that international students are good for our universities and wider economy and society.' The report has also suggested that overseas students 'may be crowding out UK students' at some universities. Shadow education minister Neil O'Brien is due to address a Policy Exchange event in London on Wednesday on higher education and migration to coincide with the launch of the think tank's report. Mr O'Brien is expected to say: 'It's not just taxpayers who are losing out. 'The current system isn't working for too many students, who are promised great things but find themselves having to pay back huge sums on very low wages. 'Too many students are being ripped off and we have to ask whether there are better uses of taxpayers' money that will leave young people better off.' Tim Bradshaw, chief executive of the Russell Group, a group of 24 research-intensive universities, said: 'In an increasingly competitive global market, the UK needs to maintain an attractive offer for international students. 'This includes the graduate visa route, which allows international graduates to remain in the UK to work and contribute to the economy for a period after their studies. 'We know that international student recruitment, like any immigration policy, needs to be robust and fair to maintain people's trust in the system. 'Our universities are committed to working with Government to eliminate any abuse of the system and ensure places go to those who are here to study and meet the standards needed to succeed on their course.' A Government spokesperson said: 'A series of measures have already been laid out in the Immigration White Paper to restore control over the system, including reducing the graduate visa from two years to 18 months. 'We will also ensure international graduates move into graduate level roles. This is what the Graduate route was created to facilitate access to, and will also help meet the UK's workforce needs, as part of our Plan for Change. 'We will also crack down further on abuse of our immigration system by strengthening requirements for universities, requiring tighter enforcement on visa approvals, course enrolments and student completions whilst continuing to welcome international students that support our world-leading universities.'

Parental leave probe could tackle gender pay gap, says minister
Parental leave probe could tackle gender pay gap, says minister

Rhyl Journal

time2 hours ago

  • Rhyl Journal

Parental leave probe could tackle gender pay gap, says minister

Justin Madders criticised a 'piecemeal approach' to designing the parental leave system over the past 134 years. Unveiling the plan, Mr Madders set out four objectives for the probe. Among these was 'support for economic growth by enabling more parents to stay in work and advance their careers', which could help the Government better tackle the gender pay gap. Currently, new fathers can take two weeks' paid leave, at a rate of either £187.18, or 90% of average weekly earnings, whichever is lowest. Maternity leave is paid at 90% of average weekly earnings for the first six weeks, and then whichever is lower of that 90% or £187.18 for the next 33 weeks. Ministers hope to increase the take-up of shared parental leave, which allows a couple to share up to 50 weeks of leave and 37 weeks of pay between them. They also hope to simplify the system for both parents and employers, with Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds warning that there are 'eight different types of parental leave'. Mr Madders told the Commons that 'the current system has grown up gradually over time'. He referred to the Factory and Workshop Act 1891, which banned women from working in factories for four weeks after they had given birth. 'Subsequent entitlements have been added to support specific groups as needs have emerged,' Mr Madders added. 'This has created a framework that does not always work cohesively as a whole. This piecemeal approach to parental leave and pay means that the system has never had an overarching set of objectives for what it should deliver. 'This review presents an opportunity to reset our approach and understanding of parental leave and pay, and what we want the system to achieve.' The minister later said: 'Our first objective is to support the physical and mental health of women during pregnancy and after giving birth to a child. 'Our second objective is to support economic growth by enabling more parents to stay in work and advance in their careers after starting a family. This will particularly focus on improving both women's labour market outcomes and tackling the gender pay gap. 'Our third objective is to ensure that there are sufficient resources and time away from work to support new and expectant parents' wellbeing. This will also include facilitating the best start in life for babies and young children, supporting health and development outcomes. 'Our fourth objective is to support parents to make balanced childcare choices that work for their family situation, including enabling co-parenting and providing flexibility to reflect the realities of modern work and childcare needs.' The review, carried out by the Department for Business and Trade and the Department for Work and Pensions, will consider how to 'balance costs and benefits to businesses and the Exchequer, as well as examining how a system can support economic opportunities for businesses and families', Mr Madders said. The review will also look at 'improving our society, for example, in supporting the child poverty strategy and on shifting social and gender norms, including around paternal childcare'. Mr Reynolds has previously told the PA news agency: 'We want this to work for millions of families who tell us at the minute that it is not working, so only about one in three new dads take paternity leave, mainly for financial reasons.' He insisted businesses would be 'absolutely integral' to the review, and would not face extra burdens as a result. He added: 'They tell us the current system is quite confusing, that people don't know what they're entitled to, that businesses don't know what they should be offering.' Shadow business minister Greg Smith described a 'toxic treatment of enterprise' by the Government and argued the British economy will be 'stripped of all signs of life' by the time the review concludes. 'I would like to take this opportunity to make it crystal clear that Conservatives are not opposed to increased parental leave, so long as it is proportionate, affordable and does not increase unemployment,' he said. 'But therein lies the problem, because this Government has left themselves no breathing room. Their political choices have imposed the most significant headwinds on business in a generation.' Mr Smith told MPs: 'It's all well and good that the minister announces this review in the House today, but, let us be in no doubt, when it concludes in a year and a half's time, Britain's economy will have been stripped of all signs of life because of the choices Labour have made.' Responding, Mr Madders said the review was launched on Tuesday to meet Labour's manifesto commitment to assess parental leave within a year of taking office.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store