logo
How government changes to special needs education could affect children with EHCPs

How government changes to special needs education could affect children with EHCPs

Yahooa day ago
Campaigners have warned the government not to cut or scrap education plans for children and young people with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND).
Ministers have refused to rule out slashing the education, health and care plans (EHCPs) that ensures children with special educational needs receive the proper support from their local authority.
The government says it has inherited a system that has been "left on its knees", and plans to publish a white paper outlining its proposals in October.
But those representing special needs, disability, autism and Down's syndrome charities, as well as a number of high-profile broadcasters and academics, have said "every sign" from the government suggests it will remove the right to an EHCP from children attending mainstream schools.
Disability charity Sense told Yahoo News that 'snatching away" ECHP provision for vulnerable children "is not the answer".
Whatever the government proposals, it has been warned it could face a damaging battle with its own Labour MPs akin to its embarrassing climbdown in the House of Commons last week over planned cuts to disability benefits.
On Monday, Stephen Morgan, the minister for early education, insisted that parents should have "absolutely" no fear that support for children with special needs or disabilities will be scaled back.
He told LBC Radio: "What we want to do is make sure we've got a better system in place as a result of the reform that we're doing that improves outcomes for children with additional needs.'
But he would not guarantee that the system of EHCPs will remain in place, saying: "'We're looking at all things in the round.
'I'm not going to get into the mechanics today, but this is about strengthening support for system.'
He is the second minister in two days to refuse to rule out scrapping EHCPs, with education secretary Bridget Phillipson telling BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg programme: 'What I can say very clearly is that we will strengthen and put in place better support for children."
In October, the government will outline its proposals in a white paper.
A Department for Education spokesperson: 'The evidence is clear that this government inherited a SEND system left on its knees – which is why we are looking at changes to improve support for children and stop parents having to fight for help. "
The Prime Minister's spokesperson also said on Monday: "It is totally inaccurate to suggest that children, families and schools might experience any loss of funding or support."
Introduced in 2014, an education, health and care plan (EHCP) is a legally binding document for children and young people up to the age of 25 who need more help than their school provides through special educational needs support.
An assessment is carried out by the person's local council to see if they need an EHCP, which identifies the person's educational, health and social needs and establishes the additional support required to meet those needs.
The government says that more 1.7 million pupils in England have special educational needs. About 5.3% of all pupils have an EHCP.
About 278,200 children and young people with an EHCP attend a mainstream school - that's 43.6% of all those with a plan, the Department of Education says.
The number of EHCPs has increased, with 638,745 in place in January 2025, according to the Department for Education, a rise of 10.8% from the same point the previous year.
The number of new plans that started in 2024 rose by 15.8% to 97,747, while the amount of requests for children to be assessed increased by 11.8% in 2023 to 154,489.
The cost of an EHCP can vary depending on the child's needs and what type of school they attend.
It can cost a few thousands pounds per year, with mainstream schools expected to spend up to £6,000 per pupil from their SEND budget before requesting additional funding from their council if required, although the government says most pupils' support will cost less than this threshold.
However, according to a National Audit Office report published in October 2024, it costs £19,100 per year to support a pupil with an EHCP in a mainstream secondary school. This rises to £23,900 per pupil per year at a state special school and £61,500 per year per pupil at an independent or private secondary school.
Last December, the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) warned that spending on SEND is "becoming unsustainable", with the 71% increase in the number of school pupils with EHCPs between 2018 and 2024 driven by three areas: autism, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and speech, language and communication needs.
It said the central government funding for "high needs" was almost £11bn a year. Because local authorities have a statutory obligation to deliver EHCPs, the IFS said high needs spending was consistently higher than funding by £200m to £800m per year between 2018 and 2022, with councils running up large deficits totalling £3.3bn a year.
The government is remaining tight-lipped about its plans to be published in October, but the current system of EHCPs has already come in for criticism.
Last month, it was revealed that fewer than half of the plans issued last year were done so within the 20-week legal time frame, the lowest level in the six years for which records are available.
Paul Whiteman, general secretary at school leaders' union NAHT, said many families faced lengthy waits for plans and a "postcode lottery in support", with rising numbers of pupils with additional needs and shortages in staff and funding having an adverse affect.
He called on the government to invest in core school budgets, specialist staff and wider health and social care services.
Whiteman said: 'The broken special educational needs system isn't working for anyone – children, parents, schools or local authorities.
'Something needs to change, and while it is right that the government is looking at fundamental reform, it will be crucial that ministers are able to demonstrate that any proposals strengthen, not weaken, support for pupils with additional needs.
'Any reforms in this space will likely provoke strong reactions and it will be crucial that the government works closely with both parents and schools every step of the way.'
James Watson-O'Neill, chief executive of the national disability charity Sense, told Yahoo News: "Snatching away EHC plans from thousands of disabled children, and removing their legal rights to the education they need, is not the answer to the ongoing crisis in the specialist education system.
'The current system is undeniably broken. Disabled children face long waiting times and a woeful lack of services in many parts of the country. And these indefensible delays in support can have serious, lifelong consequences for disabled children.
'But EHC plans in themselves work well in principle - if they are properly funded. The government needs to urgently put a long-term funding plan in place. And any reforms must be developed alongside disabled children and their families, so disabled children's needs are put first.'
The government says it wants to provide better support for children "at the earliest stage possible" and reduce the bureaucracy surrounding EHCPs.
A new national campaign, Save Our Children's Rights (SOCR), has been set up to urge the government to preserve EHCPs.
Headed by parents groups such as Special Needs Jungle, SEND Rights Alliance and SEND National Crisis, and backed by dozens of charities like Mencap, Sense, Disability Rights UK and the Down's Syndrome Association, it also has the support of academics and SEND parents including actor Sally Phillips and broadcaster Christine McGuinness.
In a letter with more than 100 signatures, it said: 'Whatever the SEND system's problems, the answer is not to remove the rights of children and young people. Families cannot afford to lose these precious legal protections.
"Many thousands of children risk being denied vital provision, or losing access to education altogether."
Special Needs Jungle told Yahoo News: "All of us know about the current system's failures and shortcomings. Families are often faced with a huge gap between the provision their child is meant to receive and what they actually get.
"But the problem here isn't the law - it's that the law isn't being followed or adequately enforced.
"Particularly in mainstream schools, a reduction or complete snatching-away of EHCPs would threaten the basis of huge swathes of provision. It will likely lead to children either being forced into specialist schools - which is the opposite of what the government says it wants to achieve."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Financial redress for LGBT veterans must be sped up, MPs to urge ministers
Financial redress for LGBT veterans must be sped up, MPs to urge ministers

