Democratic states sue Trump administration over NSF cuts
The lawsuit, filed Wednesday in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, argues that the administration in April began terminating projects that focused on increasing the participation of women, minorities and people with disabilities. Earlier this month, the administration announced that it would also limit the amount it will pay for the indirect costs of projects, including laboratory space, equipment and facility services.
The moves come as the Trump administration proposes the smallest National Science Foundation budget in decades — with $4.7 billion in cuts mainly focused on research related to climate change, clean energy and 'woke social, behavioral and economic sciences,' according to the White House.
Advertisement
The 16 Democratic attorneys general who joined the lawsuit argued that the moves jeopardize the United States' status as a catalyst for research.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gizmodo
a minute ago
- Gizmodo
Trump Moves to Kill California's Dreams of High-Speed Rail
President Donald Trump's feud with California Governor Gavin Newsom is hitting the Golden State's long-awaited high-speed train project with yet another setback. The U.S. The Transportation Department announced Wednesday that it is rescinding $4 billion in funding for a bullet train project that aims to connect Los Angeles with San Francisco. 'Governor Newsom and the complicit Democrats have enabled this waste for years,' said U.S. Transportation Secretary Sean P. Duffy — a former cast member of MTV's The Real World: Boston and ex–Fox Business co-host — in a press release. 'Federal dollars are not a blank check; they come with a promise to deliver results.' The California High-Speed Rail project, approved by voters in 2008, was pitched as an 800-mile rail system linking Northern and Southern California, with trains traveling at speeds up to 220 miles per hour. A planned second phase would extend the line further, reaching Sacramento in the north and San Diego in the south. The project was initially projected to cost $33 billion and be completed by 2020. But after years of delays and escalating construction costs, the estimated price tag has now surged past $100 billion. Governor Newsom and other California officials are not happy with the news and have signaled that they could take legal action. 'Trump wants to hand China the future and abandon the Central Valley. We won't let him. With projects like the Texas high-speed rail failing to take off, we are miles ahead of others,' Newsom said in a statement. 'We're now in the track-laying phase and building America's only high-speed rail. California is putting all options on the table to fight this illegal action.' California High-Speed Rail Authority CEO Ian Choudri, who is spearheading the project, also called the move 'illegal,' stating that the grants are legally binding and the Authority has met all its obligations. For his part, Trump posted on social media that he has 'freed' the citizens of America from 'California's disastrously overpriced, 'HIGH SPEED TRAIN TO NOWHERE.' 'The Railroad we were promised still does not exist, and never will,' Trump wrote on Truth Social. 'This project was Severely Overpriced, Overregulated, and NEVER DELIVERED.' This marks the latest clash between the Trump administration and Governor Gavin Newsom, who have sparred over everything from the state's transgender rights laws to the deployment of National Guard troops in Los Angeles. Newsom also fired back at Duffy after the Transportation Secretary posted a video on X criticizing the high-speed rail project. 'Won't be taking advice from the guy who can't keep planes in the sky,' Newsom wrote in response.
Gizmodo
a minute ago
- Gizmodo
Your Pooch's Personality Influences How They Watch TV
When a doorbell rings during your favorite TV show, does your dog leap up and start barking or cock their head inquisitively? According to a new study, the answer to this question may be linked to your pup's personality. This doesn't just apply to TV shows meant for human consumption. In recent years, dog-specific TV programming has become a popular enrichment tool among owners who want to keep their canine companion calm and entertained while they're out of the house. Today, there are many TV shows—even entire cable networks—designed for dogs, but the science behind them is limited, Lane Montgomery, lead author of the study and a PhD candidate at Auburn University, told Gizmodo in an email. She and her colleagues investigated what drives dogs to exhibit certain TV viewing behaviors, finding that temperament plays an important role. 'A dog's interactions with televisions can be both positive and negative,' Montgomery said. Understanding the factors that influence TV-watching behavior in canines can help increase positive reactions and prevent negative ones, depending on a dog's unique personality and the stimuli presented to them, she explained. The researchers recruited 650 companion dog owners to participate in an online survey that asked about their dogs' TV viewing habits. This included questions about whether the owner trained their dog to watch TV, the average number of hours per week the TV is on, and the average number of seconds the dog spends watching TV. The survey also collected demographic and behavioral information about each canine participant. The final sample of 453 companion dogs ranged in age from two months to 16 years old and included both purebreds and mixed breeds. Montgomery and her colleagues assessed the dogs' reactions to animal stimuli, non-animal stimuli, and the extent to which they followed objects on screen. Their findings, published Thursday, July 17, in the journal Scientific Reports, suggest demographic characteristics such as age, sex, and breed do not influence dogs' TV-viewing behavior, nor does prior TV exposure. Rather, it appears that the type of stimuli and dogs' temperament traits, such as excitability or anxiousness, shape how they interact with TV. The researchers found that dogs are generally more likely to react to seeing or hearing animals on-screen than other stimuli, with about 45% always responding to dog noises such as barking and howling. Fearful or anxious dogs, however, were more likely to respond to non-animal stimuli such as car horns or doorbells. Owners who described their dogs as excitable more frequently observed them following objects on-screen as if they existed in real life. 'Practically, this study helps inform what types of dog-specific programming would be most valuable for dogs,' Montgomery said. For owners, understanding how different canine temperaments respond to TV stimuli could help them select the right programs for their pets or inform training approaches to correct problematic behaviors toward TVs, the researchers concluded. The authors note that the findings may not be representative of all dogs, as all survey respondents were pet owners whose dogs regularly interact with TV. Going forward, Montgomery hopes to examine these results in an experimental context. 'Studies have begun to do this, but it would be interesting to conduct additional research concerning how personality and television stimuli interact and how these findings translate into a real-world context,' she said. Such work would further inform best practices for using TV to enrich the lives of companion dogs.
New York Times
2 minutes ago
- New York Times
Trump's Attack on the Fed Ripples Through the Global Economy
Christine Lagarde, the president of the European Central Bank, at a recent conference described Jerome H. Powell, the chair of the Federal Reserve, as 'the standard of the courageous central banker.' The room was filled with central bank officials from around the world, who stood to applaud in a public outburst of support for a fellow central banker under relentless assault by President Trump. Central banks' independence, which allows policymakers to set interest rates free from political interference, is considered sacrosanct by investors and economists. That's why the attacks on the Fed, the most important and influential central bank in the world, have reverberated far beyond Washington. 'It's a signal which is worrisome,' said Stefan Ingves, the former governor of the Riksbank, Sweden's central bank. Turmoil in U.S. financial markets risks upending the finances of countries and companies abroad. The yields on long-term U.S. government debt, which serve as benchmarks for interest rates around the world, could spike if Mr. Trump were to fire Mr. Powell, economists warn. The value of the dollar could sink. Many central banks hold a large share of their reserves in dollars and dollar-denominated assets. The dollar is also the dominant form of global payment, on one side of nearly 90 percent of all cross-border transactions, according to the Bank for International Settlements, the bank for central banks. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
