logo
Big Bang theory is wrong, claim scientists

Big Bang theory is wrong, claim scientists

Telegraph10-06-2025

The Big Bang theory is wrong and the universe is sitting inside a black hole, scientists have suggested.
Researchers previously believed everything that exists exploded from a single point of infinite density, known as singularity, since the 1930s, when Georges Lemaitre, a Belgian theoretical physicist, proposed that the universe emerged from a 'primeval atom' – the theory known as the Big Bang.
An international team of physicists, led by the University of Portsmouth's Institute of Cosmology and Gravitation, has now suggested instead that the universe formed following a huge gravitational collapse that generated a massive black hole.
Matter within the black hole was crunched down before huge amounts of stored energy caused it to bounce back like a compressed spring, creating our universe.
The new theory has been named Black Hole Universe and suggests that, rather than the birth of the universe being from nothing, it is the continuation of a cosmic cycle.
It also claims that the edge of our universe is the event horizon, which is a point around a black hole from which light cannot escape, making it impossible for us to see beyond into our parent universe. It implies other black holes may also contain unseen universes.
Prof Enrique Gaztañaga said: 'We've shown that gravitational collapse does not have to end in a singularity and found that a collapsing cloud of matter can reach a high-density state and then bounce, rebounding outward into a new expanding phase.
'What emerges on the other side of the bounce is a universe remarkably like our own. Even more surprisingly, the rebound naturally produces a phase of accelerated expansion driven not by a hypothetical field but by the physics of the bounce itself.
'We now have a fully worked-out solution that shows the bounce is not only possible – it's inevitable under the right conditions.'
Defying quantum mechanics
The Big Bang theory was based on classic physics, but scientists have struggled to make it fit with the known effects of quantum mechanics, which sets a limit on how much matter can be compressed.
Physicists such as Roger Penrose and Prof Stephen Hawking had suggested that gravitational collapse inside a black hole must lead to a singularity, but under the new model that does not need to happen. Matter does not need to crunch down infinitely, just enough so it can bounce back.
Unlike the Big Bang theory, the new theory model aligns with both the general theory of relativity and quantum physics.
Prof Gaztañaga added: 'In contrast to the famous singularity theorems by Penrose and Hawking, which assume that matter can be compressed indefinitely, we rely on the fact that quantum physics places fundamental limits on how much matter can be compressed.
'The Black Hole Universe also offers a new perspective on our place in the cosmos. In this framework, our entire observable universe lies inside the interior of a black hole formed in some larger 'parent' universe.
'We are not special. We are not witnessing the birth of everything from nothing, but rather the continuation of a cosmic cycle – one shaped by gravity, quantum mechanics, and the deep interconnections between them.'
The theory that the universe might exist inside a black hole was first proposed in 1972 by Raj Kumar Pathria, an Indian theoretical physicist, but gained little traction.
However, recent observations by the James Webb Space Telescope have reignited interest in the concept.
Anomaly of galaxies' rotation
In March, images of early galaxies showed that two thirds were spinning clockwise, with the remaining third rotating anti-clockwise. In a random universe, the distribution should be even – so something was causing an anomaly.
One explanation is that the universe was born rotating, which would occur if it had been created in the interior of a black hole.
Lior Shamir, an associate professor of computer science at Kansas State University said: 'That explanation agrees with theories such as black hole cosmology, which postulates that the entire universe is the interior of a black hole.'
Black holes form when the core of a massive star collapses under its own galaxy, leading to a supernova explosion. They cannot be seen because of the strong gravity that is pulling light into the black hole's centre.
However, scientists can see the effects of its strong gravity on the stars and gases around it, and it sometimes forms an accretion disc of spiralling gas which emits x-rays.
Under the theory of black hole cosmology, each black hole could produce a new 'baby universe' connected to the outside universe through a an Einstein-Rosen bridge, or a 'wormhole'.
Scientists are hoping that the new model may be able to explain other mysteries in the universe, such as the origin of supermassive black holes, the nature of dark matter, or the formation and evolution of galaxies.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sperm from men over the age of 45 are linked to higher IVF miscarriages and lower birth rates - even when young donor eggs were used
Sperm from men over the age of 45 are linked to higher IVF miscarriages and lower birth rates - even when young donor eggs were used

Daily Mail​

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Sperm from men over the age of 45 are linked to higher IVF miscarriages and lower birth rates - even when young donor eggs were used

IVF involving men over the age of 45 is linked to increased miscarriage risks, a study has revealed. Researchers found that a man's age plays a significant role in their reproductive success, challenging the notion that sperm age has little impact once fertilisation has occurred. They discovered that sperm from older men also led to lower live birth rates – even when young donor eggs were used. And experts said their results should be considered during the IVF counselling process between doctors and patients. The study, published in the journal Human Reproduction, analysed 1,712 egg donation cycles between 2019 and 2023 across six IVF centres in Italy and Spain. All cycles used fresh donor eggs with an average donor age of 26 and frozen sperm from male partners. The fertilised eggs were then transferred to the intended mothers, who had an average age of 43. Participants were divided into two groups – men aged 45 or younger and those over 45, and while fertilisation rates and embryo development were similar between the groups, differences emerged in the outcomes of the pregnancies. Miscarriage rates – where the baby is lost before 24 weeks – were notably higher among couples where the male partner was over 45, reaching 23.8 per cent compared with 16.3 per cent in the younger paternal age group. IVF involving men over the age of 45 is linked to increased miscarriage risks, a study has revealed Live birth rates were also lower in the older paternal age group, at 35.1 per cent versus 41 per cent for men aged 45 or younger. Discussing the findings, Dr Maria Cristina Guglielmo, an embryologist at the fertility clinic Eugin Italy, said: 'Traditionally, maternal age has been the central focus in reproductive medicine, but our results show that the age of the male partner also plays a crucial and independent role.' She explained that as men age, the continuous division of sperm stem cells increases the chance of DNA replication errors. In turn, this can impair embryo development and contribute to a higher risk of miscarriage, she said. Dr Guglielmo added: 'Our findings underscore the need for fertility clinics to adopt a more balanced approach that recognises the role of paternal age. 'Clinics should ensure male patients are informed about how advancing paternal age can impact fertility potential, pregnancy success and miscarriage risk.'

