Heisman winner predicts Georgia to lose three regular season games in 2025
Former Alabama Crimson Tide running back and FOX Sports college football analyst Mark Ingram is not high on the Georgia Bulldogs entering the 2025 college football season. Ingram thinks that Georgia will have a disappointing season.
"We own the Dawgs!" said Ingram on "The Triple Option" podcast after predicting that Georgia would lose their first game of the season at home against Alabama. The podcast features former Florida and Ohio State coach Urban Meyer and fellow FOX college football analyst Rob Stone. Ingram also went on to predict that Georgia will lose to the Texas Longhorns and Florida Gators. Georgia's 2025 win total is set at 9 and 1/2 wins and Ingram, who won the Heisman in 2009, is taking the under.
If Georgia wins just nine games, then the Bulldogs would be unlikely to advance to the SEC championship (three conference losses) or the College Football Playoff. The only team with three losses to make the 2024-2025 playoff was the Clemson Tigers, but Clemson won the ACC championship, so they received an automatic playoff berth.
Ingram thinks there's a possibility Georgia will win one of three games against Alabama, Florida or Texas, but with Georgia breaking in a new starting quarterback in Gunner Stockton he is not as optimistic for the Bulldogs' 2025 season.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
CBS Sports Crowns Clemson the Nation's Most "High-Powered" Offense for 2025
CBS Sports Crowns Clemson the Nation's Most "High-Powered" Offense for 2025 originally appeared on Athlon Sports. CLEMSON, SC – Hold onto your hats, college football fans, because CBS Sports has just delivered the ultimate preseason hype, declaring Clemson football the No. 1 "high-powered" offense in the nation, "guaranteed to produce fireworks" in 2025! With a roster brimming with returning talent and a Heisman contender at the helm, it's hard to argue with the soaring expectations. Advertisement Clemson is bringing back virtually every major piece from last year's ACC title-winning squad that punched its ticket to the College Football Playoff. The undeniable centerpiece of this offensive juggernaut is quarterback Cade Klubnik. According to CBS, Klubnik has a "realistic shot at setting the league's single-season touchdown record" in his third campaign under offensive coordinator Garrett Riley. Klubnik's electrifying 2024 season saw him account for 43 total touchdowns (36 passing, 7 rushing), proving his dual-threat capabilities. Clemson Tigers quarterback Cade Klubnik (2) and wide receiver Antonio Williams (0).Ken Ruinard-Imagn Images That kind of production has Klubnik firmly entrenched in the early Heisman Trophy conversation – a trophy that has famously eluded Death Valley. If Klubnik can deliver on this promise, he could etch his name in program history. His ascent isn't just about college accolades either; he's already appearing in first-round projections for the 2026 NFL Draft alongside star wideout Antonio Williams. Speaking of wideouts, CBS didn't hold back, labeling Clemson's pass-catching group as arguably the "best in the nation." They specifically highlighted a "better wideout trio than Antonio Williams, Bryant Wesco Jr., and T.J. Moore." The Tigers even bolstered this "expansive wideout room" with transfer Tristan Smith from Southeast Missouri State, ensuring deep-ball threats and playmaking ability are abundant. Advertisement While the departure of bruising running back Phil Mafah (who rumbled for over 1,100 yards and eight scores in 2024) leaves a hole, the sheer offensive firepower surrounding Klubnik and his elite receiving corps has Clemson fans dreaming bigger than ever. With Garrett Riley orchestrating the plays, a Heisman hopeful under center, and future NFL talent lighting up the skill positions, Clemson looks poised to explode onto scoreboards across the country. Get ready for a season of offensive fireworks as the Tigers launch another serious run at a national championship! This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jul 7, 2025, where it first appeared.