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Financial redress for LGBT veterans must be sped up, MPs to urge ministers

Ministers must ensure all LGBT veterans who suffered historical mistreatment in the armed forces get compensation swiftly, MPs are to warn in a parliamentary debate. A group of MPs will push for the redress scheme for veterans who suffered under the so-called 'gay ban' to be rolled out as quickly as possible. LGBT people in the military were abused, assaulted, and dishonourably discharged without pay, and went on to suffer lifelong consequences when their sexuality was discovered in the pre-2000 era. The £75 million redress scheme set up in December offers payments of up to £70,000 to each veteran to 'acknowledge the historic wrongs they experienced in the armed forces'. Some 84 veterans out of the 1,300 who have applied for the financial payment have been paid so far, according to Fighting with Pride, a charity advocating for the veterans. While the charity has welcomed efforts by the Government to roll out the scheme, it is warning many veterans are now ageing and in poor health and are in need of financial help in their later years. Liberal Democrat MP Jess Brown-Fuller will lead the Wednesday afternoon Westminster Hall debate on the financial redress scheme for the veterans. Ahead of the debate the Chichester MP described the matter as a 'crucial issue'. She added: 'Members of the armed forces who put their life on the line for our country were dismissed in huge numbers for simply daring to be who they are. 'Many faced verbal and physical abuse that stripped veterans not only of their career but of their dignity. 'It's a scandal that the compensation they are rightly owed has been so delayed.' Peter Gibson, chief executive of Fighting With Pride, said: 'It's vital affected veterans get swift justice. 'Many are in their 60s, 70s and 80s – many with poor mental and physical health. Put simply, they don't have time to wait. 'The debate in Westminster serves as an important reminder to Government to speed up consideration of the applications for financial reparations and improve communications. 'Every submission details someone's painful memories of being shunned by the military family; of bullying, intimidation and in some cases criminal convictions and prison.' Mr Gibson met this week with veterans minister Al Carns, where he said the charity 'passed on the real experiences and frustrations of veterans'. A series of recommendations to improve the redress scheme were 'received warmly', he added. 'We're confident – and determined – we'll see improvements which finally deliver the justice impacted veterans deserve,' Mr Gibson said. The Ministry of Defence was contacted for comment.

