
Morocco's Atlantic Gambit: Linking Restive Sahel To Ocean
A planned trade corridor linking the landlocked Sahel to the Atlantic is at the heart of an ambitious Moroccan project to tackle regional instability and consolidate its grip on disputed Western Sahara.
The "Atlantic Initiative" promises ocean access to Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger through a new $1.3-billion port in the former Spanish colony claimed by the pro-independence Polisario Front but largely controlled by Morocco.
But the project remains fraught with challenges at a time when military coups in the Sahel states have brought new leaderships to power intent on overturning longstanding political alignments following years of jihadist violence.
The Moroccan initiative aims to "substantially transform the economy of these countries" and "the region", said King Mohammed VI when announcing it in late 2023.
The "Dakhla Atlantic" port, scheduled for completion at El Argoub by 2028, also serves Rabat's goal of cementing its grip on Western Sahara after US President Donald Trump recognised its sovereignty over the territory in 2020.
Morocco's regional rival Algeria backs the Polisario but has seen its relations with Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger fray in recent months after the downing a Malian drone.
Military coups over the past five years have seen the three Sahel states pivot towards Russia in a bid to restore their sovereignty and control over natural resources after decades within the sphere of influence of their former colonial ruler France.
French troops were forced to abandon their bases in the three countries, ending their role in the fight against jihadists who have found sanctuary in the vast semi-arid region on the southern edge of the Sahara.
After both the African Union and West African bloc ECOWAS imposed economic sanctions on the new juntas, Morocco emerged as an early ally, with Niger calling the megaproject "a godsend".
"Morocco was one of the first countries where we found understanding at a time when ECOWAS and other countries were on the verge of waging war against us," Niger's Foreign Minister Bakary Yaou Sangare said in April during a visit to Rabat alongside his Malian and Burkinabe counterparts.
The Sahel countries established a bloc of their own -- the Alliance of Sahel States (AES) -- in September 2023 but have remained dependent on the ports of ECOWAS countries like Benin, Ghana, Ivory Coast and Togo.
Rising tensions with the West African bloc could restrict their access to those ports, boosting the appeal of the alternative trade outlet being offered by Rabat.
Morocco has been seeking to position itself as a middleman between Europe and the Sahel states, said Beatriz Mesa, a professor at the International University of Rabat.
With jihadist networks like Al-Qaeda and the Islamic State group striking ever deeper into sub-Saharan Africa, the security threat has intensified since the departure of French-led troops.
Morocco was now "profiting from these failures by placing itself as a reliable Global South partner", Mesa said.
Its initiative has won the backing of key actors including the United States, France and the Gulf Arab states, who could provide financial support, according to specialist journal Afrique(s) en mouvement.
But for now the proposed trade corridor is little more than an aspiration, with thousands of kilometres (many hundreds of miles) of desert road-building needed to turn it into a reality.
"There are still many steps to take," since a road and rail network "doesn't exist", said Seidik Abba, head of the Sahel-focused think tank CIRES.
Rida Lyammouri of the Policy Center for the New South said the road route from Morocco through Western Sahara to Mauritania is "almost complete", even though it has been targeted by Polisario fighters.
Abdelmalek Alaoui, head of the Moroccan Institute for Strategic Intelligence, said it could cost as much as $1 billion to build a land corridor through Mauritania, Mali and Niger all the way to Chad, 3,100 kilometres (1,900 miles) to the east.
And even if the construction work is completed, insecurity is likely to pose a persistent threat to the corridor's viability, he said. Morocco is building economic ties with several countries in the Sahel, including those that experienced military coups in recent years AFP Thousands of miles of road still need to be built as part of the project AFP
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Int'l Business Times
36 minutes ago
- Int'l Business Times
What The $3.3 Trillion Bill Means For Your Wallet And The Country