USA Today
31 minutes ago
- USA Today
Big 12 ending media poll all about distrust of College Football Playoff system
When the Big 12 sent word in June that it would not release a preseason poll this year in conjunction with its media days, it didn't seem like a huge deal. The Big 12, after all, is just copying what the Big Ten did last year, and everyone who follows college football knows that a projection of how good teams will be from year-to-year is mostly guess work given the amount of roster turnover across the sport. On the surface, it's a sensible trend. Back in the day, preseason polls were considered crucial in generating interest and getting the public back up to speed on college football after an eight-month hiatus. But now, given the intense year-round coverage of the sport, expansion of the College Football Playoff and the automatic bids that go to conference champions, you can make a solid case that preseason polls have outlived their usefulness and simply exist as fodder for the content machine. Many fans will say, 'Good riddance.' But the Big 12's decision is also part of a different trend, which we've seen across all the power conferences this summer and is actively harming college football: Distrust of the postseason system they built. The brass-knuckle truth about why the Big 12's coaches and athletics directors voted to eliminate their preseason poll is that that last year, their conference champion Arizona State was picked last by the media. Meanwhile, preseason favorite Utah struggled to a 5-7 record. Inside the Big 12, there's a belief that the upside-down nature of last year's conference title race – which, admittedly, the voters got very, very, very wrong – created a perception that the league wasn't very good. As a result, Arizona State did not get enough respect from the CFP committee and, more problematically, Brigham Young got even less. TOP 25: Ranking the best college football quarterbacks Though Alabama's exclusion (and the SEC's subsequent hissy fit) has driven almost all the offseason dialogue over last year's CFP selection process, there's an argument to be made that BYU had more of a gripe. Without doing a full autopsy, the Cougars were 10-2 with a pair of losses by a combined nine points and a head-to-head win over SMU, the team that got the final at-large spot. We can debate whether that made BYU more playoff-worthy than Alabama, but it's more than fair to say BYU didn't get nearly as much consideration as it should have – either by the committee or the media, which ranked the Cougars 17th. Did the Big 12 get the short end of the stick last year because Arizona State was ranked 16th in a preseason poll and BYU was 13th? I'm skeptical. But people in the Big 12 believe that. Just like people in the SEC now believe that they're not getting credit from the committee for their strength of schedule. And just like people in the Big Ten now believe that they need four automatic bids in the proposed 16-team iteration of the CFP because they believe it's harder to play nine conference games than the SEC's eight. See where this is heading? At the SEC's spring meetings this year, we actually had an athletics director – Florida's Scott Stricklin – suggest in an interview with Yahoo! Sports that a committee might not be the right vehicle for choosing the postseason field. 'I question whether it's appropriate for college football,' said Stricklin, who – wait for it – served on the committee from 2018-21. Explaining his position further, Stricklin claimed that football was different from other college sports because there's a longer season in basketball or volleyball, so the committees that put together those postseason tournaments have more available data to consider. But Stricklin has this completely backwards. The relative lack of data available in a 12-game college football, and thus the need for human interpretation, is the very reason why a committee is the best way to choose the CFP. Pretty much everyone in the sport agreed with that notion more than a dozen years ago when the CFP was formed and the commissioners flatly rejected using statistical models or computer rankings to pick the teams. In fact, the opaque use of computers in the Bowl Championship Series formula was one of the big complaints of the pre-College Football Playoff era. Nobody wanted decimal points on someone's hard drive deciding a national championship. The entire idea behind a committee was that actual people were best suited to look at a season and judge which teams were most qualified. Has it been perfect? Of course not. But there is simply no way to boil a college football season down to one number or even one point of emphasis when every conference schedules differently and there are even significant disparities within a conference now that they all have 16-plus teams. As long as that scheduling model exists, the only way to effectively run the sport is for the conferences to empower a set of impartial human eyes to make decisions and then accept their work regardless of which league it favors in a given year. College football has brazenly moved away from that ethos this summer. The SEC's strength-of-schedule propaganda campaign has felt unnecessary and desperate, arguably one of the most embarrassing moments for the league in the last two decades. The Big Ten trying to strong-arm its colleague conferences into four automatic playoff bids cuts against the very idea of competition and threatens to make college football's postseason look more like WrestleMania. And now the Big 12 thinks its issue is a perception problem, not a football problem, so they're going to get rid of a preseason poll – as if the committee ever cared about that in the first place. Expanding the CFP from four to 12 was a no-brainer. But moving the arguments for or against teams into the margins has come with an unintended consequence. Nobody believes in the system they built, so instead they'll attempt to game it.
Associated Press
36 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Powell joining Heat, Collins to Clippers, Love and Anderson to Utah in 3-team trade, AP source says
MIAMI (AP) — The Miami Heat are acquiring Norman Powell, John Collins is going to the Los Angeles Clippers and Kevin Love and Kyle Anderson are headed to the Utah Jazz as parts of a three-team trade, a person with knowledge of the agreement said Monday. Also in the deal: at least one second-round draft pick, going from the Clippers to Utah, said the person, who spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because the trade has not gotten the required approval from the NBA. Powell averaged 21.8 points last season for the Clippers and is a career 40% shooter from 3-point range. Collins averaged 19 points in 40 games for the Jazz last season, while Love averaged 5.3 points in 23 games with the Heat and Anderson averaged 6.7 points in 25 games after being traded to Miami. ESPN first reported the agreement. Powell figures to give Miami much-needed scoring and shooting. The Heat were 24th out of 30 teams in points per game last season, plus have already seen the departure of Duncan Robinson — the team's all-time 3-point leader — this summer. Robinson is joining the Detroit Pistons. Love is an NBA champion, a five-time All-Star, a likely Hall of Famer when his playing days end and had expressed interest in possibly remaining with the Heat even past his current contract — which expires after the coming 2025-26 season. Collins has averaged 16 points per game in eight seasons, the first six with Atlanta and two with Utah. Anderson will be joining his sixth team, after previous stints with San Antonio, Memphis, Minnesota and Golden State before getting sent to the Heat as part of the trade that moved Jimmy Butler to the Warriors. ___ AP NBA:
