US judge rules Apple must face antitrust trial over monopoly claims
District Judge Julien Neals of New Jersey ruled that the government had adequately demonstrated that Apple maintains monopoly power in smartphone markets and engages in anticompetitive conduct to maintain that dominance.
The lawsuit, filed in March 2024 by the US Department of Justice's antitrust division and 20 states, accuses Apple of illegally monopolizing smartphone markets through restrictions on app developers and device makers that limit competition and innovation.
According to the complaint, Apple controls 65 per cent of the broader US smartphone market and 70 per cent of the 'performance smartphone' market—a premium segment that excludes lower-end devices.
Judge Neals found these market share figures, combined with significant barriers to entry, sufficient to indicate Apple's monopoly power and warrant taking the case to trial.
The judge has yet to set a trial date, but the case is expected to take years.
'We believe this lawsuit is wrong on the facts and the law, and we will continue to vigorously fight it in court,' an Apple spokesperson said in an email to AFP.
The government alleges Apple maintains this dominance by restricting five key technologies: 'super apps,' cloud-streaming apps, text messaging, smartwatches, and digital wallets.
The ruling highlighted internal Apple communications that allegedly show intent to maintain monopoly power, including statements from executives about preventing users from switching to competing devices.
Apple faces potential remedies ranging from changes to its business practices to orders requiring it to divest parts of its device and software empire if the government ultimately prevails at trial.
The case is among several major antitrust challenges facing Apple, which has also been accused for taking a significant cut of proceeds from outside apps on its devices.
The lawsuit is one of five major cases launched by the first Trump administration and Joe Biden's administration that also targeted Meta and Amazon.
In the two cases against Google, judges found the search engine giant guilty of running an illegal monopoly, and the company faces potential forced divestments of some of its businesses.— AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
8 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Trump threatens Japan with up to 35pc tariff, says trade deal unlikely before July 9
WASHINGTON, July 2 — US President Donald Trump said Tuesday a trade deal with Japan was unlikely before the July 9 deadline, threatening to raise tariffs on Japanese imports to 30 or 35 per cent. Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, Trump criticised Japan's reluctance to accept imports of US rice, as well as the imbalance in auto trade between the two countries. 'I'm not sure we're going to make a deal,' Trump said. 'I doubt it with Japan, they're very tough.' While Trump imposed a sweeping 10 per cent tariff on imports from most trading partners in April, he unveiled — then paused — higher rates on dozens of economies to allow room for negotiations. This pause expires July 9, meaning the elevated rates are due to kick in next week if countries fail to reach agreements with Washington to avert them. To date, only two pacts have been announced. One was a broad framework with Britain and the other a deal to temporarily lower steep tit-for-tat duties with China. Trump said he was going to write a letter to Japan, asking them to 'pay a 30 per cent, 35 per cent or whatever the number is that we determine' because of the 'big trade deficit' with Tokyo. 'It's very unfair to the American people,' he said. Japan, a key US ally and its biggest investor, is subject to the same 10 per cent baseline tariffs imposed on most nations plus steeper levies on cars, steel and aluminium. Ryosei Akazawa, Tokyo's trade envoy, told Japanese reporters in Washington last month that some progress had been made during a fifth round of talks with the United States. However, he added: 'We've not been able to find a point of agreement yet'. — AFP
Malay Mail
9 hours ago
- Malay Mail
No apology, but US$16m payout: Paramount settles Trump lawsuit over edited Kamala Harris' ‘60 Minutes' interview
Paramount settles with Trump over 60 Minutes interview on CBS No statement of apology or regret in settlement Trump filed US$10 billion (RM42 billion) lawsuit against CBS in October over Kamala Harris interview NEW YORK, July 2 — CBS parent company Paramount today settled a lawsuit filed by US President Donald Trump over an interview broadcast in October, the latest concession by a media company to a president who has targeted outlets over what he describes as false or misleading coverage. Paramount said it would pay US$16 million to settle the suit with the money allocated to Trump's future presidential library, and not paid to Trump 'directly or indirectly.' 'The settlement does not include a statement of apology or regret,' the company statement added. Trump filed a US$10-billion lawsuit against CBS in October, alleging the network deceptively edited an interview that aired on its 60 Minutes news programme with then-vice president and presidential candidate Kamala Harris to 'tip the scales in favour of the Democratic Party' in the election. In an amended complaint filed in February, Trump bumped his claim for damages to US$20 billion. CBS aired two versions of the Harris interview in which she appears to give different answers to the same question about the Israel-Hamas war, according to the lawsuit filed in federal court in Texas. CBS previously said the lawsuit was 'completely without merit' and had asked a judge to dismiss the case. The White House did not immediately respond to a Reuters' request for comment. Edward A Paltzik, a lawyer representing Trump in the civil suit, could not be immediately reached for comment. Paramount said it also agreed that 60 Minutes would release transcripts of interviews with future US presidential candidates after they aired, subject to redactions as required for legal or national security concerns. A spokesperson for Paramount Chair Shari Redstone was unavailable for comment. The case entered mediation in April. Trump alleged CBS's editing of the interview violated the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act, which