Enterprise Ireland names Jenny Melia as new CEO
has announced the appointment of Jenny Melia as its new chief executive.
Ms Melia, who has worked with the agency for 29 years, is currently an executive director of the agency, which is responsible for helping Irish companies tap export markets. In her current role, she is chief client officer for the agency.
She will take up her new role in July.
It is understood the recruitment process attracted huge interest across the public and private sector, both domestically and from abroad.
READ MORE
Kevin Sherry, who has been interim chief executive since March, will return to his previous position of executive director.
Mr Sherry stepped into the breach after
Leo Clancy
left the organisation to take up the role of chief executive at Ei Electronics in Shannon, Co Clare.
Ms Melia, who is a UCD graduate, has held a number of senior leadership roles across Enterprise Ireland, working with client companies of varying scales across all sectors, including food, industrial, and technology.
She has also worked with the agency's high potential start-up division, as well as its research and development team.
Minister for Enterprise Peter Burke
said Ms Melia was 'a dedicated public servant who has spent much of her career supporting and fostering the development of the Irish enterprise base'.
Enterprise Ireland chairman
Michael Carey
said Ms Melia had established 'deep relationships' with key stakeholders, and had played a 'pivotal role' in the group's client base now exporting and employing at record levels.
Employment at companies supported by Enterprise Ireland rose to 234,454 earlier this year. The group's five-year plan, which Ms Melia will spearhead, aims to increase exports to €50 billion by 2029.
The strategy, which was published earlier this year, is aimed at growing the number of jobs in companies supported by Enterprise Ireland to 275,000 over the same period.
The plan, Delivering for Ireland, Leading Globally, is focused on adding 1,700 new Irish-owned exporters, helping them to become more productive, sustainable and innovative.
It also aims to support 1,000 new start-ups to help drive long-term sustainable growth and job creation.
Among the targets are reducing carbon dioxide emissions at Enterprise Ireland-supported companies by 35 per cent by the end of 2030, and a 3 per cent annual average increase in productivity.
That will be supported by a rise in investment in research and development, with Enterprise Ireland companies expected to spend €2.2 billion in 2029 compared to €1.55 billion in 2023.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
21 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Ireland has too many quangos and too many lawyers feeding off its clientelist politics
If government is the group of people who run a state and the formal rules and institutions by which they do so, governance is how they go about that through networks, processes, interests, ideologies and political actors at different levels. The Republic of Ireland has a well-defined and clearly identifiable government structure, formally accountable through elections and the Oireachtas and amply covered by media . In contrast its governance is much more opaque, less visible to its citizens and its media coverage is patchy and uneven. This matters because the Republic currently suffers from a series of problems – in housing, energy, water, climate, health and care infrastructure and in its economic model – that arise from suboptimal governance just as much as from short-sighted or incompetent governments. These problems are often made more visible by comparisons with similar states in Europe and elsewhere. This State is one of the most centralised in Europe , whether defined by the functional and geographical concentration of executive and political power in Dublin or the comparatively puny powers of both parliamentary and local government. Such centralisation puts an onus on political leaders and executive managers to get things right through coherent, integrated policymaking. READ MORE The abiding localism of Irish life is channelled to the capital by networks of TDs, private lobbying and clientelism that dominate the distribution of resources. That perfectly matches the retail, consumerist and reactive side of everyday Irish politics – and provides much of the media agenda. Less often discussed are the resulting poor outcomes across a range of public services because more local and regional structures of governance are unavailable to policymakers. [ Fintan O'Toole: The three pillars of Ireland's political system are crumbling Opens in new window ] Instead policymaking is often outsourced to quangos (quasi-autonomous non-governmental organisations). An OECD report identified 800 of them and said they clog up Irish governance and inhibit local government . Notorious examples of poor practice and opaque structures in health and educational bodies provide daily headline news. If we are over-quangoed we are also over-lawyered in planning and insurance per head of comparable European populations. These issues show up plainly in how Irish governments responded to the growing population over the past decade during the economic recovery and expansion after the financial crisis. Immigration of skilled labour through work permits has increased the population by 16 per cent, or more if refugees are also factored in. Imperatives of economic growth drove the expansion; but it was not accompanied by plans to increase housing and infrastructure to provide for a growing and more complex society demanding greater public services. Instead market forces prevailed, but they failed to meet that demand. [ Chronic inability to build anything big in the State is baked into the system Opens in new window ] These widening gaps were identified by some analysts and commentators, and they then became part of the political and election agenda. But they have dominated public debate only since being put there squarely by big economic players and international organisations over the past year. Infrastructure deficits inhibit new investments, they say – and that coincides with wider concerns about how vulnerable the Irish economic model has become to international shocks, particularly from Donald Trump. Hence the level of interest in the National Development Plan and its methodology. Rather than base it on an analysis of changing demographics, economic trends and social needs which generate development priorities, its method is more ad hoc in response to the uncertain international backdrop. Detailed project plans await definition, as the scale of the Trump tariff shock is assessed. In the meantime, different Government departments are allocated capital expenditure envelopes based on their bargaining power. How will the updated National Development Plan shape Ireland in years to come? Listen | 35:59 It's a far cry from the strategic foresight approach to governing increasingly advocated by analysts, companies, the EU and international organisations. That involves gathering information about relevant trends and potentially disruptive risks, developing scenarios about plausible futures and integrating such insights into anticipatory planning. The OECD has advocated such an approach for Ireland and there are several initiatives in government and academia to apply them. Had they been deployed over the past decade we could have been better prepared to tackle these development gaps – not to mention linking them to the equally plausible prospect of a united Ireland. Notwithstanding the highly centralised nature of Irish government, it has lacked the capacity to aggregate governance coherently and to resist particular interests. The consequences of changing demographics and economic growth should have been more effectively foreseen, but were not. For that politicians and executive managers should share the blame. [ Tariff 'uncertainties' could 'weigh heavily' on Irish economic growth Opens in new window ] The problems are exacerbated by the narrow base of Irish taxation, in which 10 US corporations provide 40 per cent of corporate tax revenue, along with the glaring six-fold contrast between the multinational sector's high productivity and that of indigenous industry. Tackling these problems requires structural change in the Republic's governance to decentralise and redemocratise power, by prioritising and co-ordinating development gaps more effectively with better analysis. That would help repair the seriously widening distributional and political gaps between older and younger generations.
