Japan's Ishiba vows to stay on after election defeat – DW – 07/20/2025
Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba's ruling coalitionwas poised for defeat in Sunday's election for the upper house of parliament.
The Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), already in a minority in the lower house since last October's snap election, has faced mounting public discontent over inflation, political scandals, and a surge in anti-immigration sentiment.
With only 50 of the 125 contested seats needed to retain control, the LDP and its junior partner Komeito looked certain to fall short, according to exit polls.
In recent years, such an electoral defeat has usually led to a prime minister's resigniation. Ishibda, however, has vowed to stay on in order to lead Japan through the difficult terrain of striking a trade deal with the US in the face of looming tariffs.
"We are engaged in extremely critical tariff negotiations with the United States...we must never ruin these negotiations," he told a press conferenece after vowing to stay on as party leader through the trade talks.
This election will also decide the political future of Ishiba.
A major defeat, like last year's, could force his resignation and pave way for a power struggle within the LDP.
Small, opposition parties with anti-establishment messages are likely to erode support from the ruling power.
If the coalition loses both houses, Japan would enter uncharted political territory as the LDP has been in power perpetually since its foundation in 1955, barring a few years in the middle.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
The surge of the right-wing populist Sanseito party is complicating the race.
Once a fringe movement, spreading conspiracy theories about vaccinations and global elites during the COVID-19 pandemic on YouTube, the party is now gaining momentum with its "Japanese First" rhetoric and criticism of immigration, globalism, and foreign capital.
Analysts say Sanseito could win over 10 seats, appealing especially to young male voters.
Its leader, Sohei Kamiya, has drawn comparisons to Trump and Germany's AfD for his anti-establishment stance and social media reach.
On Sunday, a Sanseito candidate's interview by Russia's Sputnik news agency courted controversy and prompt denials of ties to Russia by Kamiya, according to AFP news agency.
The European Union has banned Sputnik along with other Russian state media for "disinformation and information manipulation."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
9 minutes ago
- DW
World's top court says healthy environment is a human right – DW – 07/23/2025
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has issued its ruling on States' legal obligations in relation to climate change. In an watershed advisory opinion, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in the Hague has said a "clean, healthy and sustainable environment" is a human right, and that the climate must be protected for "present and future generations." Outlining the obligations of states to protect the human rights of citizens being impacted by climate change, the UN's highest court said "greenhouse gas emissions are unequivocally caused by human activities and have crossborder effects."Reading the ruling, ICJ president Yuji Iwasawa said "the consequences of climate change are severe and far-reaching," adding that they affect both natural ecosystems and human populations. "These consequences underscore the urgent and existential threat posed by climate change." He said countries have a duty to cooperate on preventing harm caused by climate change and must make sure their national climate targets represent the highest possible ambition. The case began after students from Pacific Island countries lobbied governments into calling for the legal clarification. The state of Vanuatu requested the ICJ to rule on the obligations of states under international law to protect the climate and environment from greenhouse gas emissions. And by extension present and future generations. In December, the court heard testimonies from almost 100 countries and 12 international organizations. Speaking at the time, Gaston Browne, Prime Minister of Antigua and Barbuda, told judges that sea level rise driven by "unchecked emissions" was eroding island coastlines and "swallowing land that is vital to our country." The Caribbean archipelago is being eroded by rising sea levels and faces more intense storms as a result of the impacts of a warming world. Also speaking as part of the December hearings, high-emitting nations, like the United States, said existing UN treaties — primarily the 2015 Paris Agreement — already provide legal obligations on action towards slowing climate change. President Donald Trump has since announced his country's withdrawal from the landmark accord that saw 195 nations agree to reduce carbon emissions and pursue efforts to limit global warming to no more than 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 Fahrenheit). But experts say the Paris Agreement was never intended to define all laws around climate change. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Joie Chowdhury, senior attorney at the Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) says because rising temperatures affect "almost every possible dimension of our lives," there is scope for a lot of different laws. She also points to existing international regulations on human rights, international law and legislation around state responsibility as potential tools to enforce climate action. "The climate treaties remain very important, they're just not the only game in town," she told DW. In bringing the case to the court, Vanuatu also asked for clarification on the legal consequences for countries that failed to meet their obligations on slowing their emissions. Some experts say countries that have emitted most CO2 cumulatively — including the United States, China, Russia, and the European Union — carry the most responsibility for global warming. "Past emissions matter," Chowdhury told DW, adding that harm has already been done. "That must be recognized and repaired." Poorer countries have long been calling for richer nations to pay for damage caused by extreme weather linked to the emissions that are heating the planet. Many of these less wealthy states are experiencing the worst impacts of climate change, despite having done the least to contribute to the ICJ advisory warned that "adverse impacts and loss and damage will escalate with every increment of global warming". A loss and damage fund was established at UN climate negotiations two years ago in Dubai, but has only received around $700 million in pledges. That is far lower than the hundreds of billions of dollars experts say climate change could cost in damages by 2030. "At its heart, this case is about accountability. It's a signal to end the era of empty pledges," Chowdhury added. The ICJ advisory opinion is one of three that have been delivered in past months outlining state obligations around climate action. Earlier this month, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights issued an advisory opinion asserting countries' obligations to protect citizens' human rights by ensuring a healthy environment and stable climate. The opinion also highlighted states' responsibility in relation to disinformation and misinformation, adding that authorities should not obstruct the population's access to "reliable, truthful, and complete information" needed to address risks to human rights occurring through the climate emergency. And in May last year, the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea was the first to issue its advisory opinion recognizing greenhouse gases as a form of marine pollution. Although advisory opinions are not legally binding, they hold significant legal weight and moral authority. Speaking ahead of Wednesday's ruling, Chowdhury said the advisory opinion could have far-reaching consequences for the November COP30 climate negotiations in Brazil. It could mean "not everything is up for negotiation' because some things have been clearly legally defined. "We hope very much that this clarity will provide a very clear legal blueprint which would allow states and those most affected on the front lines to hold polluters accountable for climate disruptive conduct and to secure remedy and reparations," she said. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Int'l Business Times
3 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
EU, Japan Vow Joint Push For 'Fair' Global Trade
The EU and Japan pledged on Wednesday to work together on championing a "free and fair" trade global system, as US tariffs and disputes with China rattle their economies. Brussels and Tokyo announced a "competitiveness alliance" to increase bilateral trade, address unfair practices, and boost innovation, at a summit in the Japanese capital. "In today's world, competitiveness has to be built with trusted partners such as Japan," European Union chief Ursula von der Leyen told journalists after talks with Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba. "Together, Europe and Japan represent a fifth of global GDP and a market of 600 million people," she added. "So, we have the scale to shape global rules on trade and tech in line with our values of fairness and openness." Facing a swirl of speculation over his future following a weekend election debacle, Ishiba said the EU and Japan concurred to work together to strengthen a "stable and predictable rules-based free and fair economic order". Von der Leyen congratulated the prime minister on his "successful negotiations" to secure a tariff deal with Washington, a feat that has so far escaped the European Commission she leads. US President Donald Trump announced Tuesday a "massive" trade deal with Japan, as a deadline looms for the EU and other major US trade partners to strike agreements or face steep levies. Tokyo said the deal would see a tariff on Japanese car cut to 15 percent. The EU's top trade negotiator Maros Sefcovic is due to speak once again to US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick later on Wednesday. Von der Leyen's commission, the EU's top executive body, is in charge of trade policy for the 27-nation bloc. "In a world of growing uncertainty, we are also stepping up joint efforts to boost economic security and resilience," Antonio Costa told journalists in Tokyo. Costa heads the European Council representing EU member states. He said the EU and Japan -- who back Ukraine in its war with Russia -- would push to deepen cooperation between their defence industries. Costa and von der Leyen will visit Beijing next for talks with China's top leaders on Thursday. Beijing and Brussels will mark the 50th anniversary of their establishment of diplomatic ties. But differences over state subsidies, market access and China's support for Russia are set to overshadow the event.