After months of political wrangling, the U.S. Senate is gearing up for a final round of debate and amendments on one of the most sweeping legislative packages in years. Branded by President Donald Trump as the "Big Beautiful Bill," the $3.3 trillion proposal has drawn strong reactions across the political and economic spectrum — from celebration to concern. The plan, set for final Senate votes this week, covers a lot of ground: major tax cuts, deep changes to health and retirement programs, looser rules for energy and infrastructure development, and significant shifts in federal spending. Backers say it's a long-overdue push to revive growth and reduce federal interference. Critics call it a sharp tilt toward the wealthy that leaves many Americans behind. What's in the Bill? At its core, the legislation would cut taxes sharply for businesses — dropping the corporate rate to 15% — while also offering new credits to companies that manufacture in the U.S. It would restructure income tax brackets, delivering the biggest gains to top earners. And one of its most controversial pieces: it repeals the estate tax, which currently applies only to the largest inheritances. The bill also makes significant changes to Medicare and Medicaid, the public health insurance programs that serve seniors, low-income families, and people with disabilities. Medicaid funding would shift to state control through block grants — a move ABC News notes could mean fewer benefits or tighter eligibility in many areas. Meanwhile, Medicare would introduce new income-based premiums, and the Social Security retirement age would rise gradually over the next decade. In the energy and infrastructure space, the bill would make it easier to approve oil, gas, and nuclear projects by speeding up federal permitting. Environmental reporting requirements for companies would also be rolled back. At the same time, federal funds for new roads and bridges would lean heavily on public-private partnerships, instead of direct government investment. Finally, the plan realigns federal spending, boosting budgets for the military and border enforcement, while cutting back on public education, housing assistance, and some transportation programs. It also includes privatization efforts, including proposals to transfer operations of Amtrak and the U.S. Postal Service to the private sector. How Would It Affect Everyday Americans? For middle-class families, the impact could be a mixed bag. Modest tax relief might be welcome, but many would feel the loss of services — especially if Medicaid coverage is reduced or public school funding shrinks. Analysts warn that lower-income households stand to lose the most, especially those relying on subsidized health care, food assistance, or public housing. Seniors, especially those not yet retired, could be hit hard. The plan to gradually raise the Social Security age means workers in their 50s may need to work longer or save more. And the Medicare changes could raise monthly costs for many. "[The structure] shifts financial risk from the government to individual families," said Henry Walters, a policy researcher at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, in an interview with Politico. On the other hand, wealthier Americans and large corporations would see major advantages. The estate tax repeal, in particular, would benefit only a small slice of the population — roughly the top 0.1%, according to a 2024 Treasury Department estimate. For multinational companies, especially those in oil and finance, the tax cuts and regulatory rollback are likely to boost profits in the short term. Which Industries Stand to Gain? Energy companies, especially in oil, gas, and coal, are likely to see a surge in activity. The bill removes environmental hurdles and shortens approval timelines for new projects. "[This bill could be the biggest break for fossil fuels in over a decade]," one analyst told Bloomberg. Meanwhile, manufacturers that build products in the U.S. would benefit from targeted tax credits and lower operating costs. Defense contractors and border security firms are also expected to gain, with billions in additional federal funding earmarked for military upgrades and immigration enforcement. But renewable energy developers, education nonprofits, and public sector agencies may lose ground. With fewer federal grants and more pressure to rely on private capital, some projects may stall or shrink. Likewise, cities and states that depend on federal transportation dollars may struggle to maintain services. The Price Tag — and the Risks The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that the bill could add roughly $3.3 trillion to the national deficit over the next decade. Supporters argue the economic growth unleashed by lower taxes and deregulation will offset the cost. But others, including some within the GOP, have expressed concern about long-term fiscal stability. "Even pro-growth policies have limits," said Sarah Mitchell, a former Treasury official, in a piece for the Wall Street Journal. "There's a point where borrowing becomes a threat to interest rates, inflation, and household budgets." Inflation remains a particular worry. While price increases have cooled since the pandemic highs, a new round of deficit spending—combined with looser regulations on energy and markets—could reignite upward pressure. What Happens Next? The Senate's "vote-a-rama" began at 9 a.m. Monday, giving senators the chance to introduce and vote on an unlimited number of amendments before a final up-or-down vote. If it passes with a simple majority, the bill will move to the House, where debate is expected to be just as fierce. For now, Americans are left to weigh the potential rewards against the real risks. Supporters say it's a long-needed reset that favors personal freedom, business growth, and national strength. Opponents warn it could widen inequality, erode protections for the most vulnerable, and saddle future generations with debt. Regardless of the outcome, the "Big Beautiful Bill" signals something deeper than a policy shift — it marks a return to a bold, top-down economic experiment that could reshape the American landscape for decades to come.