Irish Times
21 minutes ago
- Irish Times
How much do landlords in Ireland really earn? You might be surprised
How much do landlords in Ireland actually earn? To listen to the many lobbying groups who dominate the property sector in Ireland, the answer is not nearly enough to compensate for all the regulations and bureaucratic hurdles they face. This, it is argued, explains what is often characterised as the ' mass exodus ' from the private rental sector although the number of registered landlords has actually increased in recent years . More than 80 per cent of Irish landlords have one or two tenancies and, we're frequently told, are mostly ordinary people whose livelihoods depend on rental income. This narrative suggests landlords are mere, to use the international term, 'mom-and-pop' investors who are 'struggling' or 'earning pin money' (an argument used by short-term let lobbyists as well). Or they are 'accidental landlords', sometimes represented as almost victims of the housing crisis themselves. This is not borne out by the data. The reality internationally, as well as in Ireland, is that small landlords have higher household income and wealth levels. Here, data made available on request from the CSO's 2024 Survey on Income and Living Conditions shows that the gross household income of those with a rental income from a second property or rent-a-room is €133,800, or 85 per cent higher than households without a rental income, who earn €72,500. And their net income is 56 per cent higher. READ MORE Average income premium of households with rental income At the other end of the scale, Ireland's largest landlord, Ires Reit , averaged €21,768 rental income per annum from each of its 3,668 units in 2024. And it was able to shelter all this income from tax via a special company structure . The reason such narratives continue to be so pervasive is partly down to the effectiveness of several large lobbying groups that dominate the property sector in Ireland. Representing professional bodies, there's the Institute of Professional Auctioneers and Valuers and the Society of Chartered Surveyors Ireland . Ireland's small landlords are represented by the Irish Property Owners' Association. Property Industry Ireland is part of Ibec . Irish Institutional Property represents large landlords and is run by a former secretary general of Fianna Fáil and senator, Pat Farrell . Influencing policy since 1935 is the Construction Industry Federation, which was recently in the headlines after a terrace it owned in Dublin 6 partly collapsed . It was run for many years run by a former Progressive Democrats minister, Tom Parlon. Banking and Payments Federation Ireland is run by a former Fine Gael minister, Brian Hayes, and Airbnb is represented by a former Labour TD, Derek Nolan. All the former politicians have unfettered entry to Leinster House, allowing what Róisin Shortall called ' undue access ' to Ministers and influential politicians. Other groups peddle policy ideas mostly imported from elsewhere. Progress Ireland, which recently proposed garden cabins without planning permission as housing, was reportedly offered a meeting with senior Government advisers less than 24 hours after sending an email to Micheál Martin 's office. There is an obvious irony here: lobbying bodies demand " policy certainty " and stability for their members, and yet it is their function to lobby for policy change. Certainty and stability for developers is coincidentally mentioned in 2021's Housing for All policy, after which the Government went on to make numerous industry-friendly changes, including restricting access to judicial review and introducing inferior apartment standards - changes for which the Minister for Housing James Browne can unfortunately provide no credible evidence . This is not a uniquely Irish phenomenon. As nations' economies globalise, so too has the reach of international property money and its lobbyists. In the private rented sector internationally, global investors were enticed back post 2008 by tax-free rental income and the promise of significant profits. As housing for sale and mortgage credit dried up, the private rented sector became the tenure of necessity and grew significantly. Calls for meaningful changes to the sector to allow for it to become a better option for tenants were and are strenuously resisted everywhere. What is interesting about resistance to change is the consistency of narratives across countries. Research from Sweden's Uppsala University show three main arguments appear repeatedly: the 'vulnerable landlord', the 'counterproductive effects' and the 'violation of property rights'. This is a lobbying playbook. We've seen how the vulnerable landlord argument works in Ireland. The counter-productive effects argument claims that pro-tenant measures ultimately harm tenants by disincentivising rental housing supply and maintenance. This claim works on the basis that there is perfect competition in the housing market and that all other factors remain equal, what economists call ceteris paribus . But there's little competition in housing markets due to the fact that the supply of market land is limited and also privately owned, and other factors such as demand and interest rates are always changing, so nothing remains equal. Property lobbyists and right-of-centre