makes it illegal to use false, misleading or deceptive acts in commerce. Media advocacy groups said Trump's novel use of such laws against news outlets could be a way of circumventing legal protections for the press, which can only be held liable for defamation against public figures if they say something they knew or should have known was false. The settlement comes as Paramount prepares for an US$8.4-billion merger with Skydance Media, which will require approval from the US Federal Communications Commission. On the campaign trail last year, Trump threatened to revoke CBS' broadcasting license if elected. He has repeatedly lashed out against the news media, often casting unfavourable coverage as 'fake news.' The Paramount settlement follows a decision by Walt Disney-owned ABC News to settle a defamation case brought by Trump. As part of that settlement, which was made public on December 14, the network donated US$15 million to Trump's presidential library and publicly apologised for comments by anchor George Stephanopoulos, who inaccurately said Trump had been found liable for rape. It also follows a second settlement, by Facebook and Instagram parent company Meta Platforms, which on January 29 said it had agreed to pay about US$25 million to settle a lawsuit by Trump over the company's suspension of his accounts after the January 6, 2021, attack at the US Capitol. Trump has vowed to pursue more claims against the media. On December 17, he filed a lawsuit against the Des Moines Register newspaper and its former top pollster over its poll published on November 2 that showed Harris leading Trump by three percentage points in Iowa. The lawsuit seeks unspecified damages and an order barring the Des Moines Register from engaging in 'ongoing deceptive and misleading acts and practices' related to polling. A Des Moines Register representative said the organisation stands by its reporting and that the lawsuit was without merit. On June 30 Trump dropped the federal lawsuit and refiled it in an Iowa state court. — Reuters
Malay Mail
9 hours ago
- Malay Mail
No apology, but US$16m payout: Paramount settles Trump lawsuit over Kamala Harris' ‘60 Minutes' interview
Paramount settles with Trump over 60 Minutes interview on CBS No statement of apology or regret in settlement Trump filed US$10 billion (RM42 billion) lawsuit against CBS in October over Kamala Harris interview NEW YORK, July 2 — CBS parent company Paramount today settled a lawsuit filed by US President Donald Trump over an interview broadcast in October, the latest concession by a media company to a president who has targeted outlets over what he describes as false or misleading coverage. Paramount said it would pay US$16 million to settle the suit with the money allocated to Trump's future presidential library, and not paid to Trump 'directly or indirectly.' 'The settlement does not include a statement of apology or regret,' the company statement added. Trump filed a US$10-billion lawsuit against CBS in October, alleging the network deceptively edited an interview that aired on its 60 Minutes news programme with then-vice president and presidential candidate Kamala Harris to 'tip the scales in favour of the Democratic Party' in the election. In an amended complaint filed in February, Trump bumped his claim for damages to US$20 billion. CBS aired two versions of the Harris interview in which she appears to give different answers to the same question about the Israel-Hamas war, according to the lawsuit filed in federal court in Texas. CBS previously said the lawsuit was 'completely without merit' and had asked a judge to dismiss the case. The White House did not immediately respond to a Reuters' request for comment. Edward A Paltzik, a lawyer representing Trump in the civil suit, could not be immediately reached for comment. Paramount said it also agreed that 60 Minutes would release transcripts of interviews with future US presidential candidates after they aired, subject to redactions as required for legal or national security concerns. A spokesperson for Paramount Chair Shari Redstone was unavailable for comment. The case entered mediation in April. Trump alleged CBS's editing of the interview violated the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act, which makes it illegal to use false, misleading or deceptive acts in commerce. Media advocacy groups said Trump's novel use of such laws against news outlets could be a way of circumventing legal protections for the press, which can only be held liable for defamation against public figures if they say something they knew or should have known was false. The settlement comes as Paramount prepares for an US$8.4-billion merger with Skydance Media, which will require approval from the US Federal Communications Commission. On the campaign trail last year, Trump threatened to revoke CBS' broadcasting license if elected. He has repeatedly lashed out against the news media, often casting unfavourable coverage as 'fake news.' The Paramount settlement follows a decision by Walt Disney-owned ABC News to settle a defamation case brought by Trump. As part of that settlement, which was made public on December 14, the network donated US$15 million to Trump's presidential library and publicly apologised for comments by anchor George Stephanopoulos, who inaccurately said Trump had been found liable for rape. It also follows a second settlement, by Facebook and Instagram parent company Meta Platforms, which on January 29 said it had agreed to pay about US$25 million to settle a lawsuit by Trump over the company's suspension of his accounts after the January 6, 2021, attack at the US Capitol. Trump has vowed to pursue more claims against the media. On December 17, he filed a lawsuit against the Des Moines Register newspaper and its former top pollster over its poll published on November 2 that showed Harris leading Trump by three percentage points in Iowa. The lawsuit seeks unspecified damages and an order barring the Des Moines Register from engaging in 'ongoing deceptive and misleading acts and practices' related to polling. A Des Moines Register representative said the organisation stands by its reporting and that the lawsuit was without merit. On June 30 Trump dropped the federal lawsuit and refiled it in an Iowa state court. — Reuters