The British mini nuclear fusion reactor that actually works
The British mini nuclear fusion reactor that actually works

Times

time8 hours ago

  • Times

The British mini nuclear fusion reactor that actually works

There are a few things that mark this nuclear fusion reactor out as unusual. For one, it is rather small: it could fit on a table top. For another, this research model currently has a little more gaffer tape than you might expect of the energy technology of the future. But the biggest difference between it and its competitors is that this nuclear fusion reactor, in a warehouse north of Bristol, is actually working. And it is on the cusp of doing something more unusual still: making money. For those who think they may have missed the development of a panacea for the world's energy problems, though, this isn't that — yet. Rather than being a solution for clean electricity the plan is simply to cure cancer by alleviating a desperate shortage of medical radioisotopes. 'We have got thousands of drugs going through medical trials that use nuclear medicine, and at the same time you have got the supply dwindling,' said Dr Tom Wallace-Smith from Astral Systems. Radioisotopes are chemicals that can be used to diagnose or treat cancers. Some, such as iodine-131, are crucial in treatment. But many of the most important ones are made by bombarding other chemicals with neutrons. Currently, doing so relies on ageing nuclear reactors, some of which regularly break down, and none of which are in the UK. Doctors are increasingly concerned about shortages. 'There's this real mismatch, which is constraining the industry,' said Wallace-Smith. This is where he thinks they can help, using nuclear fusion as a new way to provide the necessary neutrons. Nuclear fusion harnesses the processes found in the sun to join together two hydrogen atoms to become one helium and a neutron. The neutrons can then in theory be used to generate electricity. For clean power advocates, if we could get it to work it would be a solution to climate change, providing unlimited carbon-free energy. But to achieve it requires controlling conditions similar to the sun, while also getting more energy out than you put in. Companies and governments around the world have been working for decades to make a practical reactor. At Astral Systems, the company co-founded by Wallace-Smith, who did his PhD at Bristol, they have just such a practical reactor. Or, in fact, several. But the difference is that they aren't looking to get more energy out than in. They are simply looking to make the neutrons, in a device that can sit on a table. 'We don't have enough neutron sources in the UK to make what we need for medicine,' said Simon Middleburgh from Bangor University, which has one of the devices on order. 'The long and the short of it is, this is a compact neutron source.' He said Astral was one of the 'most exciting British nuclear companies to emerge in 20 to 30 years.' As well as making the radioisotopes currently used in medicine, he said that having a small source that could be used in a hospital would open up new isotopes, that currently degrade too rapidly to be transported. 'It opens up a swathe of new isotopes that could be used to treat people and to diagnose people that we don't have available to us at the moment.' But how? Most fusion reactor designs work by containing a plasma in a magnetic field then heating it up to extremely high temperatures. Astral's is different. It uses high voltages to fuse hydrogen together in plasma around a cathode, which then as a consequence starts emitting small quantities of neutrons. 'It's like a neutron light bulb,' said Wallace-Smith. The physics of this has long been well understood. Wallace-Smith's metaphorical light bulb moment came when he helped show that hydrogen isotopes were also bumping into the walls of the device, and more reactions could then occur there, raising the efficiency several times over. 'This meant the plasma is less a light bulb than a spark plug,' he said. It also meant they could get more neutrons out. For now, they are well short of getting more energy out than they put in, although Wallace-Smith doesn't preclude getting there one day. Simply by making money, though, he has done something that very few have achieved, in the 60 years we have been seeking fusion. 'We have shown you can do fusion now, and there's real-world immediate applications,' he said. 'That's the surprise.'

Exmoor fingerpost displayed in London's Natural History Museum
Exmoor fingerpost displayed in London's Natural History Museum

BBC News

time14 hours ago

  • BBC News

Exmoor fingerpost displayed in London's Natural History Museum

An old wooden signpost from a national park is on display in the Natural History Museum, due to having 12 species of lichen living on it. The fingerpost from Exmoor has been part of the 'Fixing Our Broken Planet' exhibition at the museum since April to act as an example of an item recovered from an area with clean said the aim was to help educate people and "explore nature-based solutions that can help create a more sustainable world".Ranger Charlotte Wray, who assisted in the recovery of the post, said it was "such a joy to help tell the story of Exmoor". 'Lack of pollution' There are currently over 3,000 wooden fingerposts on post was originally installed near Trentishoe Common in April 2010, before being collected and transported to the London Wray said: "Some of the lichens growing on this fingerpost indicate the high air quality on Exmoor, which is made possible through the lack of pollution and the presence of these highly functioning woodland ecosystems. "It's such a joy to help tell the story of Exmoor and we look forward to visiting the museum to see how the skilled conservators have gone about preserving these unique specimens."The Natural History Museum has been working with the National Park for some time to select the best exhibit.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store