DW
36 minutes ago
- DW
Germany to cut development aid – DW – 06/30/2025
Germany is ramping up defense spending — while cutting funds for development cooperation. Aid organizations warn of the consequences for millions, amid a world beset by wars and crises. Germany's draft federal budget for 2025 includes sweeping cuts. The Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) is set to receive just €10.3 billion ($12.1 billion) — nearly a billion less than in 2024. It's the second consecutive year of reductions. A glance back at 2022 underscores the scale of the decline: at that time, Germany was still spending €13.8 billion ($16.2 billion) on development aid. Michael Herbst, chair of the umbrella organization VENRO, which represents around 140 development NGOs in Germany, illustrated the human cost of these dramatic cuts amid growing global conflict: "More than 100 million people are displaced. At the same time, more and more donor countries are pulling back." That's why, he argues, Germany needs to ensure stable funding for development cooperation and humanitarian aid. But the opposite is occurring. Germany's cuts come at a time when US President Donald Trump, early in his second term, has also initiated deep reductions in development aid, reportedlyslashing around 80% of funding. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) agreed at its recent summit on June 25, 2025, that each member state should spend 5% of its economic output on defense annually. Against this backdrop, the global decline in development aid stands out all the more starkly. The consequences are already becoming clear, especially in the field of humanitarian assistance. The US has completely withdrawn its support for the UN-administered relief fund. Faced with sweeping international cutbacks, emergency aid coordinator Tom Fletcher says he is being forced to shut down numerous programs for the world's poorest. Just weeks ago, the UN representative warned that the impact on those in need and suffering from hunger would be devastating. Instead of the originally projected $44 billion, Fletcher now expects just $29 billion to be available for distributing food, water, medicine, shelter, and other essential aid. According to him, the reduced funding will only enable 114 million people to be reached — down from the 180 million originally targeted. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Due to the sharp reduction in the BMZ budget, Germany's so-called ODA ratio (Official Development Assistance) fell below its self-imposed goal of 0.7% of gross national income in 2024. It had consistently remained above that threshold since 2020. Humanitarian emergency aid is being slashed by 53% to around €1 billion ($1.2 billion). VENRO chair, Herbst, says the move is short-sighted: "As the world's third-largest economy, Germany can and must take responsibility here. It cannot continue cutting budgets in these areas." However, his push for a reversal was unsuccessful. As an export-driven nation, Germany depends on strong international ties and global stability. "The German economy benefits from a solid reputation and reliable relationships in countries of the Global South. That helps secure jobs here at home, as well," Herbst points out. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The NGOs Welthungerhilfe and Terre des Hommes give the federal government a poor overall assessment. However, the coalition agreement between the governing center-right Christian Democratic Union/Christian Social Union (CDU/CSU) and center-left Social Democratic Party (SPD) describes the cuts to development and humanitarian aid as "appropriate." In response, the aid organizations counter: "That contradicts the government's own stated goal of ensuring sustainable humanitarian funding — especially at a time when other donor countries are pulling out." All the same, German Development Minister Reem Alabali Radovan (SPD) affirmed that Germany remains committed to its global responsibilities – "despite painful budgetary constraints on development spending imposed by the coalition agreement."While you're here: Every Tuesday, DW editors round up what is happening in German politics and society. You can sign up here for the weekly email newsletter, Berlin Briefing.


Int'l Business Times
39 minutes ago
- Int'l Business Times
TikTok 'Safe for Now,' Trump Claims, But Refuses to Reveal Mystery Buyer for Two Weeks
The popular social media platform TikTok finds itself in an ongoing state of uncertainty following President Donald Trump's assertions. While he claims the app is 'safe for now' and has identified a group of 'very wealthy people' as potential buyers, he has opted to keep their identities under wraps for the next two weeks. This latest development comes amidst continued pressure for TikTok's Chinese parent company, ByteDance, to divest its US operations or face a ban, raising questions about the app's future in the American market. The President's Promise: A Buyer Revealed Speaking to Fox News on Sunday, President Donald Trump announced that a buyer for TikTok has been found. He stated the purchasers are 'a group of very wealthy people', whose identities he intends to reveal in 'about two weeks' – a timeframe he often favours for such disclosures. US President Donald Trump said in a Fox News interview broadcast on Sunday that he had found a buyer for the TikTok short-video app, which he described as a group of "very wealthy people" whose identities he will reveal in "about two weeks." — Forbes India (@ForbesIndia) June 30, 2025 Trump indicated that Chinese approval would 'probably' be necessary for the sale to proceed. Despite this, he appeared to hold firm in his belief that Chinese leader Xi Jinping would lend his support to the acquisition. Thus far, President Trump has intervened three times to postpone the deadline for TikTok's Chinese parent company, ByteDance, to secure a new buyer, a failure which would effectively lead to the app ceasing operations in the United States. His executive order, issued on 19 June, pushed the latest deadline to 17 September. Administration's Goal: Safe and Secure TikTok for Americans At the time, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt stated that the administration's objective was to ensure that American users would continue to have access to the application. 'As he has said many times, President Trump does not want TikTok to go dark,' Leavitt said. 'This extension will last 90 days, which the Administration will spend working to ensure this deal is closed so that the American people can continue to use TikTok with the assurance that their data is safe and secure,' she added. TikTok initially missed its 19 January deadline and was briefly inaccessible for millions of Americans before President Trump intervened. For those affected, a message on the app read: ' law banning TikTok has been enacted in the US. Unfortunately, that means you can't use TikTok for now.' Potential Buyers and Past Interest Several prominent figures have previously indicated an interest in acquiring the platform, such as 'Shark Tank' personality Kevin O'Leary and former Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, AP News reported last year. Previously, Trump also indicated his support for Elon Musk, a former staunch ally, if he wished to acquire the application. In January, Musk stated his long-standing opposition to a TikTok ban, believing it 'goes against freedom of speech.' Yet, later that month, the Tesla CEO informed the WELT Economic Summit that he hadn't made an offer for the app. He added, 'I don't have any plans for what would I do if I had TikTok.' As TikTok's future in the US hangs in the balance, the coming weeks will reveal whether President Trump's promised 'very wealthy' buyers will step forward. For now, millions of American users await the outcome, hoping their beloved app remains 'safe' and accessible. Originally published on IBTimes UK