politicians argue that the problem of high rents can be solved by expanding the supply of private rental housing. The logic is that high rental prices stimulate new supply, which will eventually lower rents. This sounds very familiar. Even if you ignore the interim financial pain of rising rents for existing tenants, this argument is ropey. Whereas rising prices may make the construction of housing for sale or rent more attractive, rising prices also make waiting around, or hoarding, just as attractive (as does increasing the density of housing). Owners of valuable land, who are unsurprisingly keen to extract the most profit from it, will not necessarily crystallise their risk by commencing construction, and so will not necessarily supply housing any faster. There is currently permission granted for about 70,000 new houses and apartments nationally that are lying around not commenced. As land prices rise, a natural brake is applied to new housing supply. The third argument found internationally concerns the violation of property rights. Such absolutist views ignore the social function of property. This violation-of-rights argument was recently deployed by a landlord who illegally evicted a tenant, saying at the Residential Tenancies Board hearing that ' no external authority may dictate his housing decisions '. The RTB disagreed. No matter what measure is proposed – tenants' rights, changes to planning rules or regulations – the playbook of counter arguments is automatically mobilised. There is little detailed critiquing of individual proposals. Instead, we're offered off-the-shelf responses driven by ideology, entrenched beliefs, and profits. The real contest here is between the needs of the market and the needs of society. This permanent tension is going to arise when a Government's strategic approach - as is there case here - is to rely on the market for the supply of most of its housing, private and public. Dr Lorcan Sirr lectures in housing at Technological University Dublin
Irish Times
21 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Court case to overturn ‘fraudulent' Seán Dunne transfers played key part in US bankruptcy
Seán Dunne's US bankruptcy trustee realised $20.9 million (€18.1 million) from the 'fraudulent conveyance' claim he took in the US courts while overseeing the estate of the high-profile Irish property developer, according to a new document filed to a court in Connecticut. With the gross receipts realised by Richard Coan coming to $27.5 million, the successful case taken against Mr Dunne in the US courts accounted for a large proportion of what was available for his unfortunate creditors. Mr Coan has now filed his final report to the bankruptcy court in Connecticut at the end of a process that began in 2013 and involved legal and other manoeuvres on both sides of the Atlantic as Mr Dunne ducked and dived with not one but two bankruptcies involving hundreds of millions of euro in debts to banks. His assets, as Mr Coan's final report indicates, were a lot more modest than those debts, so much so that the €14 million secured in 2013 from the sale of Walford, a house on Shrewsbury Road, Ballsbridge, Dublin 4, that Mr Dunne and his then wife, Gayle Killilea , bought for €58 million eight years earlier, was a big part of what remained of his wealth. READ MORE In 2019, a jury in the district court in Connecticut found in favour of Mr Coan, who took a case alleging Mr Dunne had fraudulently transferred assets worth millions of dollars to Ms Killilea. Among the transfers complained of was proceeds from the sale of Walford. To fund the lawyers who acted for the US trustee in his battles with Mr Dunne, Nama and Ulster Bank issued non-interest bearing loans to pay the legal fees. Meanwhile, on this side of the Atlantic, where Mr Dunne's bankruptcy status has been extended to 2028 due to his non-cooperation with the Official Assignee, a series of legal proceedings continues. Mr Dunne has taken a number of so far unsuccessful cases against those overseeing his bankruptcy estate. The final report now filed by Mr Coan with the Connecticut court includes detailed records on recent legal bills amassed by law firm Cohn Birnbaum & Shea, engaged by Mr Coan in 2022, to work with him on the Dunne case. Fees charged by the firm amounted to between $355 and $475 an hour for a partner, and $210 to $250 for a paralegal. Records show many phone calls, reviews and email communications, and the times spent on them, as the trustee's lawyers dealt with various claims. These included claims from Ms Killilea and from Mr Dunne's first wife, Jennifer Coyle, contacts with a wide range of parties including the Revenue Commissioners and work on keeping abreast on what was happening in Ireland. Discussion and analysis of the 'priority claims' of Ms Killilea and of Ms Coyle were the subject of numerous calls and reviews that continued into this year as were matters to do with claims from banks. In the end, the priority claims agreed were $925,306 for Ms Killilea and were $1,948,764 for Ms Coyle, leaving a balance of $12.38 million. The bulk of that was shared between Nama, which got $6 million on a claim of $438 million, and Ulster Bank, which also got $6 million on its claim of $428 million. Meanwhile, the legal wrangling continues in the High Court in Dublin.