Sport minister rejects calls to consult on alcohol ban in football stands
Sport minister rejects calls to consult on alcohol ban in football stands

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Sport minister rejects calls to consult on alcohol ban in football stands

Calls from the Conservatives to consult on the 'two-tier' alcohol ban in football stands have been rejected by the sport minister. Stephanie Peacock said moves to reverse the prohibition, which has been in place since 1985, do not fall within the scope of the Football Governance Bill. MPs will have a say on the Tories' amendment to the Bill on Tuesday, if the party chooses to push it to a vote. The minister also stopped short of agreeing to financial support for ex-players who have suffered brain conditions caused by heading footballs, but said the Government is 'committed' to looking further at player welfare. Speaking in the Commons, Ms Peacock said the Bill's focus is on the 'financial sustainability of football clubs up and down the country'. The Bill would introduce an independent regulator for the top five tiers of the men's game to ensure clubs are run sustainably and are accountable to their fans. The regulator will also have 'backstop' powers to impose a financial settlement between the English Football League (EFL) and the Premier League if they cannot agree one themselves. David Kogan, a media rights expert, has been named as the Government's preferred candidate to chair the Independent Football Regulator in April, and his appointment was endorsed by a cross-party committee of MPs. But Mr Kogan faces an inquiry into his appointment following the revelation that he had donated money to both Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy, as well as other Labour figures. During the Bill's report stage, shadow sport minister Louie French accused the Government of 'appointing a Labour crony to be the new sheriff of football'. Intervening, Ms Nandy said then-minister Stuart Andrew had 'actively headhunted the individual in question and added him to the shortlist'. Mr French also urged the Government to scrap the 'legacy ban which sees fans rushing to drink their beer before kick-off and at half-time'. On new clause one, he said: 'The alcohol ban, which has been in place since 1985, was introduced to help curb hooliganism on the terraces during the problematic era of British football. 'But 40 years on, and with the modern game enjoying a more family-friendly atmosphere in stadiums across the country, clubs, fans and the Conservatives are urging the Government to consult on lifting the ban on alcohol. 'As football fans know, we have this legacy ban which sees fans rushing to drink their beer before kick-off and at half-time, this often leads to the fans being delayed entering the stadiums and overcrowding on the concourses. 'This is why we have listened to clubs and fans, especially those lower down the football pyramid, and are urging the Government to end the two-tier approach to football plans as part of their Football Governance Bill.' Responding, Ms Peacock said: 'This is outside the scope of the Bill, which is focused on sustainability of clubs and game overall. I've raised the issue with the Home Office, as I committed to do during the Bill committee, as it is their policy lead.' A number of MPs, including Labour's Chris Evans (Caerphilly) had tabled amendments to the Bill calling for greater support of past players who have developed neurodegenerative diseases as a result of heading footballs. Referring to the Liberal Democrats' amendment which called for a financial scheme to provide care, Ms Peacock said it is 'not within the tight regulatory scope of the Bill'. She told MPs: 'The Secretary of State and I recently met with a small group of affected families and ex-footballers, including individuals associated with Football Families for Justice (FFJ), to discuss player safety and welfare for those suffering with dementia. 'The Government is committed to looking further at this issue and supporting the families and football authorities to come together to address issues of lifelong consequences from concussion as well as post-career mental health and financial crises. 'I'm afraid this amendment is not within the tight regulatory scope of the Bill, although that does not mean the Government is not aware and very sympathetic to the calls that are being made on this issue, both in this House and for many former players and their families. 'This Bill is focused on the financial sustainability of football clubs up and down the country.' The Liberal Democrats had also tabled an amendment which proposed that at least 10 Premier League football matches should be made available on free-to-air television channels such as the BBC or ITV. The party's culture spokesperson Max Wilkinson said: 'If we are to get the next generation of fans involved, the easiest way to make sure that they are entertained and that they're engaging is by making football free-to-air.' Ms Peacock said: 'The Government believes that the current list of events works well, and it strikes an appropriate balance between access to sporting events and allowing sports to maximise broadcasting revenue. 'In domestic football, the present arrangements under the listed events regime have protected key moments such as the FA Cup final, while ensuring that the Premier League, the EFL, and the FA, are able to raise billions of pounds annually, which is invested back into the pyramid. 'We all want to see more matches being televised, free-to-air, but that must be balanced against investment and not risk it.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store