DW
4 hours ago
- DW
German government denies rift over Israel's conduct in Gaza – DW – 07/23/2025
The German chancellery insists that the ruling coalition is united in its stance on Israel's actions in Gaza despite differing views. A split appeared after Germany refused to add its name to a 28-country declaration. German Chancellery Minister Thorsten Frei on Wednesday dismissed concerns of a rift within Germany's coalition government over its position on Israel. A split emerged after Germany opted not to join dozens of Western countries in signing a condemnation of the "inhumane killing" of Palestinian civilians in Gaza. Frei, Chancellor Friedrich Merz's top aid, said the coalition was united in its aims regarding Gaza, even if there were divisions over how Germany could achieve them. "There's not even a sheet of paper between the partners," Frei told German broadcaster ZDF. "Of course, you can have different views about the form and the path to a shared goal." On Tuesday, leading figures in the Social Democrats (SPD), the junior coalition partner to Merz's Christian Democrats (CDU), urged the government to join a joint declaration signed by 28 states, including France, Italy and the UK, as well as the European Commission, the European Union's executive branch. It called for an immediate end to the war in Gaza and condemned Israel's actions. Germany has so far declined to sign on to the declaration. However, Frei defended the government's stance, saying the declaration lacked clarity in its sequencing of events. "It must be made clear that the starting point of this war was Hamas's attack on October 7, 2023, and that Hamas continues to hold hostages," he said. He added that Germany maintains "many channels of contact" with the Israeli government. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Frei emphasized that "the humanitarian situation in Gaza must change," and while Israel has the right to self-defense, protecting civilians is "a legal imperative under international law." Matthias Miersch, the SPD's parliamentary leader, praised the signatory states, including Germany's "closest partners such as France, Canada and Austria," for sending "a clear signal." The countries involved condemned what they called the "drip feeding of aid" to Palestinians in Gaza and said it was "horrifying" that more than 800 civilians had been killed while seeking food and water. "If international law is systematically violated, there must be consequences," Miersch wrote on the platform X. "Germany should join the UK's initiative and not opt out here." "Starving children, destroyed infrastructure, attacks on people seeking help: That goes against everything that international humanitarian law protects," the senior SPD politician said. Reem Alabali-Radovan, Germany's international development minister and an SPD member, said Tuesday she was disappointed by the decision. "The demands in the letter from the 29 partners to the Israeli government are understandable to me. I would have wished for Germany to join the signal sent by the 29 partners," she said. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video SPD foreign policy spokesperson Adis Ahmetovic and rapporteur for the Middle East Rolf Mützenich, both senior lawmakers within the party, also called on Germany to join the declaration. They stressed in a joint statement that "the situation in Gaza is catastrophic and represents a humanitarian abyss." German officials have said their stance on Israel is shaped by a unique responsibility, the Staatsraison (reason of state), rooted in the country's Nazi-era history and the Holocaust. They argued they can accomplish more through private diplomatic channels than with public declarations. Merz has said the European Council, the heads of state or government of the European Union, had already issued a joint declaration "practically identical in content to what is expressed in the letter" now circulating. He pointed to the Council's June statement, which deplored the humanitarian crisis in Gaza but was less emotional and bluntly critical of Israel and did not condemn its planned relocation of Palestinians to a so-called "humanitarian city" unveiled earlier this month. "I was one of the first to say very clearly, even in Germany, that the situation there is no longer acceptable," Merz said, pushing back on claims of any split. On Monday, he said he had spoken with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Friday, telling him "very clearly and very explicitly that we do not share the Israeli government's policy on Gaza." "The way the Israeli army is operating there is not acceptable," Merz said. Fractures within the ruling coalition, only in power since May, were already exposed over a dispute about the appointment of a Constitutional Court